Implantability of the MITRIS RESILIA mitral valve: a first-in-human case report

Mitral valve replacement in young patients: review and current challenges

Mitral valve repair is the ideal intervention for mitral valve disease with excellent long-term survival comparable to the age-matched general population. When the mitral valve is not repairable, mechanical prostheses may be associated with improved survival as compared with biological prostheses. Newer mechanical and biological valve prostheses have the potential to improve outcomes following mitral valve replacement in young patients. Patients presenting for mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve have high rates of postoperative mortality and morbidity, exceeding those seen with reoperative mitral valve surgery, which poses issues in young patients who have a higher cumulative incidence of reintervention.

The MITRIS RESILIA mitral valve is a safe and effective option for mitral valve replacement in young patients requiring mitral valve replacement

We report the first successful implantation in the United States of a novel mitral valve (MITRIS RESILIA by Edwards Lifesciences) in a patient with history of mitral valve replacement at a young age. This new bioprosthetic valve offers a unique profile and innovative option for mitral valve replacement in patients who are at risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

Using tissue mitral valves in younger patients: A word of caution

BACKGROUND

The debate about the optimal mitral valve prosthesis continues. We aimed to compare the early and late outcomes, including stroke, bleeding, survival, and reoperation after isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR) using tissue versus mechanical valves.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 291 patients who had isolated MVR from 2005 to 2015. Patients were grouped into the tissue valve group (n = 140) and the mechanical valve group (n = 151).

RESULTS

There were no differences in duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital stay, and hospital mortality between groups. Fifteen patients required cardiac rehospitalization, nine in the tissue valve group, and six in the mechanical valve group (p = .44). Stroke occurred in nine patients, five with tissue valves, and four with mechanical valves (p = .66). Bleeding occurred in 22 patients, seven patients with tissue valves, and 15 patients with mechanical valves (p = .09). Freedom from reoperation was 95%, 93%, 84%, 67% at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years for tissue valve and 97%, 96%, 96%, and 93% for mechanical valves, respectively (p˂ .001). The median follow-up was 84 months (Q1: Q3: 38-139). Survival at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years was 94%, 91%, 89%, 86% in tissue valves and 96%, 93%, 91%, 91% in mechanical valves, respectively (p = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue valve degeneration is still an issue even in the new generations of mitral tissue valves. The significant risk of reoperation in patients with mitral tissue valves should be considered when using those valves in younger patients. Mechanical valves remain a valid option for all age groups.

Double valve replacement after ventricular assist device implantation in a Fontan patient

Few reports have described the implantation and management of an implantable ventricular assist device in patients with functional uni-ventricular anatomy. We herein report a case who underwent HVAD implantation due to severe cardiac dysfunction and Fontan failure in the remote period following total cavo-pulmonary connection. Double valve replacement was subsequently required one year later due to repeated Fontan failure caused by the progression of aortic and atrioventricular regurgitation. The low-profile and saddle-shaped sewing cuff design of the MITRIS were beneficial for avoiding the HVAD inflow and atrioventricular valve interference in the less-dilated ventricle.