Combined Hybrid Procedure and VAD insertion in 9 High-Risk Neonates and Infants with HLHS

A single-institutional experience with 36 children less than 5 kilograms supported with the Berlin Heart: Comparison of congenital versus acquired heart disease

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed outcomes in all 36 consecutive children <5 kg supported with the Berlin Heart pulsatile ventricular assist device at the University of Florida, comparing those with acquired heart disease (n = 8) to those with congenital heart disease (CHD) (n = 28).

METHODS

The primary outcome was mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival after ventricular assist device insertion. T-tests using estimated survival proportions were used to compare groups at specific time points.

RESULTS

Of 82 patients supported with the Berlin Heart at our institution, 49 (49/82 = 59.76%) weighed <10 kg and 36 (36/82 = 43.90%) weighed <5 kg. Of 36 patients <5 kg, 26 (26/36 = 72.22%) were successfully bridged to transplantation. (The duration of support with ventricular assist device for these 36 patients <5 kg was [days]: median = 109, range = 4-305.) Eight out of 36 patients <5 kg had acquired heart disease, and all eight [8/8 = 100%] were successfully bridged to transplantation. (The duration of support with ventricular assist device for these 8 patients <5 kg with acquired heart disease was [days]: median = 50, range = 9-130.) Twenty-eight of 36 patients <5 kg had congenital heart disease. Eighteen of these 28 [64.3%] were successfully bridged to transplantation. (The duration of support with ventricular assist device for these 28 patients <5 kg with congenital heart disease was [days]: median = 136, range = 4-305.) For all 36 patients who weighed <5 kg: 1-year survival estimate after ventricular assist device insertion = 62.7% (95% confidence interval = 48.5-81.2%) and 5-year survival estimate after ventricular assist device insertion = 58.5% (95% confidence interval = 43.8-78.3%). One-year survival after ventricular assist device insertion = 87.5% (95% confidence interval = 67.3-99.9%) in acquired heart disease and 55.6% (95% confidence interval = 39.5-78.2%) in CHD, P = 0.036. Five-year survival after ventricular assist device insertion = 87.5% (95% confidence interval = 67.3-99.9%) in acquired heart disease and 48.6% (95% confidence interval = 31.6-74.8%) in CHD, P = 0.014.

CONCLUSION

Pulsatile ventricular assist device facilitates bridge to transplantation in neonates and infants weighing <5 kg; however, survival after ventricular assist device insertion in these small patients is less in those with CHD in comparison to those with acquired heart disease.

Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Patients With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Analysis of 100 Consecutive Neonates

BACKGROUND

We report our comprehensive approach to the management of patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and describe our outcomes in 100 consecutive neonates.

METHODS

We stratified 100 consecutive neonates (January 1, 2015 to September 1, 2023, inclusive) into 3 pathways. Pathway 1: 77 of 100 (77%) were standard risk and underwent an initial Norwood Stage 1. Pathway 2: 10 of 100 (10%) were high-risk with noncardiac risk factors and underwent an initial Hybrid Stage 1. Pathway 3: 13 of 100 (13%) were high-risk with cardiac risk factors: 10 underwent an initial Hybrid Stage 1 + Ventricular Assist Device insertion (HYBRID+VAD), and 3 were supported with prostaglandin as a planned bridge to primary cardiac transplantation.

RESULTS

The overall 1-year mortality for the entire cohort of 100 patients was 9% (9 of 100). Pathway 1: Operative Mortality in Pathway 1 for the initial Norwood Stage 1 was 2.6% (2 of 77). Of the 75 survivors of Norwood Stage 1, 72 underwent successful Glenn, 2 underwent successful biventricular repair, and 1 underwent successful cardiac transplantation. Pathway 2: Operative Mortality in Pathway 2 for the initial Hybrid Stage 1 without VAD was 10% (1 of 10). Of 9 survivors of Hybrid Stage 1, 4 underwent successful cardiac transplantation, 1 died while awaiting cardiac transplantation, 3 underwent Comprehensive Stage 2 (with 1 Operative Mortality after Comprehensive Stage 2), and 1 underwent successful biventricular repair. Pathway 3: Of 10 patients supported with initial HYBRID+VAD in Pathway 3, 7 (70%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and are alive today, and 3 (30%) died on VAD while awaiting transplantation. Median VAD support time was 134 days (range, 56-226 days). Of 3 patients who were bridged to transplant with prostaglandin, 2 underwent successful transplantation and 1 died while awaiting transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive approach to the management of patients with HLHS is associated with an Operative Mortality after Norwood of 2.6% (2 of 77) and an overall 1-year mortality of 9% (9 of 100). Ten patients (10%) were stabilized with HYBRID+VAD while awaiting transplantation. VAD facilitates survival on the waiting list during prolonged waiting times.

An Analysis of 186 Transplants for Pediatric or Congenital Heart Disease: Impact of Pretransplant VAD

BACKGROUND

We reviewed our management strategy and outcome data for all 181 patients with pediatric or congenital heart disease who received 186 heart transplants from January 1, 2011, to March 1, 2022, and evaluated the impact of pretransplant ventricular assist device (VAD).

METHODS

Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD); median [interquartile range] (range). Categorical variables are presented as number (percentage). Univariable associations with long-term mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Impact of pretransplant VAD on survival was estimated with multivariable models.

RESULTS

Pretransplant VAD was present in 53 of 186 transplants (28.5%). Patients with VAD were younger (years): 4.8 (5.6); 1 [0.5-8] (0.1-18) vs 12.1 (12.7); 10 [0.7-17] (0.1-58); P = .0001. Patients with VAD had a higher number of prior cardiac operations: 3.0 (2.3); 2 [1-4] (1-12) vs 1.8 (1.9); 2 [0-3] (0-8); P = .0003. Patients with VAD were also more likely to receive an ABO-incompatible transplant: 10 of 53 (18.9%) vs 9 of 133 (6.8%); P = .028. Univariable associations with long-term mortality included: In multivariable analysis, pretransplant VAD did not impact survival while controlling for each one of the factors shown in univariable analysis to be associated with long-term mortality. Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival (95% CI) was 85.8% (80.0%-92.1%) for all patients, 84.3% (77.2%-92.0%) without pretransplant VAD, and 91.1% (83.1%-99.9%) with pretransplant VAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-institution analysis of 181 patients receiving 186 heart transplants for pediatric or congenital heart disease over 11.25 years reveals similar survival in patients with (n = 51) and without (n = 130) pretransplant VAD. The presence of a pretransplant VAD is not a risk factor for mortality after transplantation for pediatric or congenital heart disease.

Applying the Hybrid Concept as a Bridge to Transplantation in Infants Without Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome

Therapies to support small infants in decompensated heart failure that are failing medical management are limited. We have used the hybrid approach, classically reserved for high-risk infants with single ventricle physiology, in patients with biventricular physiology with left ventricular failure. This approach secures systemic circulation, relieves left atrial hypertension, protects the pulmonary vasculature, and allows the right ventricle to support cardiac output. This approach can be used as a bridge to transplantation in select individuals. Infants without single ventricle congenital heart disease who were treated with the hybrid approach between 2008 and 2021 were included in analysis. Eight patients were identified. At the time of hybrid procedure, the median weight was 3.2 kg (range 2.4-3.6 kg) and the median age was 18 days (range 1-153 days). Seventy five percent were mechanically ventilated and 88% were on inotropic support. The median duration from hybrid procedure to transplant was 63 days (range 4-116 days). All patients experienced a good outcome (delisted for improvement or transplanted). The hybrid procedure is an appropriate therapeutic bridge to transplantation in a carefully selected subset of critically ill infants without single ventricle congenital heart disease in whom alternate therapies may confer increased risk for morbidity and mortality.

Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

We reviewed the outcomes of 82 consecutive pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) supported with the Berlin Heart ventricular assist device (VAD), comparing those with congenital heart disease (CHD; n  =  44) with those with acquired heart disease (AHD; n  =  37).

METHODS

The primary outcome was mortality after VAD insertion. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival.

RESULTS

Forty-four CHD patients were supported (age: median  =  65 days, range  =  4 days-13.3 years; weight [kg]: median  =  4, range  =  2.4-42.3). Ten biventricular CHD patients were supported with eight biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), one left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only, and one LVAD converted to BiVAD, while 34 univentricular CHD patients were supported with single ventricle-ventricular assist devices (sVADs). In CHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  134, range  =  4-554. Of 44 CHD patients, 28 underwent heart transplantation, 15 died on VAD, and one was still on VAD. Thirty-seven AHD patients were supported (age: median  =  1.9 years, range  =  27 days-17.7 years; weight [kg]: median  =  11, range  =  3.1-112), including 34 BiVAD and 3 LVAD. In AHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  97, range  =  4-315. Of 37 AHD patients, 28 underwent transplantation, three died on VAD, five weaned off VAD (one of whom underwent heart transplantation 334 days after weaning), and one was still on VAD. One-year survival after VAD insertion was 59.9% (95% CI  =  46.7%-76.7%) in CHD and 88.6% (95% CI  =  78.8%-99.8%) in AHD, P  =  .0004. Five-year survival after VAD insertion was 55.4% (95% CI  =  40.8%-75.2%) in CHD and 85.3% (95% CI  =  74.0%-98.2%) in AHD, P  =  .002.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge-to-transplantation in neonates, infants, and children with CHD; however, survival after VAD insertion is worse in patients with CHD than in patients with AHD.

Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy in Pediatric Patients on Ventricular Assist Device Support: A Single-Center Experience and Proposal for Use

Pediatric precapillary pulmonary hypertension can develop in response to systemic atrial hypertension. Systemic atrial decompression following ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation may not sufficiently lower pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) to consider heart transplant candidacy. Prostacyclins have been used in adult VAD patients with success, but pediatric data on safety and efficacy in this population are limited. We sought to describe our center's experience to show its safety and to present our current protocol for perioperative use. We reviewed our use of prostacyclin therapy in pediatric patients on VAD support with high PVR from 2016 to 2021. Of the 17 patients who met inclusion, 12 survived to transplant and 1 is alive with VAD in situ . All patients survived posttransplant. With continuous intravenous (IV) epoprostenol or treprostinil therapy, there were no bleeding complications or worsening of end-organ function. A significant reduction was observed in vasoactive inotropic scores by 49% in the first 24 hours post-prostacyclin initiation. The proportion of patients surviving to transplant in this high-risk cohort is favorable. In conclusion, prostacyclins may be safe to use in patients with elevated PVR as part of their VAD and transplant course and may provide a transplant option in those otherwise not candidates.

Heart Transplantation in Patients Less Than 18 Years of Age: Comparison of 2 Eras Over 36 Years and 323 Transplants at a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

We reviewed our management strategy and outcome data for all 311 patients less than 18 years of age who underwent 323 heart transplants at our institution (1986 to 2022) in order to assess changes in patterns of practice and outcomes over time and to compare two consecutive eras: era 1 (154 heart transplants [1986 to 2010]) and era 2 (169 heart transplants [2011 to 2022]).

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive comparisons between the two eras were performed at the level of the heart transplant for all 323 transplants. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed at the level of the patient for all 311 patients, and log-rank tests were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Transplants in era 2 were younger (6.6 ± 6.5 years vs 8.7 ± 6.1 years, p = 0.003). More transplants in era 2 were in infants (37.9% vs 17.5%, p < 0.0001), had congenital heart disease (53.8% vs 39.0%, p < 0.010), had high panel reactive antibody (32.1% vs 11.9%, p < 0.0001), were ABO-incompatible (11.2% vs 0.6%, p < 0.0001), had prior sternotomy (69.2% vs 39.0%, p < 0.0001), had prior Norwood (17.8% vs 0%, p < 0.0001), had prior Fontan (13.6% vs 0%, p < 0.0001), and were in patients supported with a ventricular assist device at the time of heart transplant (33.7% vs 9.1%, p < 0.0001). Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after transplant was as follows: era 1 = 82.4% (76.5 to 88.8), 76.9% (70.4 to 84.0), 70.7% (63.7 to 78.5), and 58.8% (51.3 to 67.4), respectively; era 2 = 90.3% (85.7 to 95.1), 85.4% (79.7 to 91.5), 83.0% (76.7 to 89.8), and 66.0% (49.0 to 88.8), respectively. Overall Kaplan-Meier survival in era 2 was better (log-rank p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing cardiac transplantation in the most recent era are higher risk but have better survival.

A Single-Institutional Experience with 36 Children Smaller Than 5 Kilograms Supported with the Berlin Heart Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) over 12 Years: Comparison of Patients with Biventricular versus Functionally Univentricular Circulation

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed outcomes in all 36 consecutive children <5 kg supported with the Berlin Heart pulsatile ventricular assist device (VAD) at the University of Florida, comparing those with univentricular circulation (n  =  23) to those with biventricular circulation (n  =  13).

METHODS

The primary outcome was mortality. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival after VAD insertion. T-tests using estimated survival proportions and standard errors were used to compare groups at specific time points.

RESULTS

Of all 82 patients ever supported with Berlin Heart at our institution, 49 (49/82  =  59.76%) weighed <10 kg and 36 (36/82  =  43.90%) weighed <5 kg. Of these 36 patients who weighed <5 kg, 26 (26/36  =  72.22%) were successfully bridged to transplantation. Of these 36 patients who weighed <5 kg, 13 (13/36  =  36.1%) had biventricular circulation and were supported with 12 biventricular assist devices (BiVADs) and 1 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (Age [days]: median  =  67, range  =  17-212; Weight [kilograms]: median  =  4.1, range  =  3.1-4.9), while 23 (23/36  =  63.9%) had univentricular circulation and were supported with 23 single ventricle-ventricular assist devices (sVADs) (Age [days]: median  =  25, range  =  4-215; Weight [kilograms]: median  =  3.4, range  =  2.4-4.9). Of 13 biventricular patients who weighed <5 kg, 12 (12/23  =  92.3%) were successfully bridged to cardiac transplantation. Of 23 functionally univentricular patients who weighed <5 kg, 14 (14/23  =  60.87%) were successfully bridged to cardiac transplantation. For all 36 patients who weighed <5 kg: 1-year survival estimate after VAD insertion  =  62.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]  =  48.5%-81.2%) and 5-year survival estimate after VAD insertion  =  58.5% (95% CI  =  43.8%-78.3%). One-year survival after VAD insertion: 84.6% (95% CI  =  67.1%-99.9%) in biventricular patients and 49.7% (95% CI  =  32.3%-76.4%) in univentricular patients, P  =  0.018. Three-year survival after VAD insertion: 84.6% (95% CI  =  67.1%-99.9%) in biventricular patients and 41.4% (95% CI  =  23.6%-72.5%) in univentricular patients, P  =  0.005.

CONCLUSION

Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge to transplantation in neonates and infants weighing <5 kg; however, survival after VAD insertion in these small patients is less in those with univentricular circulation in comparison to those with biventricular circulation.

Support with Single Ventricle-Ventricular Assist Device (sVAD) in Patients with Functionally Univentricular Circulation Prior to Fontan Operation

Some patients with functionally univentricular circulation develop cardiac failure refractory to maximal management and are supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD). The purpose of this manuscript is to summarize our previous publications related to single ventricle-ventricular assist device (sVAD) support in patients with functionally univentricular circulation and to describe our current institutional approach at University of Florida to sVAD support in neonates, infants, and children prior to Fontan. Our programmatic philosophy at University of Florida is to strive to identify the minority of neonates with functionally univentricular circulation who are extremely high-risk prior to initiating staged palliation and to stabilize these neonates with primary preemptive sVAD in preparation for cardiac transplantation; our rationale for this approach is related to the challenges associated with failed staged palliation and subsequent bail-out sVAD support and transplantation. A subset of extremely high-risk neonates and infants with functionally univentricular ductal-dependent circulation undergo primary preemptive sVAD insertion and subsequent cardiac transplantation. Support with VAD clearly facilitates survival on the waiting list during prolonged wait times and optimizes outcomes after Norwood (Stage 1) by providing an alternative pathway for extremely high-risk patients. Therefore, the selective utilization of sVAD in extremely high-risk neonates facilitates improved outcomes for all patients with functionally univentricular ductal-dependent circulation. At University of Florida, our programmatic approach to utilizing sVAD support as a bridge to transplantation in the minority of neonates with functionally univentricular circulation who are extremely high-risk for staged palliation is associated with Operative Mortality after Norwood (Stage 1) Operation of 2.9% (2/68) and a one-year survival of 91.1% (82/90) for all neonates presenting with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) or HLHS-related malformation with functionally univentricular ductal-dependent systemic circulation. Meanwhile, at University of Florida, for all 82 consecutive neonates, infants, and children supported with pulsatile paracorporeal VAD: Kaplan-Meier survival estimated one year after VAD insertion = 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.1-83.8%), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimated five years after VAD insertion = 68.3% (95% CI = 58.4-79.8%). For all 48 consecutive neonates, infants, and children at University of Florida with biventricular circulation supported with pulsatile paracorporeal VAD: Kaplan-Meier survival estimated one year after VAD insertion = 82.7% (95% CI = 72.4-94.4%), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimated five years after VAD insertion = 79.7% (95% CI = 68.6-92.6%). For all 34 consecutive neonates, infants, and children at University of Florida with functionally univentricular circulation supported with pulsatile paracorporeal sVAD: Kaplan-Meier survival estimated one year after VAD insertion = 59.7% (95% CI = 44.9-79.5%), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimated five years after VAD insertion = 50.5% (95% CI = 35.0-73.0%). These Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for patients supported with pulsatile paracorporeal VAD are better in patients with biventricular circulation in comparison to patients with functionally univentricular circulation both one year after VAD insertion (P=0.026) and five years after VAD insertion (P=0.010). Although outcomes after VAD support in functionally univentricular patients are worse than in patients with biventricular circulation, sVAD provides a reasonable chance for survival. Ongoing research is necessary to improve the outcomes of these challenging patients, with the goal of developing strategies where outcomes after sVAD support in functionally univentricular patients are equivalent to the outcomes achieved after VAD support in patients with biventricular circulation.

High-Risk Anatomic Subsets in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome

Despite overall improvements in outcomes for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, there remain anatomic features that can place these patients at higher risk throughout their treatment course. These include severe preoperative obstruction to pulmonary venous return, restrictive atrial septum, coronary fistulae, severe tricuspid regurgitation, smaller ascending aorta diameter (especially if <2 mm), and poor ventricular function. The risk of traditional staged palliation has led to the development of alternative strategies for such patients. To further improve the outcomes, we must continue to diligently examine and study anatomic details in HLHS patients.

A Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Patients With HLHS and Related Malformations: An Analysis of 83 Patients (2015-2021)

Background: Some patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and HLHS-related malformations with ductal-dependent systemic circulation are extremely high-risk for Norwood palliation. We report our comprehensive approach to the management of these patients designed to maximize survival and optimize the utilization of donor hearts. Methods: We reviewed our entire current single center experience with 83 neonates and infants with HLHS and HLHS-related malformations (2015-2021). Standard-risk patients (n = 62) underwent initial Norwood (Stage 1) palliation. High-risk patients with risk factors other than major cardiac risk factors (n = 9) underwent initial Hybrid Stage 1 palliation, consisting of application of bilateral pulmonary bands, stent placement in the patent arterial duct, and atrial septectomy if needed. High-risk patients with major cardiac risk factors (n = 9) were bridged to transplantation with initial combined Hybrid Stage 1 palliation and pulsatile ventricular assist device (VAD) insertion (HYBRID + VAD). Three patients were bridged to transplantation with prostaglandin. Results: Overall survival at 1 year = 90.4% (75/83). Operative Mortality for standard-risk patients undergoing initial Norwood (Stage 1) Operation was 2/62 (3.2%). Of 60 survivors: 57 underwent Glenn, 2 underwent biventricular repair, and 1 underwent cardiac transplantation. Operative Mortality for high-risk patients with risk factors other than major cardiac risk factors undergoing initial Hybrid Stage 1 palliation without VAD was 0/9: 4 underwent transplantation, 1 awaits transplantation, 3 underwent Comprehensive Stage 2 (with 1 death), and 1 underwent biventricular repair. Of 9 HYBRID + VAD patients, 6 (67%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and are alive today and 3 (33%) died while awaiting transplantation on VAD. Median length of VAD support was 134 days (mean = 134, range = 56-226). Conclusion: A comprehensive approach to the management of patients with HLHS or HLHS-related malformations is associated with Operative Mortality after Norwood of 2/62 = 3.2% and a one-year survival of 75/83 = 90.4%. A subset of 9/83 patients (11%) were stabilized with HYBRID + VAD while awaiting transplantation. VAD facilitates survival on the waiting list during prolonged wait times.

Palliation + VAD insertion in 15 Neonates and Infants with Functionally Univentricular Circulation

BACKGROUND

We report fifteen high-risk neonates and infants with functionally univentricular circulation stabilized with initial surgical palliation + VAD insertion (PALLIATION+VAD) in preparation for transplantation.

METHODS

Fifteen univentricular patients with ductal-dependent systemic circulation (8 HLHS, 1 HLHS-related malformation: 7 neonates, 2 infants) or ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation (HRHS: 5 neonates, 1 infants) presented with anatomical and/or physiological features associated with increased risk for conventional univentricular palliation (large coronary sinusoids with ventricular dependent coronary circulation, severe systemic atrioventricular valvar regurgitation, cardiogenic shock, or restrictive atrial septum). PALLIATION+VAD for ductal-dependent systemic circulation: VAD insertion + application of bilateral pulmonary bands, stent placement in the arterial duct, and atrial septectomy if needed. PALLIATION+VAD for ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation: VAD insertion + either stent placement in the arterial duct or systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt with pulmonary arterioplasty if needed.

RESULTS

At PALLIATION+VAD, median age = 20 days (range=13-143); median weight = 3.25 kilograms (range=2.43-4.2). Ten patients survive (67%) and five patients died (33%). Nine survivors are at home doing well after successful transplantation and one survivor is doing well in the ICU on VAD support awaiting transplantation. Only 2/10 survivors (20%) required intubation > 10 days after PALLIATION+VAD. In fourteen patients no longer on VAD, median length of VAD support was 136 days (range=56-223 days).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk neonates with functionally univentricular hearts who are suboptimal candidates for conventional palliation can be successfully stabilized with pulsatile VAD insertion along with initial palliation while awaiting cardiac transplantation; these patients may be extubated and optimized for transplantation while on VAD.

Pediatric heart transplant waiting times in the United States since the 2016 allocation policy change

We describe waiting times for pediatric heart transplant (HT) candidates after the 2016 revision to the US allocation policy. The OPTN database was queried for pediatric HT candidates listed between 7/2016 and 4/2019. Of the 1789 included candidates, 65% underwent HT, 14% died/deteriorated, 8% were removed for improvement, and 13% were still waiting at the end of follow-up. Most candidates were status 1A at HT (81%). Median wait times differ substantially by listing status, blood type, and recipient weight. The likelihood of HT was lower in candidates <25 kg and in those with blood type O; The <25 kg, blood type O subgroup experiences longer wait times and higher wait list mortality. For status 1A candidates, median wait times were 108 days (≤25 kg, blood type O), 80 days (≤25 kg, non-O), 47 days (>25 kg, O), and 24 days (>25 kg, non-O). We found that centers with more selective organ acceptance practices, based on a lower median Pediatric Heart Donor Assessment Tool (PH-DAT) score for completed transplants, experience longer status 1A wait times for their listed patients. These data can be used to counsel families and to select appropriate advanced heart failure therapies to support patients to transplant.

Ventricular assist device support in neonates and infants with a failing functionally univentricular circulation

Some neonates with functionally univentricular hearts are at extremely high risk for conventional surgical palliation. Primary cardiac transplantation offers the best option for survival of these challenging neonates; however, waitlist mortality must be minimized. We have developed a comprehensive strategy for the management of neonates with functionally univentricular hearts that includes the selective use of conventional neonatal palliation in standard-risk neonates, hybrid approaches in neonates with elevated risk secondary to a noncardiac etiology, and neonatal palliation combined with insertion of a single ventricular assist device (VAD) in neonates with elevated risk secondary to a cardiac etiology. Here we describe our selection criteria, technical details, management strategies, pitfalls, and current outcomes for neonates with functionally univentricular hearts supported with a VAD. Our experience shows that extremely high-risk neonates with functionally univentricular hearts who are poor candidates for conventional palliation can be successfully stabilized with concomitant palliation and pulsatile VAD insertion while awaiting cardiac transplantation.