Direct Axillary Artery Cannulation for Aortic Surgery: Lessons From Contemporary Experiences

Stroke After Acute Type A Dissection Repair Using Right Axillary Cannulation First Approach

BACKGROUND

This study sought to analyze the details of strokes after acute type A dissection repair (ATAD) using a right axillary artery (RAX) first approach.

METHODS

A total of 356 consecutive ATAD repairs from 2005 to 2022 were analyzed on the basis of arterial cannulation site. Strokes were evaluated by head computed tomography.

RESULTS

The rate of RAX cannulation was 82.6% (n = 294), with a 38.2% rate of antegrade cerebral perfusion use, both of which had increased over the years. The non-RAX group had more cardiogenic shock (RAX, 16.3% vs non-RAX, 37.1%; P < .001), cerebral malperfusion (8.8% vs 25.8%, respectively; P < .001), and innominate artery dissection (45.9% vs 69.2%, respectively; P = .007). Eight patients died before undergoing a full neurologic assessment. The overall stroke rate was 8.4% (n = 30), and it was lower in the RAX group (5.1% vs 24.2%; P < .001). All strokes were ischemic, with concomitant hemorrhagic strokes occurring in 6 patients. Strokes diagnosed immediately after surgery (perioperative stroke) accounted for 70% (n = 21 of 30) of cases. Strokes predominantly affected the right anterior circulation (right anterior, 80% vs left anterior, 46.7% vs left posterior, 26.7%; P = .013), independent of arterial cannulation site. The proposed mechanism of perioperative strokes was not uniform (embolism, 33.3%; hypoperfusion, 42.8%; embolism and hypoperfusion, 14.3%; lacunar infarct, 10%), whereas most postoperative strokes were embolic (77.8%). The mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 20.6 ± 9.9, and the modified Rankin score at discharge was 4.1±2.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Most strokes in ATAD occurred perioperatively from various mechanisms predominantly affecting the right anterior circulation irrespective of the arterial cannulation site. This complication is most likely the result of unstable hemodynamics and dissection of the innominate artery (IA) or its downstream vessels.

Zone 2 arch repair for acute type A dissection: Evolution from arch-first to proximal-first repair

Objective

With growing experience of acute type A aortic dissection repair, Zone 2 arch repair has been advocated. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome between "proximal-first" and "arch-first" Zone 2 repair.

Methods

From January 2015 to March 2023, 45 patients underwent Zone 2 arch repair out of 208 acute type A aortic dissection repairs: arch-first, N = 19, and proximal-first technique, N = 26, since January 2021. Indications were aortic arch or descending tear, complex dissection in neck vessels, cerebral malperfusion, or aneurysm of the aortic arch.

Results

The lowest bladder temperature was higher in the proximal-first technique (24.9 °C vs 19.7 °C, P < .001). Cardiopulmonary bypass (230 vs 177.5 minutes, P < .001), myocardial ischemic (124 vs 91 minutes, P < .001), and lower-body circulatory arrest (87 vs 28 minutes, P < .001) times were shorter in the proximal-first technique. The arch-first group required more packed red blood cells (arch-first, 2 units vs proximal-first, 0 units, P = .048), platelets (arch-first, 4 units vs proximal-first, 2 units, P = .003), and cryoprecipitates (arch-first, 2 units vs proximal-first, 1 unit, P = .024). Operative mortality and major morbidities were higher in the arch-first group (57.9% vs 11.5%, P = .001). One-year survival was comparable (arch-first, 89.5% ± 7.0% vs proximal-first, 92.0% ± 5.5%, P = .739). Distal intervention was successfully performed in 5 patients (endovascular, N = 3, and open repair, N = 2).

Conclusions

Zone 2 arch repair using the proximal-first technique for acute type A aortic dissection repair yields shorter lower-body ischemic time with a warmer core temperature, resulting in shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time, less blood product use, and fewer morbidities when compared with the arch-first technique.

Aortic Reoperation After Prior Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: Don't Despair the Repair

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of data regarding reoperation after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAD) repair.

METHODS

From October 2006 to March 2022, 75 patients received 123 reoperations after ATAD (proximal, n = 17; distal, n = 103; and both, n = 3) utilizing redo sternotomy (RS, n = 68), left thoracotomy (LT, n = 44), and endovascular approach (TEVAR, n = 11). The axillary artery cannulation was utilized in 97.1% of the RS cases. A classic elephant trunk technique was used as a 2-staged procedure for distal pathology. Most LT repairs (95.5%) were completed above the celiac axis.

RESULTS

Index ATAD repairs were predominantly ascending/hemiarch repair (73.3%). The median duration from the index repair was 2.0 years. Most reoperations were elective procedures (82.1%). Hospital mortality was 2.4% (RS, 1.5%; LT, 4.5%; TEVAR, 0%), and the stroke rate was 1.6%. There was no spinal cord ischemia. The 5-year overall survival and freedom from aortic mortality or procedure were 85.2% ± 5.6% and 80.6% ± 6.1%, respectively. There were 7 distal reinterventions (prior TEVAR, n = 3; prior LT, n = 4). Two patients required LT repair after prior TEVAR and 3 patients received infrarenal aortic repair after prior LT repair. Computed tomography after completion of the distal repair (n = 45) showed an increase of distal aorta at each level as follows: celiac axis 1.2 mm/y; renal artery 1.0 mm/y; and terminal aorta 1.2 mm/y.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation after ATAD repair can be safely performed as an elective procedure at experienced centers. Staged distal interventions utilizing classic elephant trunk insertion and open repair above the celiac axis showed durable outcomes.

Cannulation-related adverse events of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in heart transplantation: Axillary versus femoral artery cannulation

BACKGROUND

In heart transplantation (HT), peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is utilized preoperatively as a direct bridge to HT or postoperatively for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Little is known about wound complications of an arterial VA-ECMO cannulation site which can be fatal.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2021, outcomes of 80 HT recipients who were supported with peripheral VA-ECMO either preoperatively or postoperatively were compared based on the site of arterial cannulation: axillary (AX: N = 49) versus femoral artery (FA: N = 31).

RESULTS

Patients in the AX group were older (AX: 59 years vs. 52 years, p = .006), and less likely to have extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (0% vs. 12.9%, p = .040). Survival to discharge (AX, 81.6% vs. FA. 90.3%, p = .460), incidence of stroke (10.2% vs. 6.5%, p = .863), VA-ECMO cannulation-related bleeding (6.1% vs. 12.9%, p = .522), and arm or limb ischemia (0% vs. 3.2%, p = .816) were comparable. ECMO cannulation-related wound complications were lower in the AX group (AX, 4.1% vs. FA, 45.2%, p < .001) including the wound infections (2.0% vs. 32.3%, p < .001). In FA group, all organisms were gram-negative species. In univariate logistic regression analysis, AX cannulation was associated with less ECMO cannulation-related wound complications (Odds ratio, .23, p < .001). There was no difference between cutdown and percutaneous FA insertion regarding cannulation-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the lower rate of wound complications and comparable hospital outcomes with femoral cannulation, axillary VA-ECMO may be an excellent option in HT candidates or recipients when possible.