1
|
Antonoff MB, Kui N, Sun R, Deboever N, Hofstetter W, Mehran RJ, Morris VK, Rice DC, Swisher SG, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Rajaram R. Factors associated with receipt of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with lung-limited metastatic colorectal cancer: Disparities in care and impact on overall survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 168:263-271. [PMID: 37690624 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal cancer may provide respite from systemic therapy and prolonged disease-free intervals. We sought to identify factors associated with PM and to characterize the differential impact on overall survival for those offered lung resection. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for stage IV colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastatic disease between 2010 and 2016. Among patients who underwent primary tumor resection, those who underwent PM were compared with those who did not. Penalized regression with the least absolute selection and shrinkage operator was used to determine factors associated with receiving metastasectomy as well as overall survival. RESULTS In total, 867 (15.1%) patients underwent resection of both primary tumor and pulmonary metastases whereas 4864 (84.8%) had primary tumor resection alone. In unadjusted analyses, metastasectomy patents were younger, more often privately insured, more educated, and traveled farther to receive care (all P < .001). In multivariable analyses, younger age, traveling >25 miles, and care at high-volume hospitals were associated with PM (P < .01). In addition, primary site surgery without PM was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.35; confidence interval, 1.23-1.49), even after adjusting for patient, tumor, and hospital-related factors. CONCLUSIONS Patients who were older, who received care closer to home, and who were treated at low-volume hospitals were less likely to receive metastasectomy for lung-limited colorectal cancer after definitive resection of their primary tumor. Failure to receive PM resulted in worse overall survival, emphasizing the strong need for efforts to provide uniform, equitable care to all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
| | - Naishu Kui
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Ryan Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Nathaniel Deboever
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Reza J Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Ara A Vaporciyan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Garrett L Walsh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Ravi Rajaram
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baum D, Rolle A, Koschel D, Rostock L, Decker R, Sombati M, Öhme F, Plönes T. Long-Term Follow-Up after Laser-Assisted Pulmonary Metastasectomy Shows Complete Lung Function Recovery. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1762. [PMID: 38730714 PMCID: PMC11083535 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Preserving maximum lung function is a fundamental goal of parenchymal-sparing pulmonary laser surgery. Long-term studies for follow-up of lung function after pulmonary laser metastasectomy are lacking. However, a sufficient postoperative lung function is essential for quality of life and reduces potential postoperative complications. In this study, we investigate the extent of loss in lung function following pulmonary laser resection after three, six, and twelve months. We conducted a retrospective analysis using a prospective database of 4595 patients, focusing on 126 patients who underwent unilateral pulmonary laser resection for lung metastases from 1996 to 2022 using a 1318 nm Nd:YAG laser or a high-power pure diode laser. Results show that from these patients, a median of three pulmonary nodules were removed, with 75% presenting central lung lesions and 25% peripheral lesions. The median preoperative FEV1 was 98% of the predicted value, decreasing to 71% postoperatively but improving to 90% after three months, 93% after six months, and 96% after twelve months. Statistical analysis using the Friedman test indicated no significant difference in FEV1 between preoperative levels and those at six and twelve months post-surgery. The findings confirm that pulmonary laser surgery effectively preserves lung function over time, with patients generally regaining their preoperative lung function within a year, regardless of the metastases' location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Baum
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Lung Center, Neucoswiger Str. 21, 01640 Coswig, Germany
| | - Axel Rolle
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Lung Center, Neucoswiger Str. 21, 01640 Coswig, Germany
| | - Dirk Koschel
- Division of Pneumology, Medical Department I, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pneumology, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Lung Center, Neucoswiger Str. 21, 01640 Coswig, Germany
| | - Lysann Rostock
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Lung Center, Neucoswiger Str. 21, 01640 Coswig, Germany
| | - Rahel Decker
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Lung Center, Neucoswiger Str. 21, 01640 Coswig, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC Dresden), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Monika Sombati
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Lung Center, Neucoswiger Str. 21, 01640 Coswig, Germany
| | - Florian Öhme
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC Dresden), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Till Plönes
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Lung Center, Neucoswiger Str. 21, 01640 Coswig, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petrella F, Danuzzo F, Sibilia MC, Vaquer S, Longarini R, Guidi A, Raveglia F, Libretti L, Pirondini E, Cara A, Cassina EM, Tuoro A, Cortinovis D. Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasectomy: When, Why and How. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1408. [PMID: 38611086 PMCID: PMC11010871 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third-most-diagnosed cancer in males and in females, representing 8% of estimated new cases, and the third cause of cancer-related death in both sexes, accounting for 9% of cancer deaths in men and 8% in women. About 20% of patients diagnosed with CRC present metastatic disease. Although lung metachronous or synchronous metastatic spread without other involved sites has been reported in only a small proportion of patients, considering that this tumor is frequently diagnosed, the clinical approach to CRC pulmonary metastases represents a major issue for thoracic surgeons and CRC oncologists. Among patients diagnosed with pulmonary metastases from CRC, about 9-12% are eligible for local treatments with radical intent, including surgical resection, SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) and ablation therapy. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials among different local strategies, there is no definitive evidence about the optimal approach, although surgical resection is considered the most effective therapeutic option in this clinical scenario. Oncological achievement of primary radical resection, the biology of primary tumor and metastatic sites, disease free interval and or progression free survival are independent prognostic factors which make it possible to define a cohort of patients which might significantly benefit from pulmonary metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Petrella
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Federica Danuzzo
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Maria Chiara Sibilia
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Sara Vaquer
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Raffaella Longarini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (R.L.); or (D.C.)
| | - Alessandro Guidi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (R.L.); or (D.C.)
| | - Federico Raveglia
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Lidia Libretti
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Emanuele Pirondini
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Andrea Cara
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Enrico Mario Cassina
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Antonio Tuoro
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (F.D.); (M.C.S.); (S.V.); (L.L.); (E.P.); (A.C.); (E.M.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Diego Cortinovis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (R.L.); or (D.C.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kanzaki R, Watari H, Omura A, Kawagishi S, Tanaka R, Maniwa T, Okami J. Outcomes and prognostic factors of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy. INTERDISCIPLINARY CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY 2024; 38:ivae028. [PMID: 38426364 PMCID: PMC10927334 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Information on prognostic factors after repeat pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is limited, and outcomes after a third PM are not well documented. METHODS A single-institute retrospective study was conducted. Between 2000 and 2020, 68 patients underwent repeat PM for pulmonary metastases from various cancers. Outcomes and prognostic factors for the second PM and outcomes after the third PM were analysed. RESULTS This study included 39 men and 29 women. The mean age at second PM was 53.2 years old. The primary tumours were soft tissue sarcoma in 24 patients, colorectal cancer in 19 and osteosarcoma in 10. The interval between the first PM procedure and detection of pulmonary metastasis after the first PM (months) was ≤12 in 37 patients and >12 in 31 patients. At the second PM, 20 patients underwent lobectomy or bilobectomy, and 48 underwent sublobar resection. Complete resection was achieved in 60 patients, and 52 patients experienced recurrence after the second PM. The 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates after the second PM were 27% and 48%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that the interval between the first PM and the subsequent detection of pulmonary metastasis (≤12 months) was a poor prognostic factor for both relapse-free survival and overall survival after the second PM. Seventeen patients underwent a third PM, 3 of whom achieved a 3-year disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a period of >12 months between the first PM and the subsequent detection of pulmonary metastases showed favourable outcomes and are thus considered good candidates for second PM. A third PM may be beneficial for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryu Kanzaki
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Watari
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akiisa Omura
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Sachi Kawagishi
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryo Tanaka
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Maniwa
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jiro Okami
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deboever N, Bayley EM, Eisenberg MA, Hofstetter WL, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Rajaram R, Roth JA, Sepesi B, Swisher SG, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Bednarski BK, Morris VK, Antonoff MB. Lung surveillance following colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasectomy: Utilization of clinicopathologic risk factors to guide strategy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 167:814-819.e2. [PMID: 37495170 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriately selected patients clearly benefit from resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases (PMs). However, there remains equipoise surrounding optimal chest surveillance strategies following pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors that may inform chest surveillance in this population. METHODS Patients who underwent CRC pulmonary metastasectomy were identified from a single institution's prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were collected. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of subsequent PM within 6 months of the index lung resection. Multivariate modeling was used to evaluate risk factors. RESULTS A total of 197 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, of whom 52.3% (n = 103) developed subsequent PM, at a median of 9.51 months following the index metastasectomy. Patients with KRAS alterations (odds ratio [OR], 3.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.363-6.926; P = .007), TP53 alterations (OR, 3.109; 95% CI, 1.318-7.341; P = .010) were found to be at risk of PM diagnosis within 6 months of the index metastasectomy, while those with an APC alteration (OR, .218; 95% CI, 0.080-0.598; P = .003) were protected. Moreover, patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months of the initial PM diagnosis also were more likely to develop early lung recurrence (OR, 2.105; 95% CI, 0.971-4.563; P = .059). CONCLUSIONS Patients with KRAS alterations, TP53 alterations, and no APC alterations developed early recurrence in the lung following pulmonary metastasectomy, as did those who received chemotherapy after their initial PM diagnosis. As such, these groups benefit from early lung imaging after metastasectomy, as chest surveillance protocols should be based on patient-centered clinicopathologic and genomic risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Deboever
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Erin M Bayley
- Department of General Surgery, Baylor University, Houston, Tex
| | - Michael A Eisenberg
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Reza J Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Ravi Rajaram
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Jack A Roth
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Ara A Vaporciyan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Garrett L Walsh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Brian K Bednarski
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Safety of Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Third Operations and Beyond. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:685-686. [PMID: 36113559 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|