Importance of Lymph Node Evaluation in ≤2-cm Pure-Solid Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The impact of PET/CT and brain MRI for metastasis detection among patients with clinical T1-category lung cancer: Findings from a large-scale cohort study

PURPOSE

[18F]-FDG PET/CT and brain MRI are common approaches to detect metastasis in patients of lung cancer. Current guidelines for the use of PET/CT and MRI in clinical T1-category lung cancer lack risk-based stratification and require optimization. This study stratified patients based on metastatic risk in terms of the lesions' size and morphological characteristics.

METHODS

The detection rate of metastasis was measured in different sizes and morphological characteristics (solid and sub-solid) of tumors. To confirm the cut-off value for discriminating metastasis and overall survival (OS) prediction, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed based on PET/CT metabolic parameters (SUVmax/SUVmean/SULpeak/MTV/TLG), followed by Kaplan-Meier analysis for survival in post-operation patients with and without PET/CT plus MRI.

RESULTS

2,298 patients were included. No metastasis was observed in patients with solid nodules < 8.0 mm and sub-solid nodules < 10.0 mm. The cut-off of PET/CT metabolic parameters on discriminating metastasis were 1.09 (SUVmax), 0.26 (SUVmean), 0.31 (SULpeak), 0.55 (MTV), and 0.81 (TLG), respectively. Patients undergoing PET/CT plus MRI exhibited longer OS compared to those who did not receive it in solid nodules ≥ 8.0 mm & sub-solid nodules ≥ 10.0 mm (HR, 0.44; p < 0.001); in solid nodules ≥ 8.0 mm (HR, 0.12; p<0.001) and in sub-solid nodules ≥ 10.0 mm (HR; 0.61; p=0.075), respectively. Compared to patients with metabolic parameters lower than cut-off values, patients with higher metabolic parameters displayed shorter OS: SUVmax (HR, 12.94; p < 0.001), SUVmean (HR, 11.33; p <0.001), SULpeak (HR, 9.65; p < 0.001), MTV (HR, 9.16; p = 0.031), and TLG (HR, 12.06; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The necessity of PET/CT and MRI should be cautiously evaluated in patients with solid nodules < 8.0 mm and sub-solid nodules < 10.0 mm, however, these examinations remained essential and beneficial for patients with solid nodules ≥ 8.0 mm and sub-solid nodules ≥ 10.0 mm.

Recent Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Introduction: Lung cancer remains a global health concern, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprising the majority of cases. Early detection of lung cancer has led to an increased number of cases identified in the earlier stages of NSCLC. This required the revaluation of the NSCLC treatment approaches for early stage NSCLC. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search using multiple databases to identify relevant studies on treatment modalities for early stage NSCLC. Inclusion criteria prioritized, but were not limited to, clinical trials and meta-analyses on surgical approaches to early stage NSCLC conducted from 2021 onwards. Discussion: Minimally invasive approaches, such as VATS and RATS, along with lung resection techniques, including sublobar resection, have emerged as treatments for early stage NSCLC. Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) have shown prognostic significance, especially when analyzing the consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR). There have also been updates on managing GGOs, including the non-surgical approaches, the extent of lung resection indicated, and the level of lymphadenectomy required. Conclusions: The management of early stage NSCLC requires a further assessment of treatment strategies. This includes understanding the required extent of surgical resection, interpreting the significance of GGOs (specifically GGOs with a high CTR), and evaluating the efficacy of alternative therapies. Customized treatment involving surgical and non-surgical interventions is essential for advancing patient care.

Sublobar resection is associated with less lymph nodes examined and lower delivery of adjuvant therapy in patients with 1.5- to 2.0-cm clinical IA2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

CALGB140503, in which nodal sampling was mandated, reported non-inferior disease-free survival for patients undergoing sublobar resection (SLR) compared to lobectomy (L). Outside of trial settings, the adequacy of lymphadenectomy during SLR has been questioned. We sought to evaluate whether SLR is associated with suboptimal lymphadenectomy, differences in pathologic upstaging and survival in patients with 1.5- to 2.0-cm tumours using real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database(2018-2019), we evaluated patients with 1.5- to 2.0-cm non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent resection (sublobar versus lobectomy). We studied factors associated with nodal upstaging (logistic regression) and survival (Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method) after propensity matching to adjust for differences among groups.

RESULTS

Among 3196 patients included, SLR was performed in 839 (26.3%) (of which 588 were wedge resections) and L was performed in 2357 (73.7%) patients. More patients undergoing SLR (21.7%) compared to L (2.1%) had no lymph nodes sampled (P < 0.001). Those undergoing SLR had fewer total lymph nodes examined (4 vs 11, P < 0.001) and were less likely to have pathologic nodal metastases (4.7% vs 9%, P < 0.001) compared to L. Multivariable analysis identified L [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.21, 95% confidence interval, 1.47-3.35] to be independently associated with pathologic N+ disease. Overall survival was not associated with the type of procedure but was significantly decreased in those with N+ disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite comparable overall survival to L, SLR is associated with suboptimal lymphadenectomy in patients with 1.5-2.0 cm non-small-cell lung cancer. Surgeons should be careful to perform adequate lymphadenectomy when performing SLR to mitigate nodal under-staging and to identify appropriate patients for systemic therapy.