Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Fukui M, Tomita H, Takamochi K, Suzuki K. Oncological characteristics of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with radiologically pure-solid appearance.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024;
168:685-696.e2. [PMID:
37995863 DOI:
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.11.025]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
We evaluated the clinicopathological and oncological characteristics of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated clinical stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma and compared them with those of a ground-glass opacity component.
METHODS
Between 2008 and 2020, data from 1014 surgically resected clinical stage 0-IA epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinomas were evaluated. Oncological outcomes were assessed using multivariable analysis. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was estimated using the Gray's test.
RESULTS
Of these, 233 (23%) were radiologically pure-solid tumors, which demonstrated a higher proportion of nodal metastasis, micropapillary component, spread through alveolar space, and Ex19 subtype compared with those of tumors with ground-glass opacity (P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of ground-glass opacity was an independently significant factor for overall survival (P = .037) and cumulative incidence of recurrence (P < .001). In cases where the oncological outcomes were stratified by the presence of ground-glass opacity component, the 5-year overall survival was excellent at more than 90% in tumors with ground-glass opacity despite clinical-T categories (P = .2044); however, tumor size significantly affected survival only in pure-solid tumors (T1a, 100%; T1b, 77.7%; T1c, 68.5%; P = .0056). Furthermore, the cumulative incidence of recurrence was low in tumors with ground-glass opacity despite the clinical-T categories, whereas tumor size significantly affected the cumulative incidence of recurrence only in pure-solid tumors (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence: T1a-b, 18.9%; T1c, 41.3%; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS
Oncologic behavior and prognosis of radiologically pure-solid tumors were significantly poorer than those of tumors with ground-glass opacity among patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. These findings imply distinct tumorigenesis based on the presence of ground-glass opacity, even in tumors with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.
Collapse