1
|
Zimodro JM, Mucha M, Berthold HK, Gouni-Berthold I. Lipoprotein Metabolism, Dyslipidemia, and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:913. [PMID: 39065763 PMCID: PMC11279947 DOI: 10.3390/ph17070913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is a cornerstone of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention. Although LLT might lead to different reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in women and men, LLT diminishes cardiovascular risk equally effectively in both sexes. Despite similar LLT efficacy, the use of high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors is lower in women compared to men. Women achieve the guideline-recommended LDL-C levels less often than men. Greater cholesterol burden is particularly prominent in women with familial hypercholesterolemia. In clinical practice, women and men with dyslipidemia present with different cardiovascular risk profiles and disease manifestations. The concentrations of LDL-C, lipoprotein(a), and other blood lipids differ between women and men over a lifetime. Dissimilar levels of LLT target molecules partially result from sex-specific hormonal and genetic determinants of lipoprotein metabolism. Hence, to evaluate a potential need for sex-specific LLT, this comprehensive review (i) describes the impact of sex on lipoprotein metabolism and lipid profile, (ii) highlights sex differences in cardiovascular risk among patients with dyslipidemia, (iii) presents recent, up-to-date clinical trial and real-world data on LLT efficacy and safety in women, and (iv) discusses the diverse medical needs of women and men with dyslipidemia and increased cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Michal Zimodro
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magda Mucha
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland
| | - Heiner K. Berthold
- Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Bethel Clinic (EvKB), 33611 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Ioanna Gouni-Berthold
- Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kopp K, Motloch LJ, Wernly B, Berezin AE, Maringgele V, Dieplinger A, Hoppe UC, Lichtenauer M. Implementation of risk-based lipid-lowering therapies in older (age ≥ 65 years) and very-old adults (age ≥ 75 years) with ischemic heart disease in the greater Salzburg region. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1357334. [PMID: 38966548 PMCID: PMC11223559 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1357334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: European guidelines recommend the implementation of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in adults (≥ 65 years) with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and for risk-based primary prevention in older adults (≤ 75 years), yet their use in very-old adults (> 75 years) is controversial, discretionary, and oriented on the presence of risk factors. The aim of this retrospective study is to assess guideline-directed LLT implementation and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target achievement in high-/very-high-risk older/very-old adults (65-74 and ≥ 75 years) at presentation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and also to assess evidence-based care delivery to older adults in our region. Methods: All STEMI patients with available LDL-C and total cholesterol presenting for treatment at a large tertiary center in Salzburg, Austria, 2018-2020, were screened (n = 910). High-risk/very-high-risk patients (n = 369) were classified according to European guidelines criteria and divided into cohorts by age: < 65 years (n = 152), 65-74 years (n = 104), and ≥ 75 years (n = 113). Results: Despite being at high-/very-high-risk, prior LLT use was < 40% in the total cohort, with no significant difference by age. Statin monotherapy predominated; 20%-23% of older/very-old adults in the entire cohort were using low-/moderate-intensity stains, 11%-13% were using high-intensity statins, 4% were on ezetimibe therapy, and none were taking proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. In the secondary prevention cohort, 53% of older/very-old patients used prior LLTs. Significantly higher percentages of older/oldest ASCVD patients (43% and 49%) met LDL-C targets < 70 mg/dL compared to patients < 65 years (29%; p = 0.033), although just 22% and 30% of these older groups attained stricter LDL-C targets of < 55 mg/dL. Low LLT uptake (16%) among older adults aged 64-74 years for primary prevention resulted in 17% and 10% attainment of risk-based LDL-C targets < 70 mg/dL and < 55 mg/dL, respectively. Oldest adults (≥ 75 years) in both primary and secondary prevention groups more often met risk-based targets than older and younger adults, despite predominantly receiving low-/moderate-intensity statin monotherapy. Conclusion: Secondary prevention was sub-optimal in our region. Less than half of older/very-old adults with established ASCVD met LDL-C targets at the time of STEMI, suggesting severe care-delivery deficits in LLT implementation. Shortcomings in initiation of risk-based LLTs were also observed among high-/very-high-risk primary prevention patients < 75 years, with the achievement of risk-based LDL-C targets in 10%-48% of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Kopp
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas J. Motloch
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Salzkammergut Klinikum, OOEG, Voecklabruck, Austria
- Department of Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Bernhard Wernly
- Institute for General-, Family- and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Alexander E. Berezin
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Victoria Maringgele
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Anna Dieplinger
- Institute for Nursing and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Uta C. Hoppe
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Lichtenauer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lehrke M, Vogt A, Schettler V, Girndt M, Fraass U, Tabbert-Zitzler A, Bridges I, Dhalwani NN, Ray KK. Evolocumab-Based LDL-C Management in High and Very High Cardiovascular Risk Patients in German Clinical Practice: The HEYMANS Study. Adv Ther 2024; 41:1184-1200. [PMID: 38286961 PMCID: PMC10879337 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02757-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is among the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In very high-risk patients, the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines recommend attaining LDL-C < 55 mg/dL. In the German cohort of the observational HEYMANS study, we aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and LDL-C control among patients initiating evolocumab. METHODS Data was collected between 09/2016 and 05/2021 for ≤ 6 months before (retrospectively) and ≤ 30 months after evolocumab initiation (prospectively). Patient characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), lipid values, evolocumab use, and safety were collected. RESULTS Of 380 enrolled patients, 93% received evolocumab in secondary prevention and 69% had a history of statin intolerance. At study baseline, 49% did not receive any statins and LDL-C was very high (145 mg/dL). Use of evolocumab decreased LDL-C by a median of 53% within 3 months and remained stable thereafter, despite mainly unchanged background LLT. Overall, 59% attained an LDL-C level < 55 mg/dL (69% with, 49% without LLT). Persistence to evolocumab was 90.6% in months 1-12 and 93.5% in months 13-30. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 8% of patients. CONCLUSION Data from the German HEYMANS cohort corroborate previous reports on evolocumab effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. Evolocumab initiation was associated with a rapid and sustained LDL-C reduction. Persistence with evolocumab was high. Our finding that patients receiving an evolocumab/LLT combination are more likely to attain the LDL-C goal than those receiving evolocumab alone corroborates previous data showing the importance of using highly intensive therapy. Graphical abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02770131 (registration date 27 April 2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lehrke
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Anja Vogt
- Medizinische Klinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Girndt
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Kausik K Ray
- Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McKoy JN, Kalich BA, Greene L, Mackey RH, Rosenthal NA, Khan Y, Wójcik C, Jones J, Carabuena LA. LOGAN-CV: A Prospective Study of a Multifaceted Intervention Targeting United States Clinicians to Improve Guideline-Based Management of Lipid-Lowering Therapy. Adv Ther 2024; 41:451-463. [PMID: 37989909 PMCID: PMC10796413 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02716-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2018 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/Multisociety blood cholesterol guidelines recommend clinicians consider adding non-statin therapy for patients with very high-risk (VHR) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 70 mg/dl while receiving maximally tolerated statins. However, according to a recent study, only 17.1% of patients with established ASCVD received appropriate lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification. Here, we describe the design of a prospective, 12-month study (LOGAN-CV) evaluating a multifaceted site-level intervention to enhance clinicians' adherence to guidelines to improve LDL-C levels for patients with VHR ASCVD. METHODS Clinicians from up to ten research sites are eligible if they care for adult patients with ASCVD. Interventions include educational modules, a cloud-based performance platform providing clinicians a tailored summary of their LDL-C management performance, newsletters, periodic peer-to-peer calls, and pre- and post-intervention surveys evaluating knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs around LDL-C management, with additional interventions for clinicians demonstrating a lower readiness to make treatment decisions based on guideline recommendations. Patients with VHR ASCVD, defined as having recent myocardial infarction and LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl despite statin treatment, will be included in the study. Patient data will be collected from electronic medical records from baseline (clinician enrollment) through the 12-month intervention. The study started in October 2022, with anticipated completion in March 2024. PLANNED OUTCOMES The change in proportion of patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dl achieved at any time during the 12-month intervention (primary); LLT intensification, changes in guideline-aligned LDL-C testing and LLT titration over 12 months, and change in overall clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs are key outcomes of interest. The LOGAN-CV study addresses a critical unmet need in LDL-C control in patients with VHR ASCVD and evaluates the effect of a multifaceted intervention targeting clinicians to improve their adherence to guidelines and consequently improve clinical outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Nikki McKoy
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., 13034 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC, 28277, USA.
| | | | - Laura Greene
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., 13034 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC, 28277, USA
| | - Rachel H Mackey
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., 13034 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC, 28277, USA
- Pitt Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ning A Rosenthal
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., 13034 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC, 28277, USA
| | - Yosef Khan
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., 13034 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC, 28277, USA
| | - Cezary Wójcik
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Leslie A Carabuena
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., 13034 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC, 28277, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Michaeli DT, Michaeli JC, Albers S, Boch T, Michaeli T. Established and Emerging Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2023; 23:477-495. [PMID: 37486464 PMCID: PMC10462544 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00594-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite treatment with statins, patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides remain at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Consequently, novel pharmaceutical drugs have been developed to control and modify the composition of blood lipids to ultimately prevent fatal cardiovascular events in patients with dyslipidaemia. This article reviews established and emerging lipid-lowering drugs regarding their mechanism of action, development stage, ongoing clinical trials, side effects, effect on blood lipids and reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We conducted a keyword search to identify studies on established and emerging lipid modifying drugs. Results were summarized in a narrative overview. Established pharmaceutical treatment options include the Niemann-Pick-C1 like-1 protein (NPC1L1) inhibitor ezetimibe, the protein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab, fibrates as peroxisome proliferator receptor alpha (PPAR-α) activators, and the omega-3 fatty acid icosapent ethyl. Statins are recommended as the first-line therapy for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with hypercholesterinaemia and hypertriglyceridemia. For secondary prevention in hypercholesterinaemia, second-line options such as statin add-on or statin-intolerant treatments are ezetimibe, alirocumab and evolocumab. For secondary prevention in hypertriglyceridemia, second-line options such as statin add-on or statin-intolerant treatments are icosapent ethyl and fenofibrate. Robust data for these add-on therapeutics in primary cardiovascular prevention remains scarce. Recent biotechnological advances have led to the development of innovative small molecules (bempedoic acid, lomitapide, pemafibrate, docosapentaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acid), antibodies (evinacumab), antisense oligonucleotides (mipomersen, volanesorsen, pelcarsen, olezarsen), small interfering RNA (inclisiran, olpasiran), and gene therapies for patients with dyslipidemia. These molecules specifically target new cellular pathways, such as the adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase (bempedoic acid), PCSK9 (inclisiran), angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3: evinacumab), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP: lomitapide), apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB-100: mipomersen), apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III: volanesorsen, olezarsen), and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a): pelcarsen, olpasiran). The authors are hopeful that the development of new treatment modalities alongside new therapeutic targets will further reduce patients' risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Apart from statins, data on new drugs' use in primary cardiovascular prevention remain scarce. For their swift adoption into clinical routine, these treatments must demonstrate safety and efficacy as well as cost-effectiveness in randomized cardiovascular outcome trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Tobias Michaeli
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumour Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Julia Caroline Michaeli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Albers
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sport Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Boch
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumour Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Division of Personalized Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Michaeli
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumour Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Division of Personalized Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kopp K, Motloch L, Berezin A, Maringgele V, Ostapenko H, Mirna M, Schmutzler L, Dieplinger A, Hoppe UC, Lichtenauer M. Missed Opportunities in Implementation and Optimization of Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Very-High-Risk Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5685. [PMID: 37685752 PMCID: PMC10488884 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to provide real-world data on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) implementation and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target achievement in an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population, with a focus on very-high-risk patients according to European guidelines criteria. METHODS Included were all STEMI patients with available LDL-C and total cholesterol treated at a large tertiary center in Salzburg, Austria, 2018-2020 (n = 910), with stratification into very-high-risk cohorts. Analysis was descriptive, with variables reported as number, percentages, median, and interquartile range. RESULTS Among patients with prior LLT use, statin monotherapy predominated, 5.3% were using high-intensity statins, 1.2% were using combined ezetimibe therapy, and none were taking PCSK9 inhibitors at the time of STEMI. In very-high-risk secondary prevention cohorts, LLT optimization was alarmingly low: 8-22% of patients were taking high-intensity statins, just 0-6% combined with ezetimibe. Depending on the very-high-risk cohort, 27-45% of secondary prevention patients and 58-73% of primary prevention patients were not taking any LLTs, although 19-60% were actively taking/prescribed medications for hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus. Corresponding LDL-C target achievement in all very-high-risk cohorts was poor: <22% of patients had LDL-C values < 55 mg/dL at the time of STEMI. CONCLUSION Severe shortcomings in LLT implementation and optimization, and LDL-C target achievement, were observed in the total STEMI population and across all very-high-risk cohorts, attributable in part to deficits in care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Kopp
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
| | - Lukas Motloch
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Salzkammergut Klinikum, 4840 Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Alexander Berezin
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical University of Zaporozhye, 69061 Zaporozhye, Ukraine
| | - Victoria Maringgele
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Halyna Ostapenko
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
| | - Moritz Mirna
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
| | - Lukas Schmutzler
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
| | - Anna Dieplinger
- Institute for Nursing and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Uta C. Hoppe
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
| | - Michael Lichtenauer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (L.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rehm M, Jaensch A, Schöttker B, Mons U, Hahmann H, Koenig W, Brenner H, Rothenbacher D. Medical care and biomarker-based assessment of mortality in two cohorts of patients with chronic coronary syndrome 10 years apart. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2023; 23:428. [PMID: 37644408 PMCID: PMC10466796 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03469-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to describe the characteristics and mortality of two cohorts of patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) recruited with identical study designs in the same rehabilitation clinics but approximately 10 years apart. METHODS The KAROLA cohorts included patients with CCS participating in an inpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme in Germany (KAROLA-I: years 1999/2000, KAROLA-II: 2009-2011). Blood samples and information on sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, and medical treatment were collected at baseline, at the end of rehabilitation, and after one year of follow-up. A biomarker-based risk model (ABC-CHD model) and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV mortality risk. RESULTS We included 1130 patients from KAROLA-I (mean age 58.7 years, 84.4% men) and 860 from KAROLA-II (mean age 60.4 years, 83.4% men). Patients in the KAROLA-I cohort had significantly higher concentrations of CV biomarkers and fewer patients were taking CV medications, except for statins. The biomarker-based ABC-CHD model provided a higher estimate of CV death risk for patients in the KAROLA-I cohort (median 3-year risk, 3.8%) than for patients in the KAROLA-II cohort (median 3-year risk, 2.7%, p-value for difference < 0.001). After 10 years of follow-up, 91 (8.1%) patients in KAROLA-I and 45 (5.2%) in KAROLA-II had died from a CV event. CONCLUSIONS Advances in disease management over the past 20 years may have led to modest improvements in pharmacological treatment during cardiac rehabilitation and long-term outpatient care for patients with CCS. However, modifiable risk factors such as obesity have increased in the more recent cohort and should be targeted to further improve the prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rehm
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andrea Jaensch
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ben Schöttker
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Mons
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Harry Hahmann
- Klinik Schwabenland, Isny-Neutrauchburg, Isny, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Koenig
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dietrich Rothenbacher
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sinning D, Landmesser U. [Hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular risk]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2023; 148:1025-1032. [PMID: 37541292 DOI: 10.1055/a-1932-6448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacological reduction of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major treatment strategy in limiting atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) risk. Statins remain the primary therapeutic cornerstone in ASCVD prevention. Furthermore, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and PCSK9 inhibition have recently also shown to reduce cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, a treatment gap remains between guideline-recommended LDL-C goals and what is achieved in real-world practice. An important reason for this is the limited use of novel and effective non-statin lipid-lowering therapies. In order to achieve LDL-C treatment goals and, ultimately, reduction of cardiovascular events, a combination lipid-lowering therapy needs to be considered as the standard of care for patients at very high cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
|