Incidence and risk factors for medical adhesive-related skin injury in catheters of critically ill patients: A prospective cohort study

The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of medical adhesive-related skin injury in adult inpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

MARSI can occur in any population and clinical setting and is prevalent among patients who are frequently exposed to medical adhesives. It can disrupt the skin barrier and cause pain and infection, confusing patients and medical staff and making it necessary to understand its prevalence, incidence, and risk factors to improve patient health and medical safety.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the prevalence, incidence and risk factors of medical adhesive-related skin injury in adult inpatients.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A computer search was conducted on nine databases in both Chinese and English, covering studies from inception to July 10, 2024, evaluating the prevalence, incidence and risk factors of medical adhesive-related skin injuries. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 14 software.

RESULTS

The analysis included 22 studies, involving a total of 10510 research subjects. The meta-analysis of fourteen cross-sectional studies showed that the prevalence of medical adhesive-related skin injury in adult inpatients was 16 % [95 % CI: 13-18 %, Z = 10.95, P < 0.00001]. In the other seven additional cohort studies, the meta-analysis of incidence was 25 % [95 % CI: 17-33 %, Z = 5.90, P < 0.00001]. The results of the meta-analysis of risk factors showed that the following six factors: age>50 years (OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.05-1.41), dry skin (OR = 3.51, 95%CI: 1.55-7.95), history of MARSI (OR = 6.78, 95%CI: 1.69-27.15), history of skin allergies (OR = 3.82, 95%CI: 1.92-7.57), skin edema(OR = 3.59,95%CI:1.52-8.47), wet skin(OR = 3.57,95%CI:1.65-13.35) were risk factors.

Prevention and management of medical adhesive-related skin injuries in tumor patients with peripheral central venous catheters: a best practice implementation project

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral central venous catheters are common vascular access devices used in patients with tumors. To prevent catheter shedding and displacement, it is essential to use medical adhesives to secure the catheters. Repeated adhesion and removal of medical adhesives can weaken the barrier function of the skin, leading to medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSI), which can increase the patients' pain and medical expenses.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this project was to utilize the best evidence to prevent and manage MARSI in tumor patients with peripheral central venous catheters.

METHODS

This evidence-based audit and feedback project was theoretically informed by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. The framework involves seven phases in which a project team was established; measurable criteria were selected; baseline data were collected; improvement strategies were implemented to address gaps in compliance; a follow-up audit was conducted to assess improvements in compliance; and sustainability measures were considered. The project also used the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) for project management, including data collection and analysis. The JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach was also used to support implementation and compliance.

RESULTS

In the baseline audit, the compliance rate for the nine audit criteria was low. In the follow-up audit, the compliance rate significantly improved, with each audit criterion exceeding a minimum of 80%, and four audit criteria reaching 100%. Knowledge of MARSI among nurses and patients significantly improved (p  < 0.05) and the incidence of MARSI among patients with peripheral central venous catheters decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

This project successfully enhanced nurses' compliance with MARSI prevention and management and increased the knowledge and skills of both nurses and patients about MARSI.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A285.

Medical Adhesive-related Skin Injuries Caused by Eye Taping: A Case Report

This case report discusses medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSIs) caused by eye taping during an emergency open reduction internal fixation surgery under general anesthesia. The presented case involves a 72-year-old woman with a proximal humeral fracture, where 3M Transpore adhesive tape caused blisters on both eyelids. This tape is an acrylic-based medical adhesive and is commonly used to keep eyelids closed during general anesthesia. MARSIs can largely be prevented through evidence-based clinical guidance. Enhancing awareness of MARSIs among anesthesia providers and perianesthesia nurses is crucial to prevent and manage such injuries effectively.

Safety and efficacy of silicone tape for indwelling urinary catheter fixation in intensive care patients-A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients are more vulnerable to medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSI), whose prevention is a constant challenge and one of the main quality indicators of nursing care. MARSI associated with indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) fixation is a relevant adverse event, mainly because of the constant involuntary traction and high skin vulnerability of the fixation site. Silicone adhesive tape has appreciable qualities for fragile skin among the range of adhesives, leading to the inference that it reduces the risk of MARSI.

AIM

To compare silicone adhesive tape for IUC fixation with acrylate tape regarding its safety and efficacy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial blinded to the patients and evaluator. Data were collected from an intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary university hospital in Brazil. Patients with IUC and no MARSI at the fixation site were considered eligible. The omega (Ω) fixation technique was used for IUC fixation. A total of 132 participants were enrolled and divided into two research groups: 66 patients in the intervention group (silicone tape) and 66 in the control group (acrylate tape). Outcomes were the incidence of MARSI, patient outcome in the ICU and hospital and partial, total and overall spontaneous detachment of the tapes.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of MARSI was 28%, with 21% in the silicone group and 35% in the acrylate group, with no statistically significant difference (p = .121), including the severity of the lesions (p = .902). However, partial (p = .003) and overall (p < .001) detachment of the tapes were more frequent in the silicone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Silicone tape is no safer than acrylate tape for IUC fixation and is less adhesively effective.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

There is no evidence to support the extensive use of silicone tape in this context.