Can we predict the blood pressure response to renal denervation?

Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) and Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) Position Paper on the role of renal denervation in the management of the difficult-to-treat hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension. The blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of RDN is comparable to those of many single antihypertensive medications and it allows to consider the RDN as a valuable option for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension together with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. A multidisciplinary team is of pivotal importance from the selection of the patient candidate for the procedure to the post-procedural management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of RDN on clinical outcomes and to better identify the predictors of BP response to RDN in order to recognize the patients who are more likely to benefit from the procedure.

Efficacy of Antihypertensive Drugs of Different Classes After Renal Denervation in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) lowers blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Limited data exist on the effectiveness of different antihypertensive medications following RDN on BP and maladaptive cardiac phenotypes.

METHODS

Eighty-nine male spontaneously hypertensive rats with continuous BP recording underwent RDN or sham operation. Ten days postsurgery, spontaneously hypertensive rats were randomized to receive no antihypertensive medication, amlodipine, olmesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, bisoprolol, doxazosin, or moxonidine for 28 days. Cardiac remodeling was determined histologically, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was explored.

RESULTS

Before initiation of antihypertensive drugs, RDN reduced mean arterial pressure (-12.6 mm Hg [95% CI, -14.4 to -10.8]; P<0.001). At study end, mean arterial pressure was lower in RDN compared with sham operation in drug-naïve controls (P=0.006), olmesartan (P=0.002), amlodipine (P=0.0004), hydrochlorothiazide (P=0.006), doxazosin (P=0.001), and bisoprolol (P=0.039) but not in animals receiving moxonidine (P=0.122). Compared with pooled BP change of all other drug classes, mean arterial pressure change was largest for olmesartan (-15.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -18.6 to -13.2]; P<0.001) and amlodipine (-12.0 mm Hg [95% CI, -14.7 to -9.3]; P<0.001). In drug-naïve controls, RDN reduced plasma renin activity (-5.6%¸ P=0.03) and aldosterone concentration (-53.0%; P=0.005). In the presence of antihypertensive medication, plasma renin activity and aldosterone remained unchanged after RDN. Cardiac remodeling was not affected by RDN alone. In animals receiving olmesartan after RDN, cardiac perivascular fibrosis was attenuated. Amlodipine and bisoprolol following RDN reduced cardiomyocyte diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Following RDN, treatment with amlodipine and olmesartan resulted in the largest BP reduction. Antihypertensive medications mediated heterogeneous effects on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity and cardiac remodeling.

2022 Renal denervation therapy for the treatment of hypertension: a statement from the Thai Hypertension Society

Hypertension remains a significant risk factor for major cardiovascular events worldwide. Poor adherence to treatment is extremely common in clinical practice, leading to uncontrolled hypertension. However, some patients with resistant hypertension still have uncontrolled blood pressure despite good medical compliance. A specific group of patients also develop adverse reactions to many blood pressure-lowering medications. These scenarios indicate that innovative strategies to lower blood pressure in challenging cases of hypertension are needed. The blood pressure-lowering efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation therapy to decrease sympathetic tone has been confirmed in many publications in recent years. Apart from both the invasiveness and the expensiveness of this technology, appropriate case selection to undergo this procedure is still developing. The utilization of renal denervation therapy for hypertension treatment in Thailand has lasted for 10 years with a good response in most cases. Currently, only certain interventionists at a few medical schools in Thailand can perform this procedure. However, more physicians are now interested in applying this technology to their patients. The Thai Hypertension Society Committee has reviewed updated information to provide principles for the appropriate utilization of renal denervation therapy. The blood pressure-lowering mechanism, efficacy, suitable patient selection, pre- and postprocedural assessment and procedural safety of renal denervation are included in this statement.

Renal Denervation: A Review

Uncontrolled hypertension persists as an important health issue despite the availability of many medications and nondrug therapies that lower blood pressure. Increasingly, nonadherence to medication is found in approximately 2 of every 5 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. In the search for interventions that lower blood pressure that do not rely on adherence to a regimen requiring daily ingestion of medication or repeated physical activity, device-based methods that denervate the renal arteries have emerged as a potential complement to standard antihypertensive treatments. At least 3 different approaches to renal artery denervation are under active investigation, including the use of radiofrequency energy, ultrasound, or the injection of neurolytic agents into the renal perivascular tissue. In this review, we cover what is currently known about the mechanisms of antihypertensive effects of renal denervation, summarize the efficacy and safety of renal denervation using recent controlled trial publications in a number of hypertensive populations, and conclude with some thoughts about challenges in the field, including the optimization of patient selection for the procedure and what the reader can expect in the near future in this rapidly developing field.

Extended Renal Artery Denervation Is Associated with Artery Wall Lesions and Acute Systemic and Pulmonary Hemodynamic Changes: A Sham-Controlled Experimental Study

Objectives

We sought to assess acute changes in systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and microscopic artery lesions following extended renal artery denervation (RDN).

Background

RDN has been proposed to reduce sympathetic nervous system hyperactivation. Although the effects of RDN on systemic circulation and overall sympathetic activity have been studied, data on the impact of RDN on pulmonary hemodynamics is lacking.

Methods

The study comprised 13 normotensive Landrace pigs. After randomization, 7 animals were allocated to the group of bilateral RDN and 6 animals to the group of a sham procedure (SHAM). Hemodynamic measures, cannulation, and balloon-based occlusion of the renal arteries were performed in both groups. In the RDN group, radiofrequency ablation was performed in all available arteries and their segments. An autopsy study of the renal arteries was carried out in both groups.

Results

The analysis was performed on 12 pigs (6 in either group) since pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in one case. A statistically significant drop in the mean diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was detected in the RDN group when compared with the SHAM group (change by 13.0 ± 4.4 and 10.0 ± 3.0 mmHg, correspondingly; P = 0.04). In 5 out of 6 pigs in the RDN group, a significant decrease in systemic systolic blood pressure was found, when compared with baseline (98.8 ± 17.8 vs. 90.2 ± 12.6 mmHg, P = 0.04), and a lower mean pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (291.0 ± 77.4 vs. 228.5 ± 63.8 dyn∗sec∗cm⁻⁵, P = 0.03) after ablation was found. Artery dissections were found in both groups, with prevalence in animals after RDN.

Conclusions

Extensive RDN leads to a rapid and significant decrease in PAP. In the majority of cases, RDN is associated with an acute lowering of systolic blood pressure and PVR. Extended RDN is associated with artery wall lesions and thrombus formation underdiagnosed by angiography.

Renal Denervation – a Modern Option for Treating Resistant Hypertension

Hypertension is one of the main cardiovascular risk factors, and it remains an important health problem, demonstrating an increasing incidence despite new treatment methods. Numerous risk factors that can lead to the development of difficult-to-treat or resistant hypertension have been described in the literature in recent years. In this type of hypertension, an important role is played by the sympathetic nervous system. Especially in these cases, with a sympathetic overactivation, renal denervation has proven its efficacy and safety in lowering blood pressure. In this brief clinical update, we present the results of the main studies regarding the efficacy and safety of the renal denervation technique used in the treatment of resistant hypertension.

Renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: where do we stand after more than a decade

Despite the current availability of safe and efficient drugs for treating hypertension, a substantial number of patients are drug-resistant hypertensives. Aiming this condition, a relatively new approach named catheter-based renal denervation was developed. We have now a clinically relevant time window to review the efficacy of renal denervation for treating this form of hypertension. This short review addresses the physiological contribution of renal sympathetic nerves for blood pressure control and discusses the pros and cons of renal denervation procedure for the treatment of resistant hypertension.

Safety and Efficacy of a New Renal Denervation Catheter in Hypertensive Patients in the Absent of Antihypertensive Medications: A Pilot Study

Aim

The aim of present study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a new renal artery denervation system for treatment of hypertensive patients.

Methods

Hypertensive patients with mean office systolic blood pressure ≥150mmHg and ≤180mmHg or an average of 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥145mmHg and ≤170mmHg after stopping hypertensive medications for 2 weeks or more were enrolled to undergo renal denervation (RDN) using a new RDN system. Changes in office blood pressure and mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and safety were assessed after 6 months.

Results

Fifteen patients underwent RDN and followed up for 6 months. At the 6-month follow-up, office systolic blood pressure decreased 11.5±9.9mmHg (P<0.01) and office diastolic blood pressure decreased 6.9±4.8mmHg (P<0.01); mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure decreased 7.5±7.7mmHg (P<0.05) and mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure decreased 3.3±4.7mmHg (P>0.05) compared to baseline values. There were no serious RDN-related adverse events during follow-up.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the new RDN system is safe and could significantly reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients in the absence of antihypertensive medications. This trial is registered with ChiCTR1800017815.

Predictors for success in renal denervation-a single centre retrospective analysis

Renal denervation (RDN) is one of the most frequently used invasive methods for the treatment of arterial hypertension. However, recent randomized sham-controlled studies raised concern about the efficacy and predictability of response. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of patients, who underwent RDN in our hypertension center between November 2010 and April 2014 and report here outcomes twelve months after procedure based on 24-hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. We defined ten-mm Hg decrease in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) as a cut-off for response and looked for possible predictors of this response using binary multiple regression analysis. 42 patients were included. Their mean age was 59.6 ± 9.2 years and 24% were female. Baseline office SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 164.1 ± 20.3 and 91.8 ± 12.4 mm Hg respectively. Mean 24 h-SBP significantly decreased from 149.8 ± 13.3 mm Hg to 141.2 ± 14.6 mm Hg. Mean 24 h-DBP significantly decreased from 83.3 ± 11.7 mm Hg to 78.8 ± 11.2 mm Hg. A higher level of mean 24 h-DBP and office DBP was shown to be predictive for response in office BP and a higher level of mean 24 h-DBP for response in 24 h-SBP and 24 h-DBP. Further properly designed randomized trials are warranted to confirm this finding as well as further investigate the role of diabetes mellitus and arterial stiffness in RDN.

Sympathoadrenergic suppression improves heart function by upregulating the ratio of sRAGE/RAGE in hypertension with metabolic syndrome

Receptors-for-Advanced-Glycation-End-products (RAGE) activate pro-inflammatory programs mediated by carboxymethyllysine (CML) and high-mobility-group-box1 protein (HMGB1). The soluble isoform sRAGE neutralizes RAGE-ligands preventing cardiovascular complications in conditions associated with increased sympathetic activation like hypertension and diabetes. The effects of sympathetic modulation on RAGE/sRAGE-balance and end-organ damage in metabolic syndrome on top of hypertension remains unknown. We hypothesized that increased sympathoadrenergic activity might lead to an unfavourable RAGE/sRAGE regulation. Renal denervation (RDN) was used to modulate sympathetic activation in obese spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRobRDN) versus sham-operated obese spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRob), their hypertensive lean controls (SHR) and non-hypertensive controls. Cardiac fibrosis was assessed by histological analysis and sRAGE/RAGE and ligand levels by Western blotting. Levels of CML and HMGB1 were highest in SHRob and were significantly lowered by RDN in serum (-44% and -45%) and myocardium (-25% and -52%). Myocardial RAGE was increased in SHR (+72% versus controls) and in SHRob (+68% versus SHR) while sRAGE decreased (-50% in SHR versus controls and -51% in SHRob versus SHR). RDN reduced myocardial RAGE expression. (-20%) and increased sRAGE levels in heart (+80%) and serum (+180%) versus sham-operated SHRob. Myocardial fibrosis correlated inversely with myocardial sRAGE content (r = -0.79; p = .004; n = 10). Myocardial sRAGE shedding active A-Disintegrin-And-Metalloprotease-10 (ADAM-10) was decreased in SHR (-33% versus controls) and in SHRob (-54% versus SHR), and was restored after RDN (+129% versus SHRob). Serum ADAM-10 activity was also decreased in SHRob (-66% versus SHR) and restored after RDN (+150% versus SHRob). In vitro, isoproterenol induced a ß1-adrenergic receptor mediated increase of RAGE expression in splenocytes (+200%) and decreased sRAGE secretion of splenocytes and cardiac fibroblasts (-50% and -49%) by ß2-adrenergic receptor stimulation mediated suppression of ADAM-10 activity. In conclusion, sympathetic activity affects sRAGE/RAGE-balance, which can be suppressed through sympathetic modulation by RDN, preventing RAGE-induced cardiac damage in hypertension with metabolic syndrome.

Renal perivascular adipose tissue: Form and function

Renal sympathetic activity affects blood pressure in part by increasing renovascular resistance via release of norepinephrine (NE) from sympathetic nerves onto renal arteries. Here we test the idea that adipose tissue adjacent to renal blood vessels, i.e. renal perivascular adipose tissue (RPVAT), contains a pool of NE which can be released to alter renal vascular function. RPVAT was obtained from around the main renal artery/vein of the male Sprague Dawley rats. Thoracic aortic PVAT and mesenteric PVAT also were studied as brown-like and white fat comparators respectively. RPVAT was identified as a mix of white and brown adipocytes, because of expression of both brown-like (e.g. uncoupling protein 1) and white adipogenic genes. All PVATs contained NE (ng/g tissue, RPVAT:524 ± 68, TAPVAT:740 ± 16, MPVAT:96 ± 24). NE was visualized specifically in RPVAT adipocytes by immunohistochemistry. The presence of RPVAT (+RPVAT) did not alter the response of isolated renal arteries to NE compared to responses of arteries without RPVAT (-RPVAT). By contrast, the maximum contraction to the sympathomimetic tyramine was ~2× greater in the renal artery +PVAT versus -PVAT. Tyramine-induced contraction in +RPVAT renal arteries was reduced by the α₁-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin and the NE transporter inhibitor nisoxetine. These results suggest that tyramine caused release of NE from RPVAT. Renal denervation significantly (>50%) reduced NE content of RPVAT but did not modify tyramine-induced contraction of +RPVAT renal arteries. Collectively, these data support the existence of a releasable pool of NE in RPVAT that is independent of renal sympathetic innervation and has the potential to change renal arterial function.