Lansdorp BM. Flux-Type versus Concentration-Type Sensors in Transdermal Measurements.
BIOSENSORS 2023;
13:845. [PMID:
37754079 PMCID:
PMC10526996 DOI:
10.3390/bios13090845]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
New transdermal biosensors measure analytes that diffuse from the bloodstream through the skin, making it important to reduce the system response time and understand measurement output. While highly customized models have been created for specific sensors, a generalized model for transdermal sensor systems is lacking. Here, a simple one-dimensional diffusion model was used to characterize the measurement system and classify biosensors as either flux types or concentration types. Results showed that flux-type sensors have significantly faster response times than concentration sensors. Furthermore, flux sensors do not measure concentration, but rather have an output measurement that is proportional to skin permeability. These findings should lead to an improved understanding of transdermal measurements and their relation to blood analyte concentration. In the realm of alcohol research, where the majority of commercially available sensors are flux types, our work advocates toward moving away from transdermal alcohol concentration as a metric, and instead suggests embracing transdermal alcohol flux as a more suitable alternative.
Collapse