Single anti-P ribosomal antibodies are not associated with lupus nephritis in patients suffering from active systemic lupus erythematosus

The role of anticomplement therapy in lupus nephritis

The complement system plays crucial roles in homeostasis and host defense against microbes. Deficiency of early complement cascade components has been associated with increased susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), whereas excessive complement consumption is a hallmark of this disease. Although enhanced classical pathway activation by immune complexes was initially thought to be the main contributor to lupus nephritis (LN) pathogenesis, an increasing body of evidence has suggested the alternative and the lectin pathways are also involved. Therapeutic agents targeting complement activation have been used in LN patients and clinical trials are ongoing. We review the mechanisms by which complement system dysregulation contributes to renal injury in SLE and summarize the latest evidence on the use of anticomplement agents to manage this condition.

Association of Antiribosomal P Antibody with Neurological and Systemic Manifestations in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Southwestern Colombia

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous pathogenesis, various clinical manifestations, and a broad spectrum of autoantibodies which recognize different cellular components. This study examines the clinical significance and serological associations of serum antiribosomal P antibodies (anti-P) derived from SLE patients in a population from southwestern Colombia.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of 66 SLE patients. Serum antiribosomal P0 autoantibodies were detected by line immunoassay using the ANA-LIA MAXX kit and processed on the automated HumaBlot 44FA system (Human Diagnostics, Germany).

RESULTS

Of the 66 SLE patients included in the study, 17 patients (25.76%) showed anti-P positivity by line immunoassay (IA), 47 (71.21%) were negative, and results from 2 patients were indeterminate. We did not find an association with neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE), renal, or hepatic disorders (P > 0.05). Laboratory findings indicated that anti-P positivity was significantly associated to anti-Smith (P = 0.001), anti-Ro60/SSA (P = 0.046), and anti-dsDNA antibodies (P = 0.034), the latter being true only when performed using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).

CONCLUSION

The anti-P antibodies are not associated with clinical manifestations such as NPSLE, lupus nephritis, or hepatic involvement in the southwest Colombian SLE population. Moreover, we confirmed previously reported association between anti-P antibody, serum anti-dsDNA, and anti-Smith.

Association of coexisting anti-ribosomal P and anti-dsDNA antibodies with histology and renal prognosis in lupus nephritis patients

OBJECTIVES

Anti-ribosomal P protein autoantibodies (anti-P) specifically develop in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Associations of anti-P with lupus nephritis (LN) histological subclass and renal outcome remain inconclusive. We sought to determine the association of anti-P and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) with renal histology and prognosis in LN patients.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with LN, having undergone kidney biopsy, were included. The 2018 revised ISN/RPS classification system was used for pathophysiological evaluation. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² for > 3 months.

RESULTS

Six patients (17.6%) were positive for anti-P and 26 (76.5%) for anti-dsDNA. Among the six patients with anti-P, one did not have anti-dsDNA, but did have anti-Sm antibody, and showed a histological subtype of class V. This patient maintained good renal function for over 14 years. The remaining five patients, who had both anti-P and anti-dsDNA, exhibited proliferative nephritis and were associated with prolonged hypocomplementemia, and the incidence of CKD did not differ from patients without anti-P.

CONCLUSION

Although this study included a small number of patients, the results indicated that histology class and renal prognosis associated with anti-P depend on the coexistence of anti-dsDNA. Further studies with a large number of patients are required to confirm this conclusion.

Study on the correlation between anti-ribosomal P protein antibody and systemic lupus erythematosus

The aims of this study were to compare diagnostic value of anti-ribosomal P protein antibody (anti-P), anti-Smith antibody (anti-Sm), anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA), anti-nucleosome antibody (ANuA), and anti-histone antibody (AHA) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as well as explore the correlation between anti-P and SLE.A retrospective study was performed with 487 SLE patients, 235 non-SLE rheumatic diseases, and 124 healthy subjects from January 2015 to December 2018. Clinical manifestations, laboratory results and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2000 scores were analyzed between anti-P/+/ and anti-P/-/ patients. SPSS19.0 statistical software was used for data analysis.The sensitivities of anti-P, anti-Sm, anti-dsDNA, ANuA, and AHA in SLE were 31.6%, 20.7%, 45.0%, 27.9%, and 14.6%, and the specificities were 99.2%, 99.4%, 98.9%, 98.3%, and 96.7%, respectively. Only 27.9% of SLE had a single positive anti-P while the other 4 antibodies were all negative. There were significant differences in the age of onset, skin erythema, urinary protein, creatinine and serum IgG, IgM, C3, C4 between anti-P/+/ and anti-P/-/ patients (P < .05). When anti-Sjogren syndrome A antibody, anti-P were positive and anti-dsDNA was negative, the incidence of skin erythema was the highest (35.1%). Compared with anti-P/-/ patients, anti-P/+/ patients had higher SLEDAI scores (P < .001).Anti-P, anti-Sm, anti-dsDNA, ANuA, and AHA have high specificity but poor sensitivity in the diagnosis of SLE; combined detection can greatly improve the detection rate. Anti-P is more valuable in the diagnosis of SLE when other specific autoantibodies are negative. SLE patients with positive anti-P have an earlier onset age and are more prone to skin erythema, lupus nephritis as well as higher disease activity.

Advances in the diagnosis and classification of systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases. Patients with SLE display a wide spectrum of clinical and serological findings that can mislead and delay the diagnosis. Diagnostic criteria have not been developed yet, whereas several sets of classification criteria are available; however, none of them has 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, i.e. the hallmark of diagnostic criteria. Nevertheless, classification criteria are often misused as diagnostic criteria, which may affect earliness of diagnosis and lead to more misdiagnosed cases. Areas covered: In this review, we compare old and new classification criteria, discussing their application and pinpointing their limitations in the management of patients. Moreover, we will focus on current and novel biomarkers for SLE diagnosis, highlighting their predictive value and applicability in clinical practice. Expert commentary: SLE diagnosis still represents a challenge, remaining largely based on a clinical judgment. Besides SLE diagnosis, even its classification is still challenging to date. Indeed, although classification of SLE seems to be achieved more frequently with the 2012 SLICC criteria than with the previous 1997 ACR criteria, this last-updated 2012 set might be improved. Notably, diagnostic and classification criteria should be applied to any subject in the world, and consequently they should include immunological variables validated in different populations, which is still an unmet need.

Anti-ribosomal P protein: a novel antibody in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoantibodies to ribosomal P proteins (anti-rib P) are specific serological markers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are associated with liver involvement in this disease. The similarity in autoimmune background between autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and SLE-associated hepatitis raises the possibility that anti-rib P antibodies might also have relevance in AIH.

AIMS

To evaluate the frequency and clinical significance of anti-rib P antibodies in a large AIH cohort.

METHODS

Sera obtained at diagnosis of 96 AIH patients and of 82 healthy controls were tested for IgG anti-ribosomal P protein by ELISA. All of the sera were also screened for other lupus-specific autoantibodies, three patients with the presence of anti-dsDNA (n = 1) and anti-Sm (n = 2) were excluded.

RESULTS

Moderate to high titres (>40 U) of anti-rib P antibody were found in 9.7% (9/93) of the AIH patients and none of the controls (P = 0.003). At presentation, AIH patients with and without anti-rib P antibodies had similar demographic/clinical features, including the frequency of cirrhosis (44.4 vs. 28.5%, P = 0.44), hepatic laboratorial findings (P > 0.05). Importantly, at the final observation (follow-up period 10.2 ± 4.9 years), the AIH patients with anti-rib P had a significantly higher frequency of cirrhosis compared with the negative group (100 vs. 60%, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The novel demonstration of anti-rib P in AIH patients without clinical or laboratory evidence of SLE suggests a common underlying mechanism targeting the liver in these two diseases. In addition, this antibody appears to predict the patients with worse AIH prognoses.