Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Large pericardial effusion in a woman in the second trimester of pregnancy: a case report

Background

Pericardial effusion is common in pregnancy, with causes similar to the general population. Usually, it is found in the third trimester and disappears spontaneously after labour; however, there is a risk of progression to tamponade. Management is based on expert opinion, since few studies have been published.

Case summary

A woman with enlargement of a known, chronic, presumably idiopathic pericardial effusion, in the 17th gestation week, presented with mild dyspnoea, without specific echocardiographic signs of cardiac tamponade. She received double antithrombotic treatment with aspirin 100 mg, started before conception, and a prophylactic dose of tinzaparin 4500 IU, started at the beginning of the pregnancy due to obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome. A multidisciplinary team consisting of the treating obstetrician-gynaecologist, haematologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, and cardiologist discussed the management, taking into account the large size of the effusion and the significant increase during pregnancy, the possibility of further increase during the third trimester, the antiplatelet and antithrombotic treatment, which increased the haemorrhagic risk, and the difficulty and risk to intervene later in pregnancy. A surgical pericardial window was proposed to the patient and family and was performed uneventfully.

Discussion

This case demonstrates the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach and shared decision-making in the management of these complex cardio-obstetric patients in order to achieve optimal therapeutic results.

Exosomal miR-146a-5p derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells can alleviate antiphospholipid antibody-induced trophoblast injury and placental dysfunction by regulating the TRAF6/NF-κB axis

Exosomes originating from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSC-exos) have become a novel strategy for treating various diseases owing to their ability to regulate intercellular signal communication. However, the potential of hucMSC-exos to improve placental injury in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome and its underlying mechanism remain unclear. Our objective was to explore the potential application of hucMSC-exos in the treatment of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome and elucidate its underlying mechanism. In our study, hucMSC-exos ameliorated the functional impairment of trophoblasts caused by antiphospholipid antibodies in vitro and attenuated placental dysfunction in mice with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome by delivering miR-146a-5p. Exosomal miR-146a-5p suppressed the expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and inhibited the activation of NF-κB signaling, leading to the down-regulation of IL-1β and IL-18 to rescue inflammation and modulation of Cleaved-CASP3, BAX, and BCL2 to inhibit apoptosis in HTR8/SVneo cells and mice placenta. This study identified the potential molecular basis of how hucMSC-exos improved antiphospholipid antibody-induced placental injury and highlighted the functional importance of the miR-146a-5p/TRAF6 axis in the progression of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. More importantly, this study provided a fresh outlook on the promising use of hucMSC-exos as a novel and effective treatment approach in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

Protection by hydroxychloroquine prevents placental injury in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is mediated by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs, and anti‐β2 glycoprotein I antibody is the main pathogenic antibody), and recurrent abortion, preeclampsia, foetal growth restriction and other placental diseases are the main clinical characteristics of placental pathological pregnancy. It is a disease that seriously threatens the health of pregnant women. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was originally used as an anti‐malaria drug and has now shown benefit in refractory OAPS where conventional treatment has failed, with the expectation of providing protective clinical benefits for both the mother and foetus. However, its efficacy and mechanism of action are still unclear. After clinical data were collected to determine the therapeutic effect, human trophoblast cells in early pregnancy were prepared and treated with aPL. After the addition of HCQ, the proliferation, invasion, migration and tubule formation of the trophoblast cells were observed so that the therapeutic mechanism of HCQ on trophoblast cells could be determined. By establishing an obstetric APS mouse model similar to the clinical situation, we were able to detect the therapeutic effect of HCQ on pathological pregnancy. The normal function of trophoblast cells is affected by aPL. Antibodies reduce the ability of trophoblast cells to invade and migrate and can impair tubule formation, which are closely related to placental insufficiency. HCQ can partially reverse these side effects. In the OAPS mouse model, we found that HCQ prevented foetal death and reduced the incidence of pathological pregnancy. Therefore, HCQ can improve pregnancy outcomes and reverse the aPL inhibition of trophoblast disease. In OAPS, the use of HCQ needs to be seriously considered.

Treatment with low-dose prednisone in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: A retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids have been suggested as a potential therapy in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (oAPS). Our aims were to describe a cohort of patients with oAPS treated with low-dose glucocorticoids and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of additional glucocorticoids on the pregnancy outcomes in oAPS patients.

METHODS

Retrospective study that included 11 women diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. The meta-analysis was conducted by fitting random effects models and was checked for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

All women had suffered from early pregnancy losses and two also had a history of fetal deaths. We studied 47 pregnancies that resulted in 32 abortions (68.1%) and 3 fetal deaths (6.4%). Twenty-six pregnancies were under treatment, mainly LDA and LMWH. Low-dose glucocorticoids were indicated in 13 pregnancies (always in association with LDA and LMWH). There was a decrease in pregnancy loss in those patients treated with LDA and LMWH. Treatment with glucocorticoids significantly increased the rate of successful pregnancy (38.5% abortions in treated vs 85.3% abortions in non-treated pregnancies; p=0.003). After multivariate GEE analysis, only glucocorticoids remained inversely associated with pregnancy loss (OR=0.157, (CI 0.025-0.968, p=0.046)). The meta-analysis showed that glucocorticoids tended to improve the frequency of successful pregnancy (OR= 0.509 (0.252-1.028), p=0.06). Three cases of gestational diabetes and one of preeclampsia were observed in our cohort. The meta-analysis, which mostly included studies using high-dose steroids, showed that glucocorticoids increased not only the frequency of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes, but also the rate of pre-term birth.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of low-dose glucocorticoids in addition to the standard therapy in patients with refractory oAPS should be confirmed in well-designed clinical trials. However, high doses of steroids significantly increase the frequency of maternal and fetal morbidities, making their use strongly inadvisable.

Does Adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS) Predict the Obstetric Outcome in Antiphospholipid Antibody Carriers? A Single-Center Study

The adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Score (aGAPSS) is a tool proposed to quantify the risk for antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-related clinical manifestations. However, aGAPSS has been validated mainly for thrombotic events and studies on APS-related obstetric manifestations are scarce. Furthermore, the majority of them included patients with positive aPL and different autoimmune diseases. Here, we assess the utility of aGAPSS to predict the response to treatment in aPL carriers without other autoimmune disorders. One-hundred and thirty-seven women with aPL ever pregnant were included. Sixty-five meet the APS classification criteria, 61 had APS-related obstetric manifestations, and 11 were asymptomatic carriers. The patients' aGAPSS risk was grouped as low (< 6, N = 73), medium (6-11, N = 40), and high risk (≥ 12, N = 24). Since vascular risk factors included in the aGAPSS were infrequent in this population (< 10%), the aGAPSS score was mainly determined by the aPL profile. Overall, the live birth rate was 75%, and 37.2% of the patients had at least one adverse pregnancy outcome (APO). When considering patients according to the aGAPSS (high, medium, and low risk), no significant differences were found for pregnancy loss (29.2%, 25%, and 21.9%) or APO (33.3%, 47.5%, and 32.9%). In the present study, including aPL carriers without other autoimmune diseases, aGAPSS is not a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for obstetric complications despite treatment. In these patients with gestational desire, in addition to the aPL profile, other pregnancy-specific factors, such as age or previous obstetric history, should be considered.

Features of laboratory markers in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome and retrochorial hematoma

The aim. Study of hemostasis, antiphospholipid antibody levels and immunological parameters in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), in particular with retrochorial hematoma (RCH). Materials and methods. 90 women were selected and divided into two groups: the control group – 30 pregnant women with a normal pregnancy (without APS) and the main group – 60 pregnant women with APS. Women in the main group were diagnosed with APS before pregnancy. In turn, the main group was divided into two subgroups: 1 subgroup – 41 pregnant women without RCH and 2 subgroup – 19 pregnant women with RCH. The main indicators of hemostasis were determined in all pregnant women, namely: the degree and rate of platelet aggregation, Willebrand factor, D-dimers. In addition, the level of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA), antibodies to β2-glycoprotein, to annexin V, to prothrombin was examined, and the level of annexin V was also determined. The absolute and relative content of Treg, CD3+, T-lymphocytes, CD4+ (T-helpers), CD8+ (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes), CD19+ (B-lymphocytes), CD16+CD56+ (NK cells), CD16+CD56+CD107a+ (activated NK cells). Results. The obtained results showed that in pregnant women with APS compared to pregnant women without APS there are statistically significantly higher values of the degree and rate of platelet aggregation (90.6±6.3% and 106.3±6.7% vs. 65.3±5.3 % and 73.4±5.6%, respectively). There were also higher values ​​of Willebrand factor and D-dimers (2.5±0.3 IU/ml and 378.1±34.3 ng/ml against 1.7±0.2 IU/ml and 268.1±27, 3 ng/ml, respectively). APLAs were significantly higher in pregnant women with APS compared with pregnant women in the control group, namely: 16.1±1.5 vs. 3.8±0.4 U/ml. With regard to antibodies to β2-glycoprotein, to annexin V, to prothrombin and to the level of annexin V, their values were also statistically significantly higher in the group of pregnant women with APS. In addition, the results of the study showed that pregnant women with APS showed changes in subpopulations of immunocompetent cells. However, examining the difference in hemostasis, antibody content, and level of lymphocyte subpopulations between pregnant women with APS with and without RCH, it was found that their shifts in pregnant women with RCH were more pronounced than in women without RCH. Conclusions. Pregnant women with APS are characterized by significantly more significant changes in hemostasis, manifested by activation of intravascular thrombosis. In addition, such pregnant women had a significantly higher concentration of autoantibodies. There are also changes in the immune system, in particular, a decrease in Treg-cells, which have the ability to reduce the specific proliferation and effector functions of lymphocytes, thereby participating in the pathogenesis of APS.

Risk factors for pregnancy morbidity in women with antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) increases the risk of obstetric complications, but risk factors for pregnancy morbidity in women with APS remain incompletely characterized. This retrospective study included pregnant women with APS and a control group without APS admitted to Peking University People's Hospital between January 2013 and September 2019. Clinical data were extracted from medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (fetal loss, premature birth, fetal growth restriction [FGR], preeclampsia and neonatal death). We included 64 pregnancies in 59 patients with APS (age, 32.3 ± 4.3 years) and 256 pregnancies in 256 women without APS (age, 30.4 ± 3.3 years). Compared with the control group, the APS group had higher incidence rates of preeclampsia (10.9 % vs. 2.3 %, P = 0.002), premature rupture of membranes (17.2 % vs. 3.9 %, P < 0.001), postpartum hemorrhage (23.4 % vs. 4.3 %, P < 0.001), fetal loss (4.7 % vs. 0.8 %, P = 0.024) and premature delivery at ≤34 weeks (7.8 % vs. 2.3 %, P = 0.047). The incidence rates of hypertension during pregnancy, HELLP syndrome, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios and FGR were similar in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that three or more prior spontaneous miscarriages (odds ratio [OR], 6.162; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.271-29.882; P = 0.024) and double-positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (OR, 4.024; 95 %CI, 1.025-15.794; P = 0.046) were independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. APS increases the risks of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes during pregnancy. Three or more spontaneous miscarriages and double-positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies are risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with APS.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for the secondary prevention of stillbirth in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: A case series and systematic review of literature

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in secondary prevention of pregnancy complications for patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and history of stillbirth.

METHODS

We described three cases of obstetric APS patients with history of stillbirth treated with IVIg in four pregnancies. In addition, we conducted a systematic literature review on the use of IVIg in obstetric APS with history of stillbirth.

RESULTS

Three patients with obstetric APS and history of stillbirth were treated with prophylactic IVIg, in addition to standard treatment (hydroxychloroquine, low-dose aspirin, low molecular weight heparin, and prednisone), in four pregnancies (three singleton and one twin). All pregnancies resulted in live healthy newborns. Long-term follow-up re-evaluations (24-53 months) did not shown any sign or symptom of active systemic disease, and the children were healthy. The systematic literature review retrieved only three cases of use of IVIg in obstetric APS patients with history of stillbirth. All three cases resulted in live healthy newborns. Only in one case, mild thrombocytopenia occurred during treatment, although this event was unlikely to be related to IVIg.

CONCLUSION

Our experience suggests that IVIg as secondary prevention of APS-related stillbirth is associated with good pregnancy and long-term outcomes, with no relevant safety concerns. However, the literature evidence on this topic is limited to few isolated cases, and further studies are needed to clarify which obstetric APS patients may benefit the most from IVIg.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes and subsequent development of connective tissue disease in the UK: an epidemiological study

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed prevalence of connective tissue disease (CTDs), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in women with previous adverse pregnancy outcome compared with uncomplicated livebirths.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

UK Primary Care.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Records of women, 18 years and older, within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) (1 January 2000-31 December 2013).

METHODS

Clinical Practice Research Datalink was searched for pregnancy terms to identify adverse pregnancy outcome. Each identified case was matched to five livebirths.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnosis of SLE, CTD, APS or autoimmune antibodies. Poisson regression was performed to calculate relative risk ratios (RR), comparing adverse pregnancy outcome with livebirth cohorts.

RESULTS

Clinical Practice Research Datalink identified 20 123 adverse pregnancy outcomes matched to 97 323 livebirths, with a total of 875 590 person-years follow up. Median follow up from study entry was 7.29 years (SD 4.39). Compared with women with an uncomplicated livebirth, women with adverse pregnancy outcome had an increased risk of developing CTD or autoimmune antibodies (RR 3.20, 95% CI 2.90-3.51). Risk was greatest following a stillbirth (RR 5.82, 95% CI 4.97-6.81). For CTD and SLE, the risk was greatest within the first 5 years of adverse pregnancy outcome. Risk for aPL and APS diagnosis was highest ≥5 years from adverse pregnancy outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse pregnancy outcome is associated with increased risk of developing maternal CTD, including SLE. Either immunological factors predispose women to adverse pregnancy outcome and subsequent CTD diagnosis or, alternatively, adverse pregnancy outcome initiates autoimmune events which culminate in CTD in later life.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Stillbirth is associated with increased maternal risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome occurrence in patients with persistent anti-phospholipid antibodies

We investigated the overall frequency of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) occurrence in Korean patients with consecutively detected anti-phospholipid antibodies with an interval of 12 weeks (persistent aPLs). We retrospectively reviewed the results of blood tests of aPLs in 14,889 patients in whom aPL tests were performed at Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, from January 2012 to August 2018, and included 833 patients with persistent aPLs. We obtained clinical and laboratory data including anti-cardiolipin antibodies IgM and IgG, anti-beta2 glycoprotein1 IgM and IgG, and lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Of 833 patients with persistent aPLs, 96 patients (11.5%) had APS (84 patients had thrombotic events and 12 had pregnancy morbidity). Among aPLs, LAC was detected in patients with APS more frequently than asymptomatic carriers of aPLs (46.9% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001). Patients with LAC (relative risk (RR) 2.558, p < 0.001) and aPLs ≥ 2 (RR 1.731, p = 0.014) exhibited the higher rate of APS occurrence than those without. Moreover, patients with aPLs ≥ 3 and aPLs ≥ 4 exhibited the higher rates of APS occurrence than those without (RR 2.753, p < 0.001 and RR 3.209, p = 0.013). Meanwhile, patients with ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-SSA/Ro, and SLE exhibited the increased frequency of LAC positivity, compared to those without (RR 3.304, p = 0.005, RR 4.269, p = 0.032, RR 3.750, p = 0.041 and RR 8.828, p < 0.001, respectively). APS occurs in 11.5% of Korean patients with persistent aPLs. LAC positivity and aPLs ≥ 2 were significantly associated with APS occurrence. SLE and SLE-related autoantibodies were associated with LAC positivity.

Severe Preeclampsia, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, and Ulnar Artery Thrombosis in a Teenage Pregnancy: A Rare Association

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with vascular thrombosis and pregnancy complications. It causes recurrent miscarriage and it is associated with other adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction, preeclampsia, and HELLP syndrome. Obstetric morbidity is one of the major manifestations of APS with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. This case describes a case of a severe preeclampsia in a 16-year-old primigravida at 29 weeks resulting in a caesarean delivery and subsequent finding of an ulnar artery thrombosis in postpartum period. APS was diagnosed on further investigations of her symptoms and signs.

Recommendations regarding the genetic and immunological study of reproductive dysfunction

In this article several members of diverse scientific associations and reproduction experts from Spain have updated different genetic and immunological procedure recommendations in couples affected by reproductive dysfunction with the goal of providing a set of useful guidelines for the clinic. The laboratory test has been considered as highly recommendable for making clinical decisions when the result of the diagnostic test is relevant, moderately recommendable when the results are of limited evidence because they are inconsistent, and low when the benefit of the test is uncertain. It is expected that these recommendations will provide some useful guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of couples presenting reproductive dysfunction.

Obstetric Anti-phospholipid Syndrome: State of the Art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on new pathogenesis and clinical-therapeutic aspects of obstetric anti-phospholipid syndrome (ob-APS) in the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pathogenesis of ob-APS is multifactorial, including placental infarctions, infiltration of inflammatory cells that cause acute and chronic inflammation, leading to uncontrolled inflammation and poor pregnancy outcomes. A preconception counseling and a patient-tailored treatment are fundamental to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Thanks to conventional treatment, based on low-dose aspirin and heparin, 70% of women with ob-APS can have successful pregnancies. Women with positive anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) without clinical manifestations ("aPL carriers") or with obstetric manifestation not fulfilling ob-APS criteria need to be further investigated in order to assess their best management. Great interest has been given to drugs that could interact in the pathophysiological mechanisms, such as hydroxychloroquine, statins, and eculizumab. These drugs could be considered for patients refractory to conventional therapy.

Pregnancy Outcome in Women with Obstetric and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome-A Retrospective Analysis and a Review of Additional Treatment in Pregnancy

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with pregnancy complications such as recurrent early fetal loss (RFL), fetal death, preeclampsia (PE), and intrauterine growth restriction (obstetric APS/OAPS). Other clinical manifestations are venous and/or arterial thromboses (thrombotic APS/TAPS). The data of 37 pregnancies with OAPS and 37 pregnancies with TAPS were analyzed and compared. Overall, the most frequent APS antibodies (aPl) were LA as well as "triple-positivity"; LA antibodies were significantly more frequent in women with TAPS (67.6 % TAPS vs. 29.7 % OAPS, p < 0.010), whereas "triple-positivity" was significantly more seen in women with OAPS (40.5 % OAPS vs. 13.5 % TAPS, p < 0.010). Adequate therapy has been administered in nearly all pregnancies with TAPS, whereas in 18.9 % of pregnancies with OPS, no therapy has been given at all. One woman in OAPS and four women in TAPS were treated with plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption. There was no significant association between adverse obstetric outcome and therapy. The most frequent pregnancy complications were RFL in the OAPS group (32.4 vs. 13.5 % in TAPS) and PE in the TAPS group (18.9 % in OAPS and TAPS, respectively). The data of our study showed that pregnancies with OAPS and TAPS have a similar rate of pregnancy complications. However, pregnancies with OAPS tend to have rather RFL. Although we were not able to reveal a significant association with adverse obstetric outcome, it seems that the current adequate therapy for APS in pregnancy, consisting of LDA and LMWH, might rather prevent the development of RFL. Additionally, it might be considered to divide the obstetric APS into obstetric APS with early pregnancy complications and obstetric APS with late pregnancy complications. The division into two groups of obstetric APS might facilitate the choice of additional therapy in these women.

Elevated Serum Level of HMGB1 in Patients with the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Pregnancy problems are common in patients with rheumatic disease; indeed, autoimmune disorders and autoantibodies can affect pregnancy progress and lead to maternal complications. Recent studies have highlighted a close association between HMGB1, chronic inflammation, and autoimmune diseases. Thus, in this investigation, we analyzed serum levels of HMGB1, an alarmin which plays a pivotal role in inducing and enhancing immune cell function. Sera from 30 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (11 primary and 19 secondary APS), 35 subjects with pregnancy morbidity, and 30 healthy women were analysed for HMGB1 and its putative receptor RAGE (sRAGE) by Western blot and for TNF-α by ELISA. Results revealed that APS patients showed significantly increased serum levels of HMGB1, sRAGE, and the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α, as compared to healthy women. However, also, the pregnancy morbidity subjects showed significantly increased levels of HMGB1 and sRAGE as well as TNF-α compared to healthy women. Our findings suggest that in subjects with pregnancy morbidity, including obstetric APS, elevated levels of HMGB1/sRAGE may represent an alarm signal, indicating an increase of proinflammatory triggers. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of HMGB1/sRAGE as a possible tool to evaluate the risk stratification of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition that is associated with thrombosis and morbidity in pregnancy. The exact mechanisms by which these associations occur appear to be heterogeneous and are not yet well understood. The aim of this study was to identify and analyze publications in recent years to better understand the diagnosis and its contribution to monitoring APS among women with recurrent miscarriage (RM). This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Knowledge databases, with articles published between 2010 and 2014, according to the PRISMA statement. Of the 85 identified studies, nine were selected. Most of the studies reported an association between recurrent miscarriage and specific antiphospholipid antibodies, as anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) and antiphosphatidylserine (aPS), which showed a relationship with RM. The main result of the meta-analysis revealed association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and/or APS compared to the patients with RM (OR: 0.279; 95% CI: 0.212-0.366) and APS cases compared to the patients with RM (OR: 0.083; 95% CI: 0.036-0.189). High heterogeneity among these studies (I²=100.0%, p <0.001) was observed. In addition, there was no significant publication bias across studies according to Begg's test (p=0.230), although Egger's test (p=0.037) suggests significant publication bias. The funnel plot was slightly asymmetrical. Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a positive association between antiphospholipid antibodies and/or antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with recurrent miscarriage.

Antibodies Against Complement Components: Relevance for the Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Biomarkers of the Disease and Biopharmaceuticals

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laboratory criterion for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL Abs). Complement system has a role in mediating aPL Abs-induced thrombosis in animal models. The importance of antibodies against complement components (potential biomarkers of APS) and the importance of antibodies with beneficial anti-complement effects in APS (as biopharmaceuticals) are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antibodies against complement components described in APS patients, so far, are anti-C1q and anti-factor H Abs, although anti-factor B Abs and anti-C5a Abs were described in animal models of APS. Clinical studies in APS patients are limited to a small number of case reports. Studies that would confirm potential role of Abs against complement components (as potential biomarkers of APS) are lacking. Lack of randomized clinical trials (that would provide complete data for confirmation of beneficial effects of biopharmaceuticals in complement inhibition) in APS is alarming.

A importância de reconhecer a síndrome antifosfolípide na medicina vascular

A síndrome antifosfolipíde (SAF) é uma doença autoimune sistêmica caracterizada por trombose arterial ou venosa recorrente e/ou morbidade gestacional e pela presença dos anticorpos antifosfolipídeos, podendo apresentar outras manifestações vasculares, como microangiopatia, arteriopatia crônica e SAF catastrófica. Determinados testes laboratoriais para a síndrome (por exemplo, o anticoagulante lúpico) podem sofrer interferência do uso de medicações anticoagulantes, dificultando o diagnóstico. A fisiopatologia da SAF é complexa, sendo enumerados no texto diversos mecanismos patogênicos relacionados à coagulação, ao endotélio e às plaquetas. Por fim, discutimos o tratamento da SAF de acordo com a presença e o tipo de manifestações clínicas, o uso dos anticoagulantes orais diretos e o manejo perioperatório de pacientes com SAF.

[For a targeted use of aspirin]

The use of low-dose aspirin in pregnancy should remain a highly targeted indication since its long-term safety has not been established and should be restricted to women at high risk of vascular complications. Indications for which the benefit of aspirin has been shown are women with a history of preeclampsia responsible for a premature birth before 34 weeks, those having at least two history of preeclampsia, those with an antiphospholipid syndrome and those with lupus associated with positive antiphospholipid antibodies or renal failure. In all other cases, the level of evidence of the benefit of aspirin is insufficient to recommend its routine prescription.

TNF-alpha and annexin A2: inflammation in thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thromboses and/or pregnancy losses. Laboratory criterion for the diagnosis of APS is the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (aβ2gpI) and lupus anticoagulant). On the one hand, the latest classification criteria for the diagnosis of APS emphasized that thrombotic manifestations of the syndrome should be without any signs of an inflammatory process, while on the other hand, some recent reports have suggested that APS is a "pro-inflammatory state." This article is focused on the importance of TNF-alpha and annexin A2 (anxA2) for patients with vascular (thrombotic) manifestations of the primary APS. The classic antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy does not protect APS patients from the development of recurrent thrombosis. Therefore, an urgent need for the introduction of new therapeutic approaches in the treatment of APS patients is obvious. This review provides a rationale for the necessity for the use of immunomodulatory medications that could interfere with β2gpI binding to its receptor(s), such as anxA2, and/or inhibit TNF-alpha activity.

Microangiopathic antiphospholipid antibody-associated syndrome in a pregnant lady

We describe a gravid 37-year-old Chinese lady with known triple positive primary antiphospholipid syndrome with previous recurrent deep vein thrombosis and early spontaneous miscarriages. She was managed with low-molecular weight heparin, aspirin, hydroxychloroquine, prednisolone and monthly intravenous immunoglobulin. She presented with recurrent per-vaginal bleeding at 22 weeks of gestation and was found to have abruptio placentae. Anti-coagulation was held off. She subsequently delivered a stillborn at 24 weeks and anti-coagulation was restarted. Day 5 post-delivery, she developed HELLP, with hemolytic anaemia (Hb 10.1 g/dL, haptoglobin <30 g/L, LDH 2206 U/L), elevated transaminases (AST 1196 U/L, ALT 1130 U/L) and thrombocytopenia (platelet 28 × 10^9/L). There were also episodes of acute severe headache and abdominal pain assessed to be secondary to microvascular ischemia as CT did not reveal any thrombosis. Her blood pressure hovered persistently above systolic 180 mmHg, and required at least three anti-hypertensives. These were coupled with a new onset proteinuria of 2 to 3 g/day. There was no evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. She was assessed to have microangiopathic antiphospholipid syndrome and was started on plasmapheresis. On Day 10 post-partum, the patient complained of foul-smelling vaginal discharge and was found to have retained products of conception, which was immediately evacuated. Her course was followed by poly-microbial sepsis secondary to Enterococcus fecalis, Klebsiella Pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. The patient was further treated with imipenem and she completed eight exchanges of plasmapheresis followed by five days of intravenous immunoglobulins with good clinical and biochemical improvement.

The role of anti-phospholipid antibodies in autoimmune reproductive failure

Anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) are autoantibodies that are associated with thrombosis and a range of pregnancy complications including recurrent pregnancy loss and pre-eclampsia. The three clinically relevant, well-characterized aPL are anti-cardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies. aPL do not bind directly to phospholipids but instead bind to a plasma-binding ‘cofactor’. The most extensively studied cofactor is β2GPI, whose role in pregnancy is not fully elucidated. Although the pathogenicity of aPL in recurrent pregnancy loss is well established in humans and animal models, the association of aPL with infertility does not appear to be causative. aPL may exert their detrimental effects during pregnancy by directly binding trophoblast cells of the placenta, altering trophoblast signalling, proliferation, invasion and secretion of hormones and cytokines, and by increasing apoptosis. Heparin is commonly used to treat pregnant women with aPL; however, as thrombotic events do not occur in the placentae of all women with aPL, it may exert a protective effect by preventing the binding of aPL to β2GPI or by acting through non-thrombotic pathways. The aim of this review is to present evidence summarizing the current understanding of this field.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy: Diagnostic Concepts

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) comprises of a wide spectrum of clinical and obstetric manifestations linked to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS was described in the context of lupus, and later as an isolated syndrome or primary APS. The presence of aPL, especially the lupus anticoagulant test, is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as fetal death, recurrent early miscarriages, pre-eclampsia, and placental insufficiency, but does not seem to influence infertility. High quality scientific data to support these associations, however, are lacking, and controversies arise about the definition of positive aPL (low vs medium-high titers) or even the definition of the adverse events. This review discusses APS classification criteria and the current debate about it.

The European Registry on Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome (EUROAPS): A survey of 247 consecutive cases

AIM

To analyse the clinical features, laboratory data, foetal-maternal outcomes, and follow-up in a cohort of 247 women with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS).

METHODS

The European Registry on APS became a Registry within the framework of the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibody projects and placed on a website in June 2010. Cases with obstetric complaints related to aPL who tested positive for aPL prospectively and retrospectively were included. The three-year survey results are reported.

RESULTS

338 women with 1253 pregnancy episodes were included; 915 were historical and 338 were latest episodes. All these women tested positive for aPL. 247 of the 338 fulfilled the Sydney criteria. According to the laboratory categories, 84/247 were in category I, 42 in IIa, 66 in IIb and 55 in IIc. Obstetric complications other than foetal losses, appeared in 129 cases (52.2%). 192 (77.7%) had a live birth and 55 (22.3%) did not. The latter group of only 38 cases (69%) received adequate treatment and 17 (31%) did not. 177/247 (72%) women were put on heparin plus LDA. Thrombosis appeared in two during pregnancy and in 14 during the puerperium. 7 (3%) women evolved to complete SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

OAPS shows differential characteristics than classical APS. All laboratory test categories are needed to avoid false-negative diagnoses. In some cases, complement levels could act as a serological marker. OAPS has very good foetal-maternal outcomes when treated. Thrombosis and progression to SLE in mothers with OAPS are scarce compared with "classical APS", suggesting that they have different aPL-mediated pathogenic mechanisms.

Recurrent early pregnancy loss and antiphospholipid antibodies: where do we stand?

Evidence from basic science studies supports a causative relationship between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and recurrent early miscarriage (REM) (prior to 10 weeks of gestation). However, human studies have not consistently found a relationship between aPL and REM. Members of the Obstetric Task Force of the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies performed a literature review of the association of aPL and REM and searched for clinical trials in women with REM who tested positive for aPL. Of the 46 studies that investigated the relationship between aPL and REM, 27 found a positive association, seven found no association, and the remaining 12 papers could not report an association (lack of control group). The main identified problems for such conflicting results were varying definitions of REM (two or three abortions, not necessarily consecutive; different gestational age at which pregnancy losses occurred); analysis of patients with previous fetal death (>10 weeks) in the same group of REM; and different definitions of “positive aPL” (cutoffs not following international recommendations; small number of studies confirmed persistence of positive aPL after six to 12 weeks). The 10 identified randomized trials with proposed treatments for women with REM who test positive for aPL also had heterogeneous inclusion criteria, with only one trial limited to subjects who would meet the current criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by both clinical and laboratory criteria. Against this background, we conclude that the association between REM and aPL remains inconclusive and that the findings of treatment trials are at best inconsistent and at worst misleading. More convincing data are critically needed. Studies that identify, or at least stratify, according to international consensus criteria and include standardized core laboratory testing results are crucial if we are to establish an evidence-based association between aPL and REM and treatment recommendations.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a recent classification for an old defined disorder

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is now being recognized as a distinct entity from vascular APS. Pregnancy morbidity includes >3 consecutive and spontaneous early miscarriages before 10weeks of gestation; at least one unexplained fetal death after the 10th week of gestation of a morphologically normal fetus; a premature birth before the 34th week of gestation of a normal neonate due to eclampsia or severe pre-eclampsia or placental insufficiency. It is not well understood how antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), beyond their diagnostic and prognostic role, contribute to pregnancy manifestations. Indeed aPL-mediated thrombotic events cannot explain the obstetric manifestations and additional pathogenic mechanisms, such as a placental aPL mediated complement activation and a direct effect of aPLs on placental development, have been reported. Still debated is the possible association between aPLs and infertility and the effect of maternal autoantibodies on non-vascular manifestations in the babies. Combination of low dose aspirin and unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin is the effective treatment in most of the cases. However, pregnancy complications, in spite of this therapy, can occur in up to 20% of the patients. Novel alternative therapies able to abrogate the aPL pathogenic action either by interfering with aPL binding at the placental level or by inhibiting the aPL-mediated detrimental effect are under active investigation.

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force report on obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Pregnancy morbidity is one of the clinical manifestations used for classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). During the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (aPL), a Task Force with internationally-known experts was created to carry out a critical appraisal of the literature available regarding the association of aPL with obstetric manifestations present in actual classification criteria (recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death, preeclampsia and placental insufficiency) and the quality of the evidence that treatment(s) provide benefit in terms of avoiding recurrent adverse obstetric outcomes. The association of infertility with aPL and the effectiveness of the treatment of patients with infertility and positive aPL was also investigated. This report presents current knowledge and limitations of published studies regarding pregnancy morbidity, infertility and aPL, identifying areas that need better investigative efforts and proposing how critical flaws could be avoided in future studies, as suggested by participants of the Task Force. Except for fetal death, there are limitations in the quality of the data supporting the association of aPL with obstetric complications included in the current APS classification criteria. Recommended treatments for all pregnancy morbidity associated to APS also lack well-designed studies to confirm its efficacy. APL does not seem to be associated with infertility and treatment does not improve the outcomes in infertile patients with aPL. In another section of the Task Force, Dr. Jane Salmon reviewed complement-mediated inflammation in reproductive failure in APS, considering new therapeutic targets to obstetric APS (Ob APS).

Treatment of the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by a combination of laboratory findings (i.e., the presence of at least one antiphospholipid antibody) and clinical manifestations (arterial and/or venous thrombosis, obstetrical complications). Long-term oral anticoagulant is recommended to prevent recurrence of both arterial and venous thrombosis, whereas (low molecular weight) heparin plus aspirin is the treatment of choice to prevent further obstetrical complications. In the rare case of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, heparin plus high-dose corticosteroids plus plasma exchange is associated with the highest recovery rate. Some new, non-antithrombotic-based treatments of antiphospholipid syndrome with rituximab, autologous stem cell transplantation, or hydroxychloroquine are also reviewed.

Efficacy of aspirin for the primary prevention of thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: an international and collaborative meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether aspirin has a significant protective effect on risk of first thrombosis among patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL+). Observational and interventional studies identified from the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were selected if they assessed the incidence of first thrombosis in aPL+ patients treated with aspirin versus those without. Pooled effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model. Of 1211 citation retrieved, 11 primary studies (10 observational and 1 interventional) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 1208 patients and 139 thrombotic events. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the risk of first thrombosis in patients treated with aspirin (n=601) was 0.50 (95%CI: 0.27 to 0.93) compared to those without aspirin (n=607), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I(2)=46%, p=0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a protective effect of aspirin against arterial (OR: 0.48 [95%CI: 0.28-0.82]) but not venous (OR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.32-1.06]) thrombosis, as well as in retrospective (OR: 0.23 [0.13-0.42]) but not prospective studies (OR: 0.91 [0.52-1.59]). Subgroup analysis according to underlying disease revealed a significant protective effect of aspirin for asymptomatic aPL+ individuals (OR: 0.50 [0.25-0.99]), for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (OR: 0.55 [0.31-0.98]) and obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (OR: 0.25 [0.10-0.62]). This meta-analysis shows that the risk of first thrombotic event is significantly decreased by low dose aspirin among asymptomatic aPL individuals, patients with SLE or obstetrical APS. Importantly, no significant risk reduction was observed when considering only prospective studies or those with the best methodological quality.

Obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome: from the pathogenesis to the clinical and therapeutic implications

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombophilia with clinical manifestations associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patient plasma. Obstetrical APS is a complex entity that may affect both mother and fetus throughout the entire pregnancy with high morbidity. Clinical complications are as various as recurrent fetal losses, stillbirth, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and preeclampsia. Pathogenesis of aPL targets trophoblastic cells directly, mainly via proapoptotic, proinflammatory mechanisms, and uncontrolled immunomodulatory responses. Actual first-line treatment is limited to low-dose aspirin (LDA) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and still failed in 30% of the cases. APS pregnancies should be a major field in obstetrical research, and new therapeutics are still in progress.

The haplotype M2 of the ANXA5 gene is not associated with antitrophoblast antibodies

PURPOSE

The M2 haplotype in ANXA5 as well as antitrophoblast antibodies predispose to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Since M2/ANXA5 can be a factor for development of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), this study aimed to trace a possible association of M2 with antitrophoblast antibodies.

METHODS

One hundred patients with two or more consecutive, idiopathic RPLs were divided in two subgroups, JEG-3(+) (n = 42) and JEG-3(-) (n = 58), according to the anti-JEG-3 reactivity measured in subjects' sera. Both subgroups were genotyped for ANXA5 promoter haplotypes and genetic frequencies were compared to available fertile and control populations, as well as within the subgroups.

RESULTS

M2/ANXA5 was generally enriched in the JEG-3 screened cohort of RPL patients in comparison to fertile and population controls. Despite the relatively higher abundance of the haplotype in the JEG-3(-) sample as compared to JEG-3(+) patients and in the JEG-3(-) primary RPL subset in particular, compared to the rest of patients, there was no statistically significant difference between both, JEG-3(-) and JEG-3(+) subgroups.

CONCLUSION

It appears that the haplotype M2/ANXA5 is not associated with the presence of anti-trophoblast antibodies. Our finding indicates that anti-trophoblast antibodies are a class of molecules that differ from aPL and from anti-b2-GPI antibodies, apparently not directed to same or similar epitopes that aPL and anti-b2-GPI would recognize.

Treatment of refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: the state of the art and new trends in the therapeutic management

Objective

To date, there are no reliable data regarding the actual treatment received by women with refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS). The aim of this study was to assess current clinical evidence and new trends in the treatment of refractory OAPS.

Methods

A non-systematic but comprehensive literature search using relevant keywords was made to identify relevant articles published in English from different computerized databases: PubMed (Medline), Google Scholar electronic database search and The Cochrane Library, from January 2000 to March 2012. Studies on the treatment of poor obstetric outcomes in women with OAPS were included. Prospective randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis were retrieved.

Results

A total of 130 articles were finally selected for this review, including 17 randomized clinical trials and four meta-analyses. The majority of articles were non-randomized original papers and basic and clinical reviews.

Conclusion

Up to 20% of women with OAPS do not receive the currently recommended therapeutic regimen. Unfortunately, well-designed studies regarding the usefulness of new drugs in refractory OAPS are scarce. Hydroxychloroquine and low-dose prednisolone appear to be useful when added to standard therapy. Current data do not support the use of intravenous immunoglobulins in this field. The role played by double anti-aggregant therapy, fondaparinux, vitamin D, pentoxifylline and TNF-targeted therapies should be tested in well-designed studies.

Autoimmunity and Turner's syndrome

Turner Syndrome (TS) is a common genetic disorder, affecting female individuals, resulting from the partial or complete absence of one sex chromosome, and occurring in approximately 50 per 100,000 liveborn girls. TS is associated with reduced adult height and with gonadal dysgenesis, leading to insufficient circulating levels of female sex steroids and to infertility. Morbidity and mortality are increased in TS but average intellectual performance is within the normal range. TS is closely associated to the presence of autoantibodies and autoimmune diseases (AID), especially autoimmune thyroiditis and inflammatory bowel disease. Despite the fact that the strong association between TS and AID is well known and has been widely studied, the underlying immunopathogenic mechanism remains partially unexplained. Recent studies have displayed how TS patients do not show an excess of immunogenic risk markers. This is evocative for a higher responsibility of X-chromosome abnormalities in the development of AID, and particularly of X-genes involved in immune response. For instance, the long arm of the X chromosome hosts a MHC-locus, so the loss of that region may lead to a deficiency in immune regulation. Currently no firm guidelines for diagnosis exist. In conclusion, TS is a condition associated with a number of autoimmune manifestations. Individuals with TS need life-long medical attention. As a consequence of these findings, early diagnosis and regular screening for potential associated autoimmune conditions are essential in the medical follow-up of TS patients.