Development and validation of a risk calculator to differentiate flares from infections in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with fever

Risk stratification for infection during immunosuppressive therapy in patients with lupus nephritis: A nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

The current prediction models for the risk of infection during immunosuppressive treatment for lupus nephritis (LN) lack a prediction time window and have poor pertinence. This study aimed to develop a risk stratification to predict infection during immunosuppressive therapy in patients with LN.

METHODS

This retrospective nested case-control study collected patients with LN treated with immunosuppressive therapy between 2014 and 2022 in the Nephrology ward in Huashan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University and Huashan Hospital Baoshan Branch. Cases were defined as patients who experienced infection during the follow-up period; patients were eligible as controls if they did not have infection during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

There were 53 patients with infection by CTCAE V5.0 grade ≥2. According to the 1:3 nested matching, the 53 patients with infection were matched with 159 controls. In the multivariable logistic regression model, the change rate of fibrinogen (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99, p = 0.008), leukopenia (OR = 8.68, 95% CI: 1.16-301.72, p = 0.039), and reduced albumin (OR = 6.25, 95% CI: 1.38-28.24, p = 0.017) were independently associated with infection. The AUC of the ROC curve in the validation set of the multivariable logistic regression model in the internal random sampling was 0.864. The scores range from -2 to 10. The infection risk stratification ranges from 2.8% at score -2 to 97.5% at score 10.

CONCLUSION

A risk stratification was built to predict the risk of infection in patients with LN undergoing immunosuppressive therapy.

Characteristics and clustering analysis of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in children with systemic lupus erythematosus complicated with clinical infection

OBJECTIVES

Clinical infection is a common complication in children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, few studies have investigated immune alterations in children with SLE complicated with clinical infection. We assessed lymphocyte subsets in children with SLE to explore the possibility of clinical infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the proportion of peripheral lymphocyte subsets in 140 children with SLE. Children with SLE were classified into different clusters according to the proportion of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets: (CD3 + /CD4 + T cell, CD3 + /CD8 + T cell, CD3 + /CD4 + /CD8 + T cell, CD3 + /CD4-/CD8- T cell, CD19 + B cell, and CD3-/CD16 + /CD56 + NK cell). Differences in the proportion of lymphoid subsets, infection rates, and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) scores were compared between clusters. In addition, we grouped the subjects according to the presence or absence of infection. Proportions of lymphoid subsets, demographic variables, clinical presentation, and other laboratory variables were compared between the infected and uninfected groups. Finally, the diagnostic ability of lymphocyte subset ratios to distinguish secondary infection in children with SLE was predicted using an ROC curve.

RESULTS

Cluster C2 had a higher proportion of B cells than Cluster C1, while Cluster C1 had a lower proportion of NK cells, CD3 + T cells, CD3 + /CD4 + T cells, CD3 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD3 + /CD4-/CD8- T cells. Infection rates and SLEDAI scores were higher in Cluster C2 than in Cluster C1. The infected children had a higher proportion of B cells and a lower proportion of CD3 + T cells, CD3 + /CD4 + T cells, CD3 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD3 + /CD4-/CD8- T cells. There were no significant differences in lymphoid subsets between children in Cluster C2 and the infected groups. The area under the ROC curve of B lymphocytes in predicting SLE children with infection was 0.842. The area under the ROC curve was 0.855 when a combination of B cells, NK cells, CD4 + T cells, and CD8 + T cells was used to predict the outcome of coinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of B cells and a low percentage of CD3 + T cells, CD3 + /CD4 + T cells, CD3 + /CD8 + T cells, CD3 + /CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD3 + /CD4-/CD8- T cells may be associated with infection in children with SLE. B cells was used to predict the outcome of coinfection in children with SLE. Key Points • A high percentage of B cells and a low percentage of CD3 + T cells, CD3 + /CD4 + T cells, CD3 + /CD8 + T cells, CD3 + /CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD3 + /CD4-/CD8- T cells may be associated with infection in children with SLE • B cells was used to predict the outcome of coinfection in children with SLE.

A Framework to Overcome Challenges in the Management of Infections in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Infections remain one of the leading causes of death in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), despite awareness of factors contributing to increased susceptibility to infectious diseases in SLE. Clinicians report challenges and barriers when encountering infection in SLE as certain infections may mimic a lupus flare. There are no evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of fever in SLE, with suboptimal implementations of evidence-based benefits related to infectious disease control and/or prevention strategies in SLE. Vigilance in identifying an opportunistic infection must be stressed when confronted by a diagnostic challenge during a presentation with a febrile illness in SLE. A balanced approach must focus on management of infections in SLE, and reduction in the glucocorticoids dose, given the need to control lupus disease activity to avoid lupus related organ damage and mortality. Clinical judgement and application of biomarkers of lupus flares could reduce false positives and overdiagnosis and improve differentiation of infections from lupus flares. Further precision-based risk and screening measures must identify individuals who would benefit most from low dose immunosuppressive therapy, targeted immune therapy, and vaccination programs.

Procalcitonin for the early discrimination of fever etiology in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases attending the emergency department

In febrile patients with known systemic autoimmune disease, early discrimination between infection and disease flare often represents a clinical challenge. This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of procalcitonin (PCT) and other common inflammatory biomarkers in discriminating disease flare from bacterial infections in the Emergency Department (ED). In a cross-sectional observational retrospective study, we identified consecutive febrile patients with a known diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease, admitted to the ED, and subsequently hospitalized. Flare vs infective disease was defined on clinical records at hospital discharge. Dosage of common inflammatory markers was performed at ED admission. Out of 177 patients, those with infection were most commonly elderly, frail, and with reduced peripheral oxygen saturation at admission. When compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood count (WBC), PCT showed the best performance in discriminating infections vs flare. However, only at a very high threshold value of 2 ng/ml, the PCT had a satisfactory negative predictive value of 88.9%, although with a very low specificity of 13.6% and a positive predictive value of 35.8%. Our data suggest that in the ED setting, the early PCT determination has low accuracy in the differentiation of disease flare from infection in patients with known rheumatologic disease. However, the PCT could be useful in elderly and comorbid subjects, in supporting clinical assessment and in recognizing those febrile patients needing prompt antibiotic treatment.

Biological drugs for systemic lupus erythematosus or active lupus nephritis and rates of infectious complications. Evidence from large clinical trials

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease that frequently affects the kidneys, known as lupus nephritis (LN). Such patients are treated with antimalarials, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs, and more recently, target-specific biological drugs. Although efficacy of these therapies improved SLE-related outcomes, SLE remains associated with higher rates of infections. Here, we performed a comprehensive systemic review of infectious complications in clinical trials covering drug interventions for SLE or specifically for active LN. Our search in 15 online registries yielded a total of 1477 studies of which 14 matched our prespecified criteria. These covered the biological drugs anifrolumab, belimumab, and rituximab that were tested in patients with non-renal SLE and active LN.The available safety data from the SLE trials indicated that infectious complications such as herpes zoster, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, bronchitis, and urinary tract infection in patients receiving placebo were quite prevalent especially in the EXPLORER (rituximab) trial. Infections occurred mostly during the first year of LN therapy. Serious adverse events and infectious complications occurred more frequently in placebo-treated patients with active LN, especially in the BLISS-LN (belimumab) and LUNAR (rituximab) trials. Anifrolumab and rituximab increased the number of clinically relevant episodes of herpes zoster compared to belimumab in patients with active LN. Anifrolumab displayed a similar trend for influenza infections, which is consistent with the specific mechanisms-of-action of anifrolumab; highlighting drug-specific effects on infectious complications. In addition, standard-of-care therapy, e.g., MMF and immunosuppressants, as well as a longer SLE duration may also affect the incidence of serious adverse events and certain infectious complications in SLE patients with active LN.Infectious complications are common in SLE but even more common in patients with active LN, especially herpes zoster is strongly associated with active LN and anifrolumab therapy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.18 to 6.66, p = 0.018). Immunotherapy seems to impose unspecific and specific risks for infections. The latter may imply specific precautions such as preemptive vaccination and individual risk-benefit assessments.

The role of MBL, PCT, CRP, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet lymphocyte ratio in differentiating infections from flares in lupus

BACKGROUND

The distinction between infection and flare in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has always been a dilemma for clinicians as the clinical and biochemical profiles overlap. The present study evaluated affordable biomarkers to distinguish infection from flare in an SLE cohort in a tertiary care center in eastern India.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-two SLE patients were clinically evaluated and enrolled in the present study. Hematological, immunological, and biochemical profiles and various biomarkers such as C reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) were quantified.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two patients (152) were enrolled in the present study and all had SLEDAI scores of more than 4. From which 70 had infection, and the common infections were urinary tract infection (34.28%) followed by pneumonia (27.14%). Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly elevated in SLE with infections (NLR: 5.84 ± 2.47; CRP: 30.56 ± 41.63) than those with flare (NLR: 3.87 ± 2.62; CRP: 8.73 ± 9.53). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed CRP, PLR, and NLR as important markers for predicting infections (CRP: AUC = 0.682, p = 0.0001; PLR: AUC = 0.668, p = 0.0008; NLR: AUC = 0.742, p < 0.0001). The MBL and PCT levels were comparable among SLE flare and those with infections.

CONCLUSIONS

NLR and CRP levels are affordable biomarkers to distinguish infections from flares in SLE. MBL and PCT could not differentiate flare from an infection. Key Points • Biomarkers for the differentiation of infection and flare in SLE are limited. • NLR, PLR, and CRP are promising biomarkers to enable differentiation. • PCT and MBL are not ideal biomarkers to differentiate infection from flare.

Differentiating flare and infection in febrile lupus patients: Derivation and validation of a calculator for resource constrained settings

Background: Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection and it is often difficult to differentiate between infection and disease activity in a febrile patient with SLE. Methods: Patients with SLE (SLICC criteria) presenting with fever between December 2018 and August 2021 were included. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), NEUT-x, -y, -z indices, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein(CRP), C3, C4, anti-dsDNA antibodies, and procalcitonin(PCT) were tested in addition to investigations as per the treating physician's discretion. Based on the clinical assessment and laboratory data, the febrile episode was classified into infection, disease flare, or both. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad prism v8.4.2. A novel composite score was devised and validated with a calculator incorporated is a spreadsheet. The performance of a previously proposed model of duration of fever, CRP, and dsDNA (Beca et al) was evaluated and other models using PCT and NEUT-Z were explored. Results: Among 168 febrile episodes in 166 patients with SLE (25 (19-32) years), 46 were due to infection, 77 due to flare, 43 due to both, and two due to other causes. High SLEDAI 2K (0.001), anti-dsDNA (p = 0.004), and low complements(C3, p = 0.001 and C4, p = 0.001) were characteristic of disease flare, whereas high total leukocyte count (TLC) (p = 0.008), NLR (p = 0.008), NEUT-x (p = 0.001), -y (p = 0.03), -z (p = 0.002), CRP (p = 0.001), and PCT (p = 0.03) were observed with infection. A model using age, TLC, and CRP was devised using 80% of the cohort with an AUC of 0.88 (0.78-0.97) which was validated in the remaining 20% to have an AUC of 0.83(0.60-1.0). The model devised by Beca et al yielded an AUC of 0.74. Use of PCT did not improve the discrimination between flare and infection. A Model of C4 and NEUT-z analyzed in a subset performed well and needs further exploration. Conclusion: A composite score of low cost and routinely available parameters like age, TLC, and CRP gives a good discrimination between infection and flare in a febrile patient with SLE.

The utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in detecting infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review with metanalysis to investigate the utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) in diagnosing infections in hospitalized patients with SLE.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) with a search strategy developed by a medical librarian. We included retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control, and prospective studies in our analysis. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS-2) to assess for bias and applicability. We obtained mean differences, sensitivities, and specificities in our analysis.

RESULTS

We included 26 studies in our analysis. Most studies had an unclear or high risk of bias and our results were widely heterogenous. For the diagnosis of infections, the CRP had a pooled sensitivity of 0.75 (95%CI 0.57-0.94) and specificity of 0.72 (0.59-0.85), PCT had a pooled sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI 0.0.59-0.77) and specificity of 0.75 (0.59-0.90), and for ESR pooled estimates were not calculated but sensitivity ranged from 50 to 69.8 and specificity from 38.5 to 55.6. Modifying cut-offs improved sensitivities and specificities. The ESR, CRP, and PCT mean differences were all greater in infection groups versus non-infection (10.1, 95% CI 3.2-17.0; 46.8, 95% CI 36.5-57.0; 0.53, 95% CI 0.26-0.80; respectively).

DISCUSSION

Poor sensitivities and specificities were observed for the evaluated biomarkers with substantial heterogeneity in the cut-offs used to determine infection. Although mean biomarker values were increased in the infection group compared with the non-infection, our findings do not support the widespread use of ESR, CRP, or PCT in diagnosing infection in hospitalized patients with SLE due to increased heterogeneity and risk of bias. Further investigation is needed.

Clinical spectrum and therapeutic management of systemic lupus erythematosus-associated macrophage activation syndrome: a study of 20 Moroccan adult patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the clinical and laboratory manifestations, triggers factors, treatment, and outcome of MAS complicating SLE.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of adult patients with SLE for a period of 8 years (2009-2016) and identified patients who had developed MAS. We conducted statistical analysis to identify factors associated with MAS.

RESULTS

Among 208 consecutive lupus patients, 20 patients (19 women) were identified having MAS. The mean age of patients was 35.4 ± 10 years. MAS revealed lupus in 7 patients. In the others, the delay between diagnosis of SLE and MAS was 33,3 months. All cases required hospital admission, and 2 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. An anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) was found in all patients. A thrombopenia was observed in 19 (95%) cases. Hypertriglyceridemia and hyperferritinemia were present in all patients. All patients had anti-nuclear antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. Bone marrow aspiration showed hemophagocytosis in 15 (94%) cases. The mean SLEDAI was 20.95 corresponding to an SLE of a very high activity. The mean H-Score was 233.85. MAS was associated with a lupus flare in 13 patients. Documented bacterial infections, viral infections, and a breast cancer were respectively diagnosed in 4, 3, and 1 cases respectively. The corticosteroids were administered in all patients. Intravenous cyclophosphamide was used together with corticosteroids in 6 patients, mycophenolate mofetil in 2 cases and azathioprine in 2 cases. Intravenous immunoglobulin was given in 4 cases, etoposide in one case and rituximab was used as the third line treatment in one patient. All infectious episodes were also treated by broad spectrum antibiotics. All patients had a good outcome without any mortality at the management, with a mean follow-up of 24 months. The clinical parameters significantly associated with MAS were fever (p = 0,001), splenomegaly (p < 0.0001), lymphadenopathy (p < 0.0001), oral and/or nasopharyngeal ulceration (p = 0.04), arthritis (p = 0.017), and pulmonary signs (p = 0.003). Laboratory parameters associated with MAS were anemia (p < 0.0001), thrombopenia (p < 0.0001), hyperferritinemia (p < 0.0001), hypertriglyceridemia (p < 0.0001), SLEDAI (p < 0.0001), and H-Score (p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal cutoff values of ferritin (> 695 ng/mL) and SLEDAI (> 13.5) to predict the occurrence of MAS in SLE.

CONCLUSION

MAS was observed in 9.62% Moroccan adult patients with SLE. SLE flare and infection were the common triggers of MAS in our study. Our study indicates that the occurrence of unexplained fever, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, profound cytopenia, hyperferritinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, high SLEDAI, and H-Score should raises the possibility of the diagnosis of MAS in SLE patients. Early diagnosis and urgent therapeutic management improves the overall prognosis. Key Points • Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is an underdiagnosed complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The prevalence of this complication in this study is nearly 10%. • The diagnosis of MAS represents a major challenge for clinicians, as it could mimic a SLE flare up or be confused with infections. Validated diagnostic criteria for MAS in adults secondary to SLE are urgently needed. • In this study, the H-score calculate the individual risk of adult patients having reactive MAS. The cut-off value for the H-score was 190.5 (sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 97.6%). • The prognosis of MAS with SLE is good in our study. However, in the literature MAS may be a fatal condition in SLE patients. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Procalcitonin Differs in Children With Infection and Children With Disease Flares in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) often present with signs and symptoms suggestive of serious bacterial infection (SBI). Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker that is elevated in SBI. We conducted a comparative cohort study to test the hypothesis that PCT levels will differ between active JIA, quiescent JIA, and bacteremic patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

From October 2016 to May2018, consecutive children 6 months to 18 years of age with (a) active untreated JIA, (b) quiescent JIA, and (c) healthy elective presurgical candidates were recruited from clinics at a musculoskeletal specialty hospital. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis was defined according to the International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria. Clinical data and serum samples meeting the same criteria were included from a prior study. Consecutive bacteremic patients were identified over the same period. Procalcitonin and other common measures of inflammation were measured. Descriptive statistics and univariate logistic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-two study subjects were recruited. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), and PCT levels were all elevated in bacteremic patients in comparison to the other groups. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP both had wide ranges that overlapped between groups; however, the PCT concentration was 0.15 μg/mL or greater in 1 of 59 patients with JIA, whereas it was 0.15 μg/mL or less in only 1 bacteremic patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, and PCT levels are all biomarkers that can be used to distinguish SBI versus active JIA at presentation. However, PCT is the most accurate, with the least overlap between patients with infection and noninfectious inflammatory arthritis. This finding can help clinicians direct therapy.

Predicting lupus flares: epidemiological and disease related risk factors

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder, characterized by a relapsing and remitting pattern of disease activity in majority of the patients. Areas covered: This narrative review provides an overview of flare definition, major flare mimics, and the burden of flares in SLE. The authors highlight epidemiology and disease-related risk factor for flares and discuss strategies to reduce flares in SLE. Articles were selected from Pubmed searches conducted between June 2020 and September 2020. Expert opinion: Prolonged clinical remission is observed in approximately 20% of SLE patients flare over the course of the disease. Studies have shown that low disease activity is a good target in SLE, with similar risk of flares, mortality, and quality of life when compared to patients in remission. Clinical and immunological features have shown inconsistent results to identify patients at risk of flares in different cohorts. Cytokine, in serum and urine, has shown promising results to predict flares. However to be useful in clinical practice, they have to be simple, easy, and cost-effective. Future efforts in this direction will allow a more personalized treatment plan for SLE patients, reducing the burden associated with flares.

Differential parameters between activity flare and acute infection in pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are vulnerable to infections. We aim to explore the approach to differentiate active infection from disease activity in pediatric SLE patients. Fifty pediatric SLE patients presenting with 185 clinical visits were collected. The associations between both clinical and laboratory parameters and the outcome groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). These 185 visits were divided into 4 outcome groups: infected-active (n = 102), infected-inactive (n = 11), noninfected-active (n = 59), and noninfected-inactive (n = 13) visits. Multivariate GEE (generalized estimating equation) analysis showed that SDI, SLEDAI-2K, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), hemoglobin, platelet, RDW-to-platelet ratio (RPR), and C3 are predictive of flare (combined calculated AUC of 0.8964 and with sensitivity of 82.2% and specificity of 90.9%). Multivariate GEE analysis showed that SDI, fever temperature, CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), lymphocyte percentage, NLR, hemoglobin, and renal score in SLEDAI-2k are predictive of infection (combined calculated AUC of 0.7886 and with sensitivity of 63.5% and specificity of 89.2%). We can simultaneously predict 4 different outcome with accuracy of 70.13% for infected-active group, 10% for infected-inactive group, 59.57% for noninfected-active group, and 84.62% for noninfected-inactive group, respectively. Combination of parameters from four different domains simultaneously, including inflammation (CRP, ESR, PCT), hematology (Lymphocyte percentage, NLR, PLR), complement (C3, C4), and clinical status (SLEDAI, SDI) is objective and effective to differentiate flares from infections in pediatric SLE patients.

Concomitant onset of systemic lupus erythematosus and disseminated histoplasmosis: a case-based review

INTRODUCTION

Concomitant infections during the debut or relapse of systemic lupus erythematosus are a common scenario, due to multiple mechanisms including the use of immunosuppressive drugs and autoimmunity per se. Invasive fungal infections are rare in systemic lupus erythematosus and are associated with profound immunosuppressed states. Disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with lupus has rarely been reported and the concomitant presentation of both entities is exceptional.

METHODS

We describe a case and performed a literature review in order to identify all case reports. A literature search was carried out using in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar (the first 200 relevant references) bibliographic databases. All available inclusion studies from January 1968 through July 2020. All data were tabulated, and outcomes were cumulatively analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one additional cases were identified. Disseminated histoplasmosis was the most common clinical presentation and most cases have been reported in patients with a prior diagnosis of lupus in the setting of moderate to high steroid dose use, usually in combination with some other immunosuppressant. Description at systemic lupus disease onset was only reported in 3 cases with a high associated mortality. In our patient, severe disease activity, significant immunosuppression, malnutrition and multi-organ compromise conditioned the patient's fatal outcome.

CONCLUSION

Histoplasmosis can closely mimic activity of lupus. Thus, early clinical recognition is important since a delay in diagnosis and treatment can lead to fatal outcomes.

Clinical features of central nervous system infections and experience in differential diagnosis from neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus in a cohort of 8491 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Background

In clinical practice, discrimination between central nervous system (CNS) infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) could be urgent and critical yet extremely challenging. Given this, this study aimed to investigate the clinical features and outcomes of infections in the CNS in patients with SLE and to establish a simplified scoring system for guiding the discrimination of CNS infections from NPSLE.

Methods

A total of 95 patients who were identified as having CNS infections among 8491 SLE patients between January 1992 and January 2018 were included in this retrospective study. NPSLE patients admitted at the same period were randomly selected for comparison. Key factors either clinically valuable or statistically significant for discriminating CNS infections from NPSLE were integrated to build a simplified scoring system. Another group of 22 SLE patients complicated with suspected newly onset of CNS infections or NPSLE admitted after January 2018 was enrolled to verify the utility of the scoring system.

Results

Sixty-three positive pathogens were identified in 59 patients of the total 95 CNS infection cases. Compared with the NPSLE group, the CNS infections group had a longer disease duration (21.0 [3.0–50.0] vs. 1.0 [0–22.0] months, P < 0.05), exhibited more fever (96.8% vs. 23.2%, P < 0.001) and polymorphonuclear leukocyte leukocytosis in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (45.6% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.05), and had significantly decreased CSF glucose (2.0 ± 1.3 vs. 3.3 ± 0.9 mmol/L, P < 0.01), whereas hypocomplementemia seemed to be a strong hint of NPSLE (44.6% vs. 77.4%, P < 0.001). A simplified scoring system integrated with 8 key factors was established for guiding clinical differential diagnosis. By setting the cutoff value at 4 and verifying in a group of SLE patients complicated with newly occurred suspected CNS infection or NPSLE, a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 93.3% with the area under the curve (AUC) being 0.93 (95%CI 0.80–1.00) were obtained.

Conclusions

CNS infections are a fatal complication of SLE and can be difficult to discriminate from NPSLE. A simplified scoring system may help to make preliminary discrimination of CNS infections from NPSLE.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1971-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Can we validate a clinical score to predict the risk of severe infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? A longitudinal retrospective study in a British Cohort

OBJECTIVE

Severe infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our primary objective was to use data from a large Spanish cohort to develop a risk score for severe infection in SLE, the SLE Severe Infection Score (SLESIS) and to validate SLESIS in a separate cohort of 699 British patients.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective longitudinal study in a specialist tertiary care clinic in London, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients fulfilling international classification criteria for SLE (n=209). This included 98 patients who had suffered severe infections (defined as infection leading to hospitalisation and/or death) and 111 randomly selected patients who had never suffered severe infections.

OUTCOMES

We retrospectively calculated SLESIS at diagnosis for all 209 patients. For the infection cases we also calculated SLESIS just prior to infection and compared it to SLESIS in 98 controls matched for disease duration. We carried out receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to quantify predictive value of SLESIS for severe infection.

RESULTS

Median SLESIS (IQR) at diagnosis was higher in the infection group than in the control group (4.27 (3.18) vs 2.55 (3.79), p=0.0008). Median SLESIS prior to infection was higher than at diagnosis (6.64 vs 4.27, p<0.001). In ROC analysis, predictive value of SLESIS just before the infection (area under the curve (AUC)=0.79) was higher than that of SLESIS at diagnosis (AUC=0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

We validated the association of SLESIS with severe infection in an independent cohort. Calculation of SLESIS at each clinic visit may help in management of infection risk in patients with SLE. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio plus C-reactive protein for infection in systemic lupus erythematosus

Distinction between infection and flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a challenge in clinical practice.

Objective

To analyze the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) plus C-reactive protein (CRP) to differentiate between infection and active disease in patients with SLE.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of a cohort of patients with SLE was carried out. Blood samples from four groups (patients without infection or active disease, patients with infection, patients with active disease, and patients with both infection and active disease) before therapeutic interventions were analyzed. We excluded patients with current malignancy, pregnancy, ischemic heart disease or use of antimicrobials during previous 7 days. Hematological cell count, CRP and cultures were obtained. We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

Results

Forty patients were included. NLR cut-off ≥6.3 had sensitivity 70%, specificity 85%, PPV 83% and NPV 74% to detect patients with non-viral infections. A CRP cut-off ≥7.5 mg/L had sensitivity 90%, specificity 75%, PPV 78% and NPV 88% to detect infections regardless of SLE activity. Combination of CRP plus NLR improves the specificity to 90% and PPV to 88%. Excluding the group with both infection and active disease, CRP plus NLR expands specificity to 95% and NPV to 90%.

Conclusion

In our experience, levels of CRP, particularly CRP plus NLR, were useful in differentiating patients with SLE from those with suspected non-viral infection regardless of the activity of the disease.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Symptoms and Signs at Initial Presentations

BACKGROUND

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune multisystem inflammatory condition that causes microvascular inflammation with the production of various auto-antibodies that play a major role in its pathogenesis. SLE can affect both sexes, all ages, and all ethnic groups with widespread geographical and socioeconomic backgrounds. Asia encompasses people of many sociocultural backgrounds with diverse ethnic.

OBJECTIVE

Due to a lack of national epidemiological research, the incidence and prevalence of SLE in Middle Eastern and Arab countries, have only recently been studied. This article aims to explore the status of SLE in Oman and to record symptoms and signs of SLE at first presentation.

METHODOLOGY

Medical records of all patients diagnosed with SLE at the Royal Hospital from 2006 to 2014 were reviewed for information recorded at first visit. SLE diagnosis was based on the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria; ACR97 (which includes the clinical manifestation and laboratory evidence). Patients with SLE disease manifestations extrapolated and analyzed. There were 966 patients diagnosed with SLE during the period from 2006 to 2014. Mean (SD) age at presentations was 35.5 (11.5) years. Majority of patients were female which constitutes 88.7% of the total SLE patients with mean age 27.6 (1.4) years.

RESULTS

Constitutional symptoms were found in 48.68 of SLE population including fatigue in 35.22%, and weight changes in 13.43%. The cutaneous manifestations that were present included malar rash 37.69%, photosensitivity 35.10%, discoid lupus 17.63%, and hair loss 39.29%. Musculoskeletal manifestations were commonly seen among the studied population including arthralgia in 68.75%, myalgia in 55.65%, arthritis in 48.31%, whilst myositis, tendon abnormalities and avascular necrosis were found in only 2.47%, 0.31% and 1.98%. respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study of the symptoms and signs at initial clinical presentation of SLE patients compared to other studies done regionally where most have focused on clinical manifestations during the progression course of SLE. SLE manifestations may be related to the differences in the genetic make-up of the patients who come from various ethnic groups despite similar geography or sociocultural background, or to referral bias, as some studies were performed in the nephrology units and others in the rheumatology units. There is a pressing need to establish a nationwide and regional collaboration to establish LUPUS and to put forward a strategic planning with each MOH to provide an easy and efficient report of SLE cases and provide various effective management for such a debilitating syndrome.

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of infection in systemic lupus erythematosus: the controversy continues

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to investigate the utility of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as markers of infection in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine SLE patients with symptoms and signs of infection proved by culture and/or a favorable response to antibiotics and 69 SLE patients without infection were included. Serum PCT and plasma high-sensitivity CRP were assessed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

SLE patients with infection had a significantly higher level of CRP than those without infection ((median (IQR) 104.5 (25.5-100.9) and 10.3 (5.4-23.1) mg/l, respectively), p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Serum PCT could not differentiate SLE patients with or without bacterial infection in this study, while the utility of CRP as a marker of infection has been confirmed.

Clinical spectrum and therapeutic management of systemic lupus erythematosus-associated macrophage activation syndrome: A study of 103 episodes in 89 adult patients

OBJECTIVES

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome that can occur during systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Data on MAS in adult SLE patients are very limited. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, treatments, and outcomes of a large series of SLE-associated MAS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study that included 103 episodes of MAS in 89 adult patients with SLE.

RESULTS

103 episodes in 89 adult patients were analyzed. Median age at first MAS episode was 32 (18-80) years. MAS was inaugural in 41 patients (46%).Thirteen patients relapsed. Patients had the following features: fever (100% episodes), increased serum levels of AST (94.7%), LDH (92.3%), CRP (84.5%), ferritin (96%), procalcitonin (41/49 cases). Complications included myocarditis (n=22), acute lung injury (n=15) and seizures (n=11). In 33 episodes, patients required hospitalization in an ICU and 5 died. Thrombocytopenia and high CRP levels were associated independently with an increased risk for ICU admission. High dose steroids alone as first line therapy induced remission in 37/57 cases (65%). Additional medications as first or second line therapies included IV immunoglobulins (n=22), cyclophosphamide (n=23), etoposide (n=11), rituximab (n=3). Etoposide and cyclophosphamide-based regimens had the best efficacy.

CONCLUSION

MAS is a severe complication and is often inaugural. High fever and high levels of AST, LDH, CRP, ferritin and PCT should be considered as red flags for early diagnosis. High dose steroids lead to remission in two third of cases. Cyclophosphamide or etoposide should be considered for uncontrolled/severe forms.

Infection in systemic lupus erythematosus, similarities, and differences with lupus flare

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with diverse manifestations, and its pathogenesis is unclear and complicated. Infection and SLE are similar in that they both cause inf lammatory reactions in the immune system; however, one functions to protect the body, whereas the other is activated to damage the body. Infection is known as one of the common trigger factors for SLE; there are a number of reports on infectious agents that provoke autoimmune response. Several viruses, bacteria, and protozoa were revealed to cause immune dysfunction by molecular mimicry, epitope spreading, and bystander activation. In contrast, certain pathogens were revealed to protect from immune dysregulation. Infection can be threatening to patients with SLE who have a compromised immune system, and it is regarded as one of the common causes of mortality in SLE. A clinical distinction between infection and lupus f lare up is required when patients with SLE present fevers. With a close-up assessment of symptoms and physical examination, C-reactive protein and disease activity markers play a major role in differentiating the different disease conditions. Vaccination is necessary because protection against infection is important in patients with SLE.

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus during pregnancy: challenges and solutions

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem autoimmune disease predominantly affecting women, particularly those of childbearing age. SLE provides challenges in the prepregnancy, antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum periods for these women, and for the medical, obstetric, and midwifery teams who provide their care. As with many medical conditions in pregnancy, the best maternal and fetal-neonatal outcomes are obtained with a planned pregnancy and a cohesive multidisciplinary approach. Effective prepregnancy risk assessment and counseling includes exploration of factors for poor pregnancy outcome, discussion of risks, and appropriate planning for pregnancy, with consideration of discussion of relative contraindications to pregnancy. In pregnancy, early referral for hospital-coordinated care, involvement of obstetricians and rheumatologists (and other specialists as required), an individual management plan, regular reviews, and early recognition of flares and complications are all important. Women are at risk of lupus flares, worsening renal impairment, onset of or worsening hypertension, preeclampsia, and/or venous thromboembolism, and miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery, and/or neonatal lupus syndrome (congenital heart block or neonatal lupus erythematosus). A cesarean section may be required in certain obstetric contexts (such as urgent preterm delivery for maternal and/or fetal well-being), but vaginal birth should be the aim for the majority of women. Postnatally, an ongoing individual management plan remains important, with neonatal management where necessary and rheumatology followup. This article explores the challenges at each stage of pregnancy, discusses the effect of SLE on pregnancy and vice versa, and reviews antirheumatic medications with the latest guidance about their use and safety in pregnancy. Such information is required to effectively and safely manage each stage of pregnancy in women with SLE.

Infection and Lupus: Which Causes Which?

Infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE). Dysfunction of the innate and adaptive immune systems increases the risk of infection in patients with SLE. Infectious agents have also been theorized to play a role in the pathogenesis of SLE. This article summarizes our current knowledge of the infectious risk SLE patients face as a result of their underlying disease including abnormal phagocytes and T cells as well as the increased risk of infection associated with immunosuppressive agents used to treat disease. Pathogens thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of disease including EBV, CMV, human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs), and tuberculosis will also be reviewed, as well as the pathologic potential of microbial amyloids and the microbiome.

Shrinking lung syndrome associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: A multicenter collaborative study of 15 new cases and a review of the 155 cases in the literature focusing on treatment response and long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Shrinking lung syndrome (SLS) is a rare respiratory manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), characterized by dyspnea, chest pain, elevated hemidiaphragm and a restrictive pattern on pulmonary function tests. Here, we report 15 new observations of SLS during SLE and provide a systematic literature review. We studied the clinical, biological, functional and morphologic characteristics, the treatments used and their efficacy.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were all patients with SLE defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria Hochberg (1997) , associated with a restrictive pattern on pulmonary function tests. The exclusion criteria were all differential diagnoses of restrictive patterns, including obesity and pulmonary fibrosis. The patients were recruited from local databases through chest physicians, rheumatologists and internists. The data for the literature review were extracted from the Medline database using "shrinking lung syndrome" and "lupus" as key words.

RESULTS

All 15 new cases were women with a median age at SLS onset of 27years old (range 17-67years). All of them complained of dyspnea and all but one of chest pain. The antibodies were similar to those found in SLE, although the anti-SS-A was positive in 10 of 13 cases. Thoracic imaging showed elevated hemidiaphragm (12/15) and/or basal atelectasia (8/15). All of the patients had an isolated restrictive pattern on PFT, with a median decrease >50% of lung volume. All of the patients were treated, using corticosteroids (11/15), immunosuppressive drugs (8/15), beta-mimetics (2/15), physiotherapy (3/15) and/or colchicine (1/15). Improvement was described in 9 of 12 patients and stability in 3 of 12. We extracted 155 cases of SLE-associated SLS from the Medline database. The clinical, biological and functional parameters were similar to our cases. Clinical improvement was described in 48 of 52 cases (94%) and PFT improvement in 36 of 47 cases. Worsening occurred in 4 cases.

CONCLUSION

SLS is a rare SLE manifestation. Pain and parietal inflammation seem to play important pathogenic roles. Steroids and antalgics are the most commonly used therapies with good responses. There is no proof of efficacy with immunosuppressive drugs for this entity. Rituximab can be discussed after failure of corticosteroids, as well as antalgics, theophylline and beta-mimetics.

Childhood Lupus--Diagnosis and Management

Though rare, childhood lupus is a disease with the potential to have serious short and long term effects in children. These effects are to do with the disease itself, organ damage consequent to ongoing inflammation and/or because of side effects of medications. As children have an early disease onset, accrual organ damage over the years and growth and puberty issues are important aspects of care. Thus it is essential to recognize the disease early, objectively assess the patient at regular intervals, treat to a target of remission and limit the use of steroids as far as possible. This review focuses on the elements that help identify these patients in the clinic, discusses the role of objective disease assessment and outlines management and co-morbidities in these patients.