Inflammatory eye disease: Pre-treatment assessment of patients prior to commencing immunosuppressive and biologic therapy: Recommendations from an expert committee

Use of immunomodulatory treatment for non-infectious uveitis: an International Ocular Inflammation Society report of real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Non-infectious uveitis is a diverse group of inflammatory conditions that collectively account for substantial blindness worldwide. Expert guidelines and results of clinical trials guide treatment, but real-world clinical care is impacted by additional factors. In 2023, an international group of uveitis-specialised ophthalmologists formed the International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis to report current practice.

METHODS

221 study group members from 53 countries completed a 30-item questionnaire on their management of non-infectious uveitis including: indications for and investigations prior to initiating systemic immunomodulatory drugs, use of conventional and biological drugs, and follow-up of treated patients.

RESULTS

Major indications to initiate systemic immunomodulatory drugs were: uveitis not controlled with oral prednis(ol)one (n=208, 94.1%), specific uveitis diagnosis (n=197, 89.1%), and patient intolerance of oral prednis(ol)one (n=186, 84.2%). All members (n=221, 100%) performed pretreatment screens including: blood chemistry (n=217, 98.2%), blood examination (n=207, 93.7%), and Quantiferon assay (n=196, 88.7%). Eight conventional and 14 biological drugs were prescribed: methotrexate was the preferred conventional drug overall (n=126, 57.0%) and for 9 of 11 uveitides, and adalimumab was the preferred biological drug overall (n=216, 97.7%) and for 11 of 11 uveitides. When drugs were combined, methotrexate plus adalimumab was most popular (n=158 of 188 members, 84.0%). Patients with inactive uveitis were typically evaluated and screened for drug toxicity every 6-12 weeks (n=161, 72.9%, and 165, 74.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our report describes practice patterns of a large international group of uveitis specialists treating non-infectious uveitis with systemic immunomodulatory drugs.

Brain MRI White Matter Abnormalities in Pediatric Non-Infectious Uveitis

BACKGROUND

Childhood chronic non-infectious uveitis (cNIU) is a challenging disease whose differential diagnosis may include demyelinating diseases. We aim to describe the white matter abnormalities (WMA) in brain MRI in childhood cNIU.

METHODS

This is a multicentric retrospective study involving children with cNIU followed at the Pediatric rheumatology units of Florence and the ophthalmology department of the UMC Utrecht who underwent a Brain MRI. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging information was collected. The presence of WMA was considered as the main outcome.

RESULTS

Data of 123 children was collected (66 from Utrecht and 57 from Florence), of whom 51 were males, with a median uveitis onset at age 9 years (range 3-16) for the UMC Utrecht and 8.75 years (range 1.6-15.1) for Florence. We evaluated 39 children with anterior uveitis, 35 with intermediate uveitis, 1 with posterior uveitis and 48 with panuveitis. Uveitis was idiopathic in 105. On brain MRI, 33 patients (26.8%) showed WMA, and most of them had non-anterior uveitis (72.8%). WMA were more frequent in males (χ2 5.25, p = 0.02). No difference in underlying systemic disease was seen between patients with and without WMA, but 40% of patients with TINU and 27.3% of patients with idiopathic uveitis showed WMA. None of the patients received a diagnosis of demyelinating disease during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

As WMA were found in 26.8% of patients who were screened in our cohort, brain MRI might be useful in cNIU. However, the clinical significance of these WMA could not be determined in this study. An interdisciplinary evaluation is necessary to assess the appropriate management, and a longer follow up is necessary to determine the prognosis of some of these WMA.

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Utilization and Skeletal Fragility Among Non-Infectious Uveitis Patients Exposed to Oral Glucocorticoids

INTRODUCTION

Currently, little is known regarding bone health surveillance for glucocorticoid-exposed non-infectious uveitis (NIU) patients or their baseline risks of skeletal fragility outcomes.

METHODS

Using claims data, we calculated rates of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening for glucocorticoid-exposed NIU and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Separately, we compared risks of skeletal fragility metrics amongst NIU patients, RA patients, and controls, independent of glucocorticoid use.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of NIU patients to have a DXA scan was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63-0.65; p < .001) compared to RA patients. The aHR for any skeletal fragility outcome amongst NIU patients was 0.97 (p < .02) compared to normal controls, while RA patients had excess risk (aHR, 1.15; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

NIU patients are 36% less likely to receive a DXA scan after high-dose glucocorticoid exposure compared with RA patients. No elevated risk of osteoporosis for NIU patients was found compared to normal controls.

Management of Uveitis Patients on Anti-TNF Agents Who Develop Demyelinating Disease - A Case Series

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (Anti-TNF) agents have proven beneficial for the treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitis, yet rare neurological complications and demyelinating disease can occur with their use. Management of uveitis and neurological disease after developing these rare complications is not well understood. We sought to identify these specific cases and their outcomes through a retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Electronic Medical Record (EMR) chart review of 394 non-infectious uveitis patients on anti-TNF therapy focused on identifying patients seen by uveitis specialists at a single institution who were on anti-TNF therapy and had developed neurological symptoms. Cases were reviewed for subsequent management and outcomes of both their neurologic and ocular inflammatory disease.

RESULTS

Five (5) patients were included following complaints of neurological symptoms while on anti-TNF therapy. Subsequent demyelinating diagnosis, acute treatment, and long-term course were described. All five patients continue to be inactive at around three years of anti-TNF discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Unidentified rare neurological symptoms and demyelinating disease associated with the use of anti-TNF agents can be detrimental to patient treatment outcomes. Emphasis is given on possible avoidance and early identification of exacerbating underlying disease through a detailed neurologic history and use of imaging when suspicion is high. Patients may have no evidence of higher neurological risk prior to starting an anti-TNF treatment. Discontinuation of an anti-TNF agent and subsequent control of disease is possible with alternative immunosuppressive treatments.

Targeting inflammasomes and pyroptosis in retinal diseases-molecular mechanisms and future perspectives

Retinal diseases encompass various conditions associated with sight-threatening immune responses and are leading causes of blindness worldwide. These diseases include age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and uveitis. Emerging evidence underscores the vital role of the innate immune response in retinal diseases, beyond the previously emphasized T-cell-driven processes of the adaptive immune system. In particular, pyroptosis, a newly discovered programmed cell death process involving inflammasome formation, has been implicated in the loss of membrane integrity and the release of inflammatory cytokines. Several disease-relevant animal models have provided evidence that the formation of inflammasomes and the induction of pyroptosis in innate immune cells contribute to inflammation in various retinal diseases. In this review article, we summarize current knowledge about the innate immune system and pyroptosis in retinal diseases. We also provide insights into translational targeting approaches, including novel drugs countering pyroptosis, to improve the diagnosis and treatment of retinal diseases.

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Uveitis: Dissecting Responder and Non-Responder Outcomes at a Tertiary Center

Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures.

Patient Clinical Outcomes in Standalone Versus a Combined Ophthalmology-rheumatology Uveitis Clinic

BACKGROUND

To evaluate uveitis care outcomes in standalone versus a combined ophthalmology-rheumatology clinic.

METHODS

Participants were patients aged 18 years and older with a minimum 12-month history of chronic uveitis prior to being referred to the combined uveitis clinic at Kresge Eye Institute and who were treated in the combined clinic for at least 6 months. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), objective markers of inflammation, and achieving targeted dose of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) were compared in the cohort of uveitis patients 6 months prior to and after the initial evaluation in the combined clinic.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent of study participants were female with a mean age of 51.5 years. BCVA improved from 0.58 logMAR (Snellen: ~20/74) at the initial combined clinic visit to 0.50 logMAR (Snellen: ~20/63) 6 months after the first combined visit (p = 0.0137). The establishment of the combined uveitis clinic led to higher frequency of patients at target dose of IMT: an increase from 49.0% at 6 months prior to the combined visit to 70.1.4% and 79.8% at the initial combined visit and 6 months after the combined visit, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A combined model of management for chronic uveitis patients wherein rheumatological services are coupled with ophthalmic care leads to improvement in patient clinical outcomes and achieving target therapy.

BTS clinical statement for the diagnosis and management of ocular tuberculosis

The BTS clinical statement for the diagnosis and management of ocular tuberculosis (TB) draws on the expertise of both TB and and ophthalmic specialists to outline the current understanding of disease pathogenesis, diagnosis and management in adults. Published literature lacks high-quality evidence to inform clinical practice and there is also a paucity of data from animal models to elucidate mechanisms of disease. However, in order to improve and standardise patient care, this statement provides consensus points with the currently available data and agreed best practice.

New pharmacotherapy options for noninfectious posterior uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Noninfectious inflammation of the posterior eye segment represents an important cause of visual impairment. It often affects relatively young people and causes a significant personal and social impact. Although steroids and nonbiologic- Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (nbDMARDs) are effective both in acute and long- lasting diseases, however they are increasingly being replaced by biologic (DMARDs). bDMARD. This article therefore aims to identify recent advances in the therapy of noninfectious posterior segment uveitis.

METHODS

A Medline-search was conducted using the terms: nbDMARD, bDMARD, posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, treatment, corticosteroid. In addition, clinical studies were included as registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

Currently two major lines of treatments can be identified: (1) the intraocular application of anti-inflammatory agents and (2) the introduction of new agents, e.g., (bDMARDs) and small-molecule-inhibitors. Whereas intravitreal treatments have the advantage to avoid systemic side effects, new systemic agents are progressively earning credit on the basis of their therapeutic effects.

CONCLUSION

Even when current treatment strategies are still hampered by the limited number of randomized controlled trials, promising progress and continuous efforts are seen.

Relevance of Brain MRI in Patients with Uveitis: Retrospective Cohort on 402 Patients

Aim: To assess the diagnostic value of brain magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI) for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis and to establish predictive factors associated with its advantageous use.Methods: Retrospective study on all patients with de novo uveitis who were referred to our tertiary hospital and who underwent a bMRI between 2003 and 2018.Results: bMRI was contributive in 19 out of 402 cases (5%), among patients with a contributive bMRI, 68% had neurological signs. Univariate analysis established that neurological signs (p < .001), granulomatous uveitis (p = .003), retinal vasculitis (p = .002), and intermediate uveitis (p < .001) were all significantly associated with a contributive bMRI. Multivariate analysis confirms the significant association of neurological signs (p < .001) and intermediate uveitis (p = .01).Conclusion: bMRI appears to be a relevant exam in specific cases; intermediate/posterior uveitis or panuveitis accompanied by neurological signs, retinal vasculitis, or in patients older than 40, to rule out an oculocerebral lymphoma.Abbreviations: ACE: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme; bMRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CBC: Complete Blood cell Count; BMRI: Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CT: Computerized Tomography; MS: Multiple Sclerosis; NS: Neurological Signs; OCL: Oculocerebral Lymphoma; RIS: Radiologically Isolated Syndrome.

Multidisciplinary management of auto-immune ocular diseases in adult patients by ophthalmologists and rheumatologists

Purpose

Management of chronic vision threatening auto‐immune ocular diseases (AIOD, e.g. uveitis, scleritis) can be challenging. Guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach (MDA) with ophthalmologists and rheumatologists, to enhance the recognition of systemic diseases and guide the use of immunosuppressives. However, the indications and results of such an approach have not yet been studied.

Methods

A monocentre, retrospective chart review of all patients treated in a MDA between ophthalmologists and rheumatologists, in a Dutch tertiary center. The collaboration was twofold: a combined multidisciplinary team meeting every 2 weeks, and an ophthalmology‐dedicated rheumatology outpatient clinic. Primary endpoints of this descriptive study were as follows: indications for MDA, new diagnoses of systemic auto‐immune diseases and changes in systemic immunosuppression and prednisone dosages.

Results

In total, 157 adults (mean age 46 years, 57% female, median disease duration 19 months) were included, mainly with uveitis (74%) and scleritis (12%). Multidisciplinary approach (MDA)‐indications included diagnostic workup (32%), treatment support (44%), diagnostic‐and‐treatment support (10%) and side effects (8%). A systemic disease was newly diagnosed in eight and already present in 34 patients. At baseline, 54 patients used oral prednisone at >7.5 mg/day. Non‐corticoid immunosuppressives, mostly methotrexate, were started in 41% of the patients. During follow‐up, systemic prednisone was lowered to ≤7.5 mg/day in 68% of the patients.

Conclusion

This evaluation of an MDA‐programme in the management of AIOD demonstrated its added value. Mainly, it addressed the high demand for support in managing systemic immunosuppression, resulting in significant corticosteroid tapering. In addition, it resulted in the recognition of underlying systemic diseases.

Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis

ABSTRACT

The management of noninfectious uveitis is constantly evolving. A new "biologic era" in treatment began after the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking drugs was demonstrated in rheumatologic inflammatory diseases. The goal of specific immunomodulation with a biologic drug is to target inflammation at the molecular level with a low rate of serious adverse events. The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge of biologic drugs in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis by describing clinical studies and recent pharmacological developments.

A Review of Clinical Applications and Side Effects of Methotrexate in Ophthalmology

Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate analog widely used against a range of diseases including malignancies and autoimmune disorders. Its high effectiveness-price ratio also won extensive application in ophthalmology. On the other hand, although MTX has an excellent pharmacological efficacy, MTX associated side effects in clinical use, which vary from patient to patient, are nonnegligible. There is no comparatively systematic review on MTX associated side effects and its risk factors. This review aimed to reveal novel clinical approaches of MTX and its adverse effects in order to provide a reference for ophthalmic scholars in clinical application of MTX.

Behçet's Uveitis: Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach

Behçet's disease is a chronic, multisystem inflammatory disorder characterized by relapsing inflammation. Although its etiopathogenesis has not yet been clarified, both the adaptive and innate immune systems, genetic predisposition, and environmental factors have all been implicated. It is more frequent and more severe in males in the third and fourth decades of life. The eye is the most frequently involved organ in the course of the disease. Ocular involvement (Behçet's uveitis) is characterized by bilateral recurrent non-granulomatous panuveitis and occlusive retinal vasculitis. Recurrent inflammatory episodes in the posterior segment may lead to permanent vision loss due to irreversible retinal damage and complications such as macular scarring, macular atrophy, and optic atrophy. Early and aggressive immunomodulatory treatment and the use of biologic agents when needed are crucial for preventing recurrences and improving visual prognosis.

The retinal tyrosine kinome of diabetic Akimba mice highlights potential for specific Src family kinase inhibition in retinal vascular disease

Although anti-VEGF therapies have radically changed clinical practice, there is still an urgent demand for novel, integrative approaches for sight-threatening retinal vascular diseases. As we hypothesize that protein tyrosine kinases are key signaling mediators in retinal vascular disease, we performed a comprehensive activity-based tyrosine kinome profiling on retinal tissue of 12-week-old Akimba mice, a translational model displaying hallmarks of early and advanced diabetic retinopathy. Western blotting was used to confirm retinal tyrosine kinase activity in Akimba mice. HUVEC tube formation and murine organotypic choroidal sprouting assays were applied to compare tyrosine kinase inhibitors with different specificity profiles. HUVEC toxicity and proliferation were evaluated using the CellTox™ Green Cytotoxicity and PrestoBlue™ Assays. Our results indicate a shift of the Akimba retinal tyrosine kinome towards a hyperactive state. Functional network analysis of significantly hyperphosphorylated peptides and upstream kinase prediction revealed a central role for Src-FAK family kinases. Western blotting confirmed hyperactivity of this signaling node in the retina of Akimba mice. We demonstrated that not only Src but also FAK family kinase inhibitors with different selectivity profiles were able to suppress angiogenesis in vitro and ex vivo. In the latter model, the novel selective Src family kinase inhibitor eCF506 was able to achieve potent reduction of angiogenesis, comparable to the less specific inhibitor Dasatinib. None of the tested compounds demonstrated acute endothelial cell toxicity. Overall, the collected findings provide the first comprehensive overview of retinal tyrosine kinome changes in the Akimba model of diabetic retinopathy and for the first time highlight Src family kinase inhibition using highly specific inhibitors as an attractive therapeutic intervention for retinal vascular pathology.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis

Introduction: Uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment and a significant burden of blindness. Although corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents have been successfully used, these are non-specific, and their long-term use may induce significant adverse effects. Areas covered: This article discusses existing local and systemic applied treatments for ocular inflammation including corticosteroids, non-biologic, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). Potential drugs being studied in clinical trials are introduced for both local and systemic use. Expert opinion: Treatment options for uveitis continue to expand. Still, more efforts and research are needed to better understand the mechanisms potentially leading to clinical trials.

The Eyes Have it: A Rheumatologist's View of Uveitis

Uveitis is defined as intraocular inflammation. It is an extraarticular manifestation of many forms of joint disease, which include spondyloarthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and Behçet's disease. Rheumatologists may be asked to consult on the ophthalmologic care of patients with uveitis in order to identify an associated systemic illness. Diagnoses such as spondyloarthritis, sarcoidosis, and interstitial nephritis with uveitis are frequently overlooked by referring ophthalmologists. Alternatively, rheumatologists may be asked to help manage the patient's immunosuppression, including biologic therapy, which can be required to treat a subset of patients with uveitis. This review is intended to provide rheumatologists with the necessary information to facilitate collaboration in the comanagement of patients with uveitis.

Guidance on Noncorticosteroid Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy in Noninfectious Uveitis: Fundamentals Of Care for UveitiS (FOCUS) Initiative

TOPIC

An international, expert-led consensus initiative to develop systematic, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis in the era of biologics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The availability of biologic agents for the treatment of human eye disease has altered practice patterns for the management of noninfectious uveitis. Current guidelines are insufficient to assure optimal use of noncorticosteroid systemic immunomodulatory agents.

METHODS

An international expert steering committee comprising 9 uveitis specialists (including both ophthalmologists and rheumatologists) identified clinical questions and, together with 6 bibliographic fellows trained in uveitis, conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol systematic review of the literature (English language studies from January 1996 through June 2016; Medline [OVID], the Central Cochrane library, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, BIOSIS, and Web of Science). Publications included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with sufficient follow-up, case series with 15 cases or more, peer-reviewed articles, and hand-searched conference abstracts from key conferences. The proposed statements were circulated among 130 international uveitis experts for review. A total of 44 globally representative group members met in late 2016 to refine these guidelines using a modified Delphi technique and assigned Oxford levels of evidence.

RESULTS

In total, 10 questions were addressed resulting in 21 evidence-based guidance statements covering the following topics: when to start noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory therapy, including both biologic and nonbiologic agents; what data to collect before treatment; when to modify or withdraw treatment; how to select agents based on individual efficacy and safety profiles; and evidence in specific uveitic conditions. Shared decision-making, communication among providers and safety monitoring also were addressed as part of the recommendations. Pharmacoeconomic considerations were not addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus guidelines were developed based on published literature, expert opinion, and practical experience to bridge the gap between clinical needs and medical evidence to support the treatment of patients with noninfectious uveitis with noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory agents.