Rheumatic immune related adverse events in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors for immunotherapy of cancer

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and uncontrolled trials reporting on the use of checkpoint blockers in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICBs.

METHODS

We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7 %) followed by skin cancer (15.7 %). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61 % (95 % CI 54 % to 68 %); that of flares was 36 % (95 % CI 30 % to 43 %), and that of de novo irAEs was 23 % (95 % CI 16 % to 30 %). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39 %), inflammatory bowel disease (37 %), and rheumatoid arthritis (36 %). 32 % of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included corticosteroids in 72 % of the cases. The irAEs mortality rate was 0.07 %. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer response to ICBs between patients with and without autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease had irAEs, these were mild and managed with corticosteroids in most cases, with no impact on cancer response. These results suggest that ICBs can be used in these patients, but careful monitoring is required, as over a third of the patients will experience a flare of their autoimmune disease and/or require hospitalization. These findings provide a crucial foundation for oncologists to refine their monitoring and management strategies, ensuring that the benefits of ICB therapy are maximized while minimizing its risks.

Expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 in Lymphomas in Patients with Pre-Existing Rheumatic Diseases-A Possible Association with High Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity

Current research seeks to identify subgroups of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients responsive to PD-1 blocking agents. Whether patients with pre-existing rheumatic diseases might constitute such a subgroup is unknown. We determined intratumoral expression of PD-1 and its ligands in lymphoma patients with pre-existing rheumatic diseases. We included 215 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or Sjögren's syndrome with subsequent lymphoma and 74 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) controls without rheumatic disease. PD-1 and PD-ligand immunohistochemical markers were applied on tumor tissue microarrays. The number of PD-1+ tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) and proportions of PD-L1+ and PD-L2+ tumor cells and TILs were calculated and correlated with clinical data. Expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells and TILs was highest in classical Hodgkin lymphoma and DLBCL. In DLBCLs, expression of PD-1 in TILs and PD-L1 in tumor cells was similar in RA, SLE and controls. In RA-DLBCL, high expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells was significantly more common in patients with the most severe RA disease and was associated with inferior overall survival in multivariable analysis.

Development of natural products for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy against cancer

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint is one of the most promising therapeutic targets for cancer immunotherapy, but several challenges remain in current anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Natural products, mainly derived from traditional medicine, could improve and expand anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy because of their advantages such as large diversity and multi-target effects.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This review summarize natural products, raw extracts, and traditional medicines with pharmacological effects associated with the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, particularly PD-L1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic literature databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, and online drugs and chemicals databases, including DrugBank, ZINC, PubChem, STITCH, and CTD, were searched without date limitation by February 2021. 'Natural product or herb or herbal plant or traditional medicine' and 'PD-L1' and 'Cancer immunotherapy' were used as the search keywords. Among 112 articles identified in database searching, 54 articles are full text articles, reporting in silico, in vitro, in vivo and clinical trials. 68 articles included are review articles and grey literature such as thesis and congress abstracts.

RESULTS

Several natural products and traditional medicines have exhibited diverse and multi-functional effects including direct blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions, modulation of PD-L1 expression, and cooperation with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Natural products and traditional medicines can facilitate the development of more effective and acceptable diverse strategies for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, but further exploration of natural products and pharmaceutical techniques is required.

Prevalence, therapy and tumour response in patients with rheumatic immune-related adverse events following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a single-centre analysis

Background:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improved cancer therapy by inducing a higher immune system activity. This effect can cause rheumatic immune-related adverse events (rh-irAEs), which have not yet been extensively studied.

Methods:

We analysed 437 patients between 2014 and 2019, treated with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and/or nivolumab (anti-PD-1) or pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) at the Clinic for Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Haematology and Rheumatology at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany.

Results:

Of the 437 patients 60% were males. Patients were mainly treated for melanoma, lung cancer, head and neck tumour and urothelial carcinoma. At least one immune-related adverse event (irAE) was observed in 163 patients (37.3%), including rh-irAE. Most common side effects were rash, colitis and hepatitis. We identified 19 patients (4.3%) with a minimum of one rh-irAE due to ICI therapy; three of those had a pre-existing rheumatic disease. Arthralgia developed most frequently in eight patients (42.1%). Other rh-irAEs were: arthritis (n = 7; distinguished in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and undifferentiated arthritis), myalgia (n = 2) and myositis (n = 3). Most rh-irAEs were classified as moderately severe (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events grade 2: 68.4%). Median time between starting ICI therapy and the occurrence of rh-irAE was 109 days (interquartile range 40–420 days). Fifteen patients (78.9%) were treated with glucocorticosteroids. In four cases additional therapy with methotrexate or tocilizumab was required. Even though patients benefited from ICI treatment, therapy had to be discontinued in six of the participants due to rh-irAE. Interestingly, patients with rh-irAE had a significantly higher tumour response compared with patients without rh-irAE (94.4% versus 43.5%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

Rh-irAEs occur under ICI therapy, especially in patients with higher tumour response. However, they are not the most frequent irAE after ICI exposure: 9.3% of all irAEs were rheumatic (20 rh-irAE cases in 19 patients of a total of 215 irAE cases in 163 patients).

Ultrasound May Suppress Tumor Growth, Inhibit Inflammation, and Establish Tolerogenesis by Remodeling Innatome via Pathways of ROS, Immune Checkpoints, Cytokines, and Trained Immunity/Tolerance

Background

The immune mechanisms underlying low-intensity ultrasound- (LIUS-) mediated suppression of inflammation and tumorigenesis remain poorly determined.

Methods

We used microarray datasets from the NCBI GEO DataSet repository and conducted comprehensive data-mining analyses, where we examined the gene expression of 1376 innate immune regulators (innatome genes (IGs) in cells treated with LIUS.

Results

We made the following findings: (1) LIUS upregulates proinflammatory IGs and downregulates metastasis genes in cancer cells, and LIUS upregulates adaptive immunity pathways but inhibits danger-sensing and inflammation pathways and promote tolerogenic differentiation in bone marrow (BM) cells. (2) LIUS upregulates IGs encoded for proteins localized in the cytoplasm, extracellular space, and others, but downregulates IG proteins localized in nuclear and plasma membranes, and LIUS downregulates phosphatases. (3) LIUS-modulated IGs act partially via several important pathways of reactive oxygen species (ROS), reverse signaling of immune checkpoint receptors B7-H4 and BTNL2, inflammatory cytokines, and static or oscillatory shear stress and heat generation, among which ROS is a dominant mechanism. (4) LIUS upregulates trained immunity enzymes in lymphoma cells and downregulates trained immunity enzymes and presumably establishes trained tolerance in BM cells. (5) LIUS modulates chromatin long-range interactions to differentially regulate IGs expression in cancer cells and noncancer cells.

Conclusions

Our analysis suggests novel molecular mechanisms that are utilized by LIUS to induce tumor suppression and inflammation inhibition. Our findings may lead to development of new treatment protocols for cancers and chronic inflammation.

Serum Levels of T Cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin-Domain Containing Molecule 3 in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective: T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain-containing molecule 3 (TIM-3) is implicated in the development of various autoimmune diseases. We aimed to investigate the levels of soluble TIM-3 (sTIM-3) and their associations between clinical parameters in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Serum samples were collected from 65 patients with SLE and 35 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). The SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) damage index (SDI) were used to assess SLE disease activity and SLE-related organ damage. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 index was also used to assess SLE disease activity. Soluble TIM-3 (sTIM-3) in sera from patients with SLE and HCs were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results were compared with the clinical parameters of SLE including SLE disease activity. Results: Serum sTIM-3 levels in patients with SLE (median 2123 pg/mL (interquartile range (IQR), 229–7235)) were significantly higher than those in HCs (1363 pg/mL; IQR, 1097–1673; p = 0.0015). Serum levels of sTIM-3 were correlated with disease activity of SLE using the SLEDAI-2K score (p < 0.001, r = 0.53). The serum sTIM-3 levels in SLE patients with active renal disease (BILAG renal index A-B) were significantly higher than those without the active renal disease (BILAG renal index C–E). However, no significant difference was observed in serum sTIM-3 levels between SLE patients with and without active involvement in other organs (BILAG index). Serum sTIM-3 levels were significantly elevated in SLE patients with organ damage (2710 pg/mL; IQR, 256–7235) compared to those without organ damage (1532 pg/mL; IQR, 228–5274), as assessed by the SDI (p = 0.0102). Conclusions: Circulating sTIM-3 levels are elevated in SLE patients, and serum sTIM-3 levels are associated with SLE disease activity and SLE-related organ damage. The data indicate a possible link between the TIM-3/Gal-9 pathway and SLE clinical phenotypes, and further investigation of the TIM-3 pathway in SLE pathophysiology is warranted.

Eight pillars of oncorheumatology: Crossroads between malignancies and musculoskeletal diseases

ONCORHEUMATOLOGY

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALIGNANCIES AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES: Oncorheumatology is the meeting point of tumor formation and rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD). Multiple interactions exist between these two medical specialties. One major field is the topic of malignancies associated with rheumatic diseases, while the other topic covers the development of musculoskeletal disease in cancer patients. Within the first group, secondary malignancies may be associated with rheumatic diseases. Mostly sustained inflammation is responsible for transition into cancer. Tumor-associated antigens (TAA) with adhesive properties are present on tumor cells. These molecules may also be expressed by inflammatory leukocytes and soluble TAA levels may be elevated in RMDs. There has been continuous debate with respect to the possible carcinogenicity of conventional and targeted antirheumatic drugs. Very recent data from registries suggest that neither biologics, nor JAK inhibitors increase cancer risk in arthritis patients. The issue of physiotherapy in rheumatic patients with recent or current cancer has also been controversial. Some modalities, primarily exercise, may be safely applied to patients with RMD and cancer. The second large topic includes paraneoplastic syndromes. Musculoskeletal paraneoplasias are triggered by tumor-derived mediators. These syndromes are sometimes slightly different from the classical RMDs. Various chemotherapies may also be associated with autoimmune side effects. Recently, these immune-related complications have also been observed in cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Sex hormone-deprivation therapies, such as aromatase inhibitors and anti-androgens are widely used for the treatment of breast and prostate cancer, respectively. These compounds may induce bone loss and lead to osteoporosis. Finally, primary and secondary malignancies of the musculoskeletal system may also interest rheumatologists. In this review, the clinical, practical aspects of these eight pillars of oncorheumatology will be discussed.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myositis, the earliest and most lethal complication among rheumatic and musculoskeletal toxicities

BACKGROUND

In addition to restoring anti-tumor immune responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may also induce immune-related adverse events (irAE) that can affect any organ. We aim to determine the spectrum, timing, clinical features, and fatalities of rheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (RMS-irAE) associated with ICI.

PATIENTS METHODS

We performed an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the World Health Organization international pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase, from inception to January 2019. RMS-irAE reporting rate on ICI versus full database was performed using disproportionality analysis with computation of reporting-odds-ratios (ROR) and a Bayesian disproportional estimate (information component, IC). IC₀₂₅ (lower end of the IC 95% credibility interval) >0 is deemed significant.

RESULTS

We identified 1288 RMS-irAE significantly associated with ICI: polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 76, ROR = 14.6 [11.6-18.4], IC₀₂₅ = 3.34), sarcoidosis (n = 94; ROR = 9.6 [7.9-11.9]; IC₀₂₅ = 2.85), Sjogren's syndrome (n = 49; ROR = 6.9 [5.2-9.2]; IC₀₂₅ = 2.24), myositis (n = 465; ROR = 4.9 [4.5-5.4]; IC₀₂₅ = 2.12), arthritis (n = 606; ROR = 1.4 [1.3-1.5]; IC₀₂₅ = 0.34) and scleroderma (n = 17; ROR = 2.0 [1.2-3.2]; IC₀₂₅ = 0.17). Arthritis, myositis, and Sjogren's syndrome were over-reported in patients treated with ICI combination versus those treated with ICI monotherapy (ROR = 1.6-2.9, p < .05) and more frequently reported on anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy vs. anti-CTLA4 monotherapy (2.1-4.4, p < .05). Median time to onset occurred early for myositis (31 days [19.2-57.8]) and was the most delayed for scleroderma (395 days [323.8-457.2], p < .0001). The fatality rate for RMS-irAE ranged from 24% for myositis (n = 106/441) (up to 56.7% with concurrent myocarditis) to [0-6.7%] for other RMS-irAE (p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of the spectrum of RMS-irAE. Myositis can be particularly life-threatening, particularly when associated with myocarditis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis: a novel clinical entity with striking similarities to seronegative rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical and serologic similarities and differences between inflammatory arthritis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (IA-irAE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional comparative study, 20 patients with IA-irAE were age and sex matched to 40 seropositive and 40 seronegative RA patients. Electronic medical records were reviewed from diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis through May 2019. Arthritis characteristics, treatment, and relevant laboratory and serologic studies were captured.

RESULTS

Clinically, IA-irAE differed from seropositive and seronegative RA with respect to disease duration (4.18 versus 11.59 and 13.3 months, respectively, p = 0.005 (IA-irAE vs seropositive RA), p = 0.002 (IA-irAE vs seronegative RA)), polyarticular joint involvement at presentation (75% versus 97.5% and 100%, p = 0.013, p = 0.003), absence of erosive changes (5.9% vs 43.6% and 53.8%, p = 0.005, p = 0.001), mean prednisone dose (24.7 mg versus 16.53 mg and 15.68 mg, p = 0.008, p = 0.005), and use of methotrexate (5.0% versus 85.0% and 70.0%, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). Serologically, IA-irAE closely resembled seronegative RA. ANA positivity was seen in a minority of patients and did not differ significantly between all groups; however, the ANA staining pattern (speckled) was similar between IA-irAE and seronegative RA (100% versus 75%, respectively) and was not commonly observed in seropositive RA (18.2%).

CONCLUSION

IA-irAE is a new subset of IA that resembles seronegative RA immunologically. Our findings suggest that further study of IA-irAE might provide a window into underlying pathogenic mechanisms of early-stage seronegative RA. Key Points • Comprehensive comparison of clinical features between inflammatory arthritis irAE (IA-irAE) and regular rheumatoid arthritis indicates IA-irAE as a new subset of inflammatory arthritis. • IA-irAE resembles seronegative RA immunologically, suggesting that study of IA-irAE may provide a window into underlying pathogenic mechanisms of early-stage seronegative RA.

Mechanistic classification of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity as a pointer to minimal treatment strategies to further improve survival

Improved anti-tumour responses under immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) are associated with concomitant autoimmune disease development termed immune related adverse events (irAEs), of which approximately 5% are rheumatic in nature. Generally, oncologists and other specialists vigorously treat irAEs in spite of the generally accepted beneficial effect of irAEs on tumour survival. Herein, we highlight mechanistic insights on how tumour responses and certain types of autoimmunity appear to be inextricably linked around CD8+ T-cell mediated responses and that strategies that interfere with such shared immunopathgenesis could impact of survival. We discuss the possible circumstances in which intensive immunosuppressive therapy for irAEs that occur with ICIs might blunt anti-tumour immunity. We also discuss potential therapeutic strategies for emergent ICI related autoimmunity and propose some treatment considerations and research questions to minimize the impact of overzealous immunosuppression strategies on tumour responses. Thus, refraining from using powerful therapeutic armamentarium to treat irAEs, especially when these are not considered as life-threating might improve the prognosis of ICI therapy.