1
|
Wang H, Zhong G, Ji H, Chen S, Xie Q, Shen Z, Jia Y. Contrastive analysis on the safety of brand and generic nebivolol: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1280201. [PMID: 38357307 PMCID: PMC10864489 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1280201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The equivalence of generic drugs to their brand-name counterparts is a controversial issue. Current literature indicates disparities between the generic nebivolol (GN) and the brand nebivolol (BN). Aim: The study is designed to investigate the safety difference between GN and BN and provide reference information for clinical practice. Methods: We reviewed adverse event (AE) reports that recorded nebivolol as the primary suspect drug in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004 to 2022, conducted a disproportional analysis to detect signals for the GN and BN respectively, and compared the AE heterogeneity between them using the Breslow-Day test. Results: A total of 2613 AE reports of nebivolol were recorded in the FAERS database from 2004 to 2022, of which 2,200 were classified as BN, 346 as GN, and 67 unclassifiable AE reports were excluded. The signals of 37 AEs distributed in cardiac, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, and nervous systems were detected in disproportional analysis. 33 out of 37 AEs were positive signals, with 21 not previously listed on the drug label, indicating an unrecognized risk with nebivolol. In the heterogeneity analysis of AE signals between GN and BN, the GN generally showed a higher AE signal value than BN, especially 15 AEs distributed in the cardiac, neurological, and psychiatric systems that showed statistically significantly higher risk by taking GN. Conclusion: Our study shows some previously overlooked adverse effects of nebivolol. It suggests that the risk of GN's adverse effects may be higher than those in BN, which deserves further attention and investigation by healthcare professionals, regulators, and others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongli Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Guizun Zhong
- Department of Pharmacy, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Huanhuan Ji
- Department of Pharmacy Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Rare Diseases in Infection and Immunity, Chongqing, China
| | - Siqi Chen
- College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qinqin Xie
- College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhengze Shen
- Department of Pharmacy, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuntao Jia
- Department of Pharmacy Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Rare Diseases in Infection and Immunity, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clarke K, Ainslie-Garcia M, Ferko N, Shastri K. Modelling the opportunity for cost-savings or patient access with biosimilar adalimumab and tocilizumab: a European perspective. J Med Econ 2024; 27:952-962. [PMID: 39015093 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2379212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Biosimilars improve patient access by providing cost-effective treatment options. This study assessed the potential for savings and expanded patient access with increased use of two biosimilar disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs): (a) approved adalimumab biosimilars and (b) the first tocilizumab biosimilar, representing an established biosimilar field and a recent biosimilar entrant in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS Separate ex-ante analyses were conducted for each country, parameterized using country-specific list prices, unit volumes annually, and market shares for each therapy. Discounting scenarios of 10%, 20%, and 30% were tested for tocilizumab. Outputs included direct cost-savings associated with drug acquisition or the incremental number of patients that could be treated if savings were redirected. Two biosimilar conversion scenarios were tested. RESULTS Savings associated with a 100% conversion to adalimumab biosimilar ranged from €10.5 to €187 million (UK and Germany, respectively), or an additional 1,096 to 19,454 patients that could be treated using the cost-savings. Introduction of a tocilizumab biosimilar provided savings up to €29.3 million in the most conservative scenario. Exclusive use of tocilizumab biosimilars (at a 30% discount) could increase savings to €28.8 to €113 million or expand access to an additional 43% of existing tocilizumab users across countries. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the benefits that can be realized through increased biosimilar adoption, not only in an untapped tocilizumab market, but also through incremental increases in well-established markets such as adalimumab. As healthcare budgets continue to face downwards pressure globally, strategies to increase biosimilar market share could prove useful to help manage financial constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kunal Shastri
- Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH, Eysins, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Adrichem RCS, Voorneveld HJE, Waverijn GJ, Kok MR, Bisoendial RJ. The Non-medical Switch from Reference Adalimumab to Biosimilar Adalimumab is Highly Successful in a Large Cohort of Patients with Stable Inflammatory Rheumatic Joint Diseases: A Real-Life Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther 2022; 9:1109-1118. [PMID: 35655028 PMCID: PMC9314483 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00465-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The adalimumab biosimilar (ADAbio) Amgevita® has a similar efficacy and safety profile as the adalimumab reference (ADA) Humira®. We studied the clinical consequences of a non-medical switch from ADA to ADAbio in adult patients with mainly established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods Patients that received treatment with ADA for at least three months were switched to ADAbio. Data was collected retrospectively from 1 year before the switch up to 6 months after. Results A total of 603 patients were switched from ADA to ADAbio (switch group). During a 1-year follow-up, over 93% of all patients underwent a successful transition in terms of disease activity and safety from ADA to biosimilar, supporting the bioequivalence of both drugs in patients with stable inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases. Forty patients (6.6%) switched back to ADA (re-switch group). There were no objective changes in disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), or adverse effects before and after the switch between both groups. Conclusions In line with earlier reports, the transition to ADAbio went successful in the majority of patients with stable inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases. Patient-reported symptoms without objective signs that indicate a flare of disease activity after the switch to ADAbio are probably explained by nocebo effects. A pre-emptive approach to counteract nocebo effects and stimulate placebo response may have a positive impact on health outcomes for patients and preserve the economic benefits of cost savings that can be achieved by prescribing a biosimilar instead of the reference drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne C S van Adrichem
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke J E Voorneveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geeke J Waverijn
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc R Kok
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Radjesh J Bisoendial
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rathore AS, Stevenson JG, Chhabra H, Maharana C. The global landscape on interchangeability of biosimilars. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021; 22:133-148. [PMID: 33567923 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1889511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biosimilars hold the potential to be an integral healthcare component that can significantly improve affordability and thereby accessibility of the otherwise expensive biotherapeutic products. Regulators, payors, and policymakers, each have a major role to play in successful adoption of biosimilars. One of the issues that has been a point of frequent discussion is that of interchangeability of biosimilars. AREAS COVERED This article aims to review the position that the major regulatory bodies have taken on interchangeability of biosimilars. Key issues that remain are also discussed. Adalimumab and etanercept have been chosen as real-world case studies to demonstrate interchangeability considerations. The need for gaining global harmonization on interchangeability is highlighted. EXPERT OPINION A global harmonization on the interchangeability can likely accelerate biosimilar adoption and result in better accessibility to biologics. Experience gained with real-world studies supports switching to biosimilars from originators however post-marketing pharmacovigilance should be in place to assess the risk-benefit profile of biosimilars in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anurag S Rathore
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - James G Stevenson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Hemlata Chhabra
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - Chinmoyee Maharana
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taylor PC, Christensen R, Moosavi S, Selema P, Guilatco R, Fowler H, Mueller M, Liau KF, Haraoui B. Real-life drug persistence in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with CT-P13: a prospective observational cohort study (PERSIST). Rheumatol Adv Pract 2021; 5:rkab026. [PMID: 34377890 PMCID: PMC8346696 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkab026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim was to report results from PERSIST, a real-life, observational, prospective cohort study of CT-P13, an infliximab (IFX) biosimilar, for treatment of patients with RA, AS or PsA who were biologic naïve or switched from an IFX reference product (IFX-RP; Remicade). Methods Adult patients were recruited during usual care at 38 sites in Europe and Canada and enrolled by their physicians after meeting eligibility criteria according to the country-approved label for CT-P13. Primary outcomes were to determine drug utilization and treatment persistence and to assess safety. Patients were followed for up to 2 years. Data were analysed and reported descriptively. Results Of 351 patients enrolled, 334 were included in the analysis (RA, 40.4%; AS, 34.7%; PsA, 24.9%). The safety analysis set comprised all 328 patients treated with CT-P13. The majority (58.2%) of patients received CT-P13 monotherapy, most (72.6%) by dosing every 6 or 8 weeks. The mean treatment persistence was 449.2 days; 62.3% of patients completed 2 years of treatment. In all, 214 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 38.4% of patients. Most TEAEs were of mild or moderate intensity; 13 were severe. The most commonly reported TEAEs were drug ineffective (9.5%) and infusion-related reactions (5.2%). The most frequently reported infection-related TEAEs were upper respiratory tract infections (3.0%), nasopharyngitis (2.1%) and bronchitis (1.5%). No patients experienced tuberculosis. Conclusion Drug utilization and treatment persistence with CT-P13 were consistent with historical reports of IFX-RP in this patient population. Safety findings did not identify new concerns for CT-P13 in the treatment of patients with RA, AS or PsA. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02605642.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen
| | - Shahrzad Moosavi
- Worldwide Safety and Risk Management, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela Selema
- Worldwide Safety and Risk Management, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruffy Guilatco
- Global Biometrics & Data Management, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., Manila, Philippines
| | - Heather Fowler
- Clinical Development & Operations, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., London, UK
| | | | | | - Boulos Haraoui
- Clinical Research Unit in Rheumatology, Institut de rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Biosimilar Landscape: An Overview of Regulatory Approvals by the EMA and FDA. Pharmaceutics 2020; 13:pharmaceutics13010048. [PMID: 33396369 PMCID: PMC7824407 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Biosimilar medicines expand the biotherapeutic market and improve patient access. This work looked into the landscape of the European and US biosimilar products, their regulatory authorization, market availability, and clinical evaluation undergone prior to the regulatory approval. European Medicines Agency (EMEA, currently EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) repositories were searched to identify all biosimilar medicines approved before December 2019. Adalimumab biosimilars, and particularly their clinical evaluations, were used as a case study. In the past 13 years, the EMA has received 65 marketing authorization applications for biosimilar medicines with 55 approved biosimilars available in the EU market. Since the first biosimilar approval in 2015, the FDA has granted 26 approvals for biosimilars with only 11 being currently on the US market. Five adalimumab biosimilars have been approved in the EU and commercialized as eight different medicines through duplicate marketing authorizations. Whilst three of these are FDA-approved, the first adalimumab biosimilar will not be marketed in the US until 2023 due to Humira's exclusivity period. The EU biosimilar market has developed faster than its US counterpart, as the latter is probably challenged by a series of patents and exclusivity periods protecting the bio-originator medicines, an issue addressed by the US's latest 'Biosimilar Action Plan'.
Collapse
|