Sarcoidosis related to checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in melanoma

Infectious and non-infectious precipitants of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that can affect any organ in the body. Its exact cause remains unknown, but it is believed to result from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Some potential causes of sarcoidosis include genetics, environmental triggers, immune system dysfunction, the gut microbiome, sex, and race/ethnicity. Genetic mutations are associated with protection against disease progression or an increased susceptibility to more severe disease, while exposure to certain chemicals, bacteria, viruses, or allergens can trigger the formation of immune cell congregations (granulomas) in different organs. Dysfunction of the immune system, including autoimmune reactions, may also contribute. The gut microbiome and factors such as being female or having African American, Scandinavian, Irish, or Puerto Rican heritage are additional contributors to disease outcome. Recent research has suggested that certain drugs, such as anti-Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) and antibiotics such as tuberculosis (TB) drugs, may raise the risk of developing sarcoidosis. Hormone levels, particularly higher levels of estrogen and progesterone in women, have also been linked to an increased likelihood of sarcoidosis. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis involves a comprehensive assessment that includes medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. While there is no cure for sarcoidosis, the symptoms can often be effectively managed through various treatment options. Treatment may involve the use of medications, surgical interventions, or lifestyle changes. These disparate factors suggests that sarcoidosis has multiple positive and negative exacerbants on disease severity, some of which can be ameliorated and others which cannot.

The immunopathogenesis of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous multiorgan disease, thought to result from exposure to yet unidentified antigens in genetically susceptible individuals. The exaggerated inflammatory response that leads to granuloma formation is highly complex and involves the innate and adaptive immune system. Consecutive immunological studies using advanced technology have increased our understanding of aberrantly activated immune cells, mediators and pathways that influence the formation, maintenance and resolution of granulomas. Over the years, it has become increasingly clear that disease immunopathogenesis can only be understood if the clinical heterogeneity of sarcoidosis is taken into consideration, along with the distribution of immune cells in peripheral blood and involved organs. Most studies offer an immunological snapshot during disease course, while the cellular composition of both the circulation and tissue microenvironment may change over time. Despite these challenges, novel insights on the role of the immune system are continuously published, thus bringing the field forward. This review highlights current knowledge on the innate and adaptive immune responses involved in sarcoidosis pathogenesis, as well as the pathways involved in non-resolving disease and fibrosis development. Additionally, we describe proposed immunological mechanisms responsible for drug-induced sarcoid like reactions. Although many aspects of disease immunopathogenesis remain to be unraveled, the identification of crucial immune reactions in sarcoidosis may help identify new treatment targets. We therefore also discuss potential therapies and future strategies based on the latest immunological findings.

Sarcoid-like Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-mediated cutaneous adverse events, including sarcoid-like reactions. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze clinical and histologic data from patients who developed cutaneous sarcoid-like reactions between 2019 and 2022 while under treatment with ICIs. We studied 7 patients (6 women and 1 man) with a median age of 65years. Median time to onset of symptoms was 4months. The most common presentation was papular sarcoidosis of the knees followed by subcutaneous sarcoidosis. Diagnosis was confirmed histologically in all cases, and no differences were observed relative to idiopathic sarcoidosis. Discontinuation of ICI therapy was required in just two patients. ICI-induced sarcoid-like reactions tend to be mild and generally do not require treatment discontinuation. Histologic confirmation is essential for distinguishing these reactions from tumor progression.

[Translated article] Sarcoid-like Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-mediated cutaneous adverse events, including sarcoid-like reactions. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze clinical and histologic data from patients who developed cutaneous sarcoid-like reactions between 2019 and 2022 while under treatment with ICIs. We studied 7 patients (6 women and 1 man) with a median age of 65years. Median time to onset of symptoms was 4months. The most common presentation was papular sarcoidosis of the knees followed by subcutaneous sarcoidosis. Diagnosis was confirmed histologically in all cases, and no differences were observed relative to idiopathic sarcoidosis. Discontinuation of ICI therapy was required in just two patients. ICI-induced sarcoid-like reactions tend to be mild and generally do not require treatment discontinuation. Histologic confirmation is essential for distinguishing these reactions from tumor progression.

Intraocular sarcoid-like reaction in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the frequency and clinical features of intraocular paraneoplastic sarcoid-like reaction (SLR) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with CLL from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 2020. Eye examinations were searched for 22 keywords suggestive of SLR, and charts were manually reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 4209 unique patients with CLL, 1021 (24%) had at least 1 eye examination on record, and 324 (8%) had 1 or more keyword eye examination findings. After manual review, 12 patients (<1%) were identified as having probable SLR with characteristic features (n = 7), possible but not classic (n = 1), or suspect but less likely (n = 4). All patients (n = 8) with probable or possible SLR were White, and half (n = 4) were male. Intraocular SLR was diagnosed a mean of 49.7 months after the CLL diagnosis (n = 7) or preceded the CLL diagnosis by 1 month (n = 1). Involvement was bilateral in 5 patients, with 13 total affected eyes and mean presenting Snellen visual acuity of 20/50. Common characteristic features on initial examination included vitreous cell (n = 13), anterior-chamber cell (n = 10), keratic precipitates (n = 9), posterior synechiae (n = 6), chorioretinal lesions (n = 5), and vitreous haze (n = 5). Treatment included topical corticosteroids alone (n = 5), with sub-Tenon corticosteroids (n = 1), or with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents (n = 1) or oral corticosteroids alone (n = 1). After a mean follow-up of 19.8 months, final mean visual acuity was 20/30.

CONCLUSION

Intraocular SLRs affect fewer than 1% of patients with CLL. SLR should be on the differential diagnosis list for any CLL patient with ocular complaints, and most patients can be managed successfully with corticosteroids.

Sarcoid-Like Granulomatosis of the Lung Related to Durvalumab After Chemoradiation for Pulmonary Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Sarcoid-like granulomatosis is a unique immune-related adverse event (irAE) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This irAE is infrequent, reported to range from 2% to 22.2% of melanoma treated with ICI. In a case of granulomatosis localized in the lung, it is difficult to differentiate granulomatosis from cancer progression or metastases. Herein, we report a case of ICI-induced sarcoid-like granulomatosis of the lung, which was confusable with localized recurrence of the primary lung cancer. A 56-year-old woman with c-stage IIIA of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma in the right lower lobe received chemo-radiotherapy with two courses of cisplatin and vinorelbine and concurrent thoracic irradiation, followed by 1-year durvalumab consolidation therapy. The tumor in the right S₆ grew and presented abnormal uptake by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), 1.5 years after durvalumab. Neither computed tomography (CT) nor FDG-PET found mediastinal and distant metastases. She underwent right lower lobe lobectomy. Histopathologically, the tumor and sampled lymph nodes contained no residue of carcinoma cells but presented diffuse epithelioid granuloma with infiltration of inflammatory cells, partial necrotic lesions and many multinucleated giant cells. In immunohistochemical stains, CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells predominantly infiltrated, while there were few CD4⁺ T cells and a small number of CD20⁺ B cells. We followed her without steroid and other immunosuppressant drug. We should pay attention to the development of sarcoid-like granulomatosis as a rare irAE, which is difficult to be differentiated from cancer progression.

Cutaneous sarcoidosis due to immune‐checkpoint inhibition and exacerbated by a novel BRAF dimerization inhibitor

Sarcoidosis is a non‐infective granulomatous disorder of unknown aetiology, with cutaneous involvement affecting up to 30% of patients. Drug‐induced sarcoidosis has been reported secondary to modern melanoma therapies including immune‐checkpoint inhibitors and first generation BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib and dabrafenib. Herein, we report a case of cutaneous micropapular sarcoidosis that first developed on immune‐checkpoint inhibition with ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic melanoma, which was exacerbated and further complicated by pityriasis rubra pilaris‐like palmar plaques upon transition to a next‐generation BRAF‐dimerisation inhibitor. Both the micropapular eruption and palmar plaques rapidly resolved after cessation of the novel BRAF‐inhibitor and concurrent commencement of hydroxychloroquine. It is unclear how inhibition of BRAF‐dimerisation results in granuloma formation, though upregulation of T_H1/T_H17 T‐cells and impairment of T‐reg cells may be responsible. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for exacerbation of sarcoidosis when transitioning from immune‐checkpoint inhibitors to these novel BRAF‐dimerisation inhibitors, particularly as their uptake in treating cancers increases beyond clinical trials. Further studies are required to assess whether these next‐generation agents can trigger sarcoidosis de‐novo, or simply exacerbate pre‐existing sarcoidosis.

Review BRAF inhibition and the spectrum of granulomatous reactions

BRAF-inhibitors have emerged as a promising targeted therapy for malignancies with BRAF mutations, particularly metastatic melanoma. However, granulomatous reactions including sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like-reactions have been reported as a consequence of BRAF-inhibition. It is important to adequately characterise these granulomatous reactions including cutaneous manifestations and systemic involvement, in order to guide investigations and management. A literature review was conducted to characterise the spectrum of granulomatous reactions associated with BRAF-inhibitors - identifying 55 reactions affecting 51 patients, with 37 reactions limited to cutaneous involvement. Further, possible correlation with cancer response, mechanisms of granuloma formation, as well as a proposed workup and management approach for these granulomatous reactions are presented.

The diagnosis and management of sarcoid-like reactions in patients with melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. A case series and review of the literature

Sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like reactions (SLR) have been repeatedly reported in patients with melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. In the current study we present three patients that developed SLR under treatment with BRAF and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors for melanoma. Two patients developed mediastinal lymphadenitis with histological features of an SLR while on targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting, whereas one patient with metastatic melanoma developed granulomatous nephritis while receiving combination treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and atezolizumab. In addition, we review the published literature on the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, histologic features, imaging findings, and other potential useful diagnostic tools. We also address the need for a common terminology for these cases and propose an algorithm for the accurate diagnosis of BRAF/MEK inhibitor-induced SLR. We also review the currently available data on the treatment of these patients and suggest a treatment approach for SLR in patients with melanoma, as well as for the management of melanoma when SLR emerges.

Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown origin and poorly understood pathogenesis that predominantly affects lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes and is characterized by the presence of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation in involved organs. The disease is highly heterogeneous and can mimic a plethora of other disorders, making diagnosis a challenge even for experienced physicians. The evolution and severity of sarcoidosis are highly variable: many patients are asymptomatic and their disease course is generally benign with spontaneous resolution. However, up to one-third of patients develop chronic or progressive disease mainly due to pulmonary or cardiovascular complications that require long-term therapy. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis requires histopathological evidence of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation in one or more organs coupled with compatible clinical and radiological features and the exclusion of other causes of granulomatous inflammation; however, in the presence of typical disease manifestations such as Löfgren’s syndrome, Heerfordt’s syndrome, lupus pernio and asymptomatic bilateral and symmetrical hilar lymphadenopathy, the diagnosis can be established with high level of certainty on clinical grounds alone. This review critically examines the diagnostic approach to sarcoidosis and emphasizes the importance of a careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses.

Drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sarcoidosis is a complex granulomatous disease of unknown cause. Several drug categories are able to induce a systemic granulomatous indistinguishable from sarcoidosis, known as drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction (DISR). This granulomatous inflammation can resolve if the medication is discontinued. In this review, we discuss recent literature on medication associated with DISR, possible pathophysiology, clinical features, and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, increasing reports on DISR have expanded the list of drugs associated with the systemic granulomatous eruption. Most reported drugs can be categorized as combination antiretroviral therapy, tumor necrosis factor-α antagonist, interferons, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, but reports on other drugs are also published. The proposed mechanism is enhancement of the aberrant immune response which results in systemic granuloma formation. It is currently not possible to know whether DISR represents a separate entity or is a triggered but 'true' sarcoidosis.As DISRs may cause minimal symptoms, treatment is not always necessary and the benefits of continuing the offending drug should be weighed against clinical symptoms and organ dysfunction. Treatment may involve immunosuppressive medication that is used for sarcoidosis treatment.

SUMMARY

In this article, we review recent insights in DISR: associated drug categories, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Additionally, we discuss possible mechanisms of DISR which can add to our knowledge of sarcoidosis pathophysiology.

Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine mimics lymph node metastases in patients undergoing skin cancer follow-up: A monocentre study

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the lives of people around the world. Fortunately, sufficient vaccines are now available. Local reactions with ipsilateral lymphadenopathy are among the most common side effects. We investigated the impact of lymphadenopathy after COVID-19 vaccination on the value of ultrasound in tumour patients.

Patients and methods

Patients with melanoma or Merkel cell carcinoma were included who underwent lymph node excision and received COVID-19 vaccination within 6 weeks before surgery. The consistency of the preoperative ultrasound findings with the histopathologic findings was investigated.

Results

Eight patients were included (two Merkel cell carcinoma and six melanoma patients) who underwent lymph node excision between 16th April 2021 and 19th May 2021 and had previously received COVID-19 vaccination. In three of the eight patients (one Merkel cell carcinoma and two melanoma patients), lymph node metastases were erroneously diagnosed preoperatively during tumour follow-up with physical examination, ultrasound, and or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). In these three patients, the suspected lymph node metastases were located in the left axilla after COVID-19 vaccination in the left upper arm, which resulted in selective lymph node removal in two patients and complete lymphadenectomy in one patient.

Conclusion

COVID-19 vaccine–associated lymphadenopathy is expected to be observed much more frequently in the near future because of increasing vaccination rates. This cause of lymphadenopathy, which may in ultrasound as well as in FDG PET/CT resemble lymph node metastases, must be considered, especially in oncologic patients undergoing tumour follow-up. In addition, COVID-19 vaccination should be given as far away as possible from an underlying primary on the contralateral side to avoid oncologic misdiagnosis followed by malpractice.

Computed tomography-guided biopsy of radiologically unclear lesions in advanced skin cancer: A retrospective analysis of 47 cases

BACKGROUND

Radiological imaging such as computed tomography (CT) is used frequently for disease staging and therapy monitoring in advanced skin cancer patients. Detected lesions of unclear dignity are a common challenge for treating physicians. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and outcome of CT-guided biopsy (CTGB) of radiologically unclear, suspicious lesions and to depict its usefulness in different clinical settings.

METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included advanced skin cancer patients (melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, angiosarcoma, cutaneous lymphoma) with radiologically unclear lesions who underwent CTGB between 2010 and 2018.

RESULTS

Of 59 skin cancer patients who received CTGB, 47 received CTGB to clarify radiologically suspicious lesions of unclear dignity. 32 patients had no systemic therapy (cohort A), while 15 patients received systemic treatment at CTGB (cohort B). In both cohorts, CTGB revealed skin cancer metastasis in a large proportion of patients (37.5%, 40.0%, respectively), but benign tissue showing inflammation, fibrosis or infection in an equally large percentage (37.5%, 46.7%, respectively). Additionally, a significant number of other cancer entities was found (25.0%, 13.3%, respectively). In patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors, CTGB confirmed suspicious lesions as skin cancer metastasis in 83.3%, leading to treatment change. In immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients, skin cancer metastasis was confirmed in 11.1% of patients only, whereas benign tissue changes (inflammation/fibrosis) were found in 77.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the relevance of clarifying radiologically unclear lesions by CTGB before start or change of an anti-tumour therapy to exclude benign alterations and secondary malignancies.

Pyroptosis by caspase-11 inflammasome-Gasdermin D pathway in autoimmune diseases

Inflammasomes are a group of supramolecular complexes primarily comprise a sensor, adaptor protein and an effector. Among them, canonical inflammasomes are assembled by one specific pattern recognition receptor, the adaptor protein apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD and procaspase-1. Murine caspase-11 and its human ortholog caspase-4/5 are identified as cytosolic sensors which directly responds to LPS. Once gaining access to cytosol, LPS further trigger inflammasome activation in noncanonical way. Downstream pore-forming Gasdermin D is a pyroptosis executioner. Emerging evidence announced in recent years demonstrate the vital role played by caspase-11 non-canonical inflammasome in a range of autoimmune diseases. Pharmacological ablation of caspase-11 and its related effector results in potent therapeutic effects. Though recent advances have highlighted the potential of caspase-11 as a drug target, the understanding of caspase-11 molecular activation and regulation mechanism remains to be limited and thus hampered the discovery and progression of novel inhibitors. Here in this timeline review, we explored how caspase-11 get involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, we also collected the reported small-molecular caspase-11 inhibitors. Moreover, the clinical implications and therapeutic potential of caspase-11 inhibitors are discussed. Targeting non-canonical inflammasomes is a promising strategy for autoimmune diseases treatment, while information about the toxicity and physiological disposition of the promising caspase-11 inhibitors need to be supplemented before they can be translated from bench to bedside.

Sarcoidosis and Cancer: A Complex Relationship

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology, characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas in various organs, mainly the lungs, and the lymphatic system. Since the individualization of sarcoidosis-lymphoma association by Brincker et al., the relationship between sarcoidosis or granulomatous syndromes and malignancies has been clarified through observational studies worldwide. Two recent meta-analyses showed an increased risk of neoplasia in sarcoidosis. The granulomatosis can also reveal malignancy, either solid or hematological, defining paraneoplastic sarcoidosis. Recent cancer immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (targeting PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4) and BRAF or MEK inhibitors were also reported as possible inducers of sarcoidosis-like reactions. Sarcoidosis and neoplasia, especially lymphoma, can show overlapping presentations, thus making the diagnosis and treatment harder to deal with. There are currently no formal recommendations to guide the differential diagnosis workup between the evolution of lymphoma or a solid cancer and a granulomatous reaction associated with neoplasia. Thus, in atypical presentations (e.g., deeply impaired condition, compressive lymphadenopathy, atypical localization, unexplained worsening lymphadenopathy, or splenomegaly), and treatment-resistant disease, targeted biopsies on suspect localizations with histological examination could help the clinician to differentiate neoplasia from sarcoidosis. Pathological diagnosis could sometimes be challenging since very few tumor cells may be surrounded by massive granulomatous reaction. The sensitization of currently available diagnostic tools should improve the diagnostic accuracy, such as the use of more “cancer-specific” radioactive tracers coupled with Positron Emission Tomography scan.