Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy

Can we define difficult-to-treat systemic sclerosis?

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune rheumatic disease characterized by microvascular alterations, immunopathology, and widespread fibrosis involving various organs. It is considered difficult to treat due to several reasons: complex pathogenesis, heterogeneity, late diagnosis, limited treatment options for certain organ manifestations, lack of personalized medicine.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents the heterogeneity, survival and organ manifestations with their risk factors of systemic sclerosis and their current treatment options, while drawing attention to difficult-to-treat forms of the disease, based on literature indexed in PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite recent advances in the management of SSc over the last decades, the disease presents significant morbidity and mortality. Although available treatment protocols brought significant advancements in terms of survival in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension, less success has been achieved in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers and the results are modest in case of heart, gastrointestinal, and renal manifestations. There are patients who do not respond to treatment and deteriorate even with adequate therapy. They can be considered difficult-to treat (D2T) cases. We have created a possible score system based on the individual organ manifestations and highlighted treatment options for the D2T SSc category.

Anti-U1RNP antibodies are associated with a distinct clinical phenotype and a worse survival in patients with systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the impact of anti-U1RNP antibodies on the clinical features and prognosis of patients with SSc.

METHODS

We conducted a monocentric case-control, retrospective, longitudinal study. For each patient with SSc and anti-U1RNP antibodies (SSc-RNP+), one patient with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and 2 SSc patients without anti-U1RNP antibodies (SSc-RNP-) were matched for age, sex, and date of inclusion.

RESULTS

Sixty-four SSc-RNP+ patients were compared to 128 SSc-RNP- and 64 MCTD patients. Compared to SSc-RNP-, SSc-RNP+ patients were more often of Afro-Caribbean origin (31.3% vs. 11%, p < 0.01), and more often had an overlap syndrome than SSc-RNP- patients (53.1 % vs. 22.7%, p < 0.0001), overlapping with Sjögren's syndrome (n = 23, 35.9%) and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 19, 29.7%). SSc-RNP+ patients were distinctly different from MCTD patients but less often had joint involvement (p < 0.01). SSc-RNP+ patients more frequently developed interstitial lung disease (ILD) (73.4% vs. 55.5% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.05), pulmonary fibrosis (PF) (60.9% vs. 37.5% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.0001), SSc associated myopathy (29.7% vs. 6.3% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.0001), and kidney involvement (10.9% vs. 2.3% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.05). Over a 200-month follow-up period, SSc-RNP+ patients had worse overall survival (p < 0.05), worse survival without PF occurrence (p < 0.01), ILD or PF progression (p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In SSc patients, anti-U1RNP antibodies are associated with a higher incidence of overlap syndrome, a distinct clinical phenotype, and poorer survival compared to SSc-RNP- and MCTD patients. Our study suggests that SSc-RNP+ patients should be separated from MCTD patients and may constitute an enriched population for progressive lung disease.

Proximal weakness and creatine kinase elevation in systemic sclerosis: Clinical correlates, prognosis and functional implications

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency, clinical correlates and implications of clinical evidence of muscle disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants with ≥1 creatine kinase (CK) and proximal power assessment were subdivided according to presence of proximal weakness (PW: proximal muscle power<5/5) and CK elevation(≥140IU/L). Participants were assigned to one of four groups: concurrent PW&CK elevation, PW alone, CK elevation alone or neither. Between-group comparisons were made with chi-squared, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Survival analysis was performed using time-varying-covariate Cox regression modelling. Longitudinal data were modelled using multinomial logistic and linear regression.

RESULTS

Of 1786 participants, 4 % had concurrent PW&CK elevation, 15 % PW alone, 24 % CK elevation and 57 % neither. Participants with PW&CK elevation displayed a severe, inflammatory SSc phenotype, with more frequent dcSSc(p < 0.01), tendon friction rubs(p < 0.01), synovitis(p < 0.01) and digital ulceration(p = 0.03). Multimorbidity(p < 0.01) and cardiopulmonary disease, including ischaemic heart disease(p < 0.01) and pulmonary arterial hypertension(p < 0.01), were most common in those with PW, with and without CK elevation. Men with anti-Scl70 positivity most frequently had CK elevation alone, without other significant clinical differences. Multivariable modelling demonstrated 3.6-fold increased mortality in those with PW&CK elevation (95 %CI 1.9-6.6, p < 0.01) and 2.1-fold increased mortality in PW alone (95 %CI 1.4-3.0, p < 0.01) compared to those without PW or CK elevation. CK elevation alone conferred better survival (HR 0.7, 95 %CI 0.4-1.1, p = 0.09) compared to those with no PW or CK elevation. PW regardless of CK elevation was associated with impaired physical function, with reduced six-minute-walk-distance (p < 0.01), higher HAQ-DI scores (p < 0.01) and increased patient-reported dyspnoea (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Clinical features of myopathy are highly prevalent in SSc, affecting almost half of our study cohort. Detection of PW and elevated CK alone, even without imaging or histopathological identification of SSc-myopathy, identified important clinical associations and are associated with poorer function and overall prognosis.

Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy: how to treat

Purpose of review

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and myositis are two different entities that may coexist as an overlap syndrome. Immunological biomarkers such as anti-PM/Scl or anti-Ku reinforce the syndrome. This review is focused on the treatment of different and characteristic manifestations of this syndrome.

Recent findings

Among the different phenotypes of muscle involvement in patients with SSc, the fibrotic pattern and the sporadic inclusion body myositis must be identified early to avoid a futile immunosuppressive treatment. Other forms such as dermatomyositis, non-specific myositis and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy need to receive conventional immunosuppressive therapy considering that high dose of glucocorticoids may induce a scleroderma renal crisis in patients with SSc. Physicians must be aware of the existence of a "double trouble" association of hereditary myopathy with an autoimmune phenomenon. Several autoantibodies, mainly anti-PM/Scl and anti-Ku may help to define specific phenotypes with characteristic clinical manifestations that need a more specific therapy. Vasculopathy is one of the underlying mechanisms that link SSc and myositis. Recent advances in this topic are reviewed.

Summary

Current treatment of SSc associated myopathy must be tailored to specific organs involved. Identifying the specific clinical, pathological, and immunological phenotypes may help to take the correct therapeutic decisions.

Treatable Traits in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic systemic disease within the spectrum of connective tissue diseases, specifically characterized by vascular abnormalities and inflammatory and fibrotic involvement of the skin and internal organs resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The clinical phenotype of SSc is heterogeneous, and serum autoantibodies together with the extent of skin involvement have a predictive value in the risk stratification. Current recommendations include an organ-based management according to the predominant involvement with only limited individual factors included in the treatment algorithm. Similar to what has been proposed for other chronic diseases, we hypothesize that a "treatable trait" approach based on relevant phenotypes and endotypes could address the unmet needs in SSc stratification and treatment to maximize the outcomes. We provide herein a comprehensive review and a critical discussion of the literature regarding potential treatable traits in SSc, focusing on established and candidate biomarkers, with the purpose of setting the bases for a precision medicine-based approach. The discussion, structured based on the organ involvement, allows to conjugate the pathogenetic mechanisms of tissue injury with the proposed predictors, particularly autoantibodies and other serum biomarkers. Ultimately, we are convinced that precision medicine is the ideal guide to manage a complex condition such as SSc for which available treatments are largely unsatisfactory.