Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Nerve Block in Endoluminal Laser Ablation of the Greater Saphenous Vein

Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block: A Minimally Invasive Method for Pain Control During Endovascular Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSNB) for pain control in endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 252 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for CLI between January 2020 and August 2022. Of these, 69 patients underwent PSNB, whereas moderate procedural sedation and analgesia was delivered in 183 patients. Pain scores were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) before and during the intervention. Technical and clinical success of PSNB, duration of the procedure, time to onset of nerve block, time for block resolution, and adverse events were recorded. Patient and operator satisfaction were assessed using the Likert scale.

RESULTS

All PSNB procedures were technically and clinically successful, and the mean procedural duration of PSNB was 5.0 minutes ± 0.8 (range, 4-7 minutes). Prolonged effect of PSNB was observed in 3 patients, which resolved within 24 hours. No adverse events were encountered. Median VAS score was significantly lower in the PSNB group than in the moderate procedural sedation and analgesia group during endovascular treatment (0 [range, 0-2] vs 3 [range, 0-7]; P < .001). Patient satisfaction was comparable ("very satisfied" in 66 [95.7%] vs 161 [88.0%]; P = .069). However, operator satisfaction was significantly higher in the PSNB group ("very satisfied" in 69 [100%] vs 161 [88.0%]; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

PSNB is safe and effective for pain control during endovascular treatment of CLI. Low adverse event rates with high patient and operator satisfaction make PSNB a reasonable alternative for high-risk patients.

Ultrasound-guided femoral block in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of incompetent saphenous veins: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefit of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (UGFN) for reducing pain in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

Patients age 18-70 years scheduled for RFA were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to the UGFN or control group at a 1:1 ratio, and stratified according to concomitant phlebectomy procedure. The pain score and amount of fentanyl use during the operation were recorded. Pain severity and quadriceps muscle strength were recorded at 2-, 6-, and 12-hours postoperation.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients in each group were included. Moderate to severe pain during surgery was found in 16 (66.7%) patients in the control group, and in 2 (8.3%) patients in the UGFN group (p < 0.001). Fentanyl use during surgery was significantly higher in controls than in UGFN patients (107.29 ± 40.70 μg vs. 42.71 ± 26.04 μg, respectively; p < 0.0001). The postoperative pain score was not significantly different between groups. In the UGFN group, quadriceps femoris weakness was found in 19 (79.2%) patients, and in 1 (4.2%) patient at 2-hours and 6-hours postoperation, respectively. No patient in the control group had quadriceps femoris weakness.

CONCLUSION

UGFN decreased intraoperative pain during RFA. However, patients undergoing UGFN should be observed in the hospital for at least 6 hours, and quadriceps muscle power should be tested before hospital discharge.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasound on Venous and Arterial Ulcers: A Focused Review

GENERAL PURPOSE

To provide information about the use of ultrasound for diagnostic and therapeutic treatment of venous and arterial ulcers.

TARGET AUDIENCE

This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES

After completing this continuing education activity, you should be able to: ABSTRACT: To review the diagnostic and therapeutic use of ultrasound on venous and arterial ulcers.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed articles using the search terms "ultrasound for venous ulcers" and "ultrasound for arterial ulcers." The search yielded 282 articles on ultrasound for venous ulcers and 455 articles for ultrasound on arterial ulcers. Data from 36 articles were selected and included after abstract review.

RESULTS

Ultrasound is an established diagnostic modality for venous and arterial disease and is indicated for wound debridement. Recent evidence continues to support its superiority over standard of care in healing venous ulcers, but findings conflict in terms of the effectiveness of low-frequency ultrasound over high-frequency ultrasound. There are currently no standardized treatment protocols for ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic ultrasound is used to assess venous and arterial disease and guide appropriate treatment for ulcers. Therapeutic low-frequency ultrasound is used to debride the wound bed, as an adjunctive topical wound treatment with standard of care, and to guide the application of other advanced therapies to chronic wounds. Better trial designs and consistent data are needed to support the effectiveness of ultrasound therapy on venous and arterial ulcers.

Evaluation of pain during endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block

Background

Endoluminal laser ablation is now considered the method of choice for treating greater saphenous vein insufficiency. General anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks with sedation have the risk of post-procedural delay in discharge and prolonged immobilization with the risk of deep vein thrombosis. The main pain experienced by patients during the procedure is during the laser ablation and the multiple needle punctures given along and around the great saphenous vein. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of blocking the femoral nerve only under ultrasound-guidance without sedation, to reduce or prevent pain during injectable tumescent anesthesia in endovenous laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein.

Methods

Sixty patients in two groups underwent endovenous laser ablation for the greater saphenous vein insufficiency at an outpatient clinic. All patients received tumescent anesthesia. However, one group received a femoral nerve block (FNB) under ultrasound guidance before the procedure. All patients were asked to record the pain or discomfort, using the visual analog score, from the start of the procedure until the end of the great saphenous vein laser ablation. The length of the great saphenous vein and duration of the procedure were also recorded. The results were analyzed using statistical methods.

Results

No complications from FNB were observed. The pain associated with application of tumescent anesthesia and laser ablation was more intense in the group without an FNB (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of the great saphenous vein or procedure duration.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided FNB (without other peripheral nerve blocks) is a safe, adequate, and effective option to decrease and/or eliminate the intraoperative discomfort associated with tumescent anesthesia injections and laser ablation during endoluminal laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein.

Technique, Efficiency and Safety of Different Nerve Blocks for Analgesia in Laser Ablation and Sclerotherapy for Lower Limb Superficial Venous Insufficiency - A Multicentre Experience

INTRODUCTION

Laser ablation and sclerotherapy, as minimally invasive alternatives to surgery for varicose veins, have good efficacy, safety and cosmetic result. Some form of anaesthesia is generally used for pain control.

AIM

To describe the technique and evaluate the efficacy and safety of femoral, saphenous and sciatic nerve blocks in isolation or in combination for analgesia during laser ablation and sclerotherapy for lower limb varicose veins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, over a period of 33 months, in 856 limbs of 681 patients with varicose veins, ultrasound guided femoral, saphenous and sciatic nerve blocks for analgesia were performed in 769, 808 and 52 instances respectively; following which, endovenous laser ablation, sclerotherapy or combination of both were carried out using standard practice. After completion of the procedure, Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment, and muscle weakness was assessed clinically.

RESULTS

Nerve blocks could be successfully performed in all patients. Observed pain scores were 0 or 1 in 591 (69%), 2 or 3 in 214 (25%) and 4 in 51 (9%) legs with no score more than 4. Higher grades of pain were noted in femoral blocks during early stages of our learning curve. Mild to moderate muscle weakness was observed in 163 (2%) and 7 (13%) patients who underwent femoral and sciatic block respectively, which persisted for an average of two and a half hours and none beyond four and a half hours; saphenous nerve being a pure sensory nerve, did not cause motor weakness.

CONCLUSION

For analgesia during laser ablation and/or sclerotherapy of varicose veins, ultrasound guided nerve blocks can be easily and quickly performed. They provide excellent pain relief and comfort to the patient and to the operator; and they do not cause any additional complication.

The Utility of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Interventional Radiology

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of peripheral nerve blocks, the use of peripheral nerve block within and outside interventional radiology, and the complications of peripheral nerve block.

CONCLUSION

Interventional radiologists are often responsible for sedation and pain management in the majority of interventional radiology procedures. Peripheral nerve block is increasingly being used in interventional radiology.

The Efficacy of Femoral Block and Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia on Analgesia, Haemodynamics and Mobilization in Patients undergoing Endovenous Ablation in the Lower Extremity

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of femoral block and unilateral spinal anaesthesia on analgesia, haemodynamics and mobilization during endovenous ablation in patients with lower extremity venous insufficiency.

METHODS

Forty patients of ASA physical status I and II, with ages ranging between 30 and 45 years, and who were scheduled for endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized into a unilateral spinal anaesthesia group (group HS, n=20) or a femoral block group (group F, n=20). Group HS received 7.5-10 mg of heavy bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anaesthesia, while group F received 100 mg prilocaine for femoral block with ultrasound guidance. The level of motor blockage (Bromage score), visual pain score, mean heart rate and mean arterial pressures were recorded at postoperative 0, 1, 2, 3d and 6 h, respectively.

RESULTS

Perioperative visual pain score values in both groups were <4. None of the groups required an additional analgesic agent. Bromage scores were significantly lower in group F than in group HS during the postoperative period (p<0.01). Motor function returned to normal in all patients at 3 h in group F and at 6 h in group HS. Postoperative mean heart rate and arterial pressure did not differ between the groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with lower extremity venous insufficiency who were undergoing endovenous laser ablation, an ultrasound-guided femoral block provided similar analgesia with that of unilateral spinal anaesthesia. In group F, the duration of anaesthesia and mobilization time was shorter.

Haemostatic activation and inflammatory response after three methods of treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the activation of haemostasis and inflammatory response after three different methods of treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with GSV incompetence were assigned to one of the three types of treatment: high ligation and stripping (HL&S), radiofrequency ablation with ClosureFast (RFA) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with 810 nm diode laser with miniphlebectomy if required. Peripheral blood samples were obtained in the morning before the surgery and 24 hours and 10 days after the procedure. The concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), antigen of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and activity of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) were determined. The results were statistically analysed with SPSS for Windows 15.0.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients completed the study: 13 from RFA, 14 from EVLA and 11 from HL&S group. The baseline data did not differ among groups. There was a significant increase of D-dimer in HL&S group after 24 hours (P = 0.002). The changes in RFA and EVLA groups did not show statistical significance (P = 0.092). PAI-1 decreased in RFA patients after 24 hours (P = 0.02), did not change in EVLA patients, and tended to increase after HL&S (P = 0.08). The highest CRP increase was observed in HL&S group (P = 0.003). No significant changes in F1 + 2, t-PA and vWF were observed in any group of patients at 24 hours. At 10 days, a further significant increase of D-dimer (P = 0.04) and CRP (P = 0.018) concentrations in HL&S but not RFA and EVLA patients was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovenous thermal ablation is associated with significantly less activation of haemostasis and inflammatory response when compared with HL&S.

US-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for analgesia during endovenous laser ablation

PURPOSE

Endovenous laser ablation may be associated with significant pain when performed under standard local tumescent anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for analgesia during endovenous ablation in patients with lower extremity venous insufficiency.

METHODS

During a 28-month period, ultrasound-guided femoral or sciatic nerve blocks were performed to provide analgesia during endovenous laser ablation in 506 legs and 307 patients. The femoral block (n = 402) was performed at the level of the inguinal ligament, and the sciatic block at the posterior midthigh (n = 124), by injecting a diluted lidocaine solution under ultrasound guidance. After the blocks, endovenous laser ablations and other treatments (phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy) were performed in the standard fashion. After the procedures, a visual analogue pain scale (1-10) was used for pain assessment.

RESULTS

After the blocks, pain scores were 0 or 1 (no pain) in 240 legs, 2 or 3 (uncomfortable) in 225 legs, and 4 or 5 (annoying) in 41 legs. Patients never experienced any pain higher than score 5. The statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the pain scores of the right leg versus the left leg (p = 0.321) and between the pain scores after the femoral versus sciatic block (p = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks may provide considerable reduction of pain during endovenous laser and other treatments, such as ambulatory phlebectomy and foam sclerotherapy. They may make these procedures more comfortable for the patient and easier for the operator.