Routine Versus Selective Use of Intraoperative Angiography During Thromboembolectomy for Acute Lower Limb Ischemia: Analysis of Outcomes

Mid-term Outcomes of Image-Guided Surgical Thromboembolectomy and Routine Intraoperative Angiography for Native Vessel Acute Lower-Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Standard balloon-catheter thromboembolectomy (TE) is an established effective treatment for acute lower-limb ischemia (ALI) with recognized limitations when there is an underlying arterial lesion or thromboembolism of the infrapopliteal arteries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of image-guided surgical TE combined with routine intraoperative completion angiography in the treatment of ALI patients.

METHODS

Between September 2020 and August 2022, this prospective study included all consecutive adult patients presenting to a tertiary center with unilateral ALI of Rutherford class II due to thromboembolic occlusion of native arteries who underwent image-guided surgical TE and routine completion intraoperative angiography. Adjunctive endovascular techniques (hybrid revascularization) including plain balloon angioplasty (PTA)±stenting or on-table lysis were used if underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis were detected on the intraoperative angiography, respectively. The primary outcome measures included technical success and 30-day major amputation rate. Perioperative complications, 1-year primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, mortality, and amputation-free survival rates were endorsed as secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Image-guided surgical thrombectomy was done for 109 ALI patients (109 limbs), provisionally diagnosed as embolic (57 patients, 52.3%) or thrombotic (52 patients, 47.7%) arterial occlusion. Thromboembolectomy without adjunctive endovascular treatment was done in 38 patients (34.86%), whereas 71 patients (65.14%) required adjunctive PTA±stenting of underlying arterial lesions (60, 55.05%) or on-table lysis±PTA of residual thrombosis (11, 10.09%). The overall technical success rate was 92.66%. At 30 days, amputation and mortality rates were 3.67% and 5.5%, respectively. None of the patients had thrombectomy-induced arterial injuries. One-year follow-up data were available for 81 patients (74.3%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 12-month primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and amputation-free survival rates was 76.5%±0.04, 91.5%±0.03, 90.6±0.03, and 91.4±0.03%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided TE combined with routine intraoperative angiography is a safe and effective technique for surgical TE in acute lower-limb ischemia patients with the advantage of immediate identification and treatment of underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis for optimal revascularization.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The present study has confirmed the safety and effectiveness of image-guided thromboembolectomy combined with routine use of intraoperative angiography during surgical treatment of acute lower limb ischemia in terms of immediate identification and treatment of underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis for optimal revascularization. This technique also facilitates selective passage of Fogarty balloon catheter into infrapopliteal arteries from the femoral approach which is traditionally done by exploration of the popliteal trifurcation or tibial arteries under regional or general anesthesia. Using this technique can guide the operating surgeon for adequate balloon manipulation and inflation to avoid iatrogenic vessel injury.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Following Revascularization in Patients With Acute Limb Ischemia - Results From the RESCUE ALI Study

BACKGROUND

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a limb- and life-threatening condition and urgent treatment including revascularization should be offered to patients unless the limb is irreversibly ischemic. The aim of this study was to investigate 1-year clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following revascularization in patients with ALI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study examined 185 consecutive patients with ALI treated by surgical revascularization (SR), endovascular revascularization (ER), or hybrid revascularization (HR) in 6 Japanese medical centers from January 2015 to August 2021. The 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS) rate was estimated to be 69.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.8-76.2%). There were no significant differences among SR, ER, and HR regarding both technical success and perioperative complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that Rutherford category IIb and III ischemia (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.06-3.25), supra- to infrapopliteal lesion (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.08-3.95), and technical failure (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.49-4.46) were independent risk factors for 1-year AFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Rutherford category IIb and III ischemia, supra- to infrapopliteal lesions, and technical failures were identified as independent risk factors for 1-year AFS. Furthermore, patients with multiple risk factors had a lower AFS rate.

Thromboembolectomy for acute lower limb ischemia: Contemporary outcomes of two surgical methods from a single tertiary center

OBJECTIVES

The current treatment of acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) includes open surgical and percutaneous pharmaco-mechanical thromboembolectomy (TE). We hereby report our results with open surgical TE over a 10-year period and compare our outcomes using routine fluoroscopic assisted TE (FATE) with blind and selective on demand fluoroscopic-assisted TE (BSTE).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent open surgical TE for acute lower limb ischemia at a single tertiary center between 2008 and 2018. Patients were divided into a group who underwent BSTE and another who underwent routine FATE. Data on presentation, medical history, surgery performed, and short-term outcomes were retrieved from medical record. Comparison between baseline characteristics and outcomes of both groups were made using t-test and chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, 108 patients underwent surgical TE. Thirty-day mortality rate and 30-day major lower extremity amputation rate in the cohort were 12.0% and 6.5%, respectively. On subgroup analysis, 53 patients were treated by BSTE and 55 patients by FATE. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality rate (11.3% vs 12.7%, p-value = .82) and 30-day major amputation rate (9.4% vs 3.6%, p-value = .454) between the two groups. Local anesthesia was more frequently performed in patients undergoing FATE (58.2% vs 24.5%, p-value < .001). More than one arteriotomy was more frequently required in patients undergoing BSTE (2.6% vs 45.5%, p-value < .001). Patients with infrapopliteal involvement undergoing FATE required less further interventions such as patch angioplasty (2.6% vs 36.4%, p-value < .001) and bypass (2.6% vs 22.7%, p-value = .01).

CONCLUSION

ALLI remains a disease of high morbidity and mortality. Open surgical TE offers an effective approach to treat ALLI. The addition of fluoroscopy to the conduction of TE could be associated with valuable benefits, especially in patients with infra-popliteal involvement. Randomized controlled trials are needed to objectively assess the therapeutic potential of FATE.

Contemporary Management of Acute Lower Limb Ischemia: Determinants of Treatment Choice

The role of endovascular procedures in the treatment of acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) is expanding. For treatment, the choice between surgical or endovascular is still debated. The aim of this study was to identify factors that determine the selection of treatment. This study included 307 ALI patients (209 with thrombosis). Patient details, factors affecting the procedure choice, and outcomes were analyzed. The majority of patients were operated on (52.4%). Surgery was more frequent in embolic patients with embolus (odds ratio (OR) 33.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.22–184.19, p < 0.0001), severe ischemia (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.2–2.66, p = 0.0041), and active cancer (OR 4.99; 95% CI 1.26–19.72, p = 0.02). Tibial arteries involvement was negatively related to surgery (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.06–0.95, p = 0.04). The complications and amputation rates were comparable. Reinterventions were more common in the endovascular group (19 (20.2%) vs. 17 (8.9%), p = 0.007). The six-month mortality was higher in the operated patients (12.6% vs. 3.2%, respectively, p = 0.001). The determinants of the treatment path are ischemia severity, concurrent cancer, embolus, and peripheral lesion location. Modification of the Rutherford acute lower limb ischemia classification is required to improve the decision-making in patients with profound ischemia.

One-year limb outcome and mortality in patients undergoing revascularization therapy for acute limb ischemia: short-term results of the Edo registry

The present study aimed to clarify the current status, therapeutic strategy, and 1-year outcome in acute limb ischemia (ALI) patients in Japan. The EnDOvascular treatment (Edo) registry database includes 324 patients from 10 institutes who were registered between November 2011 and October 2013. A total of 70 ALI patients (mean age 74.0 years) from the Edo registry database were enrolled in this study. Of the 70 included patients, 72.9% were male and 35.7% had embolism. Of patients, 38.6%, 42.9%, and 18.6% underwent EVT, surgery, and hybrid thrombectomy, respectively, in primary revascularization strategy. Limb ischemia was categorized into four classes at initial evaluation: SVS/ISCVS class I (n = 13, 18.6%), SVS/ISCVS class IIa (n = 36, 51.4%), SVS/ISCVS class IIb (n = 21, 30%), and SVS/ISCVS class III (n = 0, 0%). Three patients with SVS/ISCVS class IIb limb ischemia developed myonephropathic metabolic syndrome. No catheter-directed thrombolysis was employed as a primary revascularization strategy. The 1-year rates of all-cause death, major amputation, and a composite of perioperative death or major adverse limb event were 28.6%, 5.7%, and 40.0%, respectively. Lower age, male sex, dyslipidemia, high estimated glomerular filtration rate, high albumin level, and low C-reactive protein level were independent positive predictors of all-cause death. In this registry, SVS/ISCVS class IIa ALI was predominant. Approximately 40% of primary revascularization strategy was surgery and EVT, followed by hybrid therapy. All-cause death and major amputation rates at 1 year were less than 30% and 6%, respectively.

Acute on chronic limb ischemia: From surgical embolectomy and thrombolysis to endovascular options

After the invention of the balloon catheter by Fogarty in 1963, surgical thromboembolectomy was considered the gold standard treatment for many years in patients with acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI). ALLI is a dramatic event, carrying a high risk of amputation and perioperative morbidity and mortality. The evolution of endovascular technologies has resulted in a variety of therapeutic options to establish arterial patency. In the 1970s, Dotter first introduced the idea of clot lysis in the treatment of ALLI, which was modified to catheter-directed thrombolysis, and now clot aspiration techniques. Currently, the majority of ALLI (about 70%) is arterial thrombosis, which generally occurs in the setting of preexisting vascular lesion. This condition is very common in patients with diabetes. Clinical presentation in case of thrombosis on atherosclerotic stenosis (so called "acute on chronic ischemia") may be less severe, but treatment is generally more challenging than ALLI due to embolism, considering the complexity in device trackability through the diseased vessels, potential vessel injury, incomplete revascularization, and need of correction of underlying vascular lesions. Although surgery is still a treatment option, especially for ALLI, endovascular interventions have assumed a prominent role in restoring limb perfusion. In this review, the treatment options for ALLI are detailed from surgical thromboembolectomy to thrombolysis and current endovascular techniques, including mechanical fragmentation, rheolytic thrombectomy, and aspiration thrombectomy. The evolution to endovascular therapies has resulted in improved clinical outcomes and lower rates of morbidity.

Carbon dioxide as a substitute for iodine contrast in arteriography during embolectomy

Acute limb ischemia can be potentially harmful to the limb and life threatening. Renal failure is a possible outcome associated with release of products of ischemic limb reperfusion. Some authors reported the benefit of performing angiography after embolectomy, even though iodine contrast is also nephrotoxic. We report a case of embolectomy on a patient with renal insufficiency in whom carbon dioxide was used as a substitute for iodine contrast.

Therapeutic effect of liposomal prostaglandin E1 in acute lower limb ischemia as an adjuvant to hybrid procedures

Prostaglandin E₁ (PGE₁) is widely used in the treatment of limb ischemia for its potent vasodilatory and antiplatelet effects. In order to assess the curative effect of liposomal PGE₁ (lipo-PGE₁) as an adjuvant to surgery in patients with acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI), 204 patients who underwent hybrid procedures (operative thromboembolectomy or bypass and necessary endovascular interventions) for ALLI were randomly divided into a blank control group and a lipo-PGE₁ group (intravenous infusion of 20 μg/day for 12–14 consecutive days following surgery). Patients were followed-up for 6 months after surgical revascularization for clinical events. The primary study endpoint, which was the combined incidence of perioperative (30 days) mortality (POM) and major adverse limb events (MALE; amputation or major intervention), was significantly reduced in patients treated with lipo-PGE₁ (5.1% compared with 13.2% in the control group). The overall incidence of clinical events, including POM, MALE and major adverse cardiovascular events, was significantly reduced in patients receiving lipo-PGE₁ (8.2%) compared with the controls (20.8%). Hybrid procedures are an improved method for treating ALLI and may remedy underlying lesions of vessels following thromboembolectomy.

The Role of Hybrid Procedures in the Management of Peripheral Vascular Disease

This paper provides a summary of up-to-date information and experience with the combined treatment of patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with endovascular and open surgery, performed simultaneously and in a single operating room. Hybrid intervention is reported to have good results in well-indicated groups of patients with acute and chronic limb ischemia, even with older, high-risk patients. The indications for the use of this technique remain unclear with inconsistent opinions among vascular surgeons. The indications for treatment were divided into three main groups: 1) Patients with chronic limb ischemia, 2) acute limb ischemia, and 3) occlusion of a previous vascular reconstruction. The operating techniques for the most commonly used combinations are described.

In conclusion, hybrid operating techniques are often useful when treating complex problems and multilevel disease in patients with chronic or acute lower limb ischemia. Modern vascular surgeons need to master both open and endovascular techniques, and to combine them in a creative fashion to the benefit of our patients.