Pedicled Flaps in Association With Distal Bypass for Lower-Limb Salvage

Definitive coverage of distal vein graft in a case of early skin necrosis following popliteal to dorsalis pedis bypass

Inframalleolar bypass is an effective intervention for chronic limb threatening ischemia. A successful outcome can be compromised by early pedal wound disruption with secondary bypass exposure. We describe the case of a 74-year-old man with a WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) clinical stage 4 foot who underwent popliteal-dorsalis pedis bypass, complicated by early skin necrosis overlying the pedal anastomosis. This necessitated a multidisciplinary approach to obtain tissue coverage over the anastomosis. The wound healed within 28 days, and at 2 years, the patient was mobilizing independently. We outline the approach taken and discuss the management of this challenging limb salvage problem.

Dual-Perforator Flap With Wide Pedicle Versus Sural Neurocutaneous Flap With Peroneal Artery Perforator in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Defects of Foot and Ankle

How to deal with large soft tissue defects around the foot and ankle is still controversial. The aim of this study was: (1) to display a new pedicled flap, also named the dual-perforator flap with wide pedicle (DPFWP), and (2) to compare it with the sural neurovascular flap with peroneal artery perforator (SNFPAP) in foot and ankle reconstruction. According to different surgical methods, 82 patients were divided into 2 groups: the DPFWP group (42 cases) and the SNFPAP group (40 cases). All cases underwent a flap surgery after radical debridement. The 2 groups were homogeneous in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), etiology, location, and follow-up duration. Operation indexes were compared, including flap length, flap width, operation time and blood loss. Complications, cosmetic appearance, and functional outcome were analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed. The DPFWP group had larger flap length (24.5 ± 4.6 cm vs 16.3 ± 3.8 cm), and flap width (10.5 ± 2.7 cm vs 7.8 ± 1.7 cm) than the SNFPAP group. In postoperative follow-up, DPFWP group showed a lower complication rate and better cosmetic, functional outcomes than SNFPAP group. In conclusion, this study showed that a DPFWP flap brought better results than a SNFPAP flap in terms of complications, cosmetic appearance, and functional outcomes for patients undergoing reconstruction of foot and ankle defects.

Impact of the Timing of Foot Tissue Resection on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

The objective of this study is to describe utilization of revascularization and tissue resection in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and determine whether the timing of resection impacts outcomes. Revascularizations for CLTI were queried (ACS-NSQIP 2011-2015). Outcomes included 30-day major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), length of stay (LOS), operative time, 30-day readmissions, and wound infections. Groups included revascularization alone, revascularization/tissue resection during the same procedure (concurrent), or revascularization/delayed tissue resection (delayed). Resections were debridement or transmetatarsal amputations. Multivariate logistic regression determined risk-adjusted effects of tissue resection on outcomes. There was no difference in overall 30-day MACE or MALE between groups (P = .70 and P = .35, respectively). Length of stay (6.1 days revascularization alone vs 7.8 days concurrent vs 8.7 days delayed, P < .0001) was longer in patients who underwent any tissue resection. Highest 30-day readmission and operative time was the concurrent group (P = .02 and P < .0001, respectively). Wound infection was highest in the delayed group (1.4% revascularization alone vs 1.3% concurrent vs 6.2% delayed, P < .0001). After risk adjustment, timing of resection did not impact LOS for concurrent and delayed groups compared to revascularization alone (both P < .0001). Debridement and minor amputations can be done concurrently in patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI.

Inferior Limb Salvage by Combined Free-tissue Transfer and the Crane Principle Revisited

Aggressive treatment of ischemia of the lower extremities has decreased the number of amputations in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients; combined vascular reconstruction and microvascular free-flap transfer has been used to improve distal perfusion and cover large tissue defects caused by the critical limb ischemia during the past 30 years. We present our experience with a 71-year-old diabetic patient who underwent revascularization with a vascular bypass and a simultaneous microvascular flap reconstruction for limb salvage after domestic trauma. An extension of the “crane” principle was used to solve bypass exposure due to wound late complication. After 1-year follow-up, the patient was able to walk without pain. Combining 3 well-established methods of arterial revascularization and free-flap transfer and the old “crane principle,” we achieved limb salvage, offering an alternative to below-knee amputation.