Endovascular Palliation of Multivessel Blowout Syndrome in the Setting of a Nonresectable Neck Sarcoma

Carotid Blowout Syndrome in the Emergency Department: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an infrequent but dangerous oncologic emergency that must be recognized due to a mortality rate that approaches 40% and neurologic morbidity that approaches 60%. Patients present with a variety of symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to frank hemorrhage, and appropriate recognition and management may improve their outcomes.

CASE REPORT

A man in his late 60s with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx presented to the emergency department (ED) with hemoptysis and several episodes of post-tussive emesis with large clots. He had been cancer free for multiple years after treatment with chemotherapy and radiation to the neck. Evaluation revealed a necrotic tumor on the posterior pharynx on bedside laryngoscopy and an external carotid pseudoaneurysm that was stented by interventional radiology. The patient experienced recurrent hemorrhage several months later and opted for palliative measures and expired of massive hemorrhage in the ED on a subsequent visit. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: CBS can be fatal, and early suspicion and recognition are key to ensure that a threatened or impending carotid blowout are appropriately managed. Once carotid blowout is suspected, early resuscitation and consultation with interventional radiology and vascular surgery is warranted.

Endovascular Management of External Iliac Blowout Syndrome Secondary to Recurrent Sigmoid Cancer

Blowout syndrome caused by vascular invasion is a dreadful complication of late stage malignancies that carry high morbidity and poor overall prognosis in a compromised population. Endovascular management can offer minimally invasive and life-saving alternative for such acute conditions. We describe the case of a 62-year-old man with massive fresh bleeding per rectum and shock resulting from rupture of the left external iliac artery secondary to nearby infiltrative recurrent sigmoid cancer. This complication is rare, presents dramatically, and is frequently fatal. The patient was successfully treated with a stent graft deployment in order to achieve hemostasis and reinstituting the arterial integrity.

Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Vascular Blowout Syndrome in End-Stage Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Vascular blowout syndrome (VBOS) is a life-threatening condition secondary to direct tumor encasement or invasion in advanced stage malignancies. Endovascular management can be used as an alternative to surgical treatment in this fragile patient population, providing a minimally invasive measure both acutely and prophylactically.

METHODS

Three patients with peripheral VBOS secondary to advanced stage malignancies underwent successful endovascular treatment. Technical success was obtained in all patients with nonsignificant perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Endovascular management controlled immediate life-threatening hemorrhage and enabled these high-risk patients to undergo other adjunctive therapeutic modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment can offer a safe and effective palliative measure of peripheral VBOS secondary to neoplastic erosion in patients with advanced stage malignancies.

Outcomes of endovascular occlusion and stenting in the treatment of carotid blowout

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid blowout is a life threatening complication of invasive head and neck cancers and their treatments. This is commonly treated with endovascular embolization and carotid stenting. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we report the immediate clinical results of patients receiving embolization and/or stenting for treatment of carotid blowout associated with head and neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the period 2003-2011, we defined carotid blowout patients as those with head and neck malignancies receiving carotid stenting and/or endovascular embolization without open surgery. Outcomes studied included mortality, acute ischemic stroke, hemiplegia/paresis, and other post-operative neurologic complications. Outcomes for the endovascular embolization and carotid stenting group were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1218 patients underwent endovascular treatment for carotid blowout. Of these, 1080 patients (88.6%) underwent embolization procedures and 138 patients (11.4%) underwent carotid stenting. The mortality rate of endovascular embolization patients was similar to that of carotid stenting patients (8.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.5%-9.7% versus 10.2%, 95% CI=6.0%-16.4%, p = 0.36). Stroke rate was similar between embolization patients and stenting patients (2.3%, 95% CI=1.6%-3.4% vs. 3.4%, 95% CI=1.3%-8.4%, p = 0.43). Hemiplegia rates were significantly higher rate in stenting patients compared with endovascular occlusion patients (3.8%, 95% CI=1.3%-8.4% vs. 1.4%, 95% CI=1.4%-2.4%, p = 0.05). The rate of post-operative neurologic complications was higher in stenting patients compared with embolization patients (6.5%, 95% CI=3.3%-12.1% vs. 1.4%, 95% CI=0.9%-2.4%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the natural history of carotid blowout, carotid stenting and endovascular embolization are acceptable means of treating this disease. Endovascular embolization remains the most common treatment among patients with head and neck cancers with lower overall rates of post-operative neurologic complications, including hemiplegia/paresis and stroke.

Direct percutaneous transhepatic portomesenteric venous stenting in management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatectomy with portal and/or superior mesenteric vein resection remains a controversial procedure because of high complexity and morbidity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to increase resectability of these locally advanced lesions. We aimed to assess the utility and efficacy of direct percutaneous transhepatic portomesenteric venous stenting (THVS) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in increasing surgical resectability of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty pancreatic carcinoma patients with tumor thrombus involving the portal vein and superior mesenteric vein were identified. Patients underwent THVS followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whipple procedure was offered to responders.

RESULTS

THVS was attempted in all. The tumor thrombus could not be crossed in 2 patients (95% technical success rate). All patients underwent 3 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and capecitabine. Disease progression was noted in 16 patients and surgery was not offered. Twenty-two patients were explored with intent-to-perform a Whipple procedure. In 7 of these (32%), extensive disease precluding surgical resection was identified and the procedure was abandoned. Whipple procedure without vascular resection was performed successfully in 15 patients (68%). There were no perioperative deaths. Negative vascular margins were noted in 3 patients and negative peripancreatic lymph nodes in 5 patients. Median survival was 17 months (range, 5 to 70 mo). In the stented nonoperative group, median survival was 9 months (range, 3 to 19 mo). The stented and resected group achieved a statistically significant (P=0.0422) survival advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

THVS in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can increase tumor resectability and survival in a select group of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients.