The impact of sex on angioplasty and primary stenting for femoropopliteal occlusive disease: results of the DURABILITY II trial

Outcomes of open and endovascular infra-inguinal revascularization are poor in young patients with atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease but do not differ between genders

OBJECTIVES

The effect of gender on the outcomes of revascularization procedures in young patients with premature atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is not known. The objective of this study was to compare short-term and long-term outcomes between young males and females undergoing infra-inguinal revascularization procedures.

METHODS

We examined postoperative outcomes of male and female PAD patients under the age of 55 who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization procedures at a single tertiary institution from 2011 to 2019. Primary outcomes included 30-day morbidity, patency of the revascularization procedures, and major adverse limb events (MALE). Secondary outcomes included survival, amputation rate, reintervention rate, improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI), and number of reinterventions.

RESULTS

Eighty-one infra-inguinal revascularization procedures (46 endovascular and 35 open procedures) were reviewed including 45 procedures in 37 males and 36 procedures in 31 females. Fifty-three (65.4%) of the procedures were performed in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia symptoms. The rest were treated for life-disabling claudication. The female patients were younger, had higher body mass index, and were more likely to have diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in comparison to males. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular event was 0.0% and MALE was 16.0%. Mean follow-up was 806.2 days. At 1 year, primary patency was 34.4 ± 6.2%, primary assisted patency was 52.7 ± 6.5%, secondary patency was 61.8 ± 6.3%, and MALE-free rate was 47.0 ± 6.4%. For secondary outcomes at 1 year, amputation-free rate was 92.5 ± 3.2%, reintervention-free rate was 50.2 ± 6.4%, and survival was 96.2 ± 2.6%. By the end of the study, overall mortality rate was 14.8% and major amputation rate was 13.6%. No major differences were observed between males and females among these outcomes. A smaller improvement in ABI after revascularization was noted in females compared to males (female 0.2 ± 0.2 vs male 0.4 ± 0.2, p = .04). Among patients who required reintervention, females required a higher number of reinterventions than males (female 1.7 ± 2.5 vs male 0.8 ± 1.1, p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in short-term and long-term outcomes between males and females under the age of 55 after infra-inguinal revascularization. Poor patency, high MALE rate, and high mid-term mortality, and amputation rates after revascularization in young PAD patients highlight the need for improved strategies to treat premature PAD.

A scoping review of female sex-related outcomes after endovascular intervention for lifestyle-limiting claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is on the rise, with a growing prevalence in an aging population and increasing rates of diabetes. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia poses a significant risk of limb loss. PAD is common in females, particularly after menopause, with a 35% prevalence rate in females older than 65 years. Studies have suggested that females have inferior outcomes compared with men after endovascular revascularization for PAD. With the rising utilization of endovascular interventions for the treatment of PAD, we sought to perform a review of sex-based outcomes of peripheral endovascular interventions for the treatment of symptomatic PAD. A scoping literature review was conducted to evaluate outcomes in females patients undergoing endovascular peripheral interventions for PAD. Eligibility criteria included studies focusing on adult females with lifestyle-limiting claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia who underwent endovascular intervention. Various endovascular procedures were considered and outcomes of interest included mortality, amputations, reinterventions, bleeding complications, and major adverse cardiac events. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Sixteen studies were included in the review. Females patients undergoing endovascular interventions were associated with bleeding complications, higher rates of reintervention, and a risk of nonfatal strokes. However, females sex was not linked to higher rates of amputation or conclusively higher mortality rates post intervention. The comprehensive scoping review reveals important sex-related disparities in outcomes after endovascular procedures for symptomatic PAD. Females patients have been reported to experience worse outcomes in terms of reinterventions and bleeding complications. These findings emphasize the need for future trials focusing specifically on females patients to develop sex-inclusive treatment recommendations for advanced PAD.

Women are Not at Higher Risk for Reintervention or Major Amputation after Lower Extremity Atherectomy for Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to compare short-term and long-term differences in reintervention-free and major amputation-free survival between female and male patients undergoing lower extremity atherectomy for peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

We analyzed lower extremity atherectomy procedures performed on 294 patients between January 2014 and September 2019. Reintervention was defined as either open bypass or endovascular procedure to the same region following the index operation. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was performed to compare reintervention-free and major amputation-free survival between sexes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the adjusted odds of reintervention and major amputation based on sex. We conducted subgroup analyses by anatomic region (femoropopliteal vs. tibial), indication (claudication vs. chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI)), and balloon type (drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus plain balloon angioplasty (POBA)) across sexes.

RESULTS

Of the 294 patients, 125 (42.5%) were female. Compared to men, women receiving atherectomy were more likely to be Black (28.0% vs. 16.6%; P = 0.018), a nonsmoker (44.8% vs. 21.3%; P < 0.001), and present with CLTI (55.2% vs. 43.2%; P = 0.042). There were no differences in atherectomy region, lesion type, or balloon type between sexes. KM analysis showed similar 4-year reintervention-free survival (68.8% vs. 75.1%; P = 0.88) and major amputation-free survival (97.6% vs. 97.6%; P = 0.41) between sexes. Women and men had similar reintervention-free survival when grouped by femoropopliteal (67.9% vs. 70.8%; P = 0.69) or tibial (76.2% vs. 83.9%; P = 0.68) atherectomy region. Indication (claudication versus CLTI) did not affect reintervention-free survival in either women (64.5% vs. 69.6%; P = 0.28) or men (68.5% vs. 76.7%; P = 0.84). KM curves for DCB versus POBA were also similar between sexes and showed an early benefit in reintervention rate favoring DCB, which dissipated in both women (65.4% vs. 72.7%; P = 0.61) and men (75.5% vs. 78.4%; P = 0.18) by 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to men, women demonstrate commensurate benefit from atherectomy for lower extremity revascularization. There were no differences seen in long-term reintervention or major amputation between sexes.

Lack of patient-centered evaluation of outcomes in intermittent claudication literature

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease, characterized as arterial atherosclerotic disease, can lead to insufficient flow in the lower extremities and ischemia, with the most common clinical manifestation being intermittent claudication (IC). In 2022, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) developed appropriate use criteria for the management of IC that used this systematic review as a source of evidence. The objective of this study is to synthesize the findings of the systematic review and identify evidence gaps.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of literature databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was conducted from January 1, 2000, to November 30, 2022. Noncomparative and comparative observational studies and randomized controlled trials were included. Included studies evaluated exercise therapy, endovascular or open revascularization for the treatment of IC. Outcomes of interest (freedom from major adverse limb event, health-related quality of life, and walking distance) were compared in various subgroups (age, sex, diabetes, smoking status, anatomical location of disease, and optimal medical therapy).

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies reported the outcomes of interest for the evidence map. The general conclusions of the studies that reported freedom from major adverse limb events were that reintervention rates for endovascular therapy at ≥2 years were >20%, major amputation rates were often not reported, and, after endovascular therapy, the 1-month mortality was low (<2%). Quality of life and walking distance data were sparse, limited to only endovascular intervention, and insufficient to make any strong conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

IC in patients with peripheral arterial disease poses a significant socioeconomic and health care burden. Major, consequential gaps exist in the IC literature with respect to the assessment of patient reported outcome measures, standardized measures of walking distance and the comparative effectiveness of initial exercise therapy vs invasive intervention. The evidence gaps identified by the Society for Vascular Surgery appropriate use criteria on IC systematic review serve as a guide for future research efforts to optimize care for this patient population.

Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloons vs Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease has shifted toward drug-coated balloons (DCB). However, limited data are available regarding the safety and efficacy of DCB vs bare-metal stents (BMS).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare DCB vs BMS outcomes in a propensity-adjusted, pooled analysis of 4 prospective, multicenter trials.

METHODS

Patient-level data were pooled from 4 prospective, multicenter studies: the IN.PACT SFA I/II and IN.PACT SFA Japan randomized controlled DCB trials and the Complete SE and DURABILITY II single-arm BMS studies. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Clinical endpoints were 12-month primary patency, freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and cumulative 36-month major adverse events (MAE).

RESULTS

The primary analysis included 771 patients (288 DCB, 483 BMS). IPTW-adjusted demographic, baseline lesion, and procedural characteristics were matched between groups. The adjusted mean lesion length was 8.1 ± 4.7 cm DCB and 7.9 ± 4.5 cm BMS. The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency (90.4% DCB, 80.9% BMS, P = 0.007), freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization (85.6% DCB, 73.7% BMS, P = 0.001), and cumulative incidence of 36-month MAE (25.3% DCB, 38.8% BMS, P < 0.001) favored DCB. There were no statistically significant differences observed in all-cause mortality, target limb major amputation, or thrombosis through 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In a patient-level, IPTW-adjusted pooled analysis of prospective, multicenter pivotal studies, DCB demonstrated significantly higher patency, lower revascularization and MAE rates, and no statistically significant differences in mortality, amputation, or thrombosis vs BMS. This analysis supports DCB use vs BMS in moderately complex femoropopliteal lesions amenable to both treatments.

Increased long-term bleeding complications in females undergoing endovascular revascularization for peripheral arterial disease

OBJECTIVE

Females with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) treated with endovascular interventions have increased limb-based procedural complications compared with males. Little is known regarding long-term bleeding risk in these patients who often require long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. We hypothesize that females have a higher incidence of bleeding events compared with males in the year after endovascular intervention for PAD.

METHODS

Adults (aged ≥65 years) who underwent endovascular revascularization for PAD between 2008 and 2015 in Medicare claims data were identified. Patients were allocated by prescribed postprocedural antithrombotic therapy, including (1) antiplatelet therapy, (2) anticoagulation therapy, (3) dual antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, and (4) no prescription antithrombotic therapy. Bleeding events were classified as gastrointestinal, intracranial, hematoma, airway, or other. Crude and covariate-standardized 30-, 90-, and 365-day cumulative incidence of bleeding events, overall and by sex, were estimated using Aalen-Johansen estimators accounting for death as a competing risk. Sex differences were identified using Gray's test.

RESULTS

Of 31,593 eligible patients, 54% were females. Females were older (77.9 years vs 75.5 years) and tended to use antiplatelet therapy more often at 30, 90, and 365 days after the intervention. Clopidogrel was the most prescribed antiplatelet, and 32% of patients continued its use at 365 days. Anticoagulants were prescribed to 26.0% of patients at the time of the procedure, and only 8.8% continued anticoagulation at 365 days. Thirty-one percent of patients were diagnosed with a bleeding event within 1 year after the intervention. The cumulative incidence of any bleeding event during the postintervention period was higher in females compared with males with a risk difference of 3% between the sex cohorts (P < .01). Specifically, females had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and hematoma (P < .01), but a lower incidence of airway-related bleeding at each time point as compared with males (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex disparities in bleeding complications after endovascular intervention for PAD persist in the long term. Females are more likely to be readmitted with a bleeding complication up to 1 year after the procedure. Antithrombotic therapy disproportionately increases the risk of bleeding in females. Further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms responsible for abnormal coagulopathy in females after endovascular therapy.

Impact of chronic outward force on arterial responses of proximal and distal of long superficial femoral artery stent

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding nitinol stent (SENS) implantation is commonly oversized in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), and leads to chronic outward force (COF) and in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study aimed to investigate the impact of COF of oversizing SENS on ISR of SFA.

METHODS

In patients with implanted SENS in SFA, intimal hyperplasia especially between proximal segment and distal segment was evaluated by quantitative angiography, and the impact of COF on mid-term angiographic outcomes was investigated. In addition, porcine model with implanted SENS was used to evaluate the impact of COF on angiographic and histopathologic outcomes at 1 month. Excised stented arteries were evaluated by histopathologic analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 65 SENS in 61 patients with follow-up angiography at 6 months to 1 year. The baseline diameter was 6.8 ± 0.71 mm and length were 97.0 ± 33.8 mm for the SENS. The ratio of the diameter of the stent to the reference vessel was 1.3 ± 0.24 at the proximal portion and 1.53 ± 0.27 at the distal portion (P < 0.001). In the long SFA stent, stent-to-vessel ratio was significantly higher in the distal stent than in the proximal stent (1.3 ± 0.2 vs. 1.55 ± 0.25, P = 0.001). ISR incidence was higher at the distal stent (37.3% vs 52.6%, P = 0.029). All 11 pigs survived for 4 weeks after SENS implantation. The vessel diameter was 4.04 ± 0.40 mm (control group) vs 4.45 ± 0.63 mm (oversized group), and the implanted stent diameter was 5.27 ± 0.46 mm vs. 7.18 ± 0.4 mm (P = 0.001). The stent-to-vessel diameter ratio was 1.31 ± 0.12 versus 1.63 ± 0.20 (P < 0.001). After 4 weeks, restenosis % was 29.5 ± 12.9% versus 46.8 ± 21.5% (P = 0.016). The neointimal area was 5.37 ± 1.15 mm² vs. 8.53 ± 5.18 mm² (P = 0.05). The restenosis % was 39.34 ± 8.53% versus 63.97 ± 17.1% (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

COF is an important cause of restenosis in the distal portion of the SFA stent. Optimal sizing of the SFA stent is important to reduce the incidence of restenosis. Therefore, COF was an important factor of restenosis following distal SFA stenting.

IN.PACT™ Admiral™ drug-coated balloon: Durable, consistent and safe treatment for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease

Endovascular management of peripheral artery disease was until recently limited to percutaneous balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, stent grafts, and bare-metal stents. These therapies have been valuable, but plagued by high restenosis and revascularization rates. Important progress has been made with the introduction of combination devices, including drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons (DCB), designed to combat restenosis by locally delivering anti-proliferative drugs. In particular, promising clinical performance has been seen with the Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ DCB, with durable, consistent and safe results. Rigorous, randomized controlled trials have directly compared this and other drug-delivering devices to their non-drug-coated counterparts with data available through two years. Additionally, trials are ongoing to assess use of drug-coated technologies in combination with traditional therapies in hope of synergistic effects. This review gathers data from currently published clinical trials with the IN.PACT Admiral DCB for the treatment of femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease and explores the possible impact on continuing clinical practice.

Comparison of Lower Extremity Endovascular Intervention Outcomes in Women Versus Men

This study examined a gender difference in 12-month patient outcomes after endovascular intervention for symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) utilizing propensity score-matched Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease registry data. Mortality and repeat intervention outcomes after endovascular treatment in women compared with men in the existing literature are inconsistent and confounded by other risk factors. The study included 1,084 patients who underwent 1,702 endovascular procedures, at 8 non-Veterans Administration hospitals from January 2005 to October 2015. Frailty hazard ratios by gender for time-to-event analysis were estimated. Women made up about 40% of the study population. After propensity score matching, 449 women and 449 men were included in the analysis, in which women had similar baseline patient and lesion characteristics, laboratory data, procedural characteristics, and medical therapy as men. Within 12-month postintervention, women were at a lower risk of mortality than men (p = 0.05); however, they underwent significantly more frequent repeat revascularization procedures (p = 0.04). In subgroup analysis, women with superficial femoral artery disease were also at higher risk of 12-month repeat intervention than men (p <0.01) and had a higher mortality risk, albeit with an attenuated significance (p = 0.07). Women with PAD are at a higher risk of 12-month repeat intervention than men.

Economic analysis of endovascular drug-eluting treatments for femoropopliteal artery disease in the UK

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the clinical and economic impact of drug-eluting endovascular treatment strategies for femoropopliteal artery disease compared with current standard of care.

DESIGN

Systematic literature search to pool target lesion revascularisations (TLR). Model-based per-patient cost impact and quasi-cost-effectiveness projection over 24 months based on pooled TLRs and current reimbursement.

SETTING

The UK's National Health Service (NHS).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients presenting with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease eligible for endovascular treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline-recommended treatment with percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) and bailout bare metal stenting (BMS) versus primary BMS placement, or drug-coated balloon (DCB), or drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

24-month per-patient cost impact to NHS (primary outcome).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

pooled 24-month TLR rates; numbers needed to treat (NNTs); cost per TLR avoided and estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in £ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

RESULTS

N=28 studies were identified, reporting on 5167 femoropopliteal lesions. Over 24 months, DCB, DES and BMS reduced TLRs of de novo lesions from 36.2% to 17.6%, 19.4% and 26.9%, respectively, at an increased cost of £43, £44 and £112. NNTs to avoid 1 TLR in 24 months were 5.4, 6.0 and 10.8, resulting in cost per TLR avoided of £231, £264 and £1204. DCB was estimated to add 0.011 QALYs, DES 0.010 QALYs and BMS 0.005 QALYs, resulting in estimated ICERs of £3983, £4534 and £20 719 per QALY gained. A subset analysis revealed more favourable clinical and economic outcomes for a 3.5 µg/mm(2) DCB with urea excipient, compared with the rest of DCBs. A modest reduction of 10% in DCB and DES prices made drug-eluting treatments dominant.

CONCLUSIONS

Widespread adoption of drug-eluting endovascular therapies for femoropopliteal disease would add meaningful clinical benefit at reasonable additional costs to the NHS. Based on currently available data, DCBs offer the highest clinical and economic value.

Intermediate Outcomes of Femoropopliteal Stenting in Women: 3-Year Results of the DURABILITY II Trial

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the effects of gender on the 3-year outcomes of the StuDy for EvalUating EndovasculaR TreAtments of Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal By usIng the Protege EverfLex NitInol STent System II (DURABILITY II) trial.

METHODS

A total of 287 patients enrolled in the DURABILITY II trial (prospective and nonrandomized trial) were stratified by gender and evaluated for primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency at 3 years. Clinical scores including changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI) and walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall 190 male and 97 female patients were included for analysis. The 3-year primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates for women versus men were 62.5% vs. 58.8%, 68.5% vs. 64.9%, and 72.1% vs. 67.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). Although ABIs at presentation were similar between women versus men (0.64 vs. 0.65, P < 0.05), women had lower ABI scores at 3 years compared with men (0.85 vs. 0.92, P = 0.03). Women versus men had inferior walking distance scores at presentation (13.6 vs. 25.7, P < 0.001), scores were equalized by 2 years (51.6 vs. 60.8, P < 0.05); however, 3-year follow-up demonstrated less durable results for women versus men (37.3 vs. 58.8, P < 0.05). In addition, women had worse WIQ scores for pain, walking speed, and stair climbing. However, the relative change in scores between men and women were comparable, with both groups seeing similar improvements from baseline for these parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Women continue to see clinical improvement after intervention, achieving comparable ABIs and walking distance to men at 2 years. These benefits are diminished at 3-year follow-up with women achieving lower absolute ABI and WIQ parameters compared with men, but improved overall compared with scores at presentation.

Gender-Related Long-term Outcome of Primary Femoropopliteal Stent Placement for Peripheral Artery Disease

Purpose: To evaluate gender-related long-term outcomes in patients undergoing stent treatment of femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. Methods: Between September 2006 and August 2010, all 517 patients (333 men and 184 women; mean age 70.6 years) undergoing primary stent placement in femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions at 2 European vascular centers were prospectively enrolled in the study. The main study outcome was primary stent patency. Secondary outcomes included secondary patency, limb salvage, and all-cause mortality. Results: Women had a higher incidence of critical limb ischemia (32.1% vs. 16.9%, p<0.001). Lesion characteristics according to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) classification were comparable in both genders (p=0.52), although total occlusions and popliteal involvement were observed more frequently in female patients (p=0.043 and p=0.001, respectively). Both genders showed similar 5-year primary patency rates (64.3% men vs. 58.1% women, p=0.11). A statistically significant difference was observed concerning the secondary patency rates in favor of men (71.9% vs. 66.8% at 5 years, p=0.005). Limb salvage rates did not vary between the groups (p=0.83). Survival rates were comparable at 5 years (83.3% and 82.6% for men and women, respectively; p=0.63), although female patients were older at their presentation (68.5 vs. 74.3 years, p<0.001). Female gender was an independent risk factor for restenosis for TASC C/D lesions (primary patency rate 39.8% in women vs. 62.0% in men; p=0.002). Finally, critical limb ischemia was an independent risk factor for restenosis in women (odds ratio 1.5). Conclusion: Female gender was associated with a higher prevalence of critical limb ischemia, poorer secondary patency, and more frequent restenosis in TASC C/D lesions. Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal lesions provides equal results between genders in terms of primary stent patency in the long term.