Double Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy of Tandem Carotid Lesions

[Surgical policy of managing patients with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of the internal and common carotid arteries]

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the natural course of stenosis of the common carotid artery (CCA) after carotid endarterectomy, as well as the long-term outcomes of various methods of reconstruction of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with extended atherosclerotic lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Presented herein are the remote retrospective and prospective results of carotid endarterectomy in a total of 78 patients with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of carotid arteries. Depending on the degree of CCA stenosis, the patients were divided into 2 groups. Group One (n=25): stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) of more than 70% and haemodynamically insignificant (30-35% stenosis) but extended (from 3.0 to 5.0 cm (Q1, Me, Q3); 3.5 cm, 4.0 cm, 5.0 cm) stenosis of the CCA. These patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) from the ostium of the ICA, during which an atherosclerotic plaque was not completely removed from the CCA because the stenosis was extended but haemodynamically insignificant. Group Two (n=53): stenosis of the ICA of more than 70% and haemodynamically significant, extended (from 7.0 to 10.0 cm (Q1, Me, Q3); 7.5 cm, 8.0 cm, 9.0 cm) stenosis of the CCA. The patients of this group were subjected to various methods of operative intervention on the ICA and CCA: carotid endarterectomy (ECA) combined with open endarterectomy from the CCA with plasty using the primary suture (n=23); carotid endarterectomy and alloreconstruction of the CCA (n=10); simultaneous eversion endarterectomy from the ICA and CCA (n=20). The remote period of follow up of patients ranged from 14 to 24 months ((Q1, Me, Q3; 19 months, 22 months, 24 months). The differences were statistically insignificant (Mann-Whitney U-test, p=0.881).

RESULTS

In the remote postoperative period, 32% of Group One patients after previously performed carotid endarterectomy were found to have an increase in the degree of stenosis of the CCA up to a haemodynamically significant one (70% and more), thus suggesting progression of the atherosclerotic process. In Group Two patients, after plasty of the CCA with the primary suture, 21.7% of patients were diagnosed as having restenosis of the reconstruction zone up to 30%, with no neurological deficit. 20% of patients after carotid endarterectomy and alloreconstruction of the CCA were diagnosed as having restenosis of the reconstruction zone more than 70% and acute impairment of cerebral circulation with a lethal outcome. The patients after simultaneous eversion endarterectomy form the ICA and CCA in the intraoperative and postoperative periods had neither restenosis of the reconstruction zone nor neurological deficit.

CONCLUSION

32% of patients after previously performed carotid endarterectomy with the presence of extended, but haemodynamically insignificant stenosis of the CCA (30-35% stenosis) in the postoperative period were found to have progression of the atherosclerotic lesion in the form of an increased degree of stenosis up to haemodynamically significant (more than 70%), thus requiring repeat reconstructive operation. Therefore, in patients presenting with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid arteries it is appropriate to carry out operative intervention simultaneously on the ICA and CCA, which would make it possible to considerably improve the remote postoperative results of reconstructive interventions on the carotid basin in this cohort of patients. A comparative study of the outcomes of various methods of reconstruction of carotid arteries in patients with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of the ICA and CCA demonstrated that simultaneous eversion endarterectomy from the ICA and CCA resulted in good postoperative parameters: absence of restenosis and neurological deficit in the remote period of follow up.