Progression of Perianeurysmal Inflammation after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic and Bilateral Common Iliac Artery Aneurysms

Infective native arterial aneurysms and inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: An overview with a focus on emergency settings

Infective native arterial aneurysms and inflammatory aortic aneurysms are rare but morbid pathologies seen by vascular surgeons in the emergency setting. Presentation is not always clear, and a full workup must be obtained before adopting a management strategy. Treatment is multidisciplinary and is tailored to every case based on workup findings. Imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography aids in diagnosis and in monitoring response to treatment. Open surgery is traditionally performed for definitive management. Endovascular surgery may offer an alternative treatment in select cases with acceptable outcomes. Neither technique has been proven to be superior to the other. Physicians should consider patient's anatomy, comorbidities, life expectancy, and goals of care before selecting an approach. Long-term pharmacological treatment, with antibiotics in case of infective aneurysms and immunosuppressants in case of inflammatory aneurysms, is usually required and should be managed in collaboration with infectious disease specialists and rheumatologists.

Multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of inflammatory aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) are a variant involving a distinct immunoinflammatory process, with nearly one half believed to be associated with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Google Scholar searches were conducted for English-language publications relevant to inflammatory aortic aneurysms from January 1970 onward. The search terms included inflammatory aortic aneurysms, aortitis, periaortitis, IgG4-related disease, and retroperitoneal fibrosis. Relevant studies were selected for review based on their relevance.

RESULTS

Morphologically, IAAAs are characterized by a thickened aneurysm wall often displaying contrast enhancement and elevated metabolic activity on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging. A strong association exists with perianeurysmal and retroperitoneal fibrosis. Although the rupture risk appears lower with IAAAs than with noninflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), the currently recommended diameter threshold for operative management is the same. Open repair has been associated with increased morbidity compared with noninflammatory AAAs, and a retroperitoneal approach or minimal dissection transperitoneal approach has been recommended to avoid duodenal and retroperitoneal structural injuries. Endovascular aneurysm repair has been increasingly used, especially for patients unfit for open surgery. It is important to exclude an infectious etiology before the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy or operative repair. Multimodality imaging follow-up is critical to monitor disease activity and secondary involvement of retroperitoneal structures by the associated fibrotic process. Maintenance of immunosuppressive therapy will be needed postoperatively for most patients with active systemic disease, especially those with IgG4-RD and those with persistent symptoms. Additional interventions aimed at ureteral decompression could also be required, and lifelong follow-up is mandatory.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative multimodality imaging is a diagnostic cornerstone for assessment of the disease extent and activity. IgG4-RD is an increasingly recognized category of IAAAs, with implications for tailoring adjunctive medical therapy. Open surgical repair remains the procedure of choice, although endovascular aneurysm repair is increasingly being offered. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy can be offered according to the disease activity as assessed by follow-up imaging studies.

Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Aortic Aneurysms: Experience in a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA) remained a rare cause of aneurysmal aortic disease, with incidences between 5% and 10%. The current treatment for IAAA consists of open surgical repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Avoiding an inflamed, fibrotic retroperitoneum is the driving force behind the desire to repair IAAA endovascularly. The latest published works confirm the promising results after EVAR for IAAA, but there is still a paucity of data regarding hydroureter and hydronephrosis. In this article, we describe our experience with 5 patients diagnosed with IAAA and treated by EVAR, of whom 3 presented with associated hydronephrosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our endovascular database identified five patients who underwent EVAR for IAAA. Unilateral ureteral involvement in the inflammatory process was seen in 3 patients, accompanied by secondary hydronephrosis. One patient presented retroperitoneal fibrosis with duodenal stenosis. Primary outcomes were primary technical success, aneurysm-related mortality, change in aneurysm size, perianeurysmal fibrosis (PAF), and hydronephrosis. Secondary outcomes were requirement for reintervention, progression/resolution of symptoms, and short-term clinical success.

RESULTS

Follow-up duration ranged from 3 to 61 months. No patients were lost to follow-up. Primary technical success was obtained in all patients. One patient died three months after the operation due to persistence of the duodenal stenosis in spite of subsequent endoscopic treatments and corticotherapy. The aneurysm sac progressively reduced in 4 patients and remained unchanged in one patient. PAF regressed in 2 patients, reduced in two, and remained unchanged in one patient. Hydronephrosis persisted in all three patients preoperatively diagnosed with this condition. No patient required subsequent intervention. Four patients had complete resolution of their symptoms at a follow-up visit at 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

This series suggests that EVAR for IAAA is technically feasible, excludes the aneurysm effectively, and reduces PAF with an acceptable morbidity and mortality rate. EVAR does not seem to offer any benefits for hydronephrosis, and closer follow-up in patients presenting renal or ureter involvement treated by EVAR is necessary.