Life Expectancy in Nonagenarians Suffering from Critical Limb Ischemia

Frailty is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes following Lower Extremity Angiograms for Limb Ischemia in Nonagenarians

BACKGROUND

Endovascular interventions are performed routinely with minimal risk in younger populations. The safety and efficacy of endovascular interventions in nonagenarians is under examined. We sought to examine the following (1) mortality and limb salvage rates in the nonagenarian population and (2) whether frailty was associated with outcomes following lower extremity (LE) interventions for both acute limb ischemia (ALI) and chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients ≥90 years who underwent a LE angiogram for ALI or CLTI over a 12-year period at a single institution was performed. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 12-month limb salvage and mortality rates. Patient demographics, 30-day complications, and 12-month target vessel reintervention (TVR) were reviewed. Frailty scores were calculated using the 11-factor modified frailty index (MFI-11).

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2021, 76 patients (36% male) with a mean age of 93 (range: 90-102) underwent endovascular procedures for ALI (n = 13) and CLTI (n = 63). 30-day amputation and mortality rates were 6% and 8%, respectively. Patient demographics, preoperative functional status, and TVR rates were not different between patients who had early amputation (≤30 days) and those who achieved limb salvage. Seventy-two patients (94%) had follow-up data at 30 days. There was an 8% mortality rate at 30 days. Of those alive at 30 days, 94% of patients had successful limb salvage. Fifty-eight patients had complete follow-up data at 12 months. Of the patients alive at 12-month follow-up (75%), the limb salvage rate was 98%. Patients with amputation at 30 days had a significantly higher mortality rate at 12 months compared to those who did not (83% vs. 19%; P < 0.01). Based on MFI-11 scoring, 35% of the population was considered frail (≥0.27). Frail patients did not have significantly different 30-day outcomes (limb salvage: 94% vs. 88%; mortality 8% vs. 9%, P = 0.41 and 0.94, respectively) or 12-month outcomes (limb salvage: 82% vs. 94%; mortality: 32% vs. 22%, P = 0.28 and 0.39, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular procedures can be done safely in nonagenarians with low mortality and amputation rates. Patients with early amputation are at significantly higher risk of death at 12 months. Frailty, as measured by a validated index, was not associated with early or late outcomes. When compared to immediate amputation, nonagenarian patients and their families should be counseled as to the benefit from a minimally invasive endovascular procedure.

Critical Limb Ischemia in Nonagenarians: A Challenge of Our Times

BACKGROUND

As a result of the increasing life expectancy of the western population, the number of older patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) seeking medical care is growing. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of a consecutive series of nonagenarian patients with CLTI and evaluate the outcomes of their management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of nonagenarian patients with CLTI attended at our institution between 2005 and 2019. Primary endpoints were 1-year limb salvage and survival rates.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included (mean age 92.7, 51.5% women), of which in 59 (34.5%) primary major amputation (n = 10) or palliative care (n = 49) was indicated at presentation because of severe dementia (n = 30, 50.8%), knee retraction (n = 17, 28.8%), terminal condition (n = 13, 22%) or a non-salvageable foot (n = 28, 47.4%). In the remaining 112 (65.5%), the need for a revascularization was further assessed finally performing A) conservative treatment/minor amputation (n = 57, 50.9%), B) revascularization (n = 50, 44.6%) or C) direct major amputation (n = 5, 4.4%), with 1-year limb salvage and survival rates of 93.1 and 57.4%, respectively. Predictive factors for lower survival included age >92 years (HR = 1,59, p = 0.041), hemoglobin <10.5 mg/dL (HR 2,34, p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (HR = 1.65, p = 0.036), non-severe dementia (HR 3,11, p < 0.001) and current mobility with wheelchair (HR 1,74, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Nearly one-third of nonagenarian patients with CLTI have a direct indication for amputation or palliative care at presentation. In the remaining, a judicious approach with conservative treatment, minor amputation or revascularization procedures yields excellent limb salvage rates. Survival is, however, the cornerstone of these patients. It can be predicted with certain clinical factors which may help decision-making.

Age-dependent outcome of first-line endovascular and surgical revascularization strategies in chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has a high mortality and amputation risk even after revascularization. Due to an ageing population the incidence of peripheral arterial disease is rising. However, the current age distribution in patients with CLTI and the impact of age on outcome remains unclear. For this reason we performed an age-dependent analysis of mortality, morbidity, and amputation-free survival after open surgical revascularization (OSR) and endovascular revascularization therapy (ERT) with identification of risk factors for mortality. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated, comparing observed deaths in the study population to expected deaths based on age and gender specific mortality rates of the overall Dutch population.

METHODS

Patients revascularized for a first episode of CLTI between 2013 and 2018 were included in this multicenter retrospective cohort study. The cohort was divided in two treatment groups (OSR and ERT) who were each stratified in three age groups: early age group <65 years (G1), middle age group 65-74 years (G2) and elderly age group ≥75 years (G3).

RESULTS

During the study period 274 limbs (43.9%) were treated with OSR and 350 limbs (56.1%) with ERT. The young population (G1) is only a small part of the whole CLTI population, namely for OSR 22% and ERT 18%. The risk profile of the early age group was characterized by male sex and smoking, while the elderly age group was characterized by poor arterial runoff, tissue loss, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, chronic kidney disease, history of heart disease, COPD and cerebrovascular disease. One year amputation rates were similar between the age groups. However, significantly higher one year mortality rates were observed in patients ≥75 years in comparison to the low mortality rates in patients <75 years. (OSR: G3 19.8% vs G2 7.1% and G1 6.7%, P = .006; ERT: G3 30.7 vs G2 12.7% and G1 7.8%, P = .001). The SMR in this elderly group equaled 3.72 after OSR and 4.04 after ERT. Independent risk factors for mortality after OSR were age, hazard ratio (HR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06; P = .006), preoperative hemoglobin level, HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.92; P = .003), tissue loss, HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.22-2.79; P = .004), cardiac history, HR 1.56 (95% CI 1.06-2.30; P = .024) and development of postoperative delirium, HR 2.75 (95% CI 1.61-4.71; P < .001) . After ERT we identified age, HR 1.06 (95% CI 1.04-1.08; P < .001), preoperative hemoglobin level, HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.87; P < .001), tissue loss, HR 1.71 (95% CI 1.15-2.53; P = .008), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.43-1.79; P < .001), history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), HR 1.55 (95% CI 1.09-2.21; P = .015), the development of postoperative pneumonia, HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.24-4.16; P = .008), postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), HR 2.42 (95% CI 1.29-4.54; P = .006) and postoperative CVA, HR 8.17 (95% CI 1.96-34.15; P = .004) as risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The current CLTI population consists mostly of elderly patients and only a small part is younger than 65 years. This shift in the population is important because increasing age is associated with considerable higher one year mortality rates regardless of the method of revascularization in patients with CLTI. The mortality rates in the elderly group are three to four times larger than expected in the general population. In relation to the high mortality of the elderly patient, we assume that interventions to prevent postoperative delirium and correct preoperative anemia may be warranted as they appear to be independent risk factors for mortality.

Editor's Choice - Mortality and Major Amputation after Revascularisation in Octogenarians Versus Non-Octogenarians with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the clinical outcomes after revascularisation in octogenarians with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI).

METHODS

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis, in which the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically by two independent researchers. Meta-analyses were performed to analyse one year mortality, one year major amputation, and one year amputation free survival (AFS) after revascularisation. Pooled outcome estimates were reported as percentages and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In addition, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed and the quality of evidence was determined according to the GRADE system.

RESULTS

The review includes 21 observational studies with patients who were treated for CLTI. Meta-analysis of 12 studies with a total of 17 118 patients was performed. A mortality rate of 32% was found in octogenarians (95% CI 27-37%), which was significantly higher than in the non-octogenarians (17%, 95% CI 11-22%/OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.93-3.29; GRADE: "low"). No significant difference in amputation rate was found (octogenarians 15%, 95% CI 11-18%; non-octogenarians 12%, 95% CI 7-14%; GRADE: "very low"). AFS was significantly lower in the octogenarian group (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.43; GRADE: "very low"). In a subgroup analysis differentiating between endovascular and surgical revascularisation, amputation rates were comparable. For octogenarians, those treated conservatively had a mortality rate significantly higher than those treated by revascularisation (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.19-2.60; GRADE: "very low"). No significant difference in mortality rate was found between primary amputation and revascularisation in octogenarians (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.24-2.03; GRADE: "very low").

CONCLUSION

In octogenarians with CLTI, a substantial one year mortality rate of 32% was found after revascularisation. The amputation rates were comparable between both age groups. However, only low quality evidence could be obtained supporting the results of this meta-analysis because only observational studies were available for inclusion.