Incidence and Outcomes of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Thrombus during Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Protocols for Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

 To summarize characteristics, complications, and success rates of different catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) protocols for the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LE-DVT).

METHODS

 A systematic review using electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies related to LE-DVT treated with CDT. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to obtain the pooled proportions of early complications, postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), and venous patency.

RESULTS

 Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria reporting 49 protocols (n = 3,028 participants). In studies that addressed the thrombus location (n = 37), LE-DVT had iliofemoral involvement in 90 ± 23% of the cases. Only four series described CDT as the sole intervention for LE-DVT, while 47% received additional thrombectomy (manual, surgical, aspiration, or pharmacomechanical), and 89% used stenting.Definition of venogram success was highly variable, being the Venous Registry Index the most used method (n = 19). Among those, the minimal thrombolysis rate (<50% lysed thrombus) was 0 to 53%, partial thrombolysis (50-90% lysis) was 10 to 71%, and complete thrombolysis (90-100%) was 0 to 88%. Pooled outcomes were 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.6-10.7) for minor bleeding, 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8-1.7%) for major bleeding, 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.6) for pulmonary embolism, and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3-0.9) for death. Pooled incidences of PTS and of venous patency at up to 1 year of follow-up were 17.6% (95% CI: 11.8-23.4) and 77.5% (95% CI: 68.1-86.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Assessment of the evidence is hampered by the heterogeneity of protocols, which may be reflected in the variation of PTS rates. Despite this, CDT is a low-risk treatment for LE-DVT.

Removing infrarenal inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) with thrombus under protection of suprarenal IVCFs: A retrospective study in a single-center institution

To determine feasibility of removing inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) with massive thrombus (>1*1cm) under protection of suprarenal IVCFs, and evaluate the filter thrombus detachment due to removal. The patients who had massive infrarenal IVCFs thrombus and received retrieval under protection of suprarenal IVCFs were retrospectively reviewed from July 2018 to December 2021. Medical data of them including demographics, filter types, dwell time, management, thrombus detachment was collected, and analyzed. There were 33 patients having massive infrarenal IVCFs thrombus and receiving retrieval under protection of suprarenal IVCFs including 23 males and 10 females with a mean age of 55.30 ± 11.97 (range, 30-85 years). All Infrarenal IVCFs were removed successfully and 29 cases (87.88%) were confirmed detachment of thrombus by cavography including 7 small-size thrombus (<1*1cm) and 22 large-size thrombus (>1*1cm). Twenty-two suprarenal IVCFs trapped large-size thrombus were treated with additional anticoagulation and 21 of them had successful retrievals with additional anticoagulation period of 66.18 ± 43.38 days (range, 9-154 days). The large-size IVCFs thrombus may be break off during retrieval, and IVCFs with large-size thrombus could be removed safely with suprarenal IVCFs protection. The thrombus trapped in filters could be reduced with an additional period of anticoagulation.

Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Complications: A Systematic Review

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been used since the 1960s to treat patients with acute risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) to prevent migration of thrombus by trapping it within the filter. Traditional usage has been in patients with contraindication to anticoagulation that carry a significant mortality risk. In this systematic review, we sought to evaluate complications associated with placement of inferior vena cava filters based on published data from the past 20 years. A search was performed on October 6th, 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews, using three databases (ProQuest, PubMed and ScienceDirect) for articles published between the dates of February 1, 2002 and October 1, 2022. Results were filtered to include full-text, clinical studies, and randomized trials written in English pertaining to keywords "IVC filter AND complications", "Inferior Vena Cava Filter AND complications", "IVC filter AND thrombosis" and "Inferior Vena Cava Filter AND thrombosis". Articles identified by the three databases were pooled and further screened for relevance based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Initial search results yielded 33,265 hits from all three databases combined. Screening criteria were applied, with 7721 results remaining. After further manual screening, including removal of duplicate hits, a total of 117 articles were selected for review. While there are no consensus guidelines for best practice, there is compelling evidence that IVC filters can provide significant protection against PE with minimal complications if the treatment window is appropriate. Increase in the variety of filter models has led to broader availability, but skepticism remains about their efficacy and safety, with ongoing controversy surrounding appropriate indications. Further research is needed to establish clear guidelines on appropriate indications for IVC placement and to determine time course of complications versus benefits for indwelling filters.

Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Symptomatic Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis Patients With Recent Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy, safety, and mid-term outcomes of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) for acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) patients with recent (within 4 weeks) aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2016 to February 2020, 11 acute symptomatic iliofemoral DVT patients with a recent history of aSAH were enrolled in this study. All patients had a history of aneurysm ligation or clipping previously, computed tomography (CT) scans revealed ventricular hemorrhage had been absorbed obviously and no residual aneurysm. The mean time of DVT onset after aSAH ictus was 19.2±4.5 days, and the mean Glasgow score was 6.8 ± 0.7 (range, 6-8). These patients underwent PMT with an 8 French Aspirex^®S device (Straub Medical AG, Wangs, Switzerland), subsequent stenting was performed to relieve the underlying stenosis, followed by anticoagulation alone. The procedure-related complications were assessed after intervention. The follow-ups were conducted up to 1 year, the patency was evaluated via duplex ultrasonography, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) was evaluated using the Villalta scale.

RESULTS

Grade III (>90%) clearance was achieved in all 11 patients. Stenting was performed in 7 patients (63.6%). There were no cerebral rebleeding events or other severe complications except 1 puncture site bleeding during treatment. A total of 90.9% (10 of 11) of patients were alive at the 12 month follow-up, and 7 patients achieved a good functional outcome. At the 1 year follow-up, there was 1 patient (10%) with mild PTS. The ultrasound showed that the patency of the iliofemoral veins was 100%, and femoral valvular incompetence was observed in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy seems to be a feasible and safe treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT in selected patients with recent aSAH, and it shows promising results in restoring patency and reducing the risk of PTS.

Ibero-American Society of Interventionism (SIDI) and the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) Standard of Practice (SOP) for the Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Objectives: to present an interventional radiology standard of practice on the use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in patients with or at risk to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE) from the Iberoamerican Interventional Society (SIDI) and Spanish Vascular and Interventional Radiology Society (SERVEI). Methods: a group of twenty-two interventional radiologist experts, from the SIDI and SERVEI societies, attended online meetings to develop a current clinical practice guideline on the proper indication for the placement and retrieval of IVCFs. A broad review was undertaken to determine the participation of interventional radiologists in the current guidelines and a consensus on inferior vena cava filters. Twenty-two experts from both societies worked on a common draft and received a questionnaire where they had to assess, for IVCF placement, the absolute, relative, and prophylactic indications. The experts voted on the different indications and reasoned their decision. Results: a total of two-hundred-thirty-three articles were reviewed. Interventional radiologists participated in the development of just two of the eight guidelines. The threshold for inclusion was 100% agreement. Three absolute and four relative indications for the IVCF placement were identified. No indications for the prophylactic filter placement reached the threshold. Conclusion: interventional radiologists are highly involved in the management of IVCFs but have limited participation in the development of multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines.

Cotinine inhibits TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway and improves deep vein thrombosis in rats

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed to explore the regulatory mechanisms and influences of cotinine on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in rats via the toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor κ binding (TLR-4/NF-κB) pathway.

METHODS

In this experimental study, 30 SD rats were randomly assigned to control group, sham operation group, model group, cotinine (10 μg/kg) group, and model + cotinine (10 μg/kg) group. The thromboxane B2 (TXB2), 6-keto-PGF1α, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), TLR4, NF-κB, and p65 mRNA and protein expression and tissue changes were analyzed by ELISA, Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining, RT-PCR, and Western blot.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the control and sham operation groups (P>0.05). The model and cotinine groups showed significantly higher mRNA and protein levels of TXB2, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), PAI, TLR-4, and NF-κB, and significantly lower levels of 6-keto-PGF1α and t-PA than the control and sham operation groups (P<0.05), and the model + cotinine group showed significantly higher mRNA and protein levels of TXB2, IL-6 and TNF-α, PAI, TLR-4, and NF-κB and significantly lower levels of 6-keto-PGF1α and t-PA than the model group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cotinine can aggravate thrombus and inflammation in rats with DVT, and the mechanism may be associated with the activation of the TLR-4/NF-κB inflammatory signaling pathway.

Interventional Radiology Therapy: Inferior Vena Cava Filter and Catheter-based Therapies

Endovascular management of pulmonary embolism can be divided into therapeutic and prophylactic treatments. Prophylactic treatment includes inferior vena cava filter placement, whereas endovascular therapeutic interventions include an array of catheter-directed therapies. The indications for both modalities have evolved over the last decade as new evidence has become available.

A better inferior vena cava filter retrieval rate: A retrospective study in a single-center institution

Purpose

To determine practice patterns of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs), retrieval rates, and reasons why retrievable-IVCFs (R-IVCFs) are kept permanent.

Methods

A total of 399 patients who received IVCFs at Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2017 to December 2017 were registered and retrospectively studied. Date of demographics, baseline medical history, dwell time, reasons why R-IVCFs were kept permanent, and R-IVCFs thrombus were collected.

Results

A total of 399 IVCFs were placed during the study period including 27 permanent IVCFs and 372 R-IVCFs. Among all patients who received R-IVCFs, the mean dwell time was 18.25 ± 16.60 days, follow-up rate was 96.24% (358/372), and 337 R-IVCFs were attempted to be removed. Except one, 336 R-IVCFs were retrieved successfully (336/372, 90.32%). Sixty-four R-IVCFs thrombi were found during retrieval including 53 small-size thrombi (< 1 cm × 1 cm) and 13 large-size thrombi (>1 cm × 1 cm). Fifty-three R-IVCFs with small-size thrombi were removed successfully with no additional treatments. Twelve large-size thrombi were retrieved successfully after catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Conclusions

With good follow-up, the retrieval rate could be improved to 90.32%. The main reasons why R-IVCFs were kept permanent were to avoid losing follow-up and overcome inappropriate selections of indications or IVCF types. And R-IVCFs with thrombus could be removed safely.

Bidirectional Pull-Back Technique for Retrieval of Strut-Embedded Cylinder-Shaped Filters in Inferior Vena Cava

BACKGROUND IVC filters have been widely accepted as an effective method to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, the placement of IVC filters is associated with significant complications and filter retrieval can be challenging when the filter struts are embedded into the caval wall. MATERIAL AND METHODS Over 26 months, we reviewed the safety and efficacy of the bidirectional pull-back technique for removing strut-embedded IVC filters in 15 consecutive patients. Retrieval procedural data such as in-dwell time, retrieval time, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Clinical outcomes and procedure-related complications were evaluated by venography or enhanced computed tomography. Histologic tissue was analyzed to reveal the pathologic effects of chronic filter implantation. All patients underwent routine clinical follow-up at a mean time of 12 months (range, 8-14 months). RESULTS Technical success of filter retrieval was achieved in 100%, with mean implantation of 46.6 days (range, 27-66 days). Filter types were as follows: OptEase (n=11) and Aegisy (n=4). The mean retrieval time and fluoroscopy time were 21.43±5.42 min and 7.63±2.67 min, respectively. Immediate postprocedure venography showed no procedure-related complications. Thirteen patients discontinued previously prescribed lifelong anticoagulation. There were no long-term complications during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The bidirectional pull-back technique is safe and efficient for filter retrieval. This complex technique can be particularly useful in selected patients to remove strut-embedded cylindrical-shaped IVC filters previously considered irretrievable.