The Need for Accreditation of Office-Based Interventional Vascular Centers

Appropriate care in chronic limb threatening ischemia: A review of current evidence and outcomes

Chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) poses a significant treatment challenge for vascular surgeons, interventionalists, podiatrists, and associated medical specialists. The evidence for what constitutes appropriate care is rapidly evolving and new treatment options are in constant development. This review examines the current guidelines for CLTI care, as well as reported outcomes for multiple care strategies in this patient population, including revascularization and medical optimization. We performed a literature review of the PubMed database, reviewing articles that reported outcomes for CLTI care between 2000 and 2023, and described these outcomes as they relate to the current state of CLTI treatment. Significant data are still forthcoming regarding CLTI care, but widespread adoption of appropriate CLTI care is essential for the treatment of this vulnerable population.

Reprint of: Early peripheral vascular interventions for claudication are associated with higher rates of late interventions and progression to chronic limb threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Despite societal guidelines that peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) should not be the first-line therapy for intermittent claudication, a significant number of patients will undergo PVI for claudication within 6 months of diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of early PVI for claudication with subsequent interventions.

METHODS

We evaluated 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all beneficiaries with a new diagnosis of claudication from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was late intervention, defined as any femoropopliteal PVI performed >6 months after the claudication diagnosis (through June 30, 2021). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the cumulative incidence of late PVI for claudication patients with early (≤6 months) PVI vs those without early PVI. A hierarchical Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the patient- and physician-level characteristics associated with late PVIs.

RESULTS

A total of 187,442 patients had a new diagnosis of claudication during the study period, of whom 6069 (3.2%) had undergone early PVI. After a median follow-up of 4.39 years (interquartile range, 3.62-5.17 years), 22.5% of the early PVI patients had undergone late PVI vs 3.6% of those without early PVI (P < .001). Patients treated by high use physicians of early PVI (≥2 standard deviations; physician outliers) were more likely to have received late PVI than were patients treated by standard use physician of early PVI (9.8% vs 3.9%; P < .001). Patients who had undergone early PVI (16.4% vs 7.8%) and patients treated by outlier physicians (9.7% vs 8.0%) were more likely to have developed CLTI (P < .001 for both). After adjustment, the patient factors associated with late PVI included receipt of early PVI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.42-7.40) and Black race (vs White; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30). The only physician factor associated with late PVI was a majority of practice in an ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory, with an increasing proportion of ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory services associated with significantly increased rates of late PVI (quartile 4 vs quartile 1; aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.41-1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Early PVI after the diagnosis of claudication was associated with higher late PVI rates compared with early nonoperative management. High use physicians of early PVI for claudication performed more late PVIs than did their peers, especially those primarily delivering care in high reimbursement settings. The appropriateness of early PVI for claudication needs critical evaluation, as do the incentives surrounding the delivery of these interventions in ambulatory intervention suites.

Endovascular experience at an academic office-based procedure center

OBJECTIVE

The number of office-based procedure centers with the capability of performing a wide range of endovascular procedures has substantially increased over the past decade. This shift in practice settings has occurred faster in the private sector as compared to the academic environment. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endovascular procedures performed at a dedicated academic outpatient procedural center.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data of 400 patients who underwent 499 endovascular procedures in a university-based, academic outpatient procedure center between November 2013 and December 2016. Outcomes analyzed included procedure-related complications, limb loss, mortality, and emergency department visits or hospital admissions that occurred within 30 days following the procedure.

RESULTS

The 400 patients had a mean age of 65 ± 13 years with slightly more females (51%; n = 203) as compared to males (49%; n = 197). Most patients (71%; 284) were Caucasian while 80 (20%) were African-Americans. Associated comorbidities included hypertension (86%), diabetes mellitus (51%), chronic kidney disease (42%), and obesity (mean body mass index of 29 ± 6). Based on anesthetic risk, most were ASA class 3 (81%), while ASA 1 and 2 comprised 17% and ASA 4 only 2%. Medicare beneficiaries accounted for 254 (64%) of our patients. Pre-operative studies included mainly duplex ultrasound (62%) and other noninvasive arterial studies (57%).The mean procedural time was 58 min (range, 7 to 200) with an overall technical success rate of 97%. There were no deaths. Complications developed in 10 patients following the 483 procedures (2.1%) being hospitalized with four of them transferred directly to the emergency room. The reasons for these hospitalizations included acute limb ischemia, arterial pseudoaneurysm, deep vein thrombosis, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and lower extremity pain not vascular in origin. Financial reimbursement at the office-based center was higher than that seen with hospital-based procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular procedures performed in an academic office-based procedure center are safe and associated with good clinical outcomes. A small minority of patients have subsequent ER visits or hospital admissions. Academic institutions should consider adding an office-based procedure center based on today's competitive healthcare market.

Early peripheral vascular interventions for claudication are associated with higher rates of late interventions and progression to chronic limb threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Despite societal guidelines that peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) should not be the first-line therapy for intermittent claudication, a significant number of patients will undergo PVI for claudication within 6 months of diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of early PVI for claudication with subsequent interventions.

METHODS

We evaluated 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all beneficiaries with a new diagnosis of claudication from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was late intervention, defined as any femoropopliteal PVI performed >6 months after the claudication diagnosis (through June 30, 2021). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the cumulative incidence of late PVI for claudication patients with early (≤6 months) PVI vs those without early PVI. A hierarchical Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the patient- and physician-level characteristics associated with late PVIs.

RESULTS

A total of 187,442 patients had a new diagnosis of claudication during the study period, of whom 6069 (3.2%) had undergone early PVI. After a median follow-up of 4.39 years (interquartile range, 3.62-5.17 years), 22.5% of the early PVI patients had undergone late PVI vs 3.6% of those without early PVI (P < .001). Patients treated by high use physicians of early PVI (≥2 standard deviations; physician outliers) were more likely to have received late PVI than were patients treated by standard use physician of early PVI (9.8% vs 3.9%; P < .001). Patients who had undergone early PVI (16.4% vs 7.8%) and patients treated by outlier physicians (9.7% vs 8.0%) were more likely to have developed CLTI (P < .001 for both). After adjustment, the patient factors associated with late PVI included receipt of early PVI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.42-7.40) and Black race (vs White; aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30). The only physician factor associated with late PVI was a majority of practice in an ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory, with an increasing proportion of ambulatory surgery center or office-based laboratory services associated with significantly increased rates of late PVI (quartile 4 vs quartile 1; aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.41-1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Early PVI after the diagnosis of claudication was associated with higher late PVI rates compared with early nonoperative management. High use physicians of early PVI for claudication performed more late PVIs than did their peers, especially those primarily delivering care in high reimbursement settings. The appropriateness of early PVI for claudication needs critical evaluation, as do the incentives surrounding the delivery of these interventions in ambulatory intervention suites.

Improving follow-up of incomplete lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound examinations performed for deep and superficial vein thromboses

OBJECTIVE

A lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound (LEVDUS) examination is the standard diagnostic test to evaluate patients for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, some studies will be incomplete for a variety of reasons, including patient-related factors such as pain, edema, a large leg circumference, or the presence of overlying bandages or orthopedic devices. We previously reported that the frequency of obtaining a follow-up examination after an incomplete and negative (I/N) LEVDUS examination was low but that the rates of DVT found on the follow-up studies of initially I/N LEVDUS studies were similar to the rates of DVT found with initially complete LEVDUS examinations. Therefore, we recommended process improvements to increase follow-up LEVDUS studies after an I/N LEVDUS examination. In the present study, we have described the results of appending a recommendation to obtain a follow-up LEVDUS study to preliminary and final reports of I/N LEVDUS.

METHODS

Starting in January 2019 through December 2019, a recommendation to obtain a repeat LEVDUS examination after an I/N study was appended to the preliminary and final reports of all I/N LEVDUS examination of patients who did not, otherwise, have an indication for anticoagulation (group 2). The patients were identified on an ongoing basis through the study period and entered into an Excel database (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Wash). Group 2 was compared with a previously reported historic control cohort of patients identified from January 2017 to December 2017 (group 1). We compared groups 1 and 2 with respect to the frequency of the repeat studies performed within 4 weeks after an I/N LEVDUS examination and the DVT rates found from the follow-up LEVDUS examinations after an I/N LEVDUS study.

RESULTS

Of the patients in groups 1 and 2, 187 and 229 had had I/N LEVDUS examinations, with 28% and 40.2% of group 1 and 2 studies having follow-up LEVDUS examinations (P < .01). Previously unidentified lower extremity thrombi were discovered in 21% of the group 2 follow-up examinations. Also, the rate of new thrombi detected was not different between groups 2 and 1 (historic controls; DVT, 14.3% vs 18.5% [P = .25]; SVT, 6.3% vs 3.3% [P = .15]). A definitive finding of either positive or negative for DVT and SVT with a complete examination in 50% of the group 2 patients with follow-up examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A recommendation to obtain a follow-up examination appended to the preliminary and final I/N LEVDUS reports was associated with an increased rate of follow-up examinations, which revealed many previously undetected DVTs and SVTs or had allowed for definitive exclusion of DVT.

Distal Retrograde Access for Infrainguinal Arterial Chronic Total Occlusions: A Prospective, Single Center, Observational Study in the Office-Based Laboratory Setting

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of retrograde arterial recanalization of infrainguinal CTOs in the OBL setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent interventions for lower extremity CTOs in the OBL setting by a single vascular surgeon were evaluated (January 2013-November 2017). If antegrade crossing was not possible, then a retrograde distal approach was used. Patient characteristics, CTO location, procedural time, contrast, anticoagulation and radiation doses and costs were recorded. Post-procedural complications were documented on post-procedure day 1 and 10-14 days post procedure. Three groups were compared: group 1-antegrade approach for femoropopliteal CTOs; group 2-antegrade approach for tibial CTOs, and; group 3-retrograde approach for femoropopliteal and tibial CTOs.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were studied. In 39 (16.5%), the lesions could not be crossed. A successful antegrade approach was used in 185 of them, of which 69% (group 1, n = 128) patients had femoropopliteal CTOs and 31% (group 2, n = 57) had tibial CTOs. Fourteen patients (5.9%, group 3) were treated by retrograde distal approach. Group 3 patients received higher contrast doses than groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.01). However, patients in groups 1 and 2 received similar contrast doses. Group 3 patients had the highest operative time and treatment costs followed by group 1 and then group 2 (p = 0.01). Three femoral pseudoaneurysms were noted in group 1, and 2 in group 2. No complications were seen in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the operative times, costs, radiation and contrast dose are higher with retrograde arterial access, it represents a safe and effective method for the crossing of CTO infrainguinal lesions in an ambulatory venue.

Safety of vascular interventions performed in an office-based laboratory in patients with low/moderate procedural risk

OBJECTIVE

An exponential increase in number of office-based laboratories (OBLs) has occurred in the United States, since the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services increased reimbursement for outpatient vascular interventions in 2008. This dramatic shift to office-based procedures directed to the objective to assess safety of vascular procedures in OBLs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed to include all procedures performed over a 4-year period at an accredited OBL. The procedures were categorized into groups for analysis; group I, venous procedures; group II, arterial; group III, arteriovenous; and group IV, inferior vena cava filter placement procedures. Local anesthesia, analgesics, and conscious sedation were used in all interventions, individualized to the patient and procedure performed. Arterial closures devices were used in all arterial interventions. Patient selection for procedure at OBL was highly selective to include only patients with low/moderate procedural risk.

RESULTS

Nearly 6201 procedures were performed in 2779 patients from 2011 to 2015. The mean age of the study population was 66.5 ± 13.31 years. There were 1852 females (67%) and 928 males (33%). In group I, 5783 venous procedures were performed (3491 vein ablation, 2292 iliac vein stenting); with group II, 238 arterial procedures (125 femoral/popliteal, 71 infrapopliteal, iliac 42); group III, 129 arteriovenous accesses; and group IV, 51 inferior vena cava filter placements. The majority of procedures belonged to American Society of Anesthesiology class II with venous (61%) and arterial (74%) disease. A total of 5% patients were deemed American Society of Anesthesiology class IV (all on hemodialysis). There was no OBL mortality, major bleed, acute limb ischemia, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital transfer within 72 hours. Minor complications occurred in 14 patients (0.5%). Thirty-day mortality, unrelated to the procedure, was noted in 9 patients (0.32%). No statistically significant differences were noted in outcomes between the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that it is safe to use OBL for minimally invasive, noncomplex vascular interventions in patients with a low to moderate cardiovascular procedural risk.

Impact of office-based laboratories on physician practice patterns and outcomes after percutaneous vascular interventions for peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous vascular interventions (PVIs) for peripheral artery disease have shifted from hospital-based facilities to office-based laboratories (OBLs). The transition to OBLs is due to a variety of factors such as technology advancement, increased efficiency, and financial incentives. We evaluated the impact of physicians switching to OBLs use from hospital-based facilities on procedure volume, procedure type, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

We identified patients with PVI for lower extremity peripheral artery disease from 2006 to 2013 in a 20% Medicare sample and identified physicians who transitioned from predominantly hospital-based facilities to OBLs (switch physicians) and compared them with those who did not use OBLs (control physicians). The main outcomes investigated were average number of PVIs at 30 days and 1 year and atherectomy usage. Patient outcomes included above-ankle amputation, major adverse limb events, and death. We used a difference-in-difference model to control for time effects in a multivariate regression model, reported as an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 292 switch physicians, who treated 7134 patients (3888 before OBL use and 3246 after transitioning to OBLs), and 3715 control physicians treating 54,213 patients (36,327 in the preperiod and 17,886 in the postperiod). Switch and control physicians both treated more patients with lower extremity wounds during the study period; however, this increase was greater for control physician (0.7% vs 5.5%, P < .001). On average, patients treated by switch physicians had 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03-0.07; P < .001) underwent more PVIs within 30 days and 0.12 more PVIs (95% CI, 0.08-0.16; P < .001) within 1 year of the initial revascularization procedure after the physician transitioned to an OBL. Similarly, patients treated by switch physicians underwent 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.03; P = .002) more atherectomy procedures at 30 days and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.05; P = .008) more atherectomy procedures at 1 year. Transitioning to OBLs was also associated with a decreased risk in above-ankle amputation at 30 days (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; P = .009) and 1 year (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95; P = .01). However, no statistical difference was observed for major adverse limb events and mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year because patients treated by switch and control physicians experienced similar decreases.

CONCLUSIONS

Transitioning to OBLs was associated higher 30-day and 1-year PVI rates and atherectomy rates. Although transitioning to OBLs was associated with lower rates of above-ankle amputations, switch physicians treated a lower number of patients with lower extremity wounds.

Consecutive cycles of hospital accreditation: Persistent low compliance associated with higher mortality and longer length of stay

Objective

To examine the association between compliance with consecutive cycles of accreditation and patient-related outcomes.

Design

A Danish nationwide population-based study from 2012 to 2015.

Setting

In-patients admitted with one of the 80 diagnoses at public, non-psychiatric hospitals.

Participants

In-patients admitted with one of 80 primary diagnoses which accounted for 80% of all deaths occuring within 30 dyas after admission.

Intervention

Admission to a hospital with high (n = 125 485 in-patients) or low compliance (n = 152 074 in-patients) in both cycles of accreditation by the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme.

Main outcome measures

A 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and all-cause acute readmission. We computed adjusted odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) using logistic and Cox Proportional Hazard regression including adjustment for six potential patient-related confounders.

Results

The 30-day mortality risk for in-patients admitted at high compliant hospitals was 3.95% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.84-4.06) and 4.39% (95% CI: 4.29-4.49) at low compliant hospitals. In-patients admitted at low compliant hospitals had a substantially higher risk of dying within 30-day after admission (adjusted OR: 1.26 (95% CI: 1.11-1.43) and a longer LOS (adjusted HR of discharge: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95) than in-patients at high compliant hospitals. No difference was seen for acute readmission (adjusted HR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.90-1.06)). Focusing on the second cycle alone, in-patients at partially accredited hospitals had a higher 30-day mortality risk and longer LOS than admissions at fully accredited hospitals (30-day: adjusted OR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.02-1.24) and LOS: adjusted HR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98)).

Conclusion

Persistent low compliance with the DDKM (in Danish: Den Danske Kvalitetsmodel) accreditation was associated with higher 30-day mortality and longer LOS.

Outpatient Endovascular Tibial Artery Intervention in an Office-Based Setting Is as Safe and Effective as in a Hospital Setting

Purpose: To compare outcomes of outpatient tibial artery procedures between an office endovascular center and a hospital angiography suite. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 204 outpatient tibial interventions performed on 161 patients (mean age 72±11.5 years; 81 men) in either an office (n=100) or hospital (n=104) angiography suite from April 2011 through September 2013. Patients who had an existing ipsilateral bypass that was completely proximal to the tibial trifurcation were eligible, as were patients with prior proximal endovascular interventions. Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral bypass involving the infrapopliteal vessels, in-patient status at the time of the procedure, planned admission after the procedure, and infrapopliteal stenting. Treatment included percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or PTA with atherectomy. Primary outcomes were unplanned admission, emergency room visits, acute complications, and patency. Results: There were no significant differences in demographics or baseline Rutherford category between patients treated in an office endovascular suite vs a hospital angiography suite. Factors more prevalent in the hospital group included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16% vs 8%, p=0.045), renal insufficiency (37% vs 25%, p=0.017), and previous proximal bypass (12% vs 4%, p=0.045). Of the 100 office procedures, 25 involved PTA and 75 were PTA with atherectomy, while in the 104 hospital procedures, PTA was applied in 68 patients and PTA with atherectomy in 36. Thirty-day local complication rates (7% vs 11%, p=0.368), systemic complication rates (4% vs 8%, p=0.263), and mortality (1% vs 2%, p=0.596) in the office vs hospital setting were not statistically different. Unplanned postprocedure hospital admission rates for medical reasons were lower in the office group (2% vs 11%, p=0.01). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 1-year follow-up data were better in the office group for primary patency (69% vs 53%, p=0.050), assisted primary patency (90% vs 89%, p=0.646), and amputation-free survival (89% vs 83%, p=0.476), but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Efficacy and safety of outpatient endovascular tibial artery interventions between office and hospital settings were similar, with lower unplanned admission rates and better patency. With appropriate patient selection, the office endovascular suite can be a safe alternative to the hospital angiography suite.