Understanding Patient Acceptance of Risk with Treatment Options for Intermittent Claudication

Psychosocial Factors Are Associated With Risk Acceptance in Upper Extremity Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients who help choose their health strategies are more adherent and achieve better health. An important role of the clinician is to verify that a patient's expressed preferences are consistent with what matters most to the patient and not muddled by common misconceptions about symptoms or conditions. Patient choices are influenced by estimation of the potential benefits and potential harms of a given intervention. One method for quantifying these estimations is the concept of maximum acceptable risk (MAR), or the maximum risk that subjects are willing to accept in exchange for a given therapeutic benefit. This study addressed the hypothesis that misconceptions due to unhelpful cognitive bias regarding pain are associated with risk acceptance among people seeking care for an upper extremity condition.

METHODS

We invited 140 new adult patients visiting an upper extremity specialist to complete a survey including demographics, pain intensity, depression and anxiety symptoms, catastrophic thinking, activity limitations, and MAR. Trauma or nontrauma diagnosis was obtained from the treating clinician and recorded by the research assistant. We used bivariate and linear regression analyses to identify factors associated with MAR among this population.

RESULTS

Accounting for potential confounding in multivariable analysis, higher MAR was associated with older age and greater catastrophic thinking.

CONCLUSIONS

Specialists can be aware that people with more unhelpful cognitive biases may be willing to take more risk. Vigilance for common misconceptions and gentle, incremental reorientation of those misconceptions can increase the probability that people will choose options consistent with what matters most to them.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Endovascular Infrapopliteal Interventions for Intermittent Claudication

BACKGROUND

Although endovascular peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) are typically limited to vessels above the knee in intermittent claudication (IC), some patients have concomitant or isolated infrapopliteal disease with IC. The benefits and risks of undergoing tibial intervention remain unclear in IC patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of infrapopliteal PVI for IC.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for PVI procedures performed for IC between 2003 and 2018. Patients were divided into 3 groups: isolated femoropopliteal (FP), isolated infrapopliteal (IP), and combined above and below knee interventions (COM). Multivariable logistic regression models identified predictors of minor and major amputation, as well as freedom from reintervention. Kaplan-Meier plots estimate amputation-free survival.

RESULTS

We identified 34,944 PVI procedures for IC. There were 31,110 (89.0%) FP interventions, 1,045 (3.0%) IP interventions, and 2,789 (8.0%) COM interventions. Kaplan-Meier plots of amputation-free survival revealed that patients with any IP intervention had significantly higher rates of both minor and major amputation (log rank <0.001). Freedom from reintervention at 1-year was 89.2% for the FP group, 91.3% for the IP group, and 85.3% for the COM group (P < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increased risk of major amputation included isolated IP intervention (OR 6.47, 95% CI, 6.45-6.49; P < 0.0001), COM interventions (OR 2.32, 95% CI, 2.31-2.33; P < 0.0001), dialysis dependence (OR 3.34, 95% CI, 3.33-3.35; P < 0.0001), CHF (OR 1.86, 95% CI, 1.85-1.86; P = 0.021) and, nonwhite race (OR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.63-1.64; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

PVI in the infrapopliteal vessels for IC is associated with higher amputation rates. This observation may suggest the need for more careful patient selection when performing PVI in patients with IC where disease extends into the infrapopliteal level.

Risk of major amputation in patients with intermittent claudication undergoing early revascularization

BACKGROUND

Revascularization is being used increasingly for the treatment of intermittent claudication and yet few studies have reported the long-term outcomes of this strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with intermittent claudication who underwent revascularization compared with a group initially treated without revascularization.

METHODS

Patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication and a diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease were recruited from outpatient clinics at three hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Based on variation in the practices of different vascular specialists, patients were either treated by early revascularization or received initial conservative treatment. Patients were followed in outpatient clinics using linked hospital admission record data. The primary outcome was the requirement for major amputation. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression and competing risks analyses were used to compare major amputation rates.

RESULTS

Some 456 patients were recruited; 178 (39·0 per cent) underwent early revascularization and 278 (61·0 per cent) had initial conservative treatment. Patients were followed for a mean(s.d.) of 5·00(3·37) years. The estimated 5-year major amputation rate was 6·2 and 0·7 per cent in patients undergoing early revascularization and initial conservative treatment respectively (P = 0·003). Early revascularization was associated with an increased requirement for major amputation in models adjusted for other risk factors (relative risk 5·40 to 4·22 in different models).

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting with intermittent claudication who underwent early revascularization appeared to be at higher risk of amputation than those who had initial conservative treatment.