Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors of Type II Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Side branch embolization before endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to prevent type II endoleak: A prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pre-emptive transcatheter arterial embolization (P-TAE) of aortic side branches to prevent type II endoleak in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, single-arm trial enrolled 100 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm from nine hospitals between 2018 and 2021. There were 85 men and 15 women, with a mean age of 79.6 ± 6.0 (standard deviation) years (range: 65-97 years). P-TAE was attempted for patent aortic side branches, including the inferior mesenteric artery, lumbar arteries, and other branches. The primary endpoint was late type II endoleak incidence at 6 months post-repair. Secondary endpoints included changes in aneurysmal sac diameter at 6- and 12 months, complications, re-intervention, and aneurysm-related mortality. Aneurysm sac changes at 6- and 12 months was compared between the late and no-late type II endoleak groups.

RESULTS

Coil embolization was successful in 80.9% (321/397) of patent aortic side branches, including 86.3% of the inferior mesenteric arteries, 80.3% of lumbar arteries, and 55.6% of other branches without severe adverse events. Late type II endoleak incidence at 6 months was 8.9% (8/90; 95% confidence interval: 3.9-16.8%). Aneurysm sac shrinkage > 5 mm was observed in 41.1% (37/90) and 55.3% (47/85) of the patients at 6- and 12-months post-EVAR, respectively. Patients with late type II endoleak had less aneurysm sac shrinkage than those without type II endoleak at 12 months (-0.2 mm vs. -6.0 mm; P = 0.040). No patients required re-intervention for type II endoleak, and no aneurysm-related mortalities occurred.

CONCLUSION

P-TAE is safe and effective in preventing type II endoleak, leading to early sac shrinkage at 12 months following EVAR.

Efficacy of Sac Coil Embolization in Endovascular Aortic Repair for Sac Shrinkage in Patients at a High Risk of Type II Endoleak from Lumbar Arteries

BACKGROUND

In endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), preemptive embolization of sac branch vessels is effective in preventing postoperative type II endoleak (T2EL). However, this technique has not been widely adopted especially for lumbar arteries (LAs) because of technical difficulties and time constraints. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of nonselective sac coil embolization, which is a simpler surgical method, in postoperative sac shrinkage for patients at a high risk of T2EL from LAs.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 76 patients who underwent elective EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm with 4 or more patent LAs or at least 1 patent LA of ≥2 mm at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2022. The patients who underwent sac coil embolization were included in Group Ⅰ (n = 20), and the others were divided into 2 groups: those with an inferior mesenteric artery that was originally occluded or embolized by coils or stent graft bodies (Group Ⅱ, n = 21), and those without that (Group Ⅲ, n = 35). In Group Ⅰ, 0.035-inch coils were inserted into the sac after complete stent graft deployment. The cumulative incidence of sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) was compared between the groups. Further, univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of sac shrinkage.

RESULTS

Sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) was observed more frequently in Group Ⅰ (50%) than in Group Ⅱ (19%) and Group Ⅲ (17%) (P = 0.052 and 0.043, respectively). The cumulative incidence of sac shrinkage was significantly higher in Group Ⅰ than in Group Ⅱ (log-rank P = 0.039) and Group Ⅲ (log-rank P = 0.024). Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that sac embolization was a significant predictor of sac shrinkage (hazard ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-10.8; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonselective sac coil embolization in EVAR is potentially effective for sac shrinkage in the early postoperative phase in patients at high risk of T2EL from LAs. This simple procedure may improve prognosis after EVAR.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Management of Endoleaks Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Endoleaks represent the most common complication after EVAR. Some types are associated with ongoing risk of aneurysm rupture and necessitate long-term surveillance and secondary interventions.

PURPOSE

This document, as with all CIRSE Standards of Practice documents, will recommend a reasonable approach to best practices of managing endoleaks. This will include imaging diagnosis, surveillance, indications for intervention, endovascular treatments and their outcomes. Our purpose is to provide recommendations based on up-to-date evidence, updating the guidelines previously published on this topic in 2013.

METHODS

The writing group was established by the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee and consisted of clinicians with internationally recognised expertise in endoleak management. The writing group reviewed the existing literature performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to select publications in English and relating to human subjects up to 2023. The final recommendations were formulated through consensus.

RESULTS

Endoleaks may compromise durability of the aortic repair, and long-term imaging surveillance is necessary for early detection and correct classification to guide potential re-intervention. The majority of endoleaks that require treatment can be managed using endovascular techniques. This Standards of Practice document provides up-to-date recommendations for the safe management of endoleaks.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Anticoagulation on Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

PURPOSE

Our objective was to investigate whether patients who receive anticoagulation therapy have different outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) from those who do not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared outcomes of EVAR in patients who were on therapeutic anticoagulation vs those who were not. We developed and reported the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines with a registered protocol (CRD42022375894). The Ovid interface was used to search Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to November 2022. The quality of studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (maximum score=9), and the evidence was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was the effect estimate in time-to-event meta-analyses, calculated using the inverse-variance statistical method and random-effects models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies qualified for inclusion reporting a total of 35 739 individuals. Anticoagulated patients had a statistically significantly higher hazard of death (HR=1.93, 95% CI=1.03-3.63), endoleak (HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.55-2.93), reintervention (HR=1.79, 95% CI=1.27-2.52), and aneurysm sac expansion (HR=2.72, 95% CI=1.57-4.72) than patients not receiving anticoagulation therapy. The median score on the NOS was 7 (range=4-9). The certainty of evidence was very low for mortality and reintervention and low for endoleak and sac expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation is a poor prognostic factor after standard EVAR and should be considered in decision-making, consent processes, and surveillance strategies.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The number of individuals who take anticoagulation treatment has been rapidly increasing over the recent years. We aimed to investigate the effect of such treatment on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Anticoagulated patients were found to have increased mortality, endoleak, and reintervention rates after EVAR compared to their non-anticoagulated counterparts. Anticoagulation therapy has a prognostic role in EVAR and should be considered in decision making and EVAR surveillance. Anticoagulated patients need to be informed of the higher failure rates of EVAR, and intensified surveillance strategies may need to be implemented in this patient cohort.

Efficacy and safety of prophylactic intraoperative sac embolization in EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A meta-analysis

Objective

We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic sac embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients suffering from abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, Wanfang and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) to identify studies evaluating the outcomes of sac embolization vs. no embolization among patients who had received EVAR. The time limit of the search was from the establishing database to July 22, 2022. Outcome measures involved the type II endoleak rate, the other endoleak rate, the reintervention rate, mortality, and operation time. Fixed (no heterogeneity) or random effects models were constructed for each outcome. The outcomes are represented as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Among the 2,622 studies screened, 13 studies involving 747 participants were included in the review. The incidence of early-term type II endoleak (OR = 0.2, 95% CI (0.13,0.31), P < 0.00001), mid-term type II endoleak (OR = 0.23, 95% CI (0.15,0.37), P < 0.00001), late-term type II endoleak (OR = 0.27, 95% CI (0.16,0.46), P < 0.00001) and reintervention (OR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.37,0.78), P = 0.002) within the sac embolization group were significantly lower than those in the non-embolization group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups were found for the other endoleak rates (OR = 0.67, 95% CI (0.34,1.32), P = 0.25), mortality (OR = 0.64, 95% CI (0.25,1.66), P = 0.36) and operation time operation (MD = 5.76, 95% CI (-8.30,19.83), P = 0.42).

Conclusions

EVAR combined with sac embolization effectively reduces the incidence of type II endoleak and the reintervention rate without enhancing the operation time. Therefore, more high-quality studies are still needed for validation due to the limited amount and quality of included literature.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022365648.

Intermittent endoleak via an aneurysm–iliac venous fistula after endovascular aneurysm repair

We have reported the rare case of an intermittent endoleak via an aneurysm–venous fistula (AVF). An 89-year-old woman had experienced postoperative sac expansion 6 years after she had undergone endovascular aneurysm repair. During aneurysmorrhaphy, we detected a small AVF, which was the source of the endoleak responsible for the aneurysmal sac expansion. This AVF had a check valve-like mechanism that allowed the inflow of blood from the iliac vein to the sac when the venous pressure exceeded the endotension. Our case has demonstrated the occurrence of an AVF after endovascular aneurysm repair that had resulted in an endoleak that was invisible on imaging studies and the presence of endotension.

[The Prophylaxis of Type 2 Endoleaks is Relevant for Long Term Success of EVAR]

One out of 8 patients needs a reintervention after EVAR during the first 5 years. Two thirds of secondary interventions aim at treating endoleaks. The prevalence of complications doubles in the presence of endoleaks. Fourth generation stent grafts do not lead to a decrease in Type 2-associated reinterventions, but to better prevention of Type 1 and 3 endoleaks. Pretreatment of potential type 2 feeding arteries with embolising agents and treatment of the occurrence of type 2 endoleaks.

Risk Factors for Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Endovascular Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Case Control Study

OBJECTIVE

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) increasingly often. Despite rEVAR being a minimally invasive method, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) remains a significant post-operative threat. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for ACS after rEVAR, including aortic morphological features.

METHODS

The Swedish vascular registry (Swedvasc) was assessed for ACS after rEVAR in the period 2008 - 2015. All patients identified were compared with controls (i.e., patients who did not develop ACS after rEVAR), matched by centre and repair date. Case records were reviewed, and radiology images analysed in a core laboratory. Comparisons were performed with respect to physiological and radiological risk factors.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 40 patients with ACS and 68 controls. Pre-operatively, patients with ACS had a lower blood pressure (BP) than controls (median 70 mmHg vs. 97 mmHg; p < .001). Intra-operatively, they had aortic balloon occlusion more often (55.0% vs. 10.3%; p < .001) and received more transfusions than controls (median nine units of packed red blood cells [pRBC] vs. two units; p < .001). Ninety-seven per cent of those who developed ACS had a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, aortic balloon occlusion, or received more than five pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the instructions for use did not differ between patients and controls (57.5% vs. 54.4%; p = .84), and neither did the pre-operative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (57.1% vs. 63.9%; p = .52) nor the number of visible lumbar arteries on pre-operative imaging (2 vs. 4; p = .014). In multivariable logistic regression, the number of intra-operative transfusions were predictive of ACS (p < .001), while pre-operative hypotension (p = .32) and aortic balloon occlusion (p = .018) were not.

CONCLUSION

ACS after rEVAR is mainly associated with physiological factors and is unlikely to develop without the presence of a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, the need for an aortic occlusion balloon, or more than five intra-operative pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the IFU or any other morphological factor were not associated with a risk of ACS.

Prophylactic Aneurysm Embolization during EVAR Is Safe, Improves Sac Regression and Decreases the Incidence of Type II Endoleak

BACKGROUND

Clinically significant endoleaks remain costly, time-consuming, morbid and even mortal following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Perigraft arterial sac embolization (PASE) has been utilized to treat type II endoleaks (T2EL) diagnosed at the time of EVAR or after repair. Our objective was to analyze the safety and efficacy of prophylactic PASE on the incidence of T2EL and aneurysm sac regression in patients undergoing EVAR.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases from the University of California San Diego and the San Diego Veterans Affairs hospitals between 2015 and 2019. Prophylactic PASE (pPASE) was performed at the time of EVAR with thrombin, contrast and gelfoam liquid embolic aneurysm treatment as previously described. We evaluated technical success, freedom from T2EL, freedom from reintervention, from sac expansion, from type I/III EL, from all-cause mortality (ACM), from aneurysm-related mortality and from non-target embolization (NTE).

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included in the study. Technical success was 100% and no NTE was observed. The average duration of follow-up was 14 ± 11months. In those treated and followed by CT scan, 100% of patients' aneurysms halted their growth following PASE, while 65.9% demonstrated sac regression. Mean aneurysm sac diameter decreased by 9 mm (95% CI 7-12). At 3 years, freedom from T2EL was 87.1%. Presence of T2EL did not result in aneurysm expansion during the follow-up period and thus did not require reintervention in any of these patients. Freedom from re-intervention was 83.2% for Type Ib EL and limb occlusion and all procedures were determined to be successful at the time of completion. No aneurysm-related deaths occurred during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

PASE proves to be an effective tool in sac management for prophylaxis of endoleak and maximizing sac regression in EVAR. It is safe, effective and durable when employed in this manner in the short and medium-term and was associated with low rates of T2ELs and reinterventions and a 100% freedom from sac expansion. Further analysis is required to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this adjunctive procedure in EVAR.

Changes in Neck Angle, Neck Length, Maximum Diameter, Maximum Area and Thrombus after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Purpose

The correlation of initial anatomy of the aneurysm, aneurysmal remodeling and endoleaks is controversial. We performed a retrospective study to measure aneurysmal remodeling with time, and to assess the structural changes in the aneurysm neck after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Materials and Methods

From January 2013 to February 2018, 108 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) underwent EVAR. Follow-up computed tomography images were available for 90 patients. Anatomic variables, including the neck angle, neck length, maximal diameter, maximal area, and thrombus volume were measured. Temporal changes were measured preoperatively, immediate postoperatively (within 1 week after EVAR), and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-EVAR. Correlation between the variables according to the temporal changes and presence of type Ia endoleaks (T1aE) was analyzed.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 10.63±20.34 months. Significant decreases in neck angle and length occurred immediately postoperative (P<0.001 and 0.036). Maximum diameter decreased at 6 months post-EVAR (P=0.003), but no significant changes in the maximal area occurred over time (P=0.142). Thrombus volume in the aneurysm sac increased immediately post-EVAR (P=0.008). There was no significant relationship between T1aE and neck changes in the group and time comparison (P=0.815 and 0.970).

Conclusion

Changes in neck angle, length and thrombus volume occurred immediately after EVAR, whereas a change in the maximum diameter of the AAA was noted 6 months after EVAR. Preoperative anatomic variables related with T1aE were not found.

Platelets reflect the fate of type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The management of type II endoleak (T2E) remains controversial because of the heterogeneous outcome. For blood-based screening to detect malignant T2E, we focused on platelets after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and compared them with the prognosis of T2Es.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2015, there were 249 patients treated with EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm who were evaluated retrospectively. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 ± 0.2 years. T2Es that had aneurysm sac enlargement or converted to type I or type III endoleak were defined as malignant; the other T2Es were considered benign. Cases without any complications, including T2E, were defined as completed. We compared the platelet count on postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 7 with preoperative baseline values among the three groups. Sequentially, we calculated the cutoff of the platelet ratio on POD 7 to the baseline value in relation to malignant T2E using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the cutoff ratio was 113% (sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 58%). We then reclassified T2E patients into T2E-high platelet (T2E-HP; ≥113%) or T2E-low platelet (T2E-LP; <113%) groups. The influence of platelets on T2E was evaluated with reintervention rate and cumulative aneurysm sac enlargement rate using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

T2Es were found in 70 patients (28%), and 179 patients were assigned to the completed group. Malignant and benign T2Es were found in 33 and 37 patients, respectively. No difference was found in the preoperative baseline values. On POD 7, the platelet count in the malignant T2E group was significantly lower than that in the completed and benign T2E groups (168 × 10³/μL vs 207 × 10³/μL and 201 × 10³/μL; P = .0124). Then, 27 and 43 patients were assigned to the T2E-HP and T2E-LP groups, respectively. The reintervention-free survival rate in the T2E-LP group was lower than that in the completed group (at 3 years, 66.4% ± 8.0% vs 71.9% ± 4.0%; P = .0031). Among T2E patients, the cumulative aneurysm sac enlargement rates in the T2E-LP group were significantly higher than those in the T2E-HP group (at 3 years, 34.6% ± 8.2% vs 20.6% ± 8.2%; P = .0105). Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for the cumulative aneurysm sac enlargement rates among T2E patients showed that sex, dual antiplatelet therapy, and lower platelet ratio (<113%) were significant predictors; multivariate analysis showed that T2E-LP was the only significant predictor (hazard ratio, 2.60; P = .0355).

CONCLUSIONS

The platelet count of patients with malignant T2Es on POD 7 was definitively lower than that of patients with completed EVAR or with benign T2Es. The lower platelet count on POD 7 could be a risk factor for aneurysm sac enlargement among patients with T2Es.

Evolving concepts and management of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair: where do we stand in 2019?

In recent years, there has been tremendous progress in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) techniques and devices. This process has seen a change in incidence, risk factors, and treatment of endoleaks as well as in follow-up protocols after EVAR. In particular, recent literature has highlighted new concepts in the evaluation and prevention/treatment of type I and II endoleak after standard EVAR. There is also recent evidence regarding new imaging protocols for follow-up after EVAR, which include magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. This comprehensive review aims to outline the most recent concepts on imaging follow-up, pathophysiology/risk factors, and management of endoleaks.

Prognostic Value of Initial Aneurysmal Sac Regression after EVAR

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of initial aneurysmal sac reduction after endovascular aneurysm repair on the evolution of aneurysmal sac over follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was made of patients subjected to elective treatment between January 2005 and December 2014, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. An analysis was made of the evolution of the aneurysmal sac according to its condition one year after surgery, defining of two groups: A (sac reduction) and B (stable sac). Follow-up by computed tomography (CT) angiography was made after one month and then every 6 months or annually, depending on the presence of endoleak.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included. Fifty-one patients (39.8%) showed a significant decrease in diameter during the first year (group A), whereas 77 patients (60.2%) showed no initial decrease (group B). Preoperative CT angiography showed the patients in group A to have larger aneurysms (63.5 mm vs. 59.25; P = 0.048), a greater presence of posterior thrombus (68.6% vs. 30.7%; P < 0.001), and fewer patent lumbar vessels (56.9% vs. 83.1%; P = 0.001). The prevalence of endoleak at some point during follow-up was lower in group A (31.4% vs. 74% in group B; P < 0.001), and 100% of all aneurysmal growths were associated to the presence of endoleak. After 5 years, significant differences were observed in the growth-free rate (96.9% in group A vs. 85.2% in group B; hazard ratio [HR] 4.8 [1.1-21.4; P = 0.036]) and in the reintervention-free rate (95,7% vs. 84.6%; HR 6.6 [0.8-52.4; P = 0.07]). No reoperation in group A was due to type II endoleak.

CONCLUSIONS

The aneurysmal sac can be expected to take a favorable course in those cases characterized by initial aneurysmal sac reduction. These findings may imply a change in the follow-up protocol, even in cases with type II endoleak.

2D-shear wave elastography in the prediction of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in the prediction of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients underwent EVAR for AAA, and 2D-SWE was performed after EVAR. Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT and ultrasonography were performed to evaluate endoleaks in all patients. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range, 3-12 months). Patients were divided into two groups: one with an endoleak (endoleak group) and another without it (control group). We compared the elasticity index (EI) of intraluminal thrombus (ITL) and fresh thrombus (FT) between the two groups.

RESULTS

Type II endoleaks were confirmed in five of the 29 patients (endoleak group), and there were no endoleaks in the other 24 (control group). ILT was observed in 21 patients of the control group and in all patients of the endoleak group. There was a difference only in EI of ILT; the mean EI (± standard deviation) of ILT was 89 ± 16 kPA in the control group and 113 ± 25 kPA in the endoleak group (p=.037).

CONCLUSIONS

High EI of ILT may predict the occurrence of type II endoleaks after EVAR of AAA.

The Spatial Morphology of Intraluminal Thrombus Influences Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 endoleaks (T2Es) after endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can lead to sac expansion or failure of sac regression, and often present as a management dilemma. The intraluminal thrombus (ILT) may influence the likelihood of endoleaks after EVAR and can be characterized using routine preoperative imaging. We examined the relationship between preoperative spatial morphology of ILT and the incidence of postoperative T2E.

METHODS

All patients who underwent EVAR at the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford, UK) were prospectively entered in a clinical database. Computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) were performed as part of routine clinical care. The ILT morphology of each patient was determined using the preoperative CTA. Arterial phase cross-sectional images of the AAA were analyzed according to the presence and morphology of the thrombus in each quadrant. The overall ILT morphology was defined by measurements obtained over a 4-cm segment of the AAA. The diagnosis of T2Es during EVAR surveillance was confirmed by CTAs. The relation between the ILT morphology and T2E was assessed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Between September 2009 and July 2016, 271 patients underwent EVAR for infrarenal AAAs (male: 241, age = 79 ± 7). The ILT was present in 265 (98%) of AAAs. Mean follow-up was 1.9 ± 1.6 years. The T2E was observed in 77 cases. Sixty-one percent of T2Es were observed within the first week after surgery. The T2E was observed in 50% (3/6) of cases without the ILT (no-ILT). Compared with no-ILT, the presence of circumferential or posterolateral ILTs was protective from T2Es (odds ratio = 0.33 and 0.37; P = 0.002 and P = 0.047, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The spatial ILT morphology on routine preoperative CTA imaging can be a biomarker for post-EVAR T2Es. ILTs that cover the posterolateral aspects of the lumen, or circumferential ILTs, are protective of T2Es. This information can be useful in the preoperative planning of EVARs.

Recent Advances and Mid-to-Long Term Results of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the standard therapy alongside open surgery repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and it is rapidly becoming prevalent. There has been substantial technical progress with respect to EVAR since its introduction. Technical contrivance can be used to manage even inappropriate EVAR cases, including those involving a hostile neck, deficient access route, or aneurysm rupture. However, there are some controversies over reinterventions in relation to long-term outcomes. Although a long-term result has not yet been analyzed in Japan a randomized controlled trial (RCT) held in the West reported that OSR is superior to EVAR for avoiding reinterventions and aneurysm-related death. The RCT involved the use of older devices and proceeded in a different way from the present study; therefore, different results may be obtained for Japanese EVAR outcomes. However, this Western RCT result should be considered as an important warning. Type II endoleak also must be managed in order to improve long term outcomes of EVAR. Efforts to improve both technical methodology and long-term outcomes are necessary to ensure EVAR as a minimally invasive therapy for patients with AAA. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2018; 27: 405–411.)

Effectiveness of Embolization of Inferior Mesenteric Artery to Prevent Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Review of the Literature

Type II endoleak is a common complication that develops after endovascular aneurysm repair. Patients with type II endoleak, which has persisted for 6 months, have a significantly higher rate of aneurysmal sac enlargement, reintervention, and rupture. To date, several studies have examined the effectiveness of preoperative embolization of branch vessels for the prevention of type II endoleak. Particularly, the embolization of the large inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) seems to be a precise, safe, and effective method. IMA is a significant risk factor for type II endoleak. However, there is currently no strong evidence to prove which patients would benefit from preventive IMA embolization. In addition, considering the incidence of type II endoleak and the adverse event rate, routine embolization seems to be unreliable and time-consuming. Moreover, previous reports of preoperative IMA embolization were retrospective. Thus, prospective and randomized studies are necessary so that the usefulness of IMA embolization can be proved and the potential benefits can be assessed. To establish preventive IMA embolization as one of the effective therapeutic strategies to prevent type II endoleak and to maximize its therapeutic effect, we should provide a wide range of therapeutic strategies to suit the state of the patient.

Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: preoperative imaging and evaluation

Imaging is a critical component of the pre-procedure evaluation and planning of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Imaging is the mainstay for proper assessment of procedural candidacy, relevant vascular anatomy, device selection, and surgical approach. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has long been considered the preferred modality for pre-operative imaging and evaluation prior to EVAR. Recently, advances in image quality and software technology have further enhanced the proceduralist's ability to plan and perform EVAR. In this review, we highlight the current state of the art to provide interventionalists a contemporary assessment of the available tools for pre-operative imaging and evaluation prior to EVAR.