Endoluminal Dilation Technique to Remove Stuck Port-A-Cath: A Case Report

A Stepwise Interventional Strategy for the Removal of Adherent Totally Implanted Central Venous Access Port Catheters

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a stepwise interventional strategy for the removal of adherent totally implanted central venous access port catheters, consisting of a guidewire support, antegrade coaxial separation, and retrograde coaxial separation with increasing technical complexity.

METHODS

This study has a retrospective design. Thirty-two patients who had failed routine removal of the port catheter and were then transferred to interventional radiology between November 2017 and December 2023 were reviewed. The technical success and complication rates were recorded.

RESULTS

All adherent catheters were successfully removed without catheter fragmentation, using guidewire support (n = 21), antegrade coaxial separation (n = 5), and retrograde coaxial separation (n = 6). The technical success rate was 100%, and no complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed stepwise interventional strategy successfully removed adherent port catheters, with good safety and high effectiveness. It appeared to reduce the incidence of catheter fracture during the removal of adherent totally implantable central venous access port catheters.

[Endoluminal balloon dilatation of impacted central venous catheter-Case report and literature review]

BACKGROUND

The long-term application of tunneled central venous catheters leads to the development of firm adhesions between the wall of the vein and the catheter, which makes removal of the catheter difficult or impossible. The treatment options in such cases include abandonment of catheter parts or an open surgical approach up to sternotomy. At present, procedural alternatives are available, which include endovascular techniques such as the use of laser energy and endoluminal dilatation.

METHODS

This article describes the successful application of endoluminal dilatation for removal of ingrown central venous catheters in three patients, which had impacted in the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein. A 5 Fr (Cordis, Santa Clara, CA, USA) sheath was inserted into one lumen through the severed end of the double lumen catheter. Subsequently, a balloon catheter was inserted into the other lumen to prevent retrograde bleeding or air embolism. Under fluoroscopy a guidewire (0.018, Terumo Medical Corporation, Somerset, New Jersey, USA) was introduced via the sheath to beyond the tip of the hemodialysis catheter into the right atrium. Finally, an angioplasty balloon was inserted (4 × 80 mm) via the guidewire and the complete catheter was sequentially inflated with a pressure of 4 atm. It was then possible to pull out the catheter with no difficulty.

RESULTS

This technique resulted in the removal of the central venous catheters in all three patients, without any relevant complications or resistance.

CONCLUSION

By dissolving adhesions between the catheter and the vein wall, endoluminal balloon dilatation constitutes a reliable and safe technique for the extraction of impacted central venous hemodialysis catheters and may thus help to avoid further invasive surgical procedures.

Endoluminal dilatation technique to remove stuck hemodialysis tunneled catheter: A case report from Indonesia

•

The phenomenon of the ‘stuck’ catheter in the central vein, where significant traction or additional maneuvers are required to remove the catheter, is not frequently reported in spite of the vast usage of these catheters worldwide.

•

The endoluminal balloon dilatation of the HD catheter not only separates the stuck HD catheter from the adherent vein by breaking the adhesions between them, but also expands the vein simultaneously, thus enabling easy removal of the HD catheter.

•

Endoluminal dilatation technique is a minimally invasive percutaneous technique that appears safe and straightforward and can be performed in any interventional suite while allowing preservation of venous access.

•

Consider endoluminal dilatation technique as a treatment option.

Background

Tunneled CVC is being increasingly used worldwide as a mean of vascular access for hemodialysis. Among these, one of the emerging complications is that of the “embedded” or stuck catheter. There have been registered cases of vasomotor collapse, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), avulsion of the vena cava, damage to the tricuspid valve having fatal consequences, and breakage of the CVC (Lodi et al., 2016).

Case presentation

A 63-year-old female with mature AV fistula came to the clinic for removal of a tunnelled 15 fr double lumen dialysis catheter (Medical Components, Harleysville, Pensylvania) that had been inserted into the left internal jugular vein 15 months prior to this visit. In the OR, our surgical attempt to remove the catheter failed. The first few dilation procedures were performed using 0.035-inch guidewire and balloon catheters. The technique was subsequently modified as follows. In this case we use a 6 × 60 mm Scoreflex balloon. Endoluminal dilation was repeated along the length of the catheter up to the cuff. Once the catheter has been removed, pressure was applied using sterile gauze to aid hemostasis. The procedure was successful without any observed complication.

Conclusion

Endoluminal dilatation technique is considered as the easiest and safest technique to remove hemodialysis catheter. Our case is the first stuck hemodialysis catheter reported in Indonesia and probably the first case that happen and treat with endoluminal dilatation technique in our country.

Efficacy and clinical outcome of the port-a-cath in children: a tertiary care-center experience

Background

Implanted vascular access devices play an essential role in the management of pediatric patients. The objectives of this study were to assess our experience with port-a-cath insertion in pediatric patients, report its complications, and compare open versus percutaneous approaches.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study, including 568 patients who underwent port-a-cath insertion between 2013 and 2019 in our center. We grouped the patients according to the technique of insertion into two groups: group 1 (n = 168) included patients who had the open approach and group 2 (n = 404) included patients who had the percutaneous technique. (p < 0.001).

Results

Patients in group 1 were younger (4.10 ± 3.45 years) compared to patients in group 2 (5.47 ± 3.85 years). The main indications of insertion were hematological malignancy 57.74% (n = 328), solid organ malignancy 25.18% (n = 143), pure hematological diseases 5.46% (n = 31), metabolic diseases 2.64% (n = 15), and others for poor vascular access 8.8% (n = 50). The most common site for insertion in group 1 was the left external jugular (n = 136; 82.98%) and the left subclavian in group 2 (n = 203; 50.25%). Two hundred and two patients had a central line before catheter insertion (36.6%). Complications during insertion were comparable between both groups (p = 0.427). The catheter got stuck in 6 patients; all required additional incision and two needed venotomy. The most common reason to remove the catheter was the completion of the treatment (63.69% and 61.14%, in groups 1 and 2, respectively). The duration of the catheter was comparable between the two groups (13.14 ± 14.76 vs. 14.44 ± 14.04 months in group 1 vs.2; p = 0.327).

Conclusions

Open and percutaneous port-a-cath insertions are safe in children with chronic diseases. Port-a-cath improved patients’ management, and complications are infrequent. The most common complications are infection and catheter malfunction, which can be managed without catheter removal in some patients.

Complicated Surgical Removal of an Adherent Port-a-Cath After 11 Years of Implantation

A 65-year-old woman with a medical history significant for anal cancer was referred by her primary care physician for a port-a-cath removal. The port was placed prior to treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, 11 years prior to this scheduled removal. She received chemotherapy and radiation in accordance with the Nigro protocol, treating the anal cancer to complete resolution. During port removal, a fibrous capsule was dissected and the port was removed from the left upper breast border along with proximal portion of the catheter. Significant difficulty was found in removing the remaining catheter despite sustained traction and guidewire insertion. Fluoroscopy revealed an intravascular adhesion of the catheter tip in the superior vena cava, which could not be freed. In order to prevent vascular injury, the adhesed portion of the distal catheter was left in place with three large surgical clips placed distally. This case highlights the very rare complication of complete vascular adherence of the terminal catheter tip and extended port intracorporeal time as a risk factor for adhesion. This case also highlights the importance of timely permanent central venous catheter removal following completion of its intended regimen.