Endovascular Reconstruction for Chronic Infrarenal Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Revascularization of Chronic Juxtarenal Aortoiliac Occlusion

Chronic juxtarenal aortoiliac occlusion (JRO) represents the most severe form of aortoiliac occlusive disease, classified under Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) as a TASC II D lesion with surgical treatment as the main recommendation. Although endovascular revascularization of other TASC II D lesions are routinely performed, JRO is often considered a contraindication for endovascular treatment due to the extensive nature, extending from the level of the renal arteries down to the iliac arteries. We hereby illustrate an intravascular ultrasound-guided re-entry based technique to facilitate endovascular reconstruction of a JRO. A 58-year-old man with JRO presented with an infected nonhealing forefoot ulcer. A transradial pigtail catheter was positioned at the level of the occlusion as an imaging catheter and landmark for re-entry. Subintimal wiring was performed through bilateral groin accesses to the level of the pigtail catheter. Intravascular-guided re-entry catheter was used to identify the true lumen guide firing of the needle catheter, allowing passage for a guidewire into the true lumen of the suprarenal aorta. The intimal fenestration was dilated using a 4-mm angioplasty balloon which allowed passage of the contralateral guidewire. Kissing stent grafts were deployed bilaterally, extending from the level of the infrarenal aorta down to the level of the distal external iliac arteries in overlapping fashion. Completion angiography showed brisk flow from the aorta through the stented portion into the femoral arteries. The patient underwent forefoot amputation 2 days later with successful wound healing and limb salvage at 6 months.

Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Class D Aortoiliac Lesions: A Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and safety outcomes between two groups of patients with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus class D (TASC II D) aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD): those with higher-risk comorbidity who underwent endovascular reconstruction and those with lower-risk comorbidity who underwent surgical bypass. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-two consecutive patients with symptomatic TASC II D AOID who underwent surgical bypass or endovascular reconstruction from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Lesion characteristics, technical approach, survival, limb salvage, patency, and change in clinical symptoms were analyzed. RESULTS. Nineteen patients with higher comorbidity underwent endovascular reconstruction, whereas 13 patients with lower comorbidity underwent surgical bypass. Patients undergoing endovascular reconstruction had an older median age (67.0 vs 62.0 years; p = 0.007), higher rates of hypertension (94.7% vs 61.5%; p = 0.018) and coronary artery disease (26.3% vs 0%; p = 0.044), and advanced renal impairment (mean [± SD] chronic kidney disease stage, 1.4 ± 1.5 vs 0.7 ± 1.3; p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in Rutherford classification between the groups. During long-term follow-up of 2.76 years, endovascular reconstruction and surgical bypass showed equivalent rates of survival (89.5% vs 84.6%; p = 0.683), limb salvage (100.0% vs 92.3%; p = 0.219), and primary or primary-assisted patency (85% vs 85%; p = 0.98). Groups showed similar clinical improvements in walking distance, rest pain, and tissue loss at 30 days (95% vs 85%; p = 0.158) and at long-term follow-up (74% vs 62%; p = 0.599). CONCLUSION. For properly selected patients, the clinical outcomes of endovascular reconstruction versus surgical bypass for TASC II D AOID may be equivalent at 2.5 years after the procedure. The decreased operative risk associated with endovascular reconstruction suggests that it is the technique of choice for high-risk patients.