Use of Double-Barrel Gore Excluder Bifurcated Endografts for Renal Artery Incorporation in an Urgent Endovascular Repair of a Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Comparative Early Results of In-Situ Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair and Other Emergent Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair Techniques for Ruptured Suprarenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms at a Regional Aortic Center

INTRODUCTION

Emergent endovascular repair of suprarenal (SRAAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) poses a significant challenge due to the need for branch vessel incorporation, time constraints, and lack of dedicated devices. Techniques to incorporate branch vessels have included parallel grafting (PG), physician modified endografts (PMEG), double-barrel/reversed iliac branch device (DB/rIBE), and in situ fenestration (ISF). This study describes a single-center experience and the associated outcomes when using these techniques for ruptured SRAAA and TAAA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAA and TAAAs from July 2014 - March 2021 with branch vessel incorporation was performed. Clinical presentation, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of those who underwent ISF were compared to those who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse events including myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, renal dysfunction, new onset dialysis, bowel ischemia, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent endovascular repair for ruptured SRAAA and TAAA, 18 of whom underwent ISF repair. Seventy-two percent of ISF patients were hypotensive prior to surgery, compared to 46% of the patients who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques (PMEG, PG, or DB/rIBE). The total procedural and fluoroscopy times were similar between the two groups despite a greater mean number of branch vessels incorporated with the ISF technique (3.1 vs. 2.2 per patient, P = .015). In-hospital mortality was 19% for all ruptures, and 25% for ruptures with hypotension. Compared to the non-ISF group, in-hospital mortality trended lower in the ISF group (11% vs. 25%, P = .233), reaching statistical significance when comparing patients who presented with hypotension (8% vs 45%, P =.048). The rate of major adverse events was 57% across all techniques and did not significantly differ between the ISF and non-ISF groups, with postoperative renal dysfunction being the most frequent complication (48%). Overall, ISF became the most commonly utilized technqiue later in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

While emergent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAA/TAAA remains a challenge, a number of techniques are available for expeditious treatment. In this series, ISF was associated improve survival, including a 5-fold reduction in mortality in patients presenting with hypotension, and has now become the dominant technique at our center. Despite these advantages, postoperative complications and reinterventions are common. Further experience and longer-term follow-up is needed to validate these initial results and assess durability.