The Midterm Effect of Iliac Vein Stenting following Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Intra-abdominal Venous Thromboses and Their Management

While a plethora of articles discuss management of deep venous thromboses in extremities, there is a relative scarcity of literature comprehensively describing intra-abdominal venous thromboses, and their management. Intra-abdominal venous thromboses include iliocaval venous obstruction (ICVO), hepatic venous thrombosis (HVT), portal venous thrombosis (PVT), renal vein thrombosis (RVT), splenic vein thrombosis (SVT), and gonadal vein thrombosis (GVT); each of which provides unique microenvironmental challenges to management. Doppler ultrasound is the first line imaging modality for diagnosis, and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can help define the extent of thrombus burden and aid with interventional planning. Systemic anticoagulation remains the common medical treatment for intra-abdominal venous thrombosis, however, catheter directed thrombolysis and thrombectomy show positive outcomes in ICVO, HVT, PVT, and RVT, with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation especially beneficial in HVT and PVT. In this review article, we describe pathophysiology, clinical features, imaging findings, and current management options for intra-abdominal venous thromboses.

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Protocols for Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

 To summarize characteristics, complications, and success rates of different catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) protocols for the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LE-DVT).

METHODS

 A systematic review using electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies related to LE-DVT treated with CDT. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to obtain the pooled proportions of early complications, postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), and venous patency.

RESULTS

 Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria reporting 49 protocols (n = 3,028 participants). In studies that addressed the thrombus location (n = 37), LE-DVT had iliofemoral involvement in 90 ± 23% of the cases. Only four series described CDT as the sole intervention for LE-DVT, while 47% received additional thrombectomy (manual, surgical, aspiration, or pharmacomechanical), and 89% used stenting.Definition of venogram success was highly variable, being the Venous Registry Index the most used method (n = 19). Among those, the minimal thrombolysis rate (<50% lysed thrombus) was 0 to 53%, partial thrombolysis (50-90% lysis) was 10 to 71%, and complete thrombolysis (90-100%) was 0 to 88%. Pooled outcomes were 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.6-10.7) for minor bleeding, 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8-1.7%) for major bleeding, 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.6) for pulmonary embolism, and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3-0.9) for death. Pooled incidences of PTS and of venous patency at up to 1 year of follow-up were 17.6% (95% CI: 11.8-23.4) and 77.5% (95% CI: 68.1-86.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Assessment of the evidence is hampered by the heterogeneity of protocols, which may be reflected in the variation of PTS rates. Despite this, CDT is a low-risk treatment for LE-DVT.

Predictors of long-term outcomes after catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with stent implantation in acute deep vein thrombosis secondary to iliac vein compression

The purpose of this study is to analyze predictive factors for long-term clinical outcomes after catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) combined with stent implantation for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to iliac vein compression (IVC). A retrospective analysis was performed to review clinical data and follow-up information on 52 patients who underwent CDT combined with stent implantation for acute DVT secondary to IVC from June 2015 to March 2020. Clinical outcomes including stent patency and incidence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) were investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. All included patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the presence of PTS. Potential risk factors, including age, gender, degree of iliac vein stenosis, time from onset to treatment, dosage of thrombolytic agent, stent extending below the inguinal ligament, and duration of anticoagulation for PTS were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 4 individuals underwent reintervention due to in-stent stenosis or stent compression. Primary stent patency was 98.1% at 1 month, 94.2% at 6 months, 90.4% at 12 months, and 88.5% at 24 months. Freedom from PTS was 98.1% at 6 months, 84.6% at 12 months, and 75% at 24 months. No treatment-related mortality or morbidity was observed. Based on the development of PTS, 13 patients with PTS were classified into group A and 39 patients without PTS were regarded as group B. Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis, key prognostic factors for PTS were degree of iliac vein stenosis and time from onset to treatment. CDT combined with stent implantation is safe and effective for acute DVT secondary to IVC in the long-term perspective. Severe iliac vein stenosis and longer period from onset to treatment may be associated with a higher risk of PTS.

The association between iliac vein compression degree and characteristics of first diagnosed left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the association between the left common iliac vein (CIV) compression degree and characteristics of first diagnosed left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Patients and methods

This was a single-center retrospective observational study. Between January 2015 and June 2022, first diagnosed left lower extremity DVT patients with enhanced computed tomography of lower extremities were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, risk factors, DVT characteristics, and CIV compression degree were collected and analyzed. Logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of iliofemoral or mixed DVT vs. compression percentage. The association between compression percentage and iliofemoral or mixed DVT was evaluated on a continuous scale with restricted cubic splines (RCS). The association between compression percentage and thrombus burden was evaluated using the Spearman test.

Results

A total of 196 (mean age, 61.8 ± 16.1 years; 86 males) patients were included. The median CIV compression percentage in iliofemoral or mixed DVT patients was significantly greater than in non-iliofemoral or non-mixed DVT, respectively (64.4 vs. 46.6%, p < 0.001; 67.8 vs. 54.8%, p = 0.004). CIV compression >50% was associated with significantly increased morbidity of iliofemoral DVT (adjusted OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.58-5.52; p = 0.001) or mixed DVT (adjusted OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.19-4.81; p = 0.014). RCS showed that a greater compression percentage was associated with a continuously increased OR of iliofemoral DVT (overall p = 0.003, non-linear p = 0.577) or mixed DVT (overall p = 0.020, non-linear p = 0.771). CIV compression percentage had a positive correlation with thrombus burden (rs = 0.284, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A greater left CIV compression percentage may be associated with increasing likelihood of more proximal location and severe clot extent in first diagnosed left lower extremity DVT.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents

BACKGROUND

Endovascular stenting of the deep venous system has been proposed as a method to treat patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of this treatment at 1-year following the development of dedicated venous stents.

METHOD AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies evaluating the effectiveness of venous stent placement. Data were extracted by disease pathogenesis: non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL), acute thrombotic (DVT), or post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Main outcomes included technical success, stent patency at 1 year and symptom relief. A total of 49 studies reporting outcomes in 5154 patients (NIVL, 1431; DVT, 950; PTS, 2773) were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rates were comparable among groups (97%-100%). There were no periprocedural deaths. Minor bleeding was reported in up to 5% of patients and major bleeding in 0.5% upon intervention. Transient back pain was noted in 55% of PTS patients following intervention. There was significant heterogeneity between studies reporting outcomes in PTS patients. Primary and cumulative patency at 1 year was: NIVL-96% and 100%; DVT-91% and 97%; PTS (stents above the ligament)-77% and 94%, and; PTS (stents across the ligament)-78% and 94%. There were insufficient data to compare patency outcomes of dedicated and nondedicated venous stents in patients with acute DVT. In NIVL and PTS patients, stent patency was comparable at 1 year. There was inconsistency in the use of validated tools for the measurement of symptoms before and after intervention. When reported, venous claudication, improved in 83% of PTS patients and 90% of NIVL patients, and ulcer healing occurred in 80% of PTS patients and 32% of NIVL patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The first generation of dedicated venous stents perform comparably in terms of patency and clinical outcomes to non-dedicated technologies at 1 year for the treatment of patients with NIVL and PTS. However, significant heterogeneity exists between studies and standardized criteria are urgently needed to report outcomes in patients undergoing deep venous stenting.

[Antithrombotic therapy after iliac vein stenting]

Stenting for iliac vein stenosis or compression has become a common therapeutic approach in recent years. The antithrombotic therapy after the stent deployment, however, reaches no consensus. Medications strategies and patients' prognoses differ in non-thrombotic, acute thrombotic and chronic thrombotic these three circumstances. Non-thrombotic patients usually possess satisfactory stent patency whatever antithrombotic therapy is used. Anticoagulant is the basic medication for acute thrombotic patients, benefits from additional antiplatelet drug remains to be clarified. In terms of chronic thrombotic patients, their prognoses are unsatisfactory under all antithrombotic therapies. In this review, we outlined the recent progress of antithrombotic therapy after iliac vein stenting, aiming to provide feasible medication plans for each circumstance.