Surgical Missteps in the Management of Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Which Lead to Reoperation

An Overview of Specific Considerations in Chronic Venous Disease and Iliofemoral Venous Stenting

Unlike arterial disease, chronic venous disease (CVD) is rarely life-threatening or limb-threatening. However, it can impose substantial morbidity on patients by influencing their lifestyle and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this nonsystematic narrative review is to provide an overview of the most recent information on the management of CVD and specifically, iliofemoral venous stenting in the context of personalized considerations for specific patient populations. The philosophy of treating CVD and phases of endovenous iliac stenting are also described in this review. Additionally, the use of intravascular ultrasound is described as the preferred operative diagnostic procedural tool for iliofemoral venous stent placement.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in Sport: A Systematic Review

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare and heterogeneous syndrome secondary to a compression of the neurovascular bundle in the thoracic outlet area. Muscle hypertrophy is recognized to induce vascular or neurogenic compression, especially in sports involving upper-arm solicitation. Athletes represent a distinctive population because of a specific management due to an ambitious objective, which is returning to high-level competition. We evaluated the scientific literature available for the management of TOS in athletes. Article research extended to March 2021 without other restriction concerning the date of articles publication. The search was performed independently by two assessors. A first preselection based on the article titles was produced, regarding their availability in English or French and a second preselection was produced after reading the abstracts. In case of doubt, a third assessor’s advice was asked. Case reports were selected only if the sport involved was documented, as well as the level of practice. Cohorts were included if data about the number and the sport level of athletes were detailed. Seventy-eight articles were selected including 40 case reports, 10 clinical studies and 28 reviews of literature. Baseball pitchers seem to be highly at risk of developing a TOS. The surgical management appears particularly frequent in this specific population. The prognosis of TOS in athletes seems to be better than in the general population, possibly due to their better physical condition and their younger age. Some studies showed interesting and encouraging results concerning return to previous sport level. Literature shows a strong link between TOS and certain sports. Unfortunately, this syndrome still lacks rigorous diagnostic criteria and management guidelines for athletes.

A Novel Approach to First-Rib Resection in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Objectives: The treatment for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) conventionally involves first-rib resection (FRR) surgery, which is quite challenging to perform, especially for novices, and is often associated with postoperative complications. Herein, we report a new segmental resection approach through piezo surgery that involves using a bone cutter, which can uniquely provide a soft tissue protective effect.

Methods: This retrospective study involved the examination of 26 NTOS patients who underwent piezo surgery and another group of 30 patients who underwent FRR using the conventional technique. In the patient group that underwent piezo surgery, the rib was first resected into two pieces using a piezoelectric device and subsequently removed. In the patient group that underwent conventional surgery, the first rib was removed as one piece using a rib cutter and rongeurs.

Results: The piezo surgery group had significantly shorter operative time (96.85 ± 14.66 vs. 143.33 ± 25.64 min, P < 0.001) and FRR duration (8.73 ± 2.11 vs. 22.23 ± 6.27 min, P < 0.001) than the conventional group. The posterior stump length of the residual rib was shorter in the piezo surgery group than in the conventional group (0.54 ± 0.19 vs. 0.65 ± 0.15 cm, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and scores of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire (CBSQ), and the visual analog scale (VAS). Even the TOS index (NTOS Index = [DASH + (0.83 × CBSQ) + (10 × VAS)]/3) and patient self-assessments of both the groups showed no significant differences. Univariate analyses indicated that the type of treatment affected operative time.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that piezo surgery is safe, effective, and simple for segmental FRR in NTOS patients. Piezo surgery provides a more thorough FRR without damaging adjacent soft tissues in a relatively short duration and achieves similar functional recovery as conventional techniques. Therefore, piezo surgery can be a promising alternative for FRR during the surgical treatment of NTOS.

Specialty Mediated 30-Day Complications in First Rib Resection for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) takes on heterogenous upper extremity manifestations depending on whether the artery, vein or brachial plexus is primarily compressed. As a result of these variable vascular and neurogenic symptoms, these patients present to surgeons of various training backgrounds for surgical decompression. Surgeon specialty is known to correlate with outcomes for numerous vascular procedures, but its role in TOS is unclear. In this work we examine the association of surgeon specialty with short-term outcomes following first rib resection (FRRS) for TOS.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, 3,070 patients were identified who underwent FRRS for TOS between 2006-2017. The primary outcomes of the study were 30-d complications, including postoperative hemorrhage requiring transfusion, wound complications, pneumothorax and deep venous thrombosis. Arterial, venous, and neurogenic TOS were distinguished with ICD-9 and 10 codes while patient characteristics, provider specialty, and postoperative outcomes were classified through a combination of standard National Surgical Quality Improvement Program variables and ICD data.

RESULTS

Most FRRS were performed by vascular surgeons (87.9%), general (6.9%) and thoracic surgeons (4.4%). The relative distribution of vascular TOS between the specialties was not significantly different, with non-vascular surgeons performing an equivalent amount of FRRS for arterial (1.1% versus 2.4%) and venous TOS (8.6% versus 9.1%, both P> 0.05). Patients who underwent FRRS with non-vascular surgeons experienced more frequent perioperative transfusions (3.2% versus 1.2%, P = 0.001) and wound infections (1.9% versus 0.8%, P= 0.04). On multivariable regression, patients undergoing FRRS for venous TOS were more likely to require blood transfusion (odds ratios:3.63, 95% CI 1.43-9.25). Patients operated on by surgeons whose specialty was not among the top three most common specialties performing FRRS had a 40% longer operative time (incidence rate ratios:1.42, 95% CI 1.15-1.74) as well as a significantly increased odds of requiring a transfusion (odds ratios:9.87, 95% CI 2.28-42.68).

CONCLUSIONS

The significantly increased operative times and transfusion requirements associated with specialties who uncommonly perform FRRS suggest the role of surgeon experience and volume in this procedure may play more of a role than specialty training. These data also suggest that vascular TOS carries unique risks that should be kept in mind when performing FRRS.

Phrenic Nerve Reconstruction for Effective Surgical Treatment of Diaphragmatic Paralysis

ABSTRACT

Diaphragmatic paralysis due to phrenic nerve injury may cause orthopnea, exertional dyspnea, and sleep-disordered breathing. Phrenic nerve reconstruction may relieve symptoms and improve respiratory function. A retrospective review of 400 consecutive patients undergoing phrenic nerve reconstruction for diaphragmatic paralysis at 2 tertiary treatment centers was performed between 2007 and 2019. Symptomatic patients were identified, and the diagnosis was confirmed on radiographic evaluations. Assessment parameters included pulmonary spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 second and FVC), maximal inspiratory pressure, compound muscle action potentials, diaphragm thickness, chest fluoroscopy, and Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) survey. There were 81 females and 319 males with an average age of 54 years (range, 19-79 years). The mean duration from diagnosis to surgery was 29 months (range, 1-320 months). The most common etiologies were acute or chronic injury (29%), interscalene nerve block (17%), and cardiothoracic surgery (15%). The mean improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and FVC at 1 year were 10% (P < 0.01) and 8% (P < 0.05), respectively. At 2-year follow-up, the corresponding values were 22% (P < 0.05) and 18% (P < 0.05), respectively. Improvement on chest fluoroscopy was demonstrated in 63% and 71% of patients at 1 and 2-year follow-up, respectively. There was a 20% (P < 0.01) improvement in maximal inspiratory pressure, and compound muscle action potentials increased by 82% (P < 0.001). Diaphragm thickness demonstrated a 27% (P < 0.01) increase, and SF-36 revealed a 59% (P < 0.001) improvement in physical functioning. Symptomatic diaphragmatic paralysis should be considered for surgical treatment. Phrenic nerve reconstruction can achieve symptomatic relief and improve respiratory function. Increasing spirometry and improvements on Sniff from 1 to 2 years support incremental recovery with longer follow-up.

Evaluation and Management of Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is uncommon but occurs in young, healthy patients, typically presenting as subclavian vein (SCV) effort thrombosis. Venous TOS arises through chronic repetitive compression injury of the SCV in the costoclavicular space with progressive venous scarring, focal stenosis, and eventual thrombosis. Diagnosis is evident on clinical presentation with sudden spontaneous upper extremity swelling and cyanotic discoloration. Initial treatment includes anticoagulation, venography, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. Surgical management using paraclavicular decompression can result in relief from arm swelling, freedom from long-term anticoagulation, and a return to unrestricted upper extremity activity in more than 90% of patients.

Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Approach for First Rib Resection in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Purpose

To assess the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of an endoscopic-assisted transaxillary approach of first rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and to compare the differences in demographic and clinical data between satisfactory and unsatisfactory outcomes using this approach.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent endoscopic-assisted first rib partial resection. A transaxillary approach for the first rib resection and neurovascular decompression were undertaken under magnified visualization. Endoscopic classification of neurovascular bundle (NVB) patterns and interscalene distance (ISD) between anterior and middle scalene muscles were evaluated intraoperatively. We assessed the Roos and DASH scores.

Results

We reviewed 131 cases of TOS (48 women and 83 men; mean age 26.2 years; range 12 to 57). Roos classification revealed 80.2% excellent or good results. DASH scores improved significantly from 40.7 ± 20.0 to 15.7 ± 19.6 (P < .001). The complication rate was low (5.3%), with 4 pneumothorax and 3 other complications. Intraoperative NVB classification revealed 30 cases of parallel type, in which the artery and nerve travel in parallel; 69 oblique types, and 30 vertical types, in which the nerve was completely behind the middle scalene muscle or abnormal band. The ISD was narrower (5.4 ± 3.6 mm) than in previous cadaveric studies. The ISD in the parallel patterns was wider than that in the vertical patterns. In the satisfactory group, we found a significantly larger number of men, younger patients, athletes, and patients with a lower preoperative DASH score.

Conclusions

An endoscopic-assisted transaxillary approach for first rib resection in TOS provides an excellent magnified visualization, safely allowing sufficient decompression of the neurovascular bundle and satisfactory surgical outcomes. Younger male athletes with TOS may be better candidates for this procedure.

Level of Evidence

IV, therapeutic case series.

Epidemiology of thoracic outlet syndrome

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) describes a complex disease process with three anatomic variations each with their own individual characteristics. Understanding the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of TOS is challenging for many providers. For this reason, the establishment of comprehensive care models and expert leadership by dedicated vascular surgeons with TOS experience has been invaluable.

Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Approach for First-Rib Resection and Neurolysis in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex disorder with signs and symptoms resulting from compression of the brachial plexus and subclavian vessels. Although transaxillary first-rib resection is a well-established surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic TOS, this approach sometimes does not allow adequate exposure of the insertion point of the middle scalene muscle to the posterior part of the first rib and neurovascular bundle. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe an endoscopic-assisted transaxillary approach for first-rib resection and neurolysis. An endoscopic-assisted transaxillary approach for first-rib resection in TOS can provide excellent magnified visualization and safely allow sufficient decompression of the neurovascular bundle.

[Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Rare, Often Missed or Over-Diagnosed?]

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Rare, Often Missed or Over-Diagnosed? Abstract. The thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) presents with various symptoms caused by compression of the neurovascular bundle in the region of the upper thoracic aperture. Since the pathogenesis also determines the therapy of TOS, the classification according to the affected structure into neurogenic, venous and arterial TOS (nTOS, vTOS and aTOS) is useful. However, mixed forms are often to be assumed, which are then usually also classified under the term 'non-specific or disputed TOS' in the group of nTOS. In the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test, accurate history taking and clinical examination continue to be of great importance. Diagnostic experience and therapeutic advances have led to hopeful possibilities in the challenging management of this condition.

Infraclavicular Thoracic Outlet Decompression Compared to Supraclavicular Thoracic Outlet Decompression for the Management of Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The treatment of venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS) requires surgical decompression often combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis and venoplasty. Surgical options include transaxillary, supraclavicular, or infraclavicular approaches to first rib resection. The optimal method, however, has yet to be defined. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent infraclavicular versus supraclavicular surgical decompression for VTOS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical management for VTOS from December 2010 to November 2017 was performed. During the study period, supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches were chosen according to surgeon preference. Patient demographics, pre- and postdecompression interventions, perioperative outcomes for each group of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent surgical management of VTOS, of which 15 (50%) underwent infraclavicular decompression and 15 (50%) supraclavicular decompression. The mean age of patients was 32.1 ± 13.6 years and 80% were male. Twenty-six patients (86.7%) presented with thrombotic VTOS. Acute axillosubclavian vein thrombosis was present in 20 (76.9%) of these patients, 10 patients in each group. Subacute or chronic thrombosis was encountered in the remaining 6 (23%) patients, 2 patients in the infraclavicular group and 4 patients in the supraclavicular group. Preoperative thrombolysis was utilized in 7 (46.7%) and 6 (40%) patients in the infraclavicular and supraclavicular groups, respectively (P = 1.00). Patients without postdecompression venography were removed from analysis and included 1 patient in the infraclavicular group and 5 patients in the supraclavicular group. Initial postdecompression venogram, prior to any endovascular intervention, demonstrated a residual axillosubclavian vein stenosis of greater than 50% in 6 (42.9%) patients in the infraclavicular decompression group and 7 (70%) patients in the supraclavicular decompression group (P = 0.24). Crossing the stenosis after surgical decompression was more easily accomplished in the infraclavicular group, 14 (100%) versus 5 (50%), (P = 0.01). Following endovascular venoplasty, calculated residual stenosis greater than 50% was found in 0 (0%) and 3 (30%) patients in the infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches, respectively (P = 0.047). Infraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression was associated with fewer patients with postoperative symptoms, 0 of 15 (0%) versus 8 of 15 (53.3%), (P = 0.0022), and infraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression demonstrated improved patency, 15 of 15 (100%) versus 8 of 15 (53.3%), (P = 0.028) at a mean combined follow-up of 8.47 ± 10.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Infraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression for the surgical management of VTOS was associated with fewer postoperative symptoms and improved axillosubclavian vein patency compared to the supraclavicular approach. Prospective analysis is warranted to determine long-term outcomes following infraclavicular decompression.