Long-term Durability of Infrainguinal Endovascular and Open Revascularization for Disabling Claudication

Critical appraisal of evidence on bypass surgery versus endovascular treatment for intermittent claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intermittent claudication (IC) stage of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with significant impairment of quality of life. In the subset of patients with disabling IC refractory to best medical treatment (BMT), revascularization procedures may be considered. However, evidence comparing open revascularization surgery, endovascular treatment and BMT focussing on the impact on quality of life is very sparse. We aim to review clinical, anatomical and hemodynamic outcomes after bypass surgery compared to BMT and/or endovascular treatment in IC patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We systematically reviewed controlled trials and comparative cohort studies assessing quality of life, walking performance, clinical/symptomatic improvement, symptom recurrence, patency rates, ankle-brachial index (ABI) improvement and adverse events after bypass surgery versus endovascular treatment/BMT in IC patients.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eleven studies involving 16,608 patients were included. Compared to BMT, bypass surgery was associated with a significantly greater improvement on Short-Form 36 (SF-36) physical functioning score (mean difference (MD), -14.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), -21.2 to -6.8), Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) walking distance score (MD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.16) and SF-36 bodily pain score (MD, -13.0; 95% CI, -20.2 to -5.8). There were no significant differences between bypass and endovascular treatment regarding the three scores. Bypass surgery presented better primary patency rates at 1 (odds ratio (OR), 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.76) and 5 years (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.57) and better ABI improvement (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03) when compared to endovascular treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between bypass and endovascular patients regarding secondary patency rates, 30-day mortality and major amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower limb revascularization may be beneficial in patients with disabling and refractory IC when the primary goal is to improve quality of life and walking capacity. Bypass surgery is associated to better symptomatic status, long-term primary patency and ABI improvement when compared to endovascular surgery, especially in anatomically extensive disease. Further studies addressing patient-reported outcomes and including a BMT group are paramount for more robust evidence on IC treatment and, consequently, better decision making.

Multiple Reinterventions for Claudication are Associated with Progression to Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Claudication has a relatively benign natural history, associated with a low risk of limb loss. However, rates of progression to chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) following lower extremity revascularization (LER) for claudication remain unclear. This study examines the long-term outcomes and risk factors associated with progression to CLTI after LER for claudication.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of patients undergoing LER for claudication was performed from 2013-2016. Patients were stratified based on whether they progressed to CLTI or not.

RESULTS

There were 448 patients (502 limbs) treated for claudication, and 57 (12.7%) progressed to CLTI with a mean follow up time of 3.7 ± 1.5 years. Among patients who progressed, 23 (5.1%) developed tissue loss, 34 (7.6%) developed rest pain, and 6 (1.2%) underwent major amputation. The mean time of progression to CLTI was 1.6 ± 1.5 years after index LER. Patients who progressed to CLTI were more likely to have a history of congestive heart failure and prior open revascularizations compared with those who did not progress. There was no difference in type or level of index revascularization between the two groups and no difference in perioperative complications. Patients who developed CLTI had significantly higher rates of reinterventions and a mean number of reinterventions after index LER prior to developing CLTI compared to those who did not progress. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that history of congestive heart failure (OR = 2.8 [1.2-6.6]), stroke (OR = 2.6 [1.1-6.1]), prior open procedure (OR = 2.8 [1.3-5.9]) and increasing number of reinterventions after index LER (OR = 2.9 [1.5-5.7]) were independently associated with disease progression to CLTI.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple reinterventions and previous open revascularization are associated with progression to CLTI following LER for claudication. Patients with atherosclerosis in the coronary and cerebrovascular beds are also more likely to have a progression of claudication to CLTI after LER.