Autologous Saphenous Vein Panel Graft for Vascular Reconstruction

Early Outcomes of Complex Vascular Reconstructions in Lower Extremities Using Spiral and Panel Vein Grafts

BACKGROUND

Spiral saphenous vein grafts (SSVG) or paneled vein grafts (PVG) can be used when the diameter of the autologous great saphenous vein does not match the vessel that needs to be repaired. This study aimed to present early results of complex vascular reconstruction with SSVGs and PVGs in the lower extremities.

METHODS

From May 2019 through January 2021, 6 SSVGs and 3 PVGs were used for vascular reconstruction in 9 patients. Patient data were collected retrospectively, including age, gender, cause of vascular pathology, target vessels, concomitant injury, surgical method, additional surgical methods, and hemodynamic status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the rate of freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

Among these patients, 7 had trauma, 1 had graft infection, and 1 had vascular reconstruction after tumor excision. The mean duration of follow-up was 6 ± 6.6 months (range 1-19 months). The rate of freedom from reintervention for any reason was 77.8% at 1 year. Two patients underwent amputation after vascular reconstruction with patent vascular reconstructions. One of the 2 amputations was performed because of infection, and the other was due to ischemia >24 hr. The success rate of reconstruction was 100%, and the primary patency rate was 100%. The rate of limb salvage was 77.8%. There was no death, bleeding, embolism, skin ulcers, graft-related complication, or aneurysmal dilation during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SSVG and PVG were associated with low infection rates and satisfactory short-term patency rates. Both 2 grafts may be good choices when there is a diameter mismatch in vascular reconstructions.

Surgical treatment of symptomatic popliteal vein aneurysm with autologous saphenous vein panel graft

We report a vein surgery procedure for popliteal venous aneurysms (PVAs). A 73-year-old woman with a long, irregularly shaped, PVA and thrombus underwent graft replacement using a manually made triple vein panel graft. Simple bypass grafting with a saphenous vein was unsuitable because of long defects and a size mismatch. We harvested the great saphenous vein from the right thigh, divided it into three segments, anastomosed it side-by-side on the long side, and created a venous panel graft. Good graft patency was confirmed at 4 years postoperatively, and the clinical course was stable without pulmonary embolism recurrence.

Modified Meso-Rex bypass with umbilical vein recanalization and intra-operative stenting

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel modified Meso-Rex bypass surgical technique with umbilical vein recanalization and intra-operative stenting to treat portal vein cavernous transformation.

METHODS

In total, 13 portal vein cavernous transformation patients underwent Meso-Rex bypass surgery, consisting of bypass grafts between the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and the recess of Rex as well as through the ligamentum teres hepatis without stent implantation (Group A, n = 9) and umbilical vein recanalization with intra-operative stent implantation (Group B, n = 4).

RESULTS

In Group A, the bypass diameter was 0-6 mm (median 3 mm) and blood flow velocity 25-115 cm/s (median 72 cm/s) 1 month after Meso-Rex bypass surgery, with open bypass times of 0-67 months (median 6 months); 6 patients in this group developed postoperative Meso-Rex bypass occlusions. A patient in Group A treated with ligamentum teres hepatis recanalization needed a thrombectomy and stent implantation during a second surgery 2 days after the Meso-Rex bypass, because of bypass thrombosis and umbilical vein stenosis. In Group B, the average modified Meso-Rex bypass diameter was 5.5-6.5 mm (median 6 mm), and the bypass vessels remained open in all patients, with blood flow rates of 45-100 cm/s (median 76.5 cm/s) 1 month after the modified Meso-Rex bypass, up to the endpoint (15-33 months, median 24 months). The rate of bypass occlusions in Group A and Group B were 22.2% and 0%, 30.0% and 0%, and 55.6% and 0% at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year, respectively, after bypass surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel modified Meso-Rex bypass approach for portal vein cavernous transformation treatment was effective with excellent long-term bypass patency.

Decellularized dermis extracellular matrix alloderm mechanically strengthens biological engineered tunica adventitia-based blood vessels

The ideal engineered vascular graft would utilize human-derived materials to minimize foreign body response and tissue rejection. Current biological engineered blood vessels (BEBVs) inherently lack the structure required for implantation. We hypothesized that an ECM material would provide the structure needed. Skin dermis ECM is commonly used in reconstructive surgeries, is commercially available and FDA-approved. We evaluated the commercially-available decellularized skin dermis ECM Alloderm for efficacy in providing structure to BEBVs. Alloderm was incorporated into our lab’s unique protocol for generating BEBVs, using fibroblasts to establish the adventitia. To assess structure, tissue mechanics were analyzed. Standard BEBVs without Alloderm exhibited a tensile strength of 67.9 ± 9.78 kPa, whereas Alloderm integrated BEBVs showed a significant increase in strength to 1500 ± 334 kPa. In comparison, native vessel strength is 1430 ± 604 kPa. Burst pressure reached 51.3 ± 2.19 mmHg. Total collagen and fiber maturity were significantly increased due to the presence of the Alloderm material. Vessels cultured for 4 weeks maintained mechanical and structural integrity. Low probability of thrombogenicity was confirmed with a negative platelet adhesion test. Vessels were able to be endothelialized. These results demonstrate the success of Alloderm to provide structure to BEBVs in an effective way.