1
|
Rakestraw SL, Lucy AT, Wood LN, Chu DI, Grams J, Stahl R, Mustian MN. Racial Disparity in Length of Stay Following Implementation of a Bariatric Enhanced Recovery Program. J Surg Res 2024; 298:81-87. [PMID: 38581766 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERPs) mitigate racial disparities in postoperative length of stay (LOS) for colorectal populations. It is unclear, however, if these effects exist in the bariatric surgery population. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the racial disparities in LOS before and after implementation of bariatric surgery ERP. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a single institution. Patients undergoing minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from 2017 to 2019 (pre-ERP) or 2020-2022 (ERP) were included. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and analysis of variance were used to compare groups, and estimated LOS (eLOS) was assessed via multivariable regression. RESULTS Seven hundred sixty four patients were identified, including 363 pre-ERPs and 401 ERPs. Pre-ERP and ERP cohorts were similar in age (median 44.3 years versus 43.8 years, P = 0.80), race (53.4% Black versus 56.4% Black, P = 0.42), and preoperative body mass index (median 48.3 versus 49.4, P = 0.14). Overall median LOS following bariatric surgery decreased from 2 days pre-ERP to 1 day following ERP (P < 0.001). Average LOS for Black and White patients decreased by 0.5 and 0.48 days, respectively. However, overall eLOS remained greater for Black patients compared with White patients despite ERP implementation (eLOS 0.21 days, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a bariatric surgery ERP was associated with decreased LOS for both Black and White patients. However, Black patients did have slightly longer LOS than White patients in both pre-ERP and ERP eras. More work is needed to understand the driving mechanism(s) of these disparities to eliminate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam T Lucy
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Lauren N Wood
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Daniel I Chu
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jayleen Grams
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Surgery, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Richard Stahl
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Margaux N Mustian
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali TZ, Zil-E-Ali A, Lavanga E, Aziz F. Race-Based Variation in the Utilization of Epidural Analgesia in Addition to General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the United States. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 102:101-109. [PMID: 38307225 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidural analgesia (EA) is recommended along with general anesthesia (GA) for patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA) and is known to be associated with improved postoperative outcomes. This study evaluates inequities in using this superior analgesic approach and further assesses the disparities at patient and hospital levels. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed using the Vascular Quality Initiative database of adult patients undergoing elective open AAA repair between 2003 and 2022. Patients were grouped and analyzed based on anesthesia utilization, that is, EA + GA (Group I) and GA only (Group II). Study groups were further stratified by race, and outcomes were studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study the impact of race on the utilization of EA with GA. A subgroup analysis was also carried out to learn the EA analgesia utilization in hospitals performing open AAA with the least to most non-White patients. RESULTS A total of 8,940 patients were included in the study, of which EA + GA (Group I) comprised n = 4,247 (47.5%) patients, and GA (Group II) had n = 4,693 (52.5%) patients. Based on multivariate regression analysis, the odds ratio of non-White patients receiving both EA and GA for open AAA repair compared to White patients was 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.72, P < 0.001). Of the patients who received both EA + GA, non-White race was associated with increased length of intensive care unit stay and a longer total length of hospital stay compared to White patients. Hospitals with the lowest quintile of minorities had the highest utilization of EA + GA for all patients compared to the highest quintile. CONCLUSIONS Non-White patients are less likely to receive the EA + GA than White patients while undergoing elective open AAA repair, demonstrating a potential disparity. Also, this disparity persists at the hospital level, with hospitals with most non-White patients having the least EA utilization, pointing toward system-wide disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Z Ali
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Ahsan Zil-E-Ali
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
| | - Elizabeth Lavanga
- Office of Medical Education, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Faisal Aziz
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McElroy IE, Pillado EB, Greene AJ, Majumdar M, Kirshkaln A, Nuzzolo K, Malek J, Dua A. Impact of socioeconomic disparities on major lower extremity revascularization complications. Vascular 2024; 32:361-365. [PMID: 36384373 DOI: 10.1177/17085381221140165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low socioeconomic status (SES), distance lived from hospital, and insurance status are well documented in the literature to increase the risk of post-operative morbidity and mortality for some disease processes however there is a paucity of data regarding how this association impacts patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study aimed to evaluate if SES, distance lived from hospital, and insurance status increased the risk of developing major graft failure in patients undergoing revascularization procedures for symptomatic PAD in a prospective, observation study. METHODS In this prospective, observational study, all patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization (endovascular or open) were included from December 2020 to February 2022. Demographic factors, insurance status, operative details, and median income and distance from hospital were documented through chart review. Complications were defined as thrombosis/occlusion of the revascularized vessel or bypass graft or infection of the distal wound or surgical incision wound. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed comparing patients that developed complications and those that did not. This project was undertaken at the Massachusetts General Hospital and was governed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB: 2020P000263) all patients agreed to participation via informed written consent prior to enrollment in the study. RESULTS A total of 108 patients were enrolled in the study of which 94 underwent successful revascularization procedures. Of those 94 patients, 38 (40.4%) underwent open bypass, 39 (41.5%) underwent endovascular revascularization, and 17 (18.1%) underwent a hybrid approach. There were no significant differences in post-operative outcomes between operative approaches. Twenty-five patients (28.7%) experienced major revascularization complications as defined as re-occlusion of the treated vessel/thrombosis of the bypass graft (n = 13) or development of post-operative infection (n = 12). There was no significant difference in median income ($75,295 vs $87,757, p = NS), distance lived from hospital, (27.4 miles vs. 29.7 miles, p = NS), or type of insurance (private 24% vs 26%, government 76% vs 73%, p = NS between patients that experienced complications versus those that did not have complications. These findings suggest the risk of major graft failure is independent of a patient's socioeconomic status, distance lived from hospital, or insurance type in patients undergoing revascularization procedures for PAD. CONCLUSION While socioeconomic factors impact access to and have a known association with negative outcomes, complications in patients with PAD appear to be independent of these factors. To mitigate the negative outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease, a focus should be on patient risk factors and modifiable medical factors that contribute to adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imani E McElroy
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric B Pillado
- Division of Vascular Surgery, McGaw Medical Center of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Adrienne J Greene
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Queens Hospital, USA
| | - Monica Majumdar
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda Kirshkaln
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kate Nuzzolo
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Junaid Malek
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anahita Dua
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee J, Oh PC, Jang AY, Ahn CM, Choi D, Ko YG, Kang WC. Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair Within and Outside the Instructions for Use in Korean Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241232915. [PMID: 38414229 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241232915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been used worldwide to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Outcomes after EVAR within and outside the instruction for use (IFU) remain controversial. We analyzed long-term outcomes of EVAR within-the-IFU compared with that outside-the-IFU and baseline clinical/anatomical characteristics that influence outcomes of EVAR. METHODS The study included 546 patients who underwent EVAR for infrarenal AAA from 1997 to 2021 at 2 Korean medical centers. The primary endpoint was graft-related adverse events (GRAEs), including type 1 or 3 endoleak, reintervention (included open conversion), aneurysm sac enlargement, aneurysm-related mortality (ARM), rupture, stent-graft migration, and stent thrombotic occlusion. RESULTS The patients who underwent EVAR outside the IFU were 287 (52.6%). A neck angle of >60° was most common outside the IFU criteria (n=146, 50.9%). This study revealed that patients outside the IFU had a higher rate of GRAEs compared with patients within the IFU (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.879; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.045-2.386). A neck angle of >60° was a significant risk factor for GRAEs (adjusted HR: 2.229; 95% CI: 1.418-3.503), type 1 or 3 endoleak (adjusted HR: 2.640; 95% CI: 1.343-5.189), and reintervention (adjusted HR: 1.891; 95% CI: 1.055-3.388). CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed EVAR with outside the IFU was associated with increased GRAEs, mainly attributed to endoleak and ARM, compared with EVAR with within the IFU. In addition, severe neck angulation was an independent risk factor for GRAEs, type 1 or 3 endoleak, and reintervention. CLINICAL IMPACT Our study revealed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with outside-the-instruction for use (IFU) was associated with increased graft-related adverse events (GRAEs) compared with EVAR with within-the-IFU. In the low-risk population, the incidence of GRAEs and Aneurysm related mortality were higher in the outside-the-IFU group rather than within-the-IFU group. In addition, severe neck angulation was an independent risk factor for GRAEs, type 1 or 3 endoleak and reintervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonpyo Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Pyung Chun Oh
- Department of Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Albert Youngwoo Jang
- Department of Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Min Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Donghoon Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Guk Ko
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woong Chol Kang
- Department of Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rockman C. To screen or not to screen…. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:78-79. [PMID: 36549799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Caron Rockman
- Division of Vascular Surgery, NYU Langone Health/NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ribieras AJ, Kang N, Shao T, Kenel-Pierre S, Rey J, Velazquez OC, Bornak A. Racial disparities in presentation and outcomes for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:69-77. [PMID: 35803484 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the present study, we used a national database to identify racial differences in the presentation and outcomes for patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) and identified areas for improving their care. METHODS We queried the EVAR-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2019) to identify patients who had undergone EVAR for both ruptured and nonruptured AAAs. The patients were categorized according to race (White, Black, and Asian). Patients with a history of abdominal aortic surgery or an indication other than AAAs were excluded. The data was analyzed using the χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests, presented as frequencies and percentages or median and interquartile range (IQR) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS We identified 3629 patients (16.6% female), including 3312 White (91.3%), 248 Black (6.8%), and 69 Asian (1.9%) patients. Black patients were more frequently women (27.0%) compared with White patients (15.9%) and were younger (median age, 71 years; IQR, 64-77 years) than White (median age, 73 years; IQR, 67-79 years) and Asian (median age, 76 years; IQR, 67-81 years) patients (P < .001 for both). The incidence of smoking, congestive heart failure, and dialysis dependency was highest for Black patients, and the incidence of obesity was lowest for Asian patients. The AAAs in Black patients extended more frequently beyond the aortic bifurcation (P = .047). In Asian patients, the internal iliac arteries were more involved (P = .040). For Black patients, 29.8% of the EVARs were performed in a nonelective setting compared with 20.2% for the White and 15.9% for the Asian patients (P < .001). The aneurysm diameter, nonruptured symptomatic rate, and rupture rate were similar across the groups (P = .807). The operative time was prolonged for Black (median, 128 minutes; IQR, 96-177 minutes) compared with White (median, 114 minutes; IQR, 84-162 minutes) patients (P < .001). Postoperatively, Black patients were more likely to require blood transfusion (16.5%) and had prolonged length of hospital stay (median, 2 days; IQR, 1-4 days) compared with White (10.0%; median, 1 day; IQR, 1-3 days) and Asian (4.3%; median, 1 day; IQR, 1-3 days) patients (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). Black patients also had a higher 30-day readmission rate (P = .038). On multivariate analysis, Black race was an independent factor for length of stay >1 day after both elective and nonelective EVAR and 30-day readmission for elective EVAR, but not 30-day mortality after elective and nonelective EVAR. CONCLUSIONS In the present nationwide sample of EVAR cases, Black patients were more often women and younger. Despite similar rates of symptomatic and ruptured AAAs at presentation and 30-day mortality, Black patients more often presented and were treated during the same nonelective admission; they also had associated increased length of hospital stay and readmission. These findings signal a missed opportunity to diagnose, optimize, and treat this particular group of patients in an elective setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine J Ribieras
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Naixin Kang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Tony Shao
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Stefan Kenel-Pierre
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Jorge Rey
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Omaida C Velazquez
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Arash Bornak
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guerra A, Feinglass JM, Chia MC, Vavra AK. Characterizing endovascular aortic intervention outcomes for nonruptured aortic aneurysms by physician specialty. Surgery 2022; 171:762-769. [PMID: 35090735 PMCID: PMC8885887 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluate patient outcomes after endovascular aortic interventions performed for nonruptured aortic aneurysms by physician specialties. METHODS Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), fenestrated or branched repair (F-BEVAR), and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures were obtained from the Illinois Hospital Association Comparative Health Care and Hospital Data Reporting Services database from 2016 to 2019. Logistic and Poisson regression were used to determine outcomes by patient, physician, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS A total of 4,935 procedures, 3,666 (74.3%) EVAR, 567 (11.5%) F-BEVAR, and 702 (14.2%) TEVAR were performed by vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, interventional cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons. Vascular surgeons performed interventions equally between hospital types while interventional radiologists primarily performed interventions in teaching hospitals (68.1%) and interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons typically performed interventions in community hospitals (91.8% and 82.1%, respectively; P < .001). No differences in inpatient mortality were noted between specialties. Patients treated by interventional radiologists had increased odds of staying in the hospital ≥8 days (odd ration [OR] 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-3.19) and patients treated by interventional cardiologists had lower odds of being admitted to the intensive care unit [ICU] (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.95). CONCLUSION Differences in practice patterns among specialties performing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for nonruptured aneurysms suggest opportunities for collaboration to optimize quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Guerra
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Vascular Surgery, Surgery Department, Chicago, IL.
| | - Joe M Feinglass
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics
| | - Matthew C Chia
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Vascular Surgery, Surgery Department
| | - Ashley K Vavra
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Vascular Surgery, Surgery Department
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grieff AN, Syal S, Beckerman WE, Huang S. Initial Post-Operative Visit Absenteeism is Associated with Worse Amputation-Free Survival after Tibial Angioplasty. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 83:284-289. [PMID: 34954033 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tibial revascularization is often performed in the setting of critical limb ischemia and tissue loss requiring close patient monitoring in the early post-operative period for worsening gangrene and/or ischemia. Multiple studies have shown loss to follow-up (LTF) is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes in several vascular procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the risk factors relating to LTF against outcomes in patients undergoing tibial endovascular procedures with the hypothesis that poor post-operative visit compliance is associated with decreased amputation-free survival rates. METHODS We performed a single-institution retrospective chart review of patients who underwent therapeutic endovascular tibial revascularization between 2014-2018. Patient follow-up and outcomes of death or major amputation (trans-tibial/trans-femoral) were followed up to 36-months post-operatively. Patients who had undergone previous infra-geniculate interventions or reached mortality/major amputation within 30-days post-operatively were excluded from analysis. RESULTS We identified 89 patients who met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of attendance at less than <1 month, 1-6 months, 6-15 months and 15-36 months post-operatively were 60%, 64%, 60 and 40% respectively. 16% of patients had complete loss to follow-up. Patients without tissue loss (≤ Rutherford 4) were less likely to attend early <1 month and 1-6 month follow-up intervals. Notably, absenteeism from the first immediate post-operative visit was a significant risk factor for further absenteeism at 1-6 months (51% vs 26%; p=.01) and at greater than 6 month follow-up (48% vs 31%; p=.05). Compared to the cohort of all patients, failure to follow-up within 1 month was associated with a decrease in attendance from 64% to 26% at 1-6 months and 63% to 31% at more than 6 months. Missing the first post-operative visit was also associated with decreased amputation-free survival (p=.04). CONCLUSIONS Absenteeism from the first post-operative visit is associated with worse amputation-free survival and a significant risk factor for further absenteeism from post-operative care. Given these results, ensuring close immediate post-operative follow up is essential to improving outcomes in patients undergoing tibial revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony N Grieff
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Sapna Syal
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - William E Beckerman
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - ShihYau Huang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease remains a major source of morbidity in developed countries and can progress to life-threatening rupture if left untreated, with exceedingly high mortality. The goal of AAA management is to identify and electively repair AAAs before rupture. AAA disease burden and outcomes have improved over time with declining tobacco use and advancements in care across patients' disease course. The introduction of endovascular AAA repair, in particular, has allowed for elective AAA repair in patients previously considered too high risk for open surgery and has contributed to lower rates of AAA rupture over time. However, these improved outcomes are not universally experienced, and disparities continue to exist in the detection, treatment, and outcomes of AAA by sex, race, and ethnicity. Mitigating these disparities requires enhanced, focused efforts at preventing disease, promoting health, and delivering appropriate care among an increasingly diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L Marcaccio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, Suite 5B, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, Suite 5B, Boston, MA 02215.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Humphries MD, Welch P, Hasegawa J, Mell MW. Correlation of Patient Activation Measure Level with Patient Characteristics and Type of Vascular Disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 73:55-61. [PMID: 33385528 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient activation or level of engagement in one's medical care is linked to hospital readmissions and worse outcomes in a number of diseases. Patients with higher levels of activation are typically guiding their care rather than acting as passive observers of care. This study aims to determine if either patient demographics or type of vascular disease can predict patient activation. METHODS All patients presenting over a 4-month period to an outpatient vascular clinic were asked to complete the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) survey. In total, 257 completed surveys were collected. Survey responses were scored on a Likert scale with anchors. Responses are tallied with a score of 1-100 and converted to summary levels 1-4 in accordance with the previously validated scoring system. Level 1 patients are considered disengaged and overwhelmed. Patients in level 2 are becoming aware of their health care, but still struggle. Level 3 patients are taking action, while level 4 represents patients who are maintaining healthy behaviors and pushing further. Chi-squared test and multivariable regression were then performed to determine if patient characteristics or type of disease correlated with activation levels. RESULTS In total, 257 patients completed the survey. The mean participant age was 67 years (±15). Sixteen percent of patients lived alone, 58% were married, and in 39% mean household income was <$50,000. Overall, 21 patients (8.2%) were classified as level 1, 65 (25%) level 2, 94 (37%) level 3, and 77 (30%) level 4. The group comprised 32% peripheral artery disease (PAD), 20% carotid, 18% aortic/aneurysm, 14% venous, and 16% were various other vascular diseases. Over each disease group there was a wide range of activation, but no significant difference between the type of vascular disease and activation level. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients comprised 35% (n = 29) of the PAD group, and 66% of these patients reported an activation level of 3 (n = 10) or 4 (n = 9). There was no difference in the levels of activation reported by the CLTI patients compared to the general PAD cohort (P = 0.99). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age, level of education, household income, and type of vascular disease correlated with PAM score, but there was no correlation between length of symptoms, race, or gender. CONCLUSIONS Patient activation is unpredictable using patient characteristics or type of vascular disease, and CLTI patients report high activation levels. Quality databases that collect only patient demographics may not fully capture patient predictors of poor outcomes. Use of the PAM survey should be further explored in vascular patients to correlate activation level with vascular-specific outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misty D Humphries
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA.
| | - Pierce Welch
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Jason Hasegawa
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Matthew W Mell
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|