Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Patients with Iliac Aneurysms Treated by Open Surgery or Endovascular Repair with Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis

Outcomes of "Anterior Versus Posterior Divisional Branches of the Hypogastric Artery as Distal Landing Zone for Iliac Branch Devices": The International Multicentric R3OYAL Registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicentric registry was to assess the outcomes of "anteRior versus posteRior divisional bRanches Of the hYpogastric artery as distAl landing zone for iLiac branch devices (R3OYAL)."

METHODS

The main exposure of interest for the purpose of this study was the internal iliac artery (IIA) divisional branch (anterior vs posterior) that was used as distal landing zone. Early endpoints included technical success and adverse events. Late endpoints included survival, primary/secondary IIA patency, and IIA branch instability.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included in the study, of which 50 received bilateral implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs). This resulted in a total of 221 incorporated IIAs included in the final analysis, of which 40 were anterior divisional branches and 181 were posterior divisional branches. Technical success was high in both groups (anterior division: 98% vs posterior division: 100%, P = .18). Occurrence of any adverse event was noted in 14% of patients in both groups (P = 1.0). The overall rate of freedom from the composite IBD branch instability did not show significant differences between patients receiving distal landing in the anterior or posterior division of the IIA at 3 years (79% vs 87%, log-rank test = .215). The 3-year estimates of IBD patency were significantly lower in patients who received distal landing in the anterior divisional branch than those who received distal landing in the posterior divisional branch (primary patency: 81% vs 96%, log-rank test = .009; secondary patency: 81% vs 97%, log-rank test < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the IIA as distal landing zone for IBD implantation shows comparable profiles in terms of immediate technical success, perioperative safety, and side-branch instability up to 3 years. However, IBD patency at 3 years was higher when the distal landing zone was achieved within the posterior divisional branch of the IIA.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The results from this large multicentric registry confirm that use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the internal iliac artery (IIA) as distal landing zone for implantation of iliac branch devices (IBD) shows comparable profiles of safety and feasibility, thereby allowing to extend the indications for endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms to cases with unsuitable anatomy within the IIA main trunk. Although mid-term rates of device durability and branch instability seem to be similar, the rates of primary and secondary IBD patency at three years was favored when the distal landing zone was achieved in the posterior divisional branch of the IIA.

Hybrid Pelvic Revascularization in Complex Aortoiliac Aneurysm Repair

Revascularization of complex pelvic vascular anatomy presents an ongoing clinical challenge when treating aortoiliac disease. As vascular surgeons continue to intervene upon increasingly complex aortoiliac pathology, the role of pelvic revascularization is important for the preservation of pelvic organ function and prevention of devastating spinal cord ischemia. In this study we describe the indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes of a novel hybrid pelvic revascularization repair that focuses on optimizing revascularization while limiting pelvic surgical dissection during the management of complex aortic pathology in patients physiologically or anatomically unsuitable for traditional pelvic revascularization techniques.

Results of iliac branch devices for hypogastric salvage after previous aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicentric study was to assess the "REsults of iliac branch deviceS for hypogastriC salvage after previoUs aortic rEpair (RESCUE)."

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs) after previous open aortic repair (OAR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) at seven centers were captured. The study cohort was divided into two groups according to the type of repair originally performed. Early outcomes included immediate technical success and perioperative adverse events. Late outcomes included survival, side branch (SB) primary patency, SB instability, and new onset buttock claudication.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (82 male) were included in the study, 10 of them received bilateral implantation of IBDs. This resulted in a total of 104 devices included in the final analysis. Indication for treatment were endoleak 1b or progressive iliac aneurysmal degeneration or distal para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms; 73 were implanted after previous EVAR and 31 after previous OAR. Technical success was 100% in both groups. The 3-year rate of freedom from SB instability was 90.1% after previous EVAR and 85.4% after previous OAR, respectively (P = .05). The 3-year estimates of SB primary patency were significantly lower in patients who had received OAR as compared with those that had received EVAR (89.8% vs 94.9%; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment with IBDs following previous OAR or EVAR is safe and effective up to 3 years. Freedom from SB instability during follow-up was lower in patients who had previously undergone OAR than EVAR.

The Importance of the Hypogastric Artery Preservation during Treatment for Aortoiliac Aneurysms: A Prospective Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

To determine the importance of the hypogastric artery for the outcomes of survival, endoleaks, reinterventions, buttock claudication (BC), and perioperative mortality rate (PMR) in patients with aortoiliac aneurysms (AIA) receiving endovascular or open surgical (OS) repair.

METHODS

This was a prospective consecutive cohort study of patients with AIA who underwent endovascular treatment or OS repair during the period of 2010-2021. Endovascular repair was performed with use of aortoiliac endoprosthesis associated with internal iliac artery (IIA) coil embolization and/or with iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) in order to preserve the IIA. The AIA OS repairs were performed with the artery ligation in order to exclude the IIA, or in some cases, the exclusion of the IIA was performed with an endosuture in the proximal stump of the artery. Three groups were identified in the postprocedural period: group 0 (no hypogastric arteries (HAs) preserved), group 1 (1 hypogastric artery preserved), and group 2 (2 hypogastric arteries preserved).

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were submitted to OS or endovascular surgery. Regarding the HA patency, there were 17 patients in group 0, 45 patients in group 1, and 29 patients in group 2. There were 17 cases of bowel ischemia (BI) (94.1% in group 0, 5.9% in group 1, and no cases in group 2, P < 0.001) most of them in group 0, with statistical significance, 12 cases of BC (91.7% in group 0, 8.3% in group 1, and no cases in group 2, P < 0.001), most of them in group 0, with statistical significance. The perioperative mortality was 14.3%, 13 patients (9 patients - 52.9% group 0, 3 patients - 6.7% group 1, and 1 patient - 3.4% group 2, P < 0.001). The linear regression analysis for survival rates showed that BI [P = 0.026 to hazard ratio (HR) = 1.69], emergency aortoiliac repair (P < 0.001, HR = 8.86), and number of HAs (P < 0.001, HR = 5.46) in postoperative were related to poorer survival rates in both univariate and multivariate analysis. The linear regression analysis showed that the number of HAs (P < 0.001, HR = 3.61) in postoperative, emergency aortoiliac repair (P = 0.002, HR 3.233), and cardiac disease (P = 0.048, HR = 3.84) were related to BI.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the number of HA is crucial for adequate and safe outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The main factors related to death were BI, emergency aortoiliac repair, and the number of HAs preserved. Moreover, the main factors related to BI were the number of HAs in postoperative, emergency aortoiliac repair, and cardiac disease.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness and safety of unilateral versus bilateral iliac branch devices for aortoiliac and iliac artery aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Iliac branch devices (IBDs) have been utilized in the treatment of aortoiliac and isolated iliac artery aneurysms. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of IBDs.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted by identifying studies in the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases regarding the outcomes of IBDs in aortoiliac or isolated iliac artery aneurysms between May 2006 and December 2020. Individual studies were evaluated for the following major outcomes: technical success, 30-day mortality, primary patency, endoleak, reintervention, and rates of pelvic ischemia. Furthermore, sub-group meta-analyses were performed to compare the pelvic ischemic events in patients with bilateral IBDs, unilateral IBDs and bilateral internal iliac artery (IIA) embolization/coverage.

RESULTS

45 studies with a total of 2736 patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral IBDs met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled technical success rate of IBD was 98.0% (CI: 97.3-98.7%). Following IBD treatment, the 30-day mortality rate was 0.4% (CI: 0.07-0.70%); 30-day patency was 98.4% (CI: 97.7-99.0%); buttock claudication developed in 1.84% (CI: 1.26-2.41%); endoleak occurred in 11.9% (CI: 9.2-14.7%) and re-intervention in 7.6% (CI: 5.65-9.58%). Furthermore, in the patients with bilateral iliac artery involvement the pooled estimate rates of buttock claudication were 0.7% in bilateral IBD group, 7.9% in unilateral IBD with contralateral IIA embolization patients and 33.8% in bilateral IIA embolization/coverage patients, which were statistically significant among the three groups. Sexual dysfunction was 5.0% in bilateral IIA occlusion group, which was significantly higher than that in IBD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of IBDs in treatment of aortoiliac or isolated iliac artery aneurysms is associated with high technical success rates as well as low incidences of pelvic ischemia. The risk of postoperative buttock claudication can be further decreased with both IIA preservation if patients are anatomically suitable for bilateral IBDs.

Iliac side branch technique for repair of bilateral iliac artery aneurysms associated with a congenital pelvic kidney

Pelvic kidney is a congenital anomaly with few literature reports of concomitant aortoiliac aneurysmal disease. When aneurysm repair is indicated, either open or endovascular, it poses a technical challenge, since kidney preservation is paramount. This paper reports a successful endovascular repair of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms in a patient with a right congenital pelvic kidney, using iliac side branch technique.

The outcomes of internal iliac artery preservation during endovascular or open surgery treatment for aortoiliac aneurysms

Background

Internal iliac artery (IIA) preservation continues to be a challenge during open surgery or endovascular repair of abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAIA).

Objectives

To determine the results in terms of survival and clinical outcomes in patients with aortoiliac aneurysms (AAIA) treated with endovascular (EV) or open surgical (OS) repair.

Methods

This was a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients with AAIA who underwent EV or OS repair.

Results

Post-procedure hospitalization time and intensive care unit stay were both longer in the OS group than in the EV group (7.08 ± 3.5 days vs. 3.32 ± 2.3 days; p = 0.03; 3.35 ± 2.2 days vs. 1.2 ± 0.8 days; p = 0.02, respectively). There were two cases of bowel ischemia (4.7%; OS 8.3% and EV 3.2%; p = 0.48), two cases of buttock claudication (4.7%; OS 8.3% and EV 3.2%; p = 0.48), and one case of sexual dysfunction (2.3% OS), all of them in patients with bilateral occlusion of the internal iliac artery (five patients, 11.6%; p = 0.035). Overall survival at 720 days was 80.6% in the EV group and 66.7% in the OS group (p = 0.58).

Conclusions

In the present study, OS and EV repair of aortoiliac aneurysms had similar overall survival and outcomes. Preservation of at least one internal iliac artery is associated with good results and no further complications.

Hybrid repair of isolated internal iliac artery aneurysm

The best operation method for an isolated internal iliac artery aneurysm remains controversial. We report on a repair of an isolated internal iliac artery aneurysm. A 78-year-old man was referred to our facility for treatment of a left isolated internal iliac artery aneurysm. At first, we embolized the arteries distal to the aneurysm using coils and vascular plugs. Two weeks later, we performed open surgery. We resected the aneurysm wall through a transperitoneal approach only with proximal blood flow control and without surgical exposure and clamping of the arteries distal to the aneurysm. The blood flow of the internal iliac artery distal to the aneurysm had completely ceased after embolization in the first stage, which enabled us to avoid further pelvic dissection and potential bleeding. At the 6-month follow up, the patient was well and without complaints.