Anatomical Considerations of Infrageniculate Popliteal Artery Puncture: Alternative Pathway for Retrograde Access After Failed Re-entry

Percutaneous Axillary Artery Puncture: An Efficient Approach for Upper Extremity Access

BACKGROUND

The aim was to analyze the anatomic feasibility of the percutaneous axillary access (PAXA) using cadaverous models and then to analyze the complications associated with PAXA during Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (F/BEVAR) procedures.

METHODS

Cadaverous models were used to analyze axillary pedicle after a PAXA on an initial anatomical investigation. A subclavian approach was performed after puncture to assess the injuries caused by the needle. Then, in an observational study, patients who underwent F/BEVAR using a PAXA between July 2019 and July 2021 were included. PAXA-related events and complications were monitored.

RESULTS

Eleven dissections were performed on cadavers. The axillary vein was injured twice (18.2%); the puncture site on the axillary artery was found on the arterial proximal part, behind the clavicle. Fifty-three patients underwent a F/BEVAR using a PAXA. The mean (SD) age of patients was 74.5 (9.7) years. Most indications for endovascular repair were para-renal aneurysms (66%). Two Proglide® closure devices served to close arterial access in all procedures. Adjunct balloon inflation was used in 19 (35.8%) patients. There were 5 (9.4%) PAXA-related events included preoperative blush in 2 (3.8%) patients, axillary artery dissection in 2 (3.8%), and 1 (1.9%) axillary artery stenosis. Five patients (9.4%) had a postoperative axillary hematoma without need for additional surgical procedure. No PAXA-related complication was found after discharge (mean [SD] 11.7 [7.4] months following surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous axillary artery access was an efficient upper extremity access and associated with a low rate of PAXA-related events.

Efficacy and Safety of Angiography-Guided Retrograde Posterior Popliteal Puncture Technique in the Supine Position

BACKGROUND

Various techniques are needed for successful treatment of femoropopliteal long chronic total occlusion (CTO). Previous reports have described popliteal puncture by duplex echo guidance, but the safety of angiography-guided popliteal puncture remains unclear. This study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of angiography-guided retrograde posterior popliteal puncture in the supine position.

METHODS

We analyzed 44 consecutive patients treated with retrograde femoropopliteal puncture for femoropopliteal CTO from October 2013 to February 2019. We compared 24 patients who underwent angiography-guided posterior popliteal puncture (posterior group) and 20 patients who underwent frontal superficial femoral artery/popliteal artery puncture (frontal group). The primary end point was successful revascularization. The secondary end points were the puncture time, hemostasis time, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

The posterior group tended to have a higher procedural success rate than the frontal group (100% vs. 90.0%, respectively; P = 0.20). The hemostasis time was significantly shorter in the posterior than frontal group (527.1 ± 146.5 vs. 710.0 ± 337.8 sec, respectively; P = 0.021). There was no significant difference in the puncture time between the posterior and frontal groups (8.19 ± 9.22 vs. 7.50 ± 9.68 min, respectively; P = 0.81). Both groups had a low complication rate (posterior, 0.0% vs. frontal, 5.0%; P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography-guided posterior popliteal puncture in the supine position can facilitate hemostasis and may improve the success rate of the procedure. This technique may contribute to the treatment of complex femoropopliteal CTO as one option for a retrograde approach.