A Literature Review and Case Series of DVT Patients with Absent IVC Treated with Thrombolysis

Developmental or Procedural Vena Cava Interruption and Venous Thromboembolism: A Review

The inferior vena cava (IVC) and superior vena cava are the main conduits of the systemic venous circulation into the right atrium. Developmental or procedural interruptions of vena cava might predispose to stasis and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) distal to the anomaly and may impact the subsequent rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to review the various etiologies of developmental or procedural vena cava interruption and their impact on venous thromboembolism. A systematic search was performed in PubMed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines per each clinical question. For management questions with no high-quality evidence and no mutual agreements between authors, Delphi methods were used. IVC agenesis is the most common form of congenital vena cava interruption, is associated with an increased risk of DVT, and should be suspected in young patients with unexpected extensive bilateral DVT. Surgical techniques for vena cava interruption (ligation, clipping, and plication) to prevent PE have been largely abandoned due to short-term procedural risks and long-term complications, although survivors of prior procedures are occasionally encountered. Vena cava filters are now the most commonly used method of procedural interruption, frequently placed in the infrarenal IVC. The most agreed-upon indication for vena cava filters is for patients with acute venous thromboembolism and coexisting contraindications to anticoagulation. Familiarity with different forms of vena cava interruption and their local and systemic adverse effects is important to minimize complications and thrombotic events.

Clinical Observation of Uninterrupted Thrombolytic Therapy via Indwelling Catheter for Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis

Purpose

Observe uninterrupted thrombolytic therapy via indwelling catheter for lower limb deep vein thrombosis.

Methods

We retrospectively studied data from 32 patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis who received comprehensive treatment, consisting of general treatment, inferior vena cava filter implantation, interventional thrombolysis, angioplasty, stenting, and post-operative monitoring.

Results

The efficacy and safety of the comprehensive treatment were observed for a follow-up period of 6-12 months. The treatment was 100% effective; patient results indicated no serious bleeding, acute pulmonary embolism, or death after surgery.

Conclusion

The combination of intravenous and healthy side femoral vein puncture and directed thrombolysis to treat acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis is safe, effective, and minimally invasive while still achieving a good therapeutic effect.

Inferior vena cava agenesis: a rare cause of deep vein thrombosis

The development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is influenced by a myriad of risk factors which are seen across a wide spectrum of healthcare settings. We present a previously fit and well male in his early 40s with extensive bilateral lower limb DVT associated with total inferior vena cava (IVC) agenesis. The diagnosis was made with contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. With no demonstrable subhepatic IVC, the majority of the venous drainage was via large azygous veins and distended collateral vessels. Lifelong anticoagulation was advised by both haematology and vascular surgery teams. IVC agenesis represents a very rare and largely unknown clinical entity within the medical community with currently no firmly established pathogenesis, guideline for future VTE prophylaxis or standardised follow-up strategy.

Conservative treatment vs thrombus removal for Iliofemoral vein thrombosis in patients with congenital abnormalities of the inferior vena cava: a case report and systematic review of the literature

Congenital abnormalities of the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) should be suspected in cases of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT), especially in young patients, with no other risk factors and apparent causes. Currently, there is no guidance regarding the management of such patients. We report a case of Iliofemoral vein thrombosis in a young patient with congenital absence of the IVC that was successfully treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and perform a systematic review of the literature to identify evidence about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis of this rare cause of DVT. A total of 42 studies reporting on 56 cases were included in the review. The mean age of the patients at the presentation of their first DVT episode is 23.6 years, 83.9% of patients were males, conservative management with anticoagulation was used in 68% of the reported cases, and thrombolysis was used in 32% of the cases. Only 10.7% of patients presented with PE potentially justified by the abnormal anatomy of the deep veins which makes the propagation of thrombi into the pulmonary arteries less possible. Comparing the long-term outcomes of the two treatment groups; 42.3% of the patients treated conservatively vs 15.4% of the patients treated with thrombolysis developed chronic symptoms (residual heaviness, pain, swelling, and cramping). 11.5% of patients who received conservative treatment developed post-thrombotic syndrome. None of the patients treated with thrombolysis developed post-thrombotic syndrome. There were no procedure-related complications and thrombolysis was well tolerated by the entirety of the thrombolysis treatment group. Recurrence of DVT occurred in 13% of the patients treated conservatively and in 7.7% of patients treated with thrombolysis. Thrombus removal by means of thrombolysis is the recommended treatment and can offer excellent short and long-term results. Anticoagulation with NOACs may be prescribed for life to prevent recurrence or for at least 6 months and then reconsidered following further evaluation of patients' bleeding risk. It may be of value to organise an international registry for such patients. Guidelines issued by the relevant scientific societies will then be able to make a clear recommendation about the management of such patients.

The inferior vena cava: anatomical variants and acquired pathologies

The inferior vena cava (IVC) is the largest vein in the body, draining blood from the abdomen, pelvis and lower extremities. This pictorial review summarises normal anatomy and embryological development of the IVC. In addition, we highlight a wide range of anatomical variants, acquired pathologies and a common pitfall in imaging of the IVC. This information is essential for clinical decision making and to reduce misdiagnosis.