Contemporary Management of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

A review of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a condition in which anatomic abnormalities in the thoracic outlet cause compression of the subclavian or, less commonly, axillary artery. Patients are usually younger and typically have an anatomic abnormality causing the compression. The condition usually goes undiagnosed until patients present with signs of acute or chronic hand or arm ischemia. Workup of this condition includes a thorough history and physical examination; chest x-ray to identify potential anatomic abnormalities; and arterial imaging, such as computed tomographic angiography or duplex to identify arterial abnormalities. Patients will usually require operative intervention, given their symptomatic presentation. Intervention should always include decompression of the thoracic outlet with at least a first-rib resection and any other structures causing external compression. If the artery is identified to have intimal damage, mural thrombus, or is aneurysmal, then arterial reconstruction is warranted. Stenting should be avoided due to external compression. In patients with symptoms of embolization, a combination of embolectomy, lytic catheter placement, and/or therapeutic anticoagulation should be done. Typically, patients have excellent outcomes, with resolution of symptoms and high patency of the bypass graft, although patients with distal embolization may require finger amputation.

Thoracic outlet syndrome in women

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is observed more frequently in women, although the exact causes of this sex disparity remain unclear. By investigating the three types of TOS-arterial, neurogenic, and venous-regarding symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment, this article aims to shed light on the current understanding of TOS, focusing on its variations in women.

17 years' experience of surgical management of thoracic outlet syndrome at a district general hospital

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is caused by compression of the neurovascular structures passing through the thoracic inlet. It is categorised into three subtypes: neurogenic TOS (NTOS), venous TOS (VTOS) and arterial TOS (ATOS). This study evaluates the outcomes of patients who underwent first rib resection (FRR) for TOS during a period of 17 years at a single district general hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patient notes of individuals treated with FRR from August 2004 to August 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 62 FRRs were performed on 51 individual patients. Indications for FRR included 42 NTOS (68%), 6 VTOS (10%) and 14 ATOS (23%). Thirty-four patients (64%) were female and the mean age at time of surgery was 39 years (range 27 to 64 years). Eleven patients (21%) underwent bilateral FRR and seven cases of cervical ribs were observed. The mean time from initial symptoms to diagnosis was 18 months (range 2 to 60 months). Overall, outcomes after surgery were positive across all subtypes of TOS. Based on Derkash's classification, 52 patients (84%) reported excellent/good, 8 (13%) reported fair and 2 (3%) reported poor resolution of symptoms at 6 month follow-up. Complications included four (9%) pneumothorax, two (4%) wound infections, two (4%) haematoma, one (2%) haemothorax, three (5%) phrenic nerve complications and one (2%) brachial neuropraxia.

CONCLUSIONS

FRR for TOS can be performed safely and effectively in a district general hospital environment with excellent patient clinical outcomes.

Thoracic outlet syndrome in females: A systematic review

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare anatomic condition caused by compression of neurovascular structures as they traverse the thoracic outlet. Depending on the primary structure affected by this spatial narrowing, patients present with one of three types of TOS-venous TOS, arterial TOS, or neurogenic TOS. Compression of the subclavian vein, subclavian artery, or brachial plexus leads to a constellation of symptoms, including venous thrombosis, with associated discomfort and swelling; upper extremity ischemia; and chronic pain due to brachial plexopathy. Standard textbooks have reported a predominance of females patients in the TOS population, with females comprising 70%. However, there have been few comparative studies of sex differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes for the various types of TOS.

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome: a 30-year experience in a high-volume referral center

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical presentation and contemporary management of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) in high-volume referral center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with TOS of any etiology between January 1^st 1990 and 2021. Supra-, or combined supra-/infraclavicular approaches have been used for decompression/vascular reconstructions. The group was divided into two equal time periods: period 1 (1990-2006, N.=27) and period 2 (2006-2021, N.=36).

RESULTS

Sixty-three consecutive patients underwent surgical treatment due to arterial TOS. Period 2 had more patients who were asymptomatic (N.=16, 44.4% vs. N.=0, 0%, P<0.001) and those presenting with critical hand ischemia (N.=12, 33.3% vs. N.=0, 0%, P=0.01), while acute limb ischemia was more common in period 1 (N.=16, 59.2% vs. N.=5, 13.9%, P<0.001). SA compression without lesion was more common in period 2 (N.=16, 44.4% vs. N.=0, 0%, P<0.001), while SA intimal damage with mural thrombus formation was more common in the period 1 (N.=12, 44.4% vs. N.=1, 2.7%, P<0.001). Decompression as an isolated procedure was performed in 25.4% (N.=16) of all asymptomatic patients, while combined decompressive and vascular procedure in 71.4% (N.=45) of patients. The most common postoperative complication was pneumothorax (N.=7, 11.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The supraclavicular approach with its modifications provides adequate decompression and allows also repair or reconstruction of the SA, as well as complete additional revascularization of the upper extremity without the need for further patient repositioning. While treatment methods and early outcomes have not changed significantly over time, there has been a trend towards different clinical and SA pathomorphological presentation.