|
1
|
Vigezzi GP, Barbati C, Blandi L, Guddemi A, Melloni A, Salvati S, Bertoglio L, Odone A. Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Fenestrated and Branched Grafts Versus Open Surgery in Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Ann Surg 2024; 279:961-972. [PMID: 38214159 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression of efficacy and safety of fenestrated/branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) compared with open repair. BACKGROUND Endovascular repair of TAAAs may be a promising alternative to open surgery by reducing invasiveness and expanding the eligible population, but evidence remains limited. METHODS We applied "Prepared Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis" guidelines to retrieve, quantitatively pool, and critically evaluate the efficacy and safety (including 30-day mortality, reintervention, spinal cord injury [SCI], and renal injury) of both approaches. Original studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until April 20, 2022, excluding papers reporting <10 patients. Pooled proportions and means were determined using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with I2 statistics. RESULTS Sixty-four studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Endovascular cohort patients were older and had higher rates of comorbidities. Endovascular repair was associated with similar proportions of mortality (0.07, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.06-0.08) compared with open repair (0.09, 95% CI: 0.08-0.12; P = 0.22), higher proportions of reintervention (0.19, 95% CI: 0.13-0.26 vs 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04-0.10; P < 0.01), similar proportions of transient SCI (0.07, 95% CI: 0.05-0.09 vs 0.06, 95% CI: 0.05-0.08; P = 0.28), lower proportions of permanent SCI (0.04, 95% CI: 0.03-0.05 vs 0.06, 95% CI: 0.05-0.07; P < 0.01), and renal injury (0.08, 95% CI: 0.06-0.10 vs 0.13, 95% CI: 0.09-0.17; P = 0.02). Results were affected by high heterogeneity and potential publication bias. CONCLUSIONS Despite these limitations and the lack of randomized trials, this meta-analysis suggests that endovascular TAAA repair could be a safer alternative to the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Collegio Ca' della Paglia, Fondazione Ghislieri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Barbati
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Blandi
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Annalisa Guddemi
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Melloni
- Department of Surgical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Simone Salvati
- Division of Vascular Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Department of Surgical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- HTA Committee, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Xodo A, D’Oria M, Mendes B, Bertoglio L, Mani K, Gargiulo M, Budtz-Lilly J, Antonello M, Veraldi GF, Pilon F, Milite D, Calvagna C, Griselli F, Taglialavoro J, Bassini S, Wanhainen A, Lindstrom D, Gallitto E, Mezzetto L, Mastrorilli D, Lepidi S, DeMartino R. Peri-Operative Management of Patients Undergoing Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair for Juxtarenal, Pararenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Preventing, Recognizing and Treating Complications to Improve Clinical Outcomes. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071018. [PMID: 35887518 PMCID: PMC9317732 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent and refinement of complex endovascular techniques in the last two decades has revolutionized the field of vascular surgery. This has allowed an effective minimally invasive treatment of extensive disease involving the pararenal and the thoracoabdominal aorta. Fenestrated-branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) now represents a feasible technical solution to address these complex diseases, moving the proximal sealing zone above the renal-visceral vessels take-off and preserving their patency. The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review on the peri-operative management of patients undergoing F/BEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism (TAAA). It will focus on how to prevent, diagnose, and manage the complications ensuing from these complex interventions, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, F/BEVAR remains a technically, physiologically, and mentally demanding procedure. Intraoperative adverse events often require prolonged or additional procedures and complications may significantly impact a patient's quality of life, health status, and overall cost of care. The presence of standardized preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative pathways of care, together with surgeons and teams with significant experience in aortic surgery, should be considered as crucial points to improve clinical outcomes. Aggressive prevention, prompt diagnosis and timely rescue of any major adverse events following the procedure remain paramount clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Xodo
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Mario D’Oria
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0403994645
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Gonda Vascular Center, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55902, USA; (B.M.); (R.D.)
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, “Vita-Salute” San Raffaele University, 58-20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Kevin Mani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, IRCCS-University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, DIMES-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, 161-8200 Aarhus, Denmark;
| | - Michele Antonello
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, DSCTV-University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy;
| | - Gian Franco Veraldi
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Fabio Pilon
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Domenico Milite
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Cristiano Calvagna
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Filippo Griselli
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Jacopo Taglialavoro
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Silvia Bassini
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - David Lindstrom
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, IRCCS-University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, DIMES-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Luca Mezzetto
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Davide Mastrorilli
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Randall DeMartino
- Gonda Vascular Center, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55902, USA; (B.M.); (R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|