Peripheral artery disease leading to major amputation: Trends in revascularization and mortality over 18 years

Risk Factors for Mortality and Promoting Factors for Ambulation After Major Lower Limb Amputation for End-Stage Arterial Disease: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Around 1%-2% of patients with peripheral arterial disease will require a lower limb amputation at some point. Despite advancements in prevention and treatment, mortality after major amputation remains high. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors related to mortality and promoting factors for ambulation postamputation.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study of consecutive major lower limb amputation patients performed at the department of thoracic and vascular surgery of the University Hospitals Ghent and Leuven between January 2008 and December 2017.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 1-year mortality rate was 29.7% with age being the most important risk factor. Above-knee amputations had significantly higher mortality (37%) than below-knee amputations (22%) at 1 year. Diabetes and number of vascular interventions were not linked to higher mortality. Age, amputation level, and presence of hypertension were the most important determining factors for successful ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining the independency of patients, whether this is obtained by maximizing limb salvage or primary amputation, is critical. Knowledge about the factors that play a role in the risk of death and the chance of regaining ambulation is important to include in the decision-making conversation with the patient.

Medical Optimization of Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive disease associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events and elevated mortality rates. Symptoms of PAD, including claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, impair functional capacity and lead to lower quality of life. The focus of current therapies is to minimize symptoms, improve quality of life, and reduce adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Among the medical therapies are antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, lipid lowering therapies, cilostazol and pentoxifylline, and novel blood sugar-lowering therapies, plus exercise therapy and smoking cessation. In this review, we discuss these evidence-based medical therapies that are available for patients with symptomatic PAD.

The mid-term effect of intravascular ultrasound on endovascular interventions for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an important adjunctive tool for patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT). The evidence regarding the advantages of IVUS use is evolving, and recent studies have reported conflicting results. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of IVUS during angiography-guided EVT for patients with PAD.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through April 2023 to identify studies that investigated the outcomes of IVUS with angiography-guided EVT vs angiography-alone-guided EVT. The primary outcome was restenosis/occlusion rate; secondary outcomes were target lesion revascularization, major amputation, and mortality.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial and 14 observational studies, largely of moderate quality, were included, yielding a total of 708,808 patients with 709,189 lesions that were treated with IVUS-guided EVT (n = 101,405) vs angiography-alone (n = 607,784). Compared with angiography alone, IVUS-guided EVT was associated with a non-significant trend towards decreased restenosis/occlusion (relative risk [RR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.00; I2 = 60%). Although the risk of target lesion revascularization and mortality were comparable (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.65-1.10; I2 = 70%; RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79-1.28; I2 = 43%, respectively), the use of IVUS was also associated with significantly lower risk of major amputation (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.82; I2 = 47%). Subgroup analysis focusing on femoropopliteal disease demonstrated significantly higher patency (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98; I2 = 73%). However, superiority with major amputation was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

IVUS-guided EVT for PAD may possibly be associated with a lower major amputation rate compared with angiography alone-guided EVT, although the difference in patency remained an insignificant trend in favor of IVUS-guided EVT. Adjunctive use of IVUS during EVT may be beneficial, and further prospective studies are warranted to delineate this relationship and the applicability of this technology in routine practice.

Optimal Medical Management in Patients undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia is associated with Improved Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Optimizing medical management and risk factor modification are underutilized strategies in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), despite evidence of improved outcomes. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry is a tool to improve quality of vascular care. In this study, we used the VQI to evaluate trends in medical management in CLTI patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI), and the impact of changes in management on overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and limb salvage (LS).

METHODS

Patients undergoing index PVI for CLTI between 2012-2016, with at least 24-month follow-up were identified from the national VQI registry. Patient details including smoking status and medication use, OS, LS, and AFS were analyzed with linear-by-linear association, t-test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

12,370 PVI were completed in 11,466 patients. There was a significant increase in infrapopliteal interventions (29.8% → 39.0%; P < .001) and PVI performed for tissue loss (TL) (59.1% → 66.5%; P < .001). The percentage of current smokers at time of PVI decreased (36.2% → 30.7%; P = .036). At discharge, statins were initiated in 25%, aspirin in 45% and P2Y12 therapy in 58% of patients not receiving these medications prior to PVI. Over the course of follow-up, dual antiplatelet (DAPT) (41.1% → 48.0%; P < .001), ACE-inhibitor (46.2% → 51.3%; P < .001), and statin (70.4% → 77.5%; P < .001) use increased. Combined DAPT, ACE-inhibitor and statin use increased from 33.6% → 39.6% (P=<.001). Significant improvement in 24-month OS and AFS was noted (OS, 90.9% → 93.7%; P = .002: AFS, 81.2% → 83.1%; P = .046) but not LS (89.6% → 89.0%; P = .83). Combined therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors, statins and ACE-inhibitors was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.61; 0.39 - 0.96, P = .034). DAPT was independent predictor of improved LS (HR 0.83; 0.79 - 0.87, P < .007).

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelet, ACE-inhibitor and statin use increased over the study period and was associated with improved OS and AFS. Limb salvage trends did not change significantly over time, possibly due to inclusion of patients with higher disease burden or inadequate medical management. Medical management, although improved, remained far from optimal and represents an area for continued development.

Prevalence of frailty in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Increasing studies have reported on the prevalence of frailty in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the pooled prevalence of frailty in patients with lower extremity PAD.

METHODS

Two authors systematically searched PubMed and Embase databases from their inception to August 8, 2022. Original articles that reported the prevalence of frailty in patients with lower extremity PAD were included. The prevalence of frailty in patients with lower extremity PAD was pooled using a random-effect model. Meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies reported on 17 articles involving 1,726,343 patients with lower extremity PAD were identified. The pooled prevalence of frailty in patients with lower extremity PAD was 49 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 37-61 %), with significant heterogeneity between studies (I ² = 100 %, p < 0.001). Multivariable meta-regression showed that only the severity of PAD (coefficient 0.270; 95 % CI 0.017-0.523, p = 0.039) was significantly associated with the heterogeneity. In subgroup analysis, the pooled prevalence of frailty was higher in critical limb ischemia or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (54 %) than all PAD (48 %); the pooled prevalence of frailty was 64 %, 51 %, and 54 % for Modified Frailty Index-5, Modified Frailty Index-11, and Clinical Frailty Scale, respectively. The pooled prevalence of frailty appeared to be lower in male (39 %) than the female patients (47 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of frailty was higher in patients with lower extremity PAD, suggesting frailty is a common condition. This finding highlights the significance of assessing frailty in patients with lower extremity PAD.

Discrete Event Simulation Model for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Screening for Asymptomatic Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease

Lower limb ischemic disease (LEAD) affects a significant portion of the population, with most patients being asymptomatic. Patient screening is necessary because LEAD patients have an increased risk of occurrence of other cardiovascular events and manifestations of disease, in terms of leg symptoms such as intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia, or amputation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening using ABI diagnostics in asymptomatic patients and its impact on limb symptoms associated with LEAD. A discrete event simulation model was created to capture lifetime costs and effects. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the health care payer, and the effects were calculated as QALYs. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare ABI screening examination and the situation without such screening. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were carried out to evaluate the robustness of the results. In the basic setting, the screening intervention was a more expensive intervention, at a cost of CZK 174,010, compared to CZK 70,177 for the strategy without screening. The benefits of screening were estimated at 14.73 QALYs, with 14.46 QALYs without screening. The final ICER value of CZK 389,738 per QALY is below the willingness to pay threshold. Likewise, the results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and of the scenario analysis were below the threshold of willingness to pay, thus confirming the robustness of the results. In conclusion, ABI screening appears to be a cost-effective strategy for asymptomatic patients aged 50 years when compared to the no-screening option.

Impact of frailty on all-cause mortality or major amputation in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty has been increasingly identified as a risk factor of adverse outcomes in vascular disease. However, its impact on the survival and amputation in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the value of frailty in predicting all-cause mortality or major amputation in patients with lower extremity PAD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases (up to April 7, 2022) were comprehensively searched to identify relevant studies that investigated the association between frailty and all-cause mortality or major amputation in patients with lower extremity PAD. The impact of frailty on adverse outcomes was summarized by pooling the fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random effect (DerSimonian-Laird) model.

RESULTS

Seven studies reporting on eight articles that involved 122,892 patients were included. The prevalence of frailty ranged from 42% to 80% based on the frailty tool used. Meta-analysis showed that frailty was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR 2.11; 95% CI 1.41-3.15; I² =47.6%, p = 0.148, Tau-squared=0.058) and long-term all-cause mortality (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.25-2.76; I² =76.1%, p = 0.002, Tau-squared=0.118). However, no clear association was observed between frailty and major amputation (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.83-1.36; I² =23.0%, p = 0.273, Tau-squared=0.019).

CONCLUSION

Frailty independently predicts short and long-term all-cause mortality but not major amputation in patients with lower extremity PAD. Frailty status may play an important role in risk stratification of lower extremity PAD.