Transcarotid Arterial Revascularization Adoption Should not Be Hindered by a Concern for a Long Learning Curve

Fixed compared to mobile imaging arms for transcarotid artery revascularization

OBJECTIVE

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a new surgical option for carotid artery stenosis. While this procedure is optimally performed in hybrid operating rooms (OR), it is currently unclear whether it could be safely performed using portable, C-arm fluoroscopy with equivalent results. The aim of this study is to determine whether there are differences in intraoperative and perioperative outcomes stratified by imaging modality.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all TCAR procedures attempted within our health system was performed, capturing all cases between September 2017 and May 2022. Procedures were divided into 2 cohorts, based on whether they were performed in a hybrid OR or with portable, C-arm in a standard OR. Patient demographics, intraoperative results, and postoperative outcomes were compared using univariate strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 503 patients were included for review, of which 422 were performed in a hybrid OR (84%) and 81 were performed using a portable C-arm (16%). Intraoperatively, an increased estimated blood loss (47.7 ± 54.7 vs 26.1 ± 26.9 mLs, p < 0.01) and operative time was found in the cases performed in a hybrid OR. However, the fluoroscopy time was lower (4.0 ± 2.6 vs 5.2 ± 5.8 min, p = 0.01) in the setting of advanced intraoperative imaging. Postoperatively, we found no differences with respect to myocardial infarction (0.2% vs. 0%, p > 0.99), stroke (2.4% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.96), or death (0.7% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.15) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are some intraoperative variabilities between TCAR performed in hybrid versus standard ORs, postoperative outcomes are comparable. Therefore, the lack of a hybrid room should not be a deterrent to the adoption of TCAR.

Complications and long-term in-stent restenosis of endovascular treatment of severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis and relevant risk factors

To investigate the complications and in-stent restenosis of endovascular treatment of severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis and relevant risk factors. Three hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (70%-99%) were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data, treatment outcomes, complications and in-stent restenosis at follow-up were analyzed. The endovascular treatment was composed of balloon dilatation only in 21 (5.93%) patients, and deployment of self-expandable stents in 232 (65.54%), balloon-expandable stents in 75 (21.19%), and both balloon- and self-expandable stents in 26 (7.34%), with a total of 359 stents being successfully deployed at the stenotic location. After treatment, the residual stenosis ranged 9.2%±1.5% (range 7%-19%), which was significantly (P < .05) smaller than that before treatment. Periprocedural complications occurred in 43 patients with a complication rate of 12.15% including arterial dissection in 4 (1.13%) patients, new cerebral infarction in 21 (5.93%), cerebral hemorrhage in 12 (3.3%), and subarachnoid hemorrhage in 6 (1.69%). Hyperlipidemia [odds ratio (OR) 10.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.42-24.28, and P < .0001] and location at the middle cerebral artery (MCA) (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.92-8.97, and P < .001) were significant (P < .05) risk factors for periprocedural complications, whereas hyperlipidemia (OR 11.28, 95% CI 4.65-30.60, and P < .0001), location at the MCA (or 5.26, 95% CI 2.03-15.08, and P < .001), and angulation (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, and P = .02) were significant (P < .05) independent risk factors for periprocedural complications. Follow-up was performed in 287 (81.07%) patients at 6 to 36 (28 ± 6.7) months. In-stent restenosis was present in 36 (12.54%), and female sex (OR 2.53, and 95% CI 1.27-5.06) and periprocedural complications (OR 9.18, and 95% CI 3.52-23.96) were significant (P < .05) risk factors for in-stent restenosis, with periprocedural complication (OR 9.61, and 95% CI 3.48-27.23) as the only significant (P < .0001) independent risk factor for in-stent restenosis. A certain rate of periprocedural complications and in-stent stenosis may occur in endovascular treatment of severe intracranial stenosis, and the relevant risk factors may include hyperlipidemia, MCA location, angulation at the stenosis and female sex.