1
|
Vu VH, Nguyen NT, Nguyen CD, Nguyen KD, Truong BQ. Endovascular intervention with intravascular ultrasound guidance of very early dissection complication in transplant renal artery: a case report and literature review. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1396998. [PMID: 38841260 PMCID: PMC11150689 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1396998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Transplant renal artery dissection (TRAD) is a rare and serious event that can cause allograft dysfunction and eventually graft loss. Most cases are managed by operative repair. We report a case of TRAD in the early postoperative period, which was successfully managed with intravascular ultrasound-assisted endovascular intervention. Case presentation A 38-year-old man underwent HLA-compatible living kidney transplantation. The allograft had one renal artery and vein, which were anastomosed to the internal iliac artery and external iliac vein, respectively. Doppler ultrasonography performed a day after the operation showed an increase in systolic blood velocity, with no observed urine output and raising a suspicion of arterial anastomotic stenosis. Angiography showed a donor renal artery dissection distal to the moderately stenosed anastomosis site with calcified atherosclerotic plaque confirmed by IVUS. The transplant renal artery lesion was intervened with a stent. After the intervention, Doppler US revealed that the blood flow of the renal artery was adequate without an increase in the systolic blood velocity. Urine output gradually returned after 3 weeks, and serum creatinine level was normalized after 2 months. Conclusions Transplant recipients commonly have atherosclerosis and hypertension, which are risk factors for arterial dissection. Our case showed that endovascular intervention can replace surgery to repair very early vascular complications such as dissection and help patients avoid high-risk operations. Early diagnosis and IVUS-assisted intervention with experienced interventionists can save allograft dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vu Hoang Vu
- Medicine Faculty, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nghia Thuong Nguyen
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Chinh Duc Nguyen
- Cardiovascular Center, Can Tho Stroke International Services, Can Tho, Vietnam
| | - Khang Duong Nguyen
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Binh Quang Truong
- Medicine Faculty, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cavenaghi AS, Cappiello A, Pini R, Faggioli G, La Manna G, Gargiulo M. Urgent endovascular maneuvers to rescue a failing transplant kidney with a T-stent approach - A case report. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023; 9:101168. [PMID: 37168706 PMCID: PMC10164889 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Renal artery thrombosis (RAT) is a major cause of renal transplant loss and, for this reason, should be treated promptly. We present a case of a 48-year-old man with external iliac thrombosis associated with thrombosis of a transplant renal artery that led to worsening of renal function. Multiple mechanisms have been identified in the literature as risk factors for RAT. In our patient, a combination of anastomotic stenosis, hypercoagulability, and diabetic nephropathy had resulted in RAT, and an unconventional endovascular revascularization technique with a T-stent approach was needed to guarantee patency of the treated vessels. No 30-day perioperative complications occurred, and the postoperative follow-up examination showed patency of the treated vessels; thus, transplant loss was avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Cappiello
- Vascular Surgery University of Bologna DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- Correspondence: Antonio Cappiello, MD, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Vascular 11 Surgery Unit, IRCCS University Hospital, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Pini
- Vascular Surgery University of Bologna DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- the Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery University of Bologna DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- the Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gaetano La Manna
- the Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
- the Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery University of Bologna DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- the Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
David E, Del Gaudio G, Drudi FM, Dolcetti V, Pacini P, Granata A, Pretagostini R, Garofalo M, Basile A, Bellini MI, D’Andrea V, Scaglione M, Barr R, Cantisani V. Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Compared with MRI and CT in the Evaluation of Post-Renal Transplant Complications. Tomography 2022; 8:1704-1715. [PMID: 35894008 PMCID: PMC9326620 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8040143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal transplantation (RT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, significantly improving patients’ survival and quality of life. However, approximately 3–23% of patients encounter post-operative complications, and radiology plays a major role for their early detection and treatment or follow-up planning. CT and MRI are excellent imaging modalities to evaluate renal transplant post-operative course; nevertheless, they are both associated with a high cost and low accessibility, as well as some contraindications, making them not feasible for all patients. In particular, gadolinium-based contrast can lead to the rare condition of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, and iodine-based contrast can lead to contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). CT also exposes the patients who may require multiple examinations to ionizing radiation. Therefore, considering the overall advantages and disadvantages, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is presently considered an effective first-line imaging modality for post-operative early and long-term follow-up in RT, reducing the need for biopsies and providing adequate guidance for drainage procedures. Hence, this paper aims to review the updated knowledge on CEUS compared with CT and MRI for the evaluation of RT renal transplant complications; advantages, limitations, and possible recommendations are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele David
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Unit of Radiology, Papardo Hospital, 98158 Messina, Italy
- Correspondence: (E.D.); (V.C.)
| | - Giovanni Del Gaudio
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.D.G.); (F.M.D.); (V.D.); (P.P.)
| | - Francesco Maria Drudi
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.D.G.); (F.M.D.); (V.D.); (P.P.)
| | - Vincenzo Dolcetti
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.D.G.); (F.M.D.); (V.D.); (P.P.)
| | - Patrizia Pacini
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.D.G.); (F.M.D.); (V.D.); (P.P.)
| | | | - Renzo Pretagostini
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.P.); (M.G.)
| | - Manuela Garofalo
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.P.); (M.G.)
| | - Antonio Basile
- Radiology Unit 1, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, University Hospital “Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele”, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Maria Irene Bellini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.B.); (V.D.)
| | - Vito D’Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (M.I.B.); (V.D.)
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- Department of Surgery, Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Tees Valley, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
- Department of Radiology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, NHS, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK
| | - Richard Barr
- Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Youngstown, OH 44272, USA;
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.D.G.); (F.M.D.); (V.D.); (P.P.)
- Correspondence: (E.D.); (V.C.)
| |
Collapse
|