The time course of normalizing speech variability in vowels

What we do (not) know about the mechanisms underlying adaptive speech perception: A computational framework and review

Speech from unfamiliar talkers can be difficult to comprehend initially. These difficulties tend to dissipate with exposure, sometimes within minutes or less. Adaptivity in response to unfamiliar input is now considered a fundamental property of speech perception, and research over the past two decades has made substantial progress in identifying its characteristics. The mechanisms underlying adaptive speech perception, however, remain unknown. Past work has attributed facilitatory effects of exposure to any one of three qualitatively different hypothesized mechanisms: (1) low-level, pre-linguistic, signal normalization, (2) changes in/selection of linguistic representations, or (3) changes in post-perceptual decision-making. Direct comparisons of these hypotheses, or combinations thereof, have been lacking. We describe a general computational framework for adaptive speech perception (ASP) that-for the first time-implements all three mechanisms. We demonstrate how the framework can be used to derive predictions for experiments on perception from the acoustic properties of the stimuli. Using this approach, we find that-at the level of data analysis presently employed by most studies in the field-the signature results of influential experimental paradigms do not distinguish between the three mechanisms. This highlights the need for a change in research practices, so that future experiments provide more informative results. We recommend specific changes to experimental paradigms and data analysis. All data and code for this study are shared via OSF, including the R markdown document that this article is generated from, and an R library that implements the models we present.

Development of Achieving Constancy in Lexical Tone Identification With Contextual Cues

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore when and how Mandarin-speaking children use contextual cues to normalize speech variability in perceiving lexical tones. Two different cognitive mechanisms underlying speech normalization (lower level acoustic normalization and higher level acoustic-phonemic normalization) were investigated through the lexical tone identification task in nonspeech contexts and speech contexts, respectively. Besides, another aim of this study was to reveal how domain-general cognitive abilities contribute to the development of the speech normalization process.

METHOD

In this study, 94 five- to eight-year-old Mandarin-speaking children (50 boys, 44 girls) and 24 young adults (14 men, 10 women) were asked to identify ambiguous Mandarin high-level and mid-rising tones in either speech or nonspeech contexts. Furthermore, in this study, we tested participants' pitch sensitivity through a nonlinguistic pitch discrimination task and their working memory using the digit span task.

RESULTS

Higher level acoustic-phonemic normalization of lexical tones emerged at the age of 6 years and was relatively stable thereafter. However, lower level acoustic normalization was less stable across different ages. Neither pitch sensitivity nor working memory affected children's lexical tone normalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandarin-speaking children above 6 years of age successfully achieved constancy in lexical tone normalization based on speech contextual cues. The perceptual normalization of lexical tones was not affected by pitch sensitivity and working memory capacity.

Music Does Not Facilitate Lexical Tone Normalization: A Speech-Specific Perceptual Process

Listeners utilize the immediate contexts to efficiently normalize variable vocal streams into standard phonology units. However, researchers debated whether non-speech contexts can also serve as valid clues for speech normalization. Supporters of the two sides proposed a general-auditory hypothesis and a speech-specific hypothesis to explain the underlying mechanisms. A possible confounding factor of this inconsistency is the listeners' perceptual familiarity of the contexts, as the non-speech contexts were perceptually unfamiliar to listeners. In this study, we examined this confounding factor by recruiting a group of native Cantonese speakers with sufficient musical training experience and a control group with minimal musical training. Participants performed lexical tone judgment tasks in three contextual conditions, i.e., speech, non-speech, and music context conditions. Both groups were familiar with the speech context and not familiar with the non-speech context. The musician group was more familiar with the music context than the non-musician group. The results evidenced the lexical tone normalization process in speech context but not non-speech nor music contexts. More importantly, musicians did not outperform non-musicians on any contextual conditions even if the musicians were experienced at pitch perception, indicating that there is no noticeable transfer in pitch perception from the music domain to the linguistic domain for tonal language speakers. The findings showed that even high familiarity with a non-linguistic context cannot elicit an effective lexical tone normalization process, supporting the speech-specific basis of the perceptual normalization process.