The role of active-site amino acid residues in the cleavage of DNA and RNA substrates by human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1

Mechanistic insight into AP-endonuclease 1 cleavage of abasic sites at stalled replication fork mimics

Many types of damage, including abasic sites, block replicative DNA polymerases causing replication fork uncoupling and generating ssDNA. AP-Endonuclease 1 (APE1) has been shown to cleave abasic sites in ssDNA. Importantly, APE1 cleavage of ssDNA at a replication fork has significant biological implications by generating double strand breaks that could collapse the replication fork. Despite this, the molecular basis and efficiency of APE1 processing abasic sites at replication forks remain elusive. Here, we investigate APE1 cleavage of abasic substrates that mimic APE1 interactions at stalled replication forks or gaps. We determine that APE1 has robust activity on these substrates, like dsDNA, and report rates for cleavage and product release. X-ray structures visualize the APE1 active site, highlighting an analogous mechanism is used to process ssDNA substrates as canonical APE1 activity on dsDNA. However, mutational analysis reveals R177 to be uniquely critical for the APE1 ssDNA cleavage mechanism. Additionally, we investigate the interplay between APE1 and Replication Protein A (RPA), the major ssDNA-binding protein at replication forks, revealing that APE1 can cleave an abasic site while RPA is still bound to the DNA. Together, this work provides molecular level insights into abasic ssDNA processing by APE1, including the presence of RPA.

Inner Amino Acid Contacts Are Key Factors of Multistage Structural Rearrangements of DNA and Affect Substrate Specificity of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease APE1

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is one of the most important enzymes in base excision repair. Studies on this enzyme have been conducted for a long time, but some aspects of its activity remain poorly understood. One such question concerns the mechanism of damaged-nucleotide recognition by the enzyme, and the answer could shed light on substrate specificity control in all enzymes of this class. In the present study, by pulsed electron-electron double resonance (DEER, also known as PELDOR) spectroscopy and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis along with wild-type (WT) APE1 from Danio rerio (zAPE1) or three mutants (carrying substitution N253G, A254G, or E260A), we aimed to elucidate the molecular events in the process of damage recognition. The data revealed that the zAPE1 mutant E260A has much higher activity toward DNA substrates containing 5,6-dihydro-2'-deoxyuridine (DHU), 2'-deoxyuridine (dU), alpha-2'-deoxyadenosine (αA), or 1,N6-ethenoadenosine (εA). Examination of conformational changes in DNA clearly revealed multistep DNA rearrangements during the formation of the catalytic complex. These structural rearrangements of DNA are directly associated with the capacity of damaged DNA for enzyme-induced bending and unwinding, which are required for eversion of the damaged nucleotide from the DNA duplex and for its placement into the active site of the enzyme. Taken together, the results experimentally prove the factors that control substrate specificity of the AP endonuclease zAPE1.

Fluorescently labeled human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1 reveals effects of DNA polymerase β on the APE1-DNA interaction

The base excision repair (BER) pathway involves sequential action of DNA glycosylases and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases to incise damaged DNA and prepare DNA termini for incorporation of a correct nucleotide by DNA polymerases. It has been suggested that the enzymatic steps in BER include recognition of a product-enzyme complex by the next enzyme in the pathway, resulting in the "passing-the-baton" model of transfer of DNA intermediates between enzymes. To verify this model, in this work, we aimed to create a suitable experimental system. We prepared APE1 site-specifically labeled with a fluorescent reporter that is sensitive to stages of APE1-DNA binding, of formation of the catalytic complex, and of subsequent dissociation of the enzyme-product complex. Interactions of the labeled APE1 with various model DNA substrates (containing an abasic site) of varied lengths revealed that the enzyme remains mostly in complex with the DNA product. By means of the fluorescently labeled APE1 in combination with a stopped-flow fluorescence assay, it was found that Polβ stimulates both i) APE1 binding to an abasic-site-containing DNA duplex with the formation of a catalytically competent complex and ii) the dissociation of APE1 from its product. These findings confirm DNA-mediated coordination of APE1 and Polβ activities and suggest that Polβ is the key trigger of the DNA transfer between the enzymes participating in initial steps of BER.

The Kinetic Mechanism of 3′-5′ Exonucleolytic Activity of AP Endonuclease Nfo from E. coli

Escherichia coli apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease Nfo is one of the key participants in DNA repair. The principal biological role of this enzyme is the recognition and hydrolysis of AP sites, which arise in DNA either as a result of the spontaneous hydrolysis of an N-glycosidic bond with intact nitrogenous bases or under the action of DNA glycosylases, which eliminate various damaged bases during base excision repair. Nfo also removes 3′-terminal blocking groups resulting from AP lyase activity of DNA glycosylases. Additionally, Nfo can hydrolyze the phosphodiester linkage on the 5′ side of some damaged nucleotides on the nucleotide incision repair pathway. The function of 3′-5′-exonuclease activity of Nfo remains unclear and probably consists of participation (together with the nucleotide incision repair activity) in the repair of cluster lesions. In this work, using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and the stopped-flow method, we analyzed the kinetics of the interaction of Nfo with various model DNA substrates containing a 5′ single-stranded region. These data helped to describe the mechanism of nucleotide cleavage and to determine the rates of the corresponding stages. It was revealed that the rate-limiting stage of the enzymatic process is a dissociation of the reaction product from the enzyme active site. The stability of the terminal pair of nucleotides in the substrate did not affect the enzymatic-reaction rate. Finally, it was found that 2′-deoxynucleoside monophosphates can effectively inhibit the 3′-5′-exonuclease activity of Nfo.

The mechanism of damage recognition by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease Nfo from Escherichia coli

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease Nfo from Escherichia coli recognises AP sites in DNA and catalyses phosphodiester bond cleavage on the 5' side of AP sites and some damaged or undamaged nucleotides. Here, the mechanism of target nucleotide recognition by Nfo was analysed by pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR, also known as DEER) spectroscopy and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis with Förster resonance energy transfer detection of DNA conformational changes during DNA binding. The efficiency of endonucleolytic cleavage of a target nucleotide in model DNA substrates was ranked as (2R,3S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran [F-site] > 5,6-dihydro-2'-deoxyuridine > α-anomer of 2'-deoxyadenosine >2'-deoxyuridine > undamaged DNA. Real-time conformational changes of DNA during interaction with Nfo revealed an increase of distances between duplex ends during the formation of the initial enzyme-substrate complex. The use of rigid-linker spin-labelled DNA duplexes in DEER measurements indicated that double-helix bending and unwinding by the target nucleotide itself is one of the key factors responsible for indiscriminate recognition of a target nucleotide by Nfo. The results for the first time show that AP endonucleases from different structural families utilise a common strategy of damage recognition, which globally may be integrated with the mechanism of searching for specific sites in DNA by other enzymes.

Pre-steady-state kinetic and mutational insights into mechanisms of endo- and exonuclease DNA processing by mutant forms of human AP endonuclease

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1 catalyzes endonucleolytic hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds on the 5' side of structurally unrelated damaged nucleotides in DNA or native nucleotides in RNA. APE1 additionally possesses 3'-5'-exonuclease, 3'-phosphodiesterase, and 3'-phosphatase activities. According to structural data, endo- and exonucleolytic cleavage of DNA is executed in different complexes when the excised residue is everted from the duplex or placed within the intrahelical DNA cavity without nucleotide flipping. In this study, we investigated the functions of residues Arg177, Arg181, Tyr171 and His309 in the APE1 endo- and exonucleolytic reactions. The interaction between residues Arg177 and Met270, which was hypothesized recently to be a switch for endo- and exonucleolytic catalytic mode regulation, was verified by pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of the R177A APE1 mutant. The function of another DNA-binding-site residue, Arg181, was analyzed too; it changed its conformation when enzyme-substrate and enzyme-product complexes were compared. Mutation R181A significantly facilitated the product dissociation stage and only weakly affected DNA-binding affinity. Moreover, R181A reduced the catalytic rate constant severalfold due to a loss of contact with a phosphate group. Finally, the protonation/deprotonation state of residues Tyr171 and His309 in the catalytic reaction was verified by their substitution. Mutations Y171F and H309A inhibited the chemical step of the AP endonucleolytic reaction by several orders of magnitude with retention of capacity for (2R,3S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran-containing-DNA binding and without changes in the pH dependence profile of AP endonuclease activity, indicating that deprotonation of these residues is likely not important for the catalytic reaction.

Insights into Mechanisms of Damage Recognition and Catalysis by APE1-like Enzymes

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases are the key DNA repair enzymes in the base excision repair (BER) pathway, and are responsible for hydrolyzing phosphodiester bonds on the 5′ side of an AP site. The enzymes can recognize not only AP sites but also some types of damaged bases, such as 1,N⁶-ethenoadenosine, α-adenosine, and 5,6-dihydrouridine. Here, to elucidate the mechanism underlying such a broad substrate specificity as that of AP endonucleases, we performed a computational study of four homologous APE1-like endonucleases: insect (Drosophila melanogaster) Rrp1, amphibian (Xenopus laevis) APE1 (xAPE1), fish (Danio rerio) APE1 (zAPE1), and human APE1 (hAPE1). The contact between the amino acid residues of the active site of each homologous APE1-like enzyme and the set of damaged DNA substrates was analyzed. A comparison of molecular dynamic simulation data with the known catalytic efficiency of these enzymes allowed us to gain a deep insight into the differences in the efficiency of the cleavage of various damaged nucleotides. The obtained data support that the amino acid residues within the “damage recognition” loop containing residues Asn222–Ala230 significantly affect the catalytic-complex formation. Moreover, every damaged nucleotide has its unique position and a specific set of interactions with the amino acid residues of the active site.

Comparative Analysis of Exo- and Endonuclease Activities of APE1-like Enzymes

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP)-endonucleases are multifunctional enzymes that are required for cell viability. AP-endonucleases incise DNA 5′ to an AP-site; can recognize and process some damaged nucleosides; and possess 3′-phosphodiesterase, 3′-phosphatase, and endoribonuclease activities. To elucidate the mechanism of substrate cleavage in detail, we analyzed the effect of mono- and divalent metal ions on the exo- and endonuclease activities of four homologous APE1-like endonucleases (from an insect (Rrp1), amphibian (xAPE1), fish (zAPE1), and from humans (hAPE1)). It was found that the enzymes had similar patterns of dependence on metal ions’ concentrations in terms of AP-endonuclease activity, suggesting that the main biological function (AP-site cleavage) was highly conserved among evolutionarily distant species. The efficiency of the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity was the highest in hAPE1 among these enzymes. In contrast, the endoribonuclease activity of the enzymes could be ranked as hAPE1 ≈ zAPE1 ≤ xAPE1 ≤ Rrp1. Taken together, the results revealed that the tested enzymes differed significantly in their capacity for substrate cleavage, even though the most important catalytic and substrate-binding amino acid residues were conserved. It can be concluded that substrate specificity and cleavage efficiency were controlled by factors external to the catalytic site, e.g., the N-terminal domain of these enzymes.

Kinetic Analysis of the Interaction of Nicking Endonuclease BspD6I with DNA

Nicking endonucleases (NEs) are enzymes that incise only one strand of the duplex to produce a DNA molecule that is 'nicked' rather than cleaved in two. Since these precision tools are used in genetic engineering and genome editing, information about their mechanism of action at all stages of DNA recognition and phosphodiester bond hydrolysis is essential. For the first time, fast kinetics of the Nt.BspD6I interaction with DNA were studied by the stopped-flow technique, and changes of optical characteristics were registered for the enzyme or DNA molecules. The role of divalent metal cations was estimated at all steps of Nt.BspD6I-DNA complex formation. It was demonstrated that divalent metal ions are not required for the formation of a non-specific complex of the protein with DNA. Nt.BspD6I bound five-fold more efficiently to its recognition site in DNA than to a random DNA. DNA bending was confirmed during the specific binding of Nt.BspD6I to a substrate. The optimal size of Nt.BspD6I's binding site in DNA as determined in this work should be taken into account in methods of detection of nucleic acid sequences and/or even various base modifications by means of NEs.

Common Kinetic Mechanism of Abasic Site Recognition by Structurally Different Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonucleases

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases Nfo (Escherichia coli) and APE1 (human) represent two conserved structural families of enzymes that cleave AP-site–containing DNA in base excision repair. Nfo and APE1 have completely different structures of the DNA-binding site, catalytically active amino acid residues and catalytic metal ions. Nonetheless, both enzymes induce DNA bending, AP-site backbone eversion into the active-site pocket and extrusion of the nucleotide located opposite the damage. All these stages may depend on local stability of the DNA duplex near the lesion. Here, we analysed effects of natural nucleotides located opposite a lesion on catalytic-complex formation stages and DNA cleavage efficacy. Several model DNA substrates that contain an AP-site analogue [F-site, i.e., (2R,3S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran] opposite G, A, T or C were used to monitor real-time conformational changes of the tested enzymes during interaction with DNA using changes in the enzymes’ intrinsic fluorescence intensity mainly caused by Trp fluorescence. The extrusion of the nucleotide located opposite F-site was recorded via fluorescence intensity changes of two base analogues. The catalytic rate constant slightly depended on the opposite-nucleotide nature. Thus, structurally different AP endonucleases Nfo and APE1 utilise a common strategy of damage recognition controlled by enzyme conformational transitions after initial DNA binding.

Coping with RNA damage with a focus on APE1, a BER enzyme at the crossroad between DNA damage repair and RNA processing/decay

Interest in RNA damage as a novel threat associated with several human pathologies is rapidly increasing. Knowledge on damaged RNA recognition, repair, processing and decay is still scanty. Interestingly, in the last few years, more and more evidence put a bridge between DNA damage repair enzymes and the RNA world. The Apurinic/apyrimidinic endodeoxyribonuclease 1 (APE1) was firstly identified as a crucial enzyme of the base excision repair (BER) pathway preserving genome stability toward non-distorting DNA lesion-induced damages. Later, an unsuspected role of APE1 in controlling gene expression was discovered and its pivotal involvement in several human pathologies, ranging from tumor progression to neurodegenerative diseases, has emerged. Recent novel findings indicate a role of APE1 in RNA metabolism, particularly in processing activities of damaged (abasic and oxidized) RNA and in the regulation of oncogenic microRNAs (miRNAs). Even though the role of miRNAs in human pathologies is well-known, the mechanisms underlying their quality control are still totally unexplored. A detailed knowledge of damaged RNA decay processes in human cells is crucial in order to understand the molecular processes involved in multiple pathologies. This cutting-edge perspective article will highlight these emerging aspects of damaged RNA processing and decay, focusing the attention on the involvement of APE1 in RNA world.

Mutational and Kinetic Analysis of APE1 Endoribonuclease Activity

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) participates in the DNA repair system. It is believed that the main biological function of APE1 is Mg²⁺-dependent hydrolysis of AP-sites in DNA. On the base of structural data, kinetic studies, and mutation analysis, the key stages of APE1 interaction with damaged DNA were established. It has been shown recently that APE1 can act as an endoribonuclease that catalyzes mRNA hydrolysis at certain pyrimidine–purine sites and thus controls the level of certain transcripts. In addition, the presence of Mg²⁺ ions was shown to be not required for the endoribonuclease activity of APE1, in contrast to the AP-endonuclease activity. This indicates differences in mechanisms of APE1 catalysis on RNA and DNA substrates, but the reasons for these differences remain unclear. Here, the analysis of endoribonuclease hydrolysis of model RNA substrates with wild type APE1 enzyme and its mutant forms Y171F, R177F, R181A, D210N, N212A, T268D, M270A, and D308A, was performed. It was shown that mutation of Asn212, Asp210, and Tyr171 residues leads to the decrease of AP-endonuclease activity while endoribonuclease activity is retained. Also, T268D and M270A APE1 mutants lose specificity to pyrimidine–purine sequences. R177F and R181A did not show a significant decrease in enzyme activity, whereas D308A demonstrated a decrease of endoribonuclease activity.

The Enigma of Substrate Recognition and Catalytic Efficiency of APE1-Like Enzymes

Despite significant achievements in the elucidation of the nature of protein-DNA contacts that control the specificity of nucleotide incision repair (NIR) by apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases, the question on how a given nucleotide is accommodated by the active site of the enzyme remains unanswered. Therefore, the main purpose of our study was to compare kinetics of conformational changes of three homologous APE1-like endonucleases (insect Drosophila melanogaster Rrp1, amphibian Xenopus laevis xAPE1, and fish Danio rerio zAPE1) during their interaction with various damaged DNA substrates, i.e., DNA containing an F-site (an uncleavable by DNA-glycosylases analog of an AP-site), 1,N⁶-ethenoadenosine (εA), 5,6-dihydrouridine (DHU), uridine (U), or the α-anomer of adenosine (αA). Pre-steady-state analysis of fluorescence time courses obtained for the interaction of the APE1-like enzymes with DNA substrates containing various lesions allowed us to outline a model of substrate recognition by this class of enzymes. It was found that the differences in rates of DNA substrates’ binding do not lead to significant differences in the cleavage efficiency of DNA containing a damaged base. The results suggest that the formation of enzyme–substrate complexes is not the key factor that limits enzyme turnover; the mechanisms of damage recognition and cleavage efficacy are related to fine conformational tuning inside the active site.