1
|
Alexander LT, Lepore R, Kryshtafovych A, Adamopoulos A, Alahuhta M, Arvin AM, Bomble YJ, Böttcher B, Breyton C, Chiarini V, Chinnam NB, Chiu W, Fidelis K, Grinter R, Gupta GD, Hartmann MD, Hayes CS, Heidebrecht T, Ilari A, Joachimiak A, Kim Y, Linares R, Lovering AL, Lunin VV, Lupas AN, Makbul C, Michalska K, Moult J, Mukherjee PK, Nutt W(S, Oliver SL, Perrakis A, Stols L, Tainer JA, Topf M, Tsutakawa SE, Valdivia‐Delgado M, Schwede T. Target highlights in CASP14: Analysis of models by structure providers. Proteins 2021; 89:1647-1672. [PMID: 34561912 PMCID: PMC8616854 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The biological and functional significance of selected Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction 14 (CASP14) targets are described by the authors of the structures. The authors highlight the most relevant features of the target proteins and discuss how well these features were reproduced in the respective submitted predictions. The overall ability to predict three-dimensional structures of proteins has improved remarkably in CASP14, and many difficult targets were modeled with impressive accuracy. For the first time in the history of CASP, the experimentalists not only highlighted that computational models can accurately reproduce the most critical structural features observed in their targets, but also envisaged that models could serve as a guidance for further studies of biologically-relevant properties of proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila T. Alexander
- Biozentrum, University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Computational Structural BiologySIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBaselSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Athanassios Adamopoulos
- Oncode Institute and Division of BiochemistryNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Markus Alahuhta
- Bioscience Center, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenColoradoUSA
| | - Ann M. Arvin
- Department of PediatricsStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Microbiology and ImmunologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yannick J. Bomble
- Bioscience Center, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenColoradoUSA
| | - Bettina Böttcher
- Biocenter and Rudolf Virchow Center, Julius‐Maximilians Universität WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Cécile Breyton
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural BiologyGrenobleFrance
| | - Valerio Chiarini
- Program in Structural Biology and BiophysicsInstitute of Biotechnology, University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Naga babu Chinnam
- Department of Molecular and Cellular OncologyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Wah Chiu
- Microbiology and ImmunologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- BioengineeringStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Cryo‐EM and Bioimaging SSRLSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Rhys Grinter
- Infection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of MicrobiologyMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
| | - Gagan D. Gupta
- Radiation Biology & Health Sciences DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia
| | - Marcus D. Hartmann
- Department of Protein EvolutionMax Planck Institute for Developmental BiologyTübingenGermany
| | - Christopher S. Hayes
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
- Biomolecular Science and Engineering ProgramUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | - Tatjana Heidebrecht
- Oncode Institute and Division of BiochemistryNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Andrea Ilari
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology of the National Research Council of Italy (CNR)RomeItaly
| | - Andrzej Joachimiak
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Youngchang Kim
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - Romain Linares
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural BiologyGrenobleFrance
| | | | - Vladimir V. Lunin
- Bioscience Center, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenColoradoUSA
| | - Andrei N. Lupas
- Department of Protein EvolutionMax Planck Institute for Developmental BiologyTübingenGermany
| | - Cihan Makbul
- Biocenter and Rudolf Virchow Center, Julius‐Maximilians Universität WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Karolina Michalska
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - John Moult
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of MarylandRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Prasun K. Mukherjee
- Nuclear Agriculture & Biotechnology DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia
| | - William (Sam) Nutt
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - Stefan L. Oliver
- Department of PediatricsStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Anastassis Perrakis
- Oncode Institute and Division of BiochemistryNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lucy Stols
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - John A. Tainer
- Department of Molecular and Cellular OncologyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Cancer BiologyUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Maya Topf
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University College LondonLondonUK
- Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Leibniz‐Institut für Experimentelle VirologieHamburgGermany
| | - Susan E. Tsutakawa
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated BioimagingLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Torsten Schwede
- Biozentrum, University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Computational Structural BiologySIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBaselSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ozden B, Kryshtafovych A, Karaca E. Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions. Proteins 2021; 89:1787-1799. [PMID: 34337786 PMCID: PMC9109697 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In CASP14, 39 research groups submitted more than 2500 3D models on 22 protein complexes. In general, the community performed well in predicting the fold of the assemblies (for 80% of the targets), although it faced significant challenges in reproducing the native contacts. This is especially the case for the complexes without whole-assembly templates. The leading predictor, BAKER-experimental, used a methodology combining classical techniques (template-based modeling, protein docking) with deep learning-based contact predictions and a fold-and-dock approach. The Venclovas team achieved the runner-up position with template-based modeling and docking. By analyzing the target interfaces, we showed that the complexes with depleted charged contacts or dominating hydrophobic interactions were the most challenging ones to predict. We also demonstrated that if AlphaFold2 predictions were at hand, the interface prediction challenge could be alleviated for most of the targets. All in all, it is evident that new approaches are needed for the accurate prediction of assemblies, which undoubtedly will expand on the significant improvements in the tertiary structure prediction field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcu Ozden
- Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, 35340, Izmir, Turkey
- Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, 35340, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Andriy Kryshtafovych
- Protein Structure Prediction Center, Genome and Biomedical Sciences Facilities, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Ezgi Karaca
- Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, 35340, Izmir, Turkey
- Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, 35340, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|