Characterization of diphtheria toxin's catalytic domain interaction with lipid membranes

Immunotoxins and nanobody-based immunotoxins: review and update

Immunotoxins (ITs) are protein-based drugs that compose of targeting and cytotoxic moieties. After binding the IT to the specific cell-surface antigen, the IT internalises into the target cell and kills it. Targeting and cytotoxic moieties usually include monoclonal antibodies and protein toxins with bacterial or plant origin, respectively. ITs have been successful in haematologic malignancies treatment. However, ITs penetrate poorly into solid tumours because of their large size. Use of camelid antibody fragments known as nanobodies (Nbs) as a targeting moiety may overcome this problem. Nbs are the smallest fragment of antibodies with excellent tumour tissue penetration. The ability to recognise cryptic (immuno-evasive) target antigens, low immunogenicity, and high-affinity are other fundamental characteristics of Nbs that make them suitable candidates in targeted therapy. Here, we reviewed and discussed the structure and function of ITs, Nbs, and nanobody-based ITs. To gain sound insight into the issue at hand, we focussed on nanobody-based ITs.

Resolving the Molecular Steps in Clostridial Neurotoxin Light Chain Translocation

The clostridial neurotoxins (CNTs), botulinum toxin and tetanus toxin, are the most toxic proteins for humans. Neurotoxicity is based upon the specificity of the CNTs for neural host receptors and substrates. CNTs are organized into three domains, a Light Chain (LC) that is a metalloprotease and a Heavy Chain (HC) that has two domains, an N-terminal LC translocation domain (HCN) and a C-terminal receptor binding domain (HCC). While catalysis and receptor binding functions of the CNTs have been developed, our understanding of LC translocation is limited. This is due to the intrinsic complexity of the translocation process and limited tools to assess the step-by-step events in LC translocation. Recently, we developed a novel, cell-based TT-reporter to measure LC translocation as the translocation of a β-lactamase reporter across a vesicle membrane in neurons. Using this approach, we identified a role for a cis-Loop, located within the HCN, in LC translocation. In this commentary, we describe our current understanding of how CNTs mediate LC translocation and place the role of the cis-Loop in the LC translocation process relative to other independent functions that have been implicated in LC translocation. Understanding the basis for LC translocation will enhance the use of CNTs in vaccine development and as human therapies.

Bacterial protein toxins and lipids: pore formation or toxin entry into cells

Lipids are hydrophobic molecules which play critical functions in cells, in particular, they are essential constituents of membranes, whereas bacterial toxins are mainly hydrophilic proteins. All bacterial toxins interact first with their target cells by recognizing a surface receptor, which is either a lipid or a lipid derivative, or another compound but in a lipid environment. Most bacterial toxins are PFTs (pore-forming toxins) which oligomerize and insert into the lipid bilayer. A common mechanism of action involves the formation of a beta-barrel structure, resulting from the assembly of individual beta-hairpin(s) from individual monomers. An essential step for intracellular active toxins is to translocate their enzymatic part into the cytosol. Some toxins use a translocation mechanism based on pore formation similar to that of PFTs, others undergo a yet unclear 'chaperone' process.

Solution and membrane-bound chaperone activity of the diphtheria toxin translocation domain towards the catalytic domain

During cell intoxication by diphtheria toxin, endosome acidification triggers the translocation of the catalytic (C) domain into the cytoplasm. This event is mediated by the translocation (T) domain of the toxin. Previous work suggested that the T domain acts as a chaperone for the C domain during membrane penetration of the toxin. Using partitioning experiments with lipid vesicles, fluorescence spectroscopy, and a lipid vesicle leakage assay, we characterized the dominant behavior of the T domain over the C domain during the successive steps by which these domains interact with a membrane upon acidification: partial unfolding in solution and during membrane binding, and then structural rearrangement during penetration into the membrane. To this end, we compared, for each domain, isolated or linked together in a CT protein (the toxin lacking the receptor-binding domain), each of these steps. The behavior of the T domain is marginally modified by the presence or absence of the C domain, whereas that of the C domain is greatly affected by the presence of the T domain . All of the steps leading to membrane penetration of the C domain are triggered at higher pH by the T domain , by 0.5-1.6 pH units. The T domain stabilizes the partially folded states of the C domain corresponding to each step of the process. The results unambiguously demonstrate that the T domain acts as a specialized pH-dependent chaperone for the C domain. Interestingly, this chaperone activity acts on very different states of the protein: in solution, membrane-bound, and membrane-inserted.

The membrane topography of the diphtheria toxin T domain linked to the a chain reveals a transient transmembrane hairpin and potential translocation mechanisms

The diphtheria toxin T domain helps translocate the A chain of the toxin across membranes. To gain insight into translocation, the membrane topography of key residues in T domain attached to the A chain (AT protein) was compared to that in the isolated T domain using fluorescence techniques. This study demonstrates that residues in T domain hydrophobic helices (TH5-TH9) tended to be less exposed to aqueous solution in the AT protein than in the isolated T domain. Under conditions in which the loop connecting TH5 to TH6/7 is located stably on the cis (insertion) side of the membrane in the isolated T domain, it moves between the cis and trans sides of the membrane in the AT protein. This is indicative of the formation of a dynamic, transient transmembrane hairpin topography by TH5-TH7 in the AT protein. Since TH8 and TH9 also form a transmembrane hairpin, this means that TH5-TH9 may form a cluster of transmembrane helices. These helices have a nonpolar surface likely to face the lipid bilayer in a helix cluster and a surface rich in uncharged hydrophilic residues which in a helix cluster would likely be facing inward (and perhaps be pore-lining). This uncharged hydrophilic surface could play a crucial role in translocation, interacting transiently with the translocating A chain. A similar motif can be found in, and may be important for, other protein translocation systems.

Peptide–lipid interactions: insights and perspectives

As the number of membrane proteins in the Protein Data Bank increases, efforts to understand how they interact with their natural environment are increasing in importance. A number of membrane proteins crystallise with lipid molecules implicitly bound at discrete locations that are consistent with the transmembrane regions of the protein. Bioinformatics studies also point to the specific interactions of some amino acids with membrane lipids. The results of experiments using model systems are revealing how these interactions contribute to the stability of both the protein and the membrane in which it is embedded. From a different perspective, the processes involved in the binding of peptides to membrane surfaces to produce a variety of effects are being understood in ever-increasing detail. This review describes current research efforts and thinking in this area.